'methodology' 검색 결과

Find scientific datasets, AI models, methodology posts, and interactive demos through the Hugging Science catalog. Compare candidates for a research task and verify their licenses, input formats, access requirements, and supported ways to run them.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Finding models for protein or genome analysis
• Selecting datasets for scientific machine learning
• Comparing resource licenses and runtime requirements

Explains how PluginEval combines structural checks and experimental model assessments into quality scores. Helps interpret low scores, identify improvement areas, set marketplace thresholds, and explain what evaluation badges actually represent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Investigating why a skill received a low score
• Improving descriptions that define when a skill should run
• Setting score thresholds for marketplace listings

Assess cybersecurity risks using NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 by examining threats, weaknesses, likelihood, and business impact. Produce a ranked risk register, a structured record of risks and recommended responses, with a summary for leadership.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Preparing documented risk analysis for compliance frameworks
• Assessing a new system before launch
• Reporting the highest risks to leadership

Prepare for CMMC Level 2, a cybersecurity certification for defense contractors. Define the systems handling controlled information, review security requirements, calculate the SPRS assessment score, and organize remediation plans and evidence into a readiness report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Define the assessment scope for systems handling controlled information
• Calculate an SPRS score and prioritize unmet security requirements
• Prepare security plans, remediation milestones, and assessment evidence

Build market research evidence by comparing two market-size estimates, calculating survey sample sizes for each customer group, and scoring potential segments. Outputs show methods and assumptions so teams can assess the basis for business decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Estimating market size for a business decision
• Planning survey responses for each customer segment
• Evaluating which market segments to pursue

Evaluate AI models and agents on Google Cloud using test datasets and scoring criteria. Generate simulated user scenarios, analyze failures, and compare results across changes to guide improvements to prompts and code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Build evaluation datasets from conversation logs
• Generate simulated user scenarios
• Choose scoring criteria for responses and tool use

Plan smart contract audits using research from security organizations. Combine threat modeling, static code analysis, fuzzing that varies test inputs, and manual review, while using attack patterns and a four-phase roadmap to guide further learning.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Planning a smart contract security audit
• Setting up Echidna or Medusa fuzzing
• Reviewing attack patterns and past audit findings

Assess dependency confusion, where a build retrieves a public package instead of an intended private one. Discover internal package names, review registry settings, plan callback-based proofs of execution, and document fixes across major package ecosystems.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing package registry settings in CI/CD
• Finding internal package names in lock files
• Planning an authorized callback-based proof of concept

Examines project code, development history, tests, and documentation, then asks three focused questions to recommend a combination of AI-assisted development methods, with practical starting steps tailored to the project.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Choosing development methods for a solo prototype
• Reviewing workflows for an existing SaaS product
• Selecting evaluation methods for an AI product

This skill should be used when the user asks to "learn ethical hacking", "understand penetration testing lifecycle", "perform reconnaissance", "conduct security scanning", "exploit vulnerabilities", or "write penetration test reports". It provides comprehensive ethical hacking methodology and techniques.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Golang performance optimization patterns and methodology - if X bottleneck, then apply Y. Covers allocation reduction, CPU efficiency, memory layout, GC tuning, pooling, caching, and hot-path optimization. Use when profiling or benchmarks have identified a bottleneck and you need the right optimization pattern to fix it. Also use when performing performance code review to suggest improvements or benchmarks that could help identify quick performance gains. Not for measurement methodology (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark` skill) or debugging workflow (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshooting` skill).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply plugin knowledge base updates to an existing generated system. Consults the Ars Contexta research graph for methodology improvements, proposes skill upgrades with research justification. Never auto-implements. Triggers on "/upgrade", "upgrade skills", "check for improvements", "update methodology".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive OSINT methodology for external red-team operations and authorized attack-surface assessments. Covers the 6-stage recon pipeline (seed → asset expansion → enrichment → exposure analysis → convergence → operator-armed active validation) with connector-resilience and stage-vs-gating discipline, asset-graph discipline, severity rubric, confidence upgrade workflows, time budgeting, identity-fabric mapping, breach×identity correlation with per-person identity dossiers, detectability tagging, detection-aware probing, WAF/CDN bypass, vulnerability prioritization, phishing infrastructure planning, bug bounty submission, and client deliverable templates. Use when planning or executing reconnaissance against authorized targets, mapping an organization's external attack surface, investigating a person/entity, or producing client deliverables.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reconnaissance and methodology playbook. Use when mapping assets, discovering endpoints, fingerprinting technology, and building a structured testing plan for a new target.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Add another file (resource) to an EXISTING dataset in a PortalJS portal — a data dictionary, methodology, or an additional data file. Turns a single-file dataset into a multi-resource one; the showcase renders a section per resource. Use when a dataset needs a second file, such as a data dictionary, methodology doc, or an additional period's data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cavekit specification-driven development methodology — the Hunt lifecycle (Draft → Architect → Build → Inspect → Monitor) and how to apply it. Use when starting a Cavekit project, structuring an existing codebase as kits/plans, or routing between sub-skills.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Verification-first methodology for the UNMIK Regulation 64 Panels of the Kosovo district courts (2000–2008). Citations are verified against UNMIK/EULEX archives and legal-tools.org. Keeps the Reg. 64 Panels distinct from the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, and clarifies that Reg. 2000/64 permitted (did not impose) internationally-majority panels. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Verification-first methodology for the Special Panels for Serious Crimes of the Dili District Court (UNTAET, 2000–2006). Citations are verified against JSMP, the UN archives and legal-tools.org. Covers the Los Palos case, the Serious Crimes Unit caseload (391 indicted; about 88 tried) and the SPSC-vs-Jakarta distinction. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Verification-first methodology for the Special Court for Sierra Leone and its Residual Special Court. Citations are verified against rscsl.org and legal-tools.org. Covers Taylor, the AFRC/CDF/RUF cases, the child-soldier and forced-marriage holdings, the head-of-State immunity decision, and the fixed-term (no life) penalty regime. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Verification-first methodology for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. Citations are verified against the STL legacy archive and legal-tools.org. Covers the Ayyash et al. case, the two contempt cases (STL-14-05 New TV/Al-Khayat and STL-14-06 Akhbar Beirut/Al-Amin), and the 2011 terrorism decision. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Verification-first methodology for the post-WWII tribunals: the IMT at Nuremberg, the twelve Nuremberg Military Tribunals, and the IMTFE at Tokyo. Citations are verified against the official records (Blue/Green Series, Pritchard-Zaide) and the digital archives (Avalon, Harvard NTP, UVA IMTFE). Guards the four classic traps (IMT vs NMT; Nuremberg vs Tokyo; Charter article numbers; majority judgment vs separate opinions, e.g. the Pal dissent). Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Verification-first methodology for the ICTY, the ICTR and the Residual Mechanism (IRMCT). Citations are verified against irmct.org, the Case Law and Unified Court Records databases, and legal-tools.org. Handles the IT/ICTR to MICT case-number transition (Karadžić, Mladić) and the protective-measures rule. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library - methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Verification-first methodology for the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor's Office (The Hague, applying Kosovo law). Citations are verified against scp-ks.org before use; appeal registry numbers are cited only once confirmed. Covers Thaçi et al., Mustafa, Pjetër Shala and Gucati & Haradinaj. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Verification-first methodology for the ECCC (Khmer Rouge Tribunal). Every citation is verified against eccc.gov.kh, the ECCC archive or legal-tools.org. Covers Case File numbering, the 001/002/002-01/002-02 structure, the genocide findings against the Cham and the Vietnamese, and the Internal Rules revision discipline. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.