176건 · 관련도순
Complete CCPA/CPRA compliance implementation covering California Civil Code §1798.100-199. Includes consumer rights framework, business obligations, service provider and contractor requirements, enforcement mechanisms, and CPPA rulemaking. Triggers on CCPA, CPRA, California privacy, consumer rights.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate systematic refinement steps from high-level specifications to concrete implementations in Isabelle/HOL or Coq, preserving correctness obligations at each step. Use when working with formal verification, program refinement, proof development, or when translating abstract specifications into executable code while maintaining formal guarantees. Supports data refinement (abstract types → concrete structures), algorithmic refinement (specifications → algorithms), and stepwise refinement with proof obligations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Coordinates central clearing requirements with CCP selection, margin optimization, and clearing threshold monitoring. Use when managing clearing obligations, optimizing CCP selection, or analyzing clearing economics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate an ASC 606 / IFRS 15 revenue recognition engine for SaaS — the five-step model (identify contract, identify performance obligations, determine transaction price, allocate to performance obligations, recognize as POs are satisfied) applied to subscription contracts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Drafts Assignment and Assumption Agreements transferring contractual rights and obligations from assignor to assignee in asset purchase transactions. Covers assignment mechanics, liability assumption with temporal cutoff, third-party consent handling, reps and warranties, indemnification, and Exhibit A contract schedule. Trigger keywords: "assignment and assumption", "contract transfer", "assign contracts", "assume obligations", "asset purchase closing document", "assignor assignee agreement".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply normative BDI reasoning to agents that must detect norms, choose which commitments to internalize, and resolve conflicts by comparing consequences. Use when obligations, prohibitions, or policies collide in autonomous systems. NOT for simple fixed-priority rules, pure constraint satisfaction, or domains where no real normative conflict exists.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when a company must work out where each of its AI systems sits under the EU AI Act, and asks "is this high-risk", "classify our AI systems", "AI Act risk tier", "are we a provider or a deployer", "does Annex III apply to us", "is this a prohibited practice", "what does the AI Act mean for our chatbot" or "which AI Act obligations do we have". Tests each system, one at a time, for scope, role, prohibited practices, the two high-risk routes, the narrow exemption, transparency duties and general-purpose models, and writes a reasoned classification record per system plus a summary table of resulting obligations to confirm with whoever owns legal interpretation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Produces a draft controls and gap pack from a requirement, regulation, standard or policy and the organisation's control descriptions: obligations broken out of the source text, the controls that appear to address each, apparent coverage, gaps, questions for control owners and actions to assess. Never concludes compliance or that a control is effective; owners and audit assess. Use when the user asks to "map this regulation to our controls", "run a controls gap analysis", "break this standard into obligations" or "where is our control coverage thin". Do not use for comparing a policy document against a standard, use policy-gap-review instead; to draft evidence requests from the mapped controls, use control-evidence-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turns the text of a regulatory change (new regulation, amendment, rule, guidance or standard revision) into a DRAFT impact note: what changed against the prior text where supplied, who is affected as the text scopes it, an obligations table with dates and owners to confirm, and open interpretation questions for legal. States only what the text says; the rest is UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "brief legal on this new regulation", "list what we must do by when under this amendment", "compare the new standard with the version it replaces", "turn this directive into an obligations table" or "what does this rule mean for us". Do not use for assessing existing controls against a requirement set, use controls-gap-pack instead; for gapping a policy against a standard, use policy-gap-review. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Use for AI system classification (high-risk vs prohibited vs general), conformity assessment procedures, GPAI model obligations, transparency and disclosure requirements, governance structure (AI Office / AI Board), penalty tiers, value-chain operator obligations, post-market monitoring, and Annex III use-case analysis. Does not cover EU liability rules for AI (separate proposed directive) or implementation guidance documents issued after July 2024.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Find suitable grants and bidding opportunities, check eligibility before drafting, and prepare applications or responses to requests for proposals using past submissions and actual organizational data. It also tracks submission deadlines and reporting obligations after an award.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Screens incoming nondisclosure agreements against an organization's criteria or stated defaults. Classifies each agreement into three review levels and produces a report covering flagged clauses, risks, suggested fixes, and recommended next steps.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review mathematical proofs in LaTeX for logical gaps, missing assumptions, and unjustified steps. Attempt counterexamples, develop explicit repairs, and repeat the review, producing an audit report that distinguishes completed fixes from assumptions and unresolved proof obligations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Check a paper's numerical consistency using fixed rules, then record blocking or warning decisions and outstanding findings. The workflow preserves a traceable correction history, while explicitly leaving broader semantic review unavailable in its Codex mode.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit a paper for numerical inconsistencies and other research integrity concerns. Record findings tied to source passages, track corrections and human waivers, and translate the audit report into workflow blocking or warning decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Screen incoming nondisclosure agreements against your team's review rules. The skill assigns GREEN, YELLOW, or RED, identifies clauses needing legal attention, and outlines next steps so sales and business development teams can prepare a focused handoff.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guide feature development from a human-reviewed plan to testable requirements, implementation, and independent verification. Record each requirement with a concrete proof, then have a separate agent check the work and produce a verification report.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Document a settled architecture choice as an ADR, a record of a design decision. Capture its context, rejected alternatives, benefits, costs, and links to earlier decisions it replaces so future readers can understand the reasoning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Runs environment, health and safety on an operating site — hazard controls in order of effectiveness, incident recording and reporting obligations, and safety measurement that does not reward silence. Use this to build or audit a safety program, decide what controls a hazard actually needs, work out whether an injury is recordable or reportable, investigate an incident, or fix safety metrics that have stopped producing reports.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Covers the employment rules that carry real penalties — exempt and non-exempt classification, overtime and hours, employee versus contractor status, work authorization and recordkeeping, accommodation requests, and the notices and retention obligations that go with them. Use this to classify a role, review a contractor arrangement, respond to an accommodation request, work out what records to keep and for how long, or sanity-check a practice you inherited.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Runs a security incident from detection to closure — triage, containment, investigation, communication, and the review afterward. Use this when a compromise is suspected or confirmed, when preparing an incident response plan or running an exercise, when deciding whether something is an incident, or when a breach may trigger notification obligations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Owns legal, contracts, intellectual property, regulatory compliance, privacy, security governance, enterprise risk, and audit readiness. Use this to review a contract or commitment, assess regulatory or privacy exposure, evaluate an IP or licensing question, judge the risk in a business decision, prepare for an audit or certification, or when a plan may create obligations the business cannot meet. Also use to decide whether a risk should be accepted, mitigated, or refused.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Covers what the organization owns and what it is only borrowing — trademarks and clearance, copyright and work-for-hire, patents and trade secrets, open-source license obligations and copyleft reach, and IP terms in customer, contractor and AI-tool agreements. Use this to check whether a name is usable, establish that you own work you paid for, decide how to handle a license obligation in a dependency, or respond to an infringement claim.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Handles a dispute from the first sign of it — recognizing when preservation obligations attach, issuing and scoping a legal hold, suspending automatic deletion across every system that holds relevant material, preserving privilege, managing outside counsel and cost, and evaluating settlement against the real cost of continuing. Use this to respond to a claim or demand letter, issue a hold, work out which systems the hold has to reach, or decide whether to fight.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.