'leak' 검색 결과

Film light leaks, grain, 16:9 letterbox, and large serif type for cinematic openings or chapter cards.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[omh] Software slowness, memory leaks, or cost spikes: find where a system is actually slow, leaking, or expensive across runtime, memory, token cost, storage, rendering, inference, CI, and query domains, then fix one measured hot path at a time behind a regression budget. Use when the user says: ultraperf, ulw-perf, performance audit, performance bottleneck, find the bottleneck, profile the hot path, memory leak investigation, token cost hotspot.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user mentions memory leak prevention, code review for memory issues, or proactive leak checking — retain cycles, leaks, and Timer/observer patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assessing privacy risks in large language model outputs including training data memorisation, PII leakage in generated text, prompt injection leading to data extraction, and hallucinated personal data. Covers output filtering, guardrails, and monitoring. Keywords: LLM privacy, output risk, memorisation, PII leakage, prompt injection, hallucinated PII.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create, implement, or review video template frame light leak cinema work with format, accessibility, performance, and visual-verification controls. Use when the requested deliverable depends on video template frame light leak cinema.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

德州扑克策略 (德州扑克策略 (Texas Hold'em) — solver/GTO 时代的无限注德州扑克竞技打法，牌手/职业视角。覆盖: (a) 理论两极 — GTO 博弈论均衡 (不可剥削的基线策略) vs Exploitative 剥削打法 (针对对手漏洞偏离均衡最大化 EV)，以及二者的实战取舍; (b) solver 时代工作流 — PioSOLVER/GTO Wizard 跑解、范围构建、节点锁定 (node-locking) 做剥削、用 HUD+数据库 (Hold'em Manager/PokerTracker/Hand2Note) 复盘找漏洞 (leak finding); (c) 牌型分层 — 现金局 (cash game) vs 锦标赛 (MTT) 的根本差异，后者叠加 ICM (独立筹码模型) 与跳台/泡沫期博弈; (d) 核心概念栈 — 范围 (range)/权益 (equity)/EV/位置 (position)/翻前开池与 3-bet/4-bet/翻后下注理论 (c-bet、极化 vs 浓缩范围、MDF 最小防守频率、阻断牌 blockers、超池下注 overbet)、SPR、底池赔率; (e) 元层 — 资金管理 (bankroll management)、桌位选择 (table selection)、方差与心态 (mental game/tilt 控制)、抽水 (rake) 与场次选择对长期赢率 (winrate, bb/100) 的影响; (f) 智识演进 — 从 Sklansky 古典手牌价值 → Janda/Tipton 博弈论 → solver 普及 → GTO Wizard 民主化求解 → AI 超人 (Libratus/Pluribus) 对人类策略的反哺。学派分歧: GTO 派 vs 剥削派、现金局 vs 锦标赛、理论自上而下 vs 牌局自下而上、solver 纯学院派 vs 实战感觉派。不含: 线下牌场运营/发牌荷官、博彩合规与赌场管理、扑克之外的牌类 (桥牌/斗地主)、纯概率赌博 (老虎机/轮盘)。) Master OS — automated mastery of 德州扑克策略 (Texas Hold'em) — solver/GTO 时代的无限注德州扑克竞技打法，牌手/职业视角。覆盖: (a) 理论两极 — GTO 博弈论均衡 (不可剥削的基线策略) vs Exploitative 剥削打法 (针对对手漏洞偏离均衡最大化 EV)，以及二者的实战取舍; (b) solver 时代工作流 — PioSOLVER/GTO Wizard 跑解、范围构建、节点锁定 (node-locking) 做剥削、用 HUD+数据库 (Hold'em Manager/PokerTracker/Hand2Note) 复盘找漏洞 (leak finding); (c) 牌型分层 — 现金局 (cash game) vs 锦标赛 (MTT) 的根本差异，后者叠加 ICM (独立筹码模型) 与跳台/泡沫期博弈; (d) 核心概念栈 — 范围 (range)/权益 (equity)/EV/位置 (position)/翻前开池与 3-bet/4-bet/翻后下注理论 (c-bet、极化 vs 浓缩范围、MDF 最小防守频率、阻断牌 blockers、超池下注 overbet)、SPR、底池赔率; (e) 元层 — 资金管理 (bankroll management)、桌位选择 (table selection)、方差与心态 (mental game/tilt 控制)、抽水 (rake) 与场次选择对长期赢率 (winrate, bb/100) 的影响; (f) 智识演进 — 从 Sklansky 古典手牌价值 → Janda/Tipton 博弈论 → solver 普及 → GTO Wizard 民主化求解 → AI 超人 (Libratus/Pluribus) 对人类策略的反哺。学派分歧: GTO 派 vs 剥削派、现金局 vs 锦标赛、理论自上而下 vs 牌局自下而上、solver 纯学院派 vs 实战感觉派。不含: 线下牌场运营/发牌荷官、博彩合规与赌场管理、扑克之外的牌类 (桥牌/斗地主)、纯概率赌博 (老虎机/轮盘)。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 德州扑克策略 (Texas Hold'em) — solver/GTO 时代的无限注德州扑克竞技打法，牌手/职业视角。覆盖: (a) 理论两极 — GTO 博弈论均衡 (不可剥削的基线策略) vs Exploitative 剥削打法 (针对对手漏洞偏离均衡最大化 EV)，以及二者的实战取舍; (b) solver 时代工作流 — PioSOLVER/GTO Wizard 跑解、范围构建、节点锁定 (node-locking) 做剥削、用 HUD+数据库 (Hold'em Manager/PokerTracker/Hand2Note) 复盘找漏洞 (leak finding); (c) 牌型分层 — 现金局 (cash game) vs 锦标赛 (MTT) 的根本差异，后者叠加 ICM (独立筹码模型) 与跳台/泡沫期博弈; (d) 核心概念栈 — 范围 (range)/权益 (equity)/EV/位置 (position)/翻前开池与 3-bet/4-bet/翻后下注理论 (c-bet、极化 vs 浓缩范围、MDF 最小防守频率、阻断牌 blockers、超池下注 overbet)、SPR、底池赔率; (e) 元层 — 资金管理 (bankroll management)、桌位选择 (table selection)、方差与心态 (mental game/tilt 控制)、抽水 (rake) 与场次选择对长期赢率 (winrate, bb/100) 的影响; (f) 智识演进 — 从 Sklansky 古典手牌价值 → Janda/Tipton 博弈论 → solver 普及 → GTO Wizard 民主化求解 → AI 超人 (Libratus/Pluribus) 对人类策略的反哺。学派分歧: GTO 派 vs 剥削派、现金局 vs 锦标赛、理论自上而下 vs 牌局自下而上、solver 纯学院派 vs 实战感觉派。不含: 线下牌场运营/发牌荷官、博彩合规与赌场管理、扑克之外的牌类 (桥牌/斗地主)、纯概率赌博 (老虎机/轮盘)。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「德州扑克」「德扑」「Texas Hold'em」「poker strategy」「扑克策略」

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnose Kolu client-side performance issues (memory leaks, high GPU, slow interactions) using chrome-devtools MCP + the Debug → Diagnostic info dialog + heap-snapshot analyzers. Triggers on "memory leak", "GPU memory", "tab bloat", "why is kolu slow", "debug performance", "zombie canvas", "WebGL leak", or any

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prevents private infrastructure details (node hostnames, internal project names, local usernames and personal emails, absolute home paths, private and VPN IP ranges) from leaking into public repositories through commits, PRs, docs or release artifacts. Use when working in a public or soon-to-be-public repo, before commits or releases, when writing deployment docs for an OSS project, or when the user asks to "set up the privacy guard", "install privacy-guard", "check for leaks", "protect this public repo". Bootstraps a pre-commit hook backed by a gitignored local denylist plus gitleaks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Decide what to PERSIST in your data structures (graph nodes, DB tables, cache layouts) based on the QUERIES you must answer, not the DEFINITIONS that justify the data. Definitions tell you logical identity; storage strategy is independent. Materializing every definitional component leads to O(N×M) blow-ups that masquerade as memory leaks. Use when: (1) designing a new graph-node type, edge type, DB table, or cache layout; (2) about to name a `subgraph` / `comprises` / `members` / `contains` collection on a parent entity; (3) memory growth proportional to (entities × per-entity-elements); (4) "memory leak" debugging that survives multiple targeted patches — the leak may be storage shape, not retention; (5) pre-implementation sketch includes "for each X, store all reached nodes"; (6) research/spec doc says "X = ⟨A, B, C⟩" and you're tempted to make it three storage edges per X.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when you need to check whether an organisation/domain has been claimed by a ransomware group, profile a specific ransomware group (TTPs, leak-site infra, IOCs, YARA), or aggregate ransomware victim claims by country/sector/timeframe. Backed by ransomware.live's leak-site scrapes — 27k+ victims across 330+ groups. Commonly invoked by /domain-investigation, /ransomware-ecosystem, /threat-actor-profiling, and detection-engineering workflows. Reads $RANSOMWARE_LIVE.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Extract sensitive training data and internal capabilities from AI models through repeated programmatic querying. Use this skill when testing LLMs and ML models for data privacy leaks, intellectual property exposure, or unintended memorization. Covers membership inference, prompt extraction, training data reconstruction, and API boundary testing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Pre-share leak scanner for Claude Code skills (or any folder). Scans BEFORE you publish for secrets (API keys, tokens, private keys, .env values, high-entropy strings), PII (emails/phones), local machine paths (C:\Users\<name>, /home/<name>, /Users/<name>, UNC, internal hostnames), and client/proper-noun names from a LOCAL private dictionary; also flags service-specific code (jira/github/gitlab/slack/salesforce/notion/linear/ stripe/aws/google) that should be split into a dedicated service plugin. Use when the user says "sanitize this skill", "before sharing a skill", "check for leaks", "is this skill clean", "is this safe to commit/publish/ open-source", "scrub secrets", "redact before commit", or "pre-push leak check". Cross-platform, stdlib-only Python, fail-closed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

- Check and interpret data-breach exposure for an email, username, phone or name using Have I Been Pwned, the Pwned Passwords k-anonymity range API, DeHashed, IntelX and Snusbase. Use when checking breach or leak exposure, finding which services an account was registered with, interpreting a combolist or credential dump, assessing credential compromise, or auditing your own leaked personal data

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

敵対的分析手法を統合したレビューの entry skill。認知バイアス対策の3手法 （Pre-mortem / War Game / Logic Torturing）と、宣言・主張と実態の乖離を突く claim-vs-actual 検出3パターン（Self-Contradiction / Refactor-Claim Audit / Cross-File Leakage）へルーティングし、通常のレビューでは見えない設計の盲点・ 防御の穴・論理の弱点・宣言と実装のズレを可視化する。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Integrate gitleaks and trufflehog into CI/CD pipelines to tespit etme
leaked secrets before Dağıt:ment

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

bu skill covers implementing Gitleaks for Tespit etme and preventing hardcoded secrets in git repositories. It addresses configuring pre-commit hooks, CI/CD pipeline integration, custom rule authoring for organization-specific secrets, baseline management for existing repositories, and remediation workflows for exposed credentials.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Tests APIs for excessive data exposure where endpoints return more data than the client application needs, relying on the frontend to filter sensitive fields. The tester intercepts API responses and analyzes them for leaked PII, internal identifiers, debug information, or sensitive business data that the UI does not display but the API transmits. This maps to OWASP API3:2023 Broken Object Property Level Authorization. Activates for requests involving API data leakage testing, excessive data e...

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detects leaky abstractions in PHP code. Identifies implementation details exposed in interfaces, concrete returns from abstract methods, framework leakage into domain, and infrastructure concerns in application layer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematic debugging methodology covering root cause analysis, log-based debugging, production debugging, memory leak diagnosis, deadlock detection, performance anomaly investigation, and reproducible bug reproduction. Distilled from real experience at Google, DeepMind, ByteDance, and Huawei. USE WHEN: investigating production incidents, debugging hard-to-reproduce bugs, analyzing crash dumps, finding race conditions, diagnosing memory leaks, debugging performance regressions, or any situation requiring systematic root cause analysis. Triggers on "debugging", "root cause", "bug", "crash", "segfault", "deadlock", "race condition", "memory leak".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit code for memory leaks and disposable issues. Use when reviewing event listeners, DOM handlers, lifecycle callbacks, or fixing leak reports. Covers addDisposableListener, Event.once, MutableDisposable, DisposableStore, and onWillDispose patterns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Tests APIs for excessive data exposure where endpoints return more data than the client application needs, relying on the frontend to filter sensitive fields. The tester intercepts API responses and analyzes them for leaked PII, internal identifiers, debug information, or sensitive business data that the UI does not display but the API transmits. This maps to OWASP API3:2023 Broken Object Property Level Authorization. Activates for requests involving API data leakage testing, excessive data exposure, response filtering bypass, or API over-fetching.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

의료 앱의 환자·직원·재무 기밀 정보를 분류하고, 의료기관별 접근 제어와 감사 기록을 설계하며 로그·주소·브라우저 저장소의 정보 유출을 점검합니다.

• 환자 기록을 다루는 코드를 점검합니다
• 의료기관 간 접근 제어를 설계합니다
• 기밀 정보의 조회와 변경을 기록합니다

Design evaluation tasks that check whether agents actually complete work. Define requests, simulated user behavior, starting conditions, and verifiable success criteria, then plan difficulty levels, training-data leakage checks, and ongoing maintenance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Creating evaluation tasks for real business workflows
• Reviewing success criteria and verification logic
• Designing checks for evaluation data leakage into training

Build and evaluate time-to-event models with scikit-survival, including records whose events remain unobserved when follow-up ends. Keep preprocessing separate from evaluation data, compare models, predict survival probabilities, and summarize censoring-aware metrics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Validate event indicators and follow-up times in local CSV data
• Train survival models without leaking evaluation data
• Evaluate survival probabilities with censoring-aware metrics