Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
77건 · 관련도순
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs, ensuring all dependent templates stay in sync.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
archive ステップ完了後に Lessons を分析し constitution.md への追加提案を生成するサブエージェント
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Classify constitutional (germline) copy number variants for clinical reporting using the 2019 ACMG/ClinGen technical standards points-based framework, with ClassifyCNV and AnnotSV for semi-automated scoring. Covers the separate copy-number-loss and copy-number-gain rubrics, the five-tier classification, ClinGen haploinsufficiency/triplosensitivity and dosage-sensitive regions, de novo and segregation evidence, and population-frequency benign evidence. Use when assigning pathogenic/likely-pathogenic/VUS/likely-benign/benign to a constitutional CNV, scoring a CNV against ACMG/ClinGen criteria, or distinguishing the automatable evidence from the case-specific evidence requiring manual input.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Orchestrator for spec-driven development (SDD) — the discipline of writing executable specs before code, with a constitution above them and a hard cross-check gate before implementation. Mirrors GitHub Spec Kit / AWS Kiro slash-command shape. Routes /constitution, /specify, /clarify, /plan, /tasks, /analyze, /implement to the right leaf skill. Load when the user says "spec-driven development", "SDD", "specs-first workflow", "run the spec loop", "/specify a feature", "/plan from this spec", "do spec-driven for this", "GitHub Spec Kit workflow", "Kiro workflow", or invokes any SDD-style slash command. Single entry point for all SDD workflows.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Classify constitutional (germline) copy number variants for clinical reporting using the 2019 ACMG/ClinGen technical standards points-based framework, with ClassifyCNV and AnnotSV for semi-automated scoring. Covers the separate copy-number-loss and copy-number-gain rubrics, the five-tier classification, ClinGen haploinsufficiency/triplosensitivity and dosage-sensitive regions, de novo and segregation evidence, and population-frequency benign evidence. Use when assigning pathogenic/likely-pathogenic/VUS/likely-benign/benign to a constitutional CNV, scoring a CNV against ACMG/ClinGen criteria, or distinguishing the automatable evidence from the case-specific evidence requiring manual input.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prepare for Anthropic-specific technical interviews covering Constitutional AI, RLHF, interpretability, scaling laws, MCP, agentic systems, and AI safety. Activate on "anthropic interview", "constitutional AI prep", "alignment interview", "safety interview", "RLHF opinion", "interpretability prep", "anthropic technical". NOT for general ML interview prep, system design interviews, coding challenges, or behavioral interview practice.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
장기 프로젝트의 기존 문서를 규칙, 구조, 현황, 결정 이력으로 정리합니다. 에이전트의 참조 경로와 갱신 규칙을 마련해 문서 불일치와 삭제한 파일의 재생성을 방지하도록 돕습니다.
Maintain personal goals and beliefs with timestamped backups, or analyze project documents to connect problems, goals, strategies, and projects. Turn findings about progress, bottlenecks, and alignment into reports, presentation points, or interactive dashboards.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review stored LifeOS goals and personal context against available records such as sleep, app usage, work, and expenses. The skill prioritizes stale information and contradictions, proposes corrections for approval, and reviews the gap between current and ideal states.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn site requirements or existing content into a SITE.md project guide for the Stitch Build Loop. It records the site's purpose, visual direction, navigation, file structure, and prioritized tasks to guide successive development rounds.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review specifications, plans, and tasks together before implementation. Identify missing task coverage, duplicate requirements, unclear wording, and conflicting decisions, then receive a prioritized report with recommendations without changing project files.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design technical architecture, select technology stack, and define implementation strategy from specifications and constitution constraints.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Execute development tasks to build features, producing code, tests, and configuration artifacts that satisfy specification requirements and comply with constitution standards.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Validate implementation quality through custom checklists, scoring against constitution standards, specification coverage, and producing remediation recommendations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Perform cross-artifact consistency and coverage analysis across constitution, specification, plan, and task artifacts to detect gaps, conflicts, and misalignments before implementation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Establish project governing principles including dev guidelines, code quality standards, testing policies, UX requirements, performance benchmarks, and security constraints.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert prompt engineer specializing in advanced prompting techniques, LLM optimization, and AI system design. Masters chain-of-thought, constitutional AI, and production prompt strategies. Use when building AI features, improving agent performance, or crafting system prompts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Search and cite French and European case law with the LibreJustice MCP tools. Use whenever the user asks about court decisions (Cour de cassation, Conseil d'État, cours d'appel, TJ/TA, CNDA, Conseil constitutionnel, CNIL, CEDH, CJUE), needs authorities for a brief, requête, référé or consultation, wants to check how courts rule on an issue, or needs counts of decisions on a point, even if they never mention LibreJustice.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
A jurisdiction-grounding reference file for AI assistants working on Gibraltar legal, regulatory, and compliance research. Corrects systematic errors AI models make when applying English law to Gibraltar — a distinct jurisdiction under the Gibraltar Constitution Order 2006, with its own court hierarchy, civil procedure rules, employment law, and regulatory framework. Covers the source hierarchy, court structure, civil procedure divergences (14-day deemed service, post-Jackson reforms not adopted), employment law specifics (uncapped discrimination awards, 5-employee redundancy threshold), FSC financial services regulation, AML/KYC compliance sources, Gibraltar Companies Act 2014 with UBO public register, and a structured directory of official public record sources. Includes research profiles for lawyers, compliance professionals, and due diligence practitioners. Not legal advice.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Complete prep for all three scored components of the California Bar Exam: the five written ESSAYS (13 subjects — Business Associations, Civil Procedure, Community Property, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence, Professional Responsibility, Real Property, Remedies, Torts, Trusts, Wills & Succession), the PERFORMANCE TEST, and the multiple-choice MBE (7 subjects). Trigger whenever someone is studying for the California bar (or the MBE) and says things like: "give me the rule for [issue]", "big issues in [subject]", "drill/quiz me on [topic]", "MBE questions on [subject]", "teach me [doctrine]", "build an attack outline", "grade my essay", "memorizable paragraph for [issue]", "performance test approach", or "make a study plan" — or names any tested essay/MBE subject in a study, memorization, drilling, or practice-question context. Also trigger when a student uploads a practice essay, PT, or question set to be graded or turned into rule blocks. When in doubt during bar prep, trigger.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Argentine Supreme Court citation network analysis using JurisRank — a peer-reviewed PageRank algorithm with temporal decay for measuring jurisprudential authority. Ranks precedents by citation influence, traces doctrinal evolution, and detects constitutional drift. Published methodology: JCLLT (DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951). Activate with: which cases to cite, rank precedents, case authority, doctrinal evolution, Argentine Supreme Court, CSJN jurisprudence, citation network, leading case, legal research Argentina.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Comprehensive understanding of the spec-kit methodology. Constitution-driven feature development with specify, plan, tasks, and implement phases.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
当用户开始新小说项目时激活 - 通过温和的提示和解释引导他们完成七步方法论(constitution → specify → clarify → plan → tasks → write → analyze)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.