'reframing' 검색 결과

Use when the user wants to convert a video between horizontal and vertical orientations while preserving the inverted aspect ratio (16:9 ↔ 9:16, 4:3 ↔ 3:4, 21:9 ↔ 9:21). The skill crops a narrow band from the source and tracks the active speaker — the person whose mouth is moving — via MediaPipe face landmarks and mouth-aspect-ratio variance, so the talker stays in frame even when other people are visible. Triggers — "横转竖", "竖转横", "做成竖屏发抖音/视频号/小红书", "16:9 to 9:16", "make this vertical for Reels / TikTok / YouTube Shorts", "crop to portrait", "convert to landscape".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Applies the reasoning style of Kaiming He, computer vision pioneer and creator of ResNet. Use this skill whenever you are designing deep learning architectures, debugging neural network optimization, formulating generative AI problems, or bridging AI with other scientific domains. Trigger this skill for discussions on network depth, weight initialization, residual learning, flow matching, or when reframing discriminative tasks as conditional generation. It emphasizes simplicity in complex visual problems, end-to-end optimization, and viewing AI as a universal language for science.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Techniques for generating novel ideas, reframing problems, and escaping fixed mental models. Covers lateral thinking (de Bono), Six Thinking Hats, random stimulation, provocation operators (PO), analogical transfer, assumption challenging, and divergent-then-convergent thinking cycles. Use when the goal is to produce new options or perspectives rather than evaluate existing ones.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI pressure redirection — handling conflicting demands, tool failures, and competing constraints by blending with incoming force then reframing. Use when receiving contradictory instructions from different sources, during tool failure cascades where the planned approach becomes unviable, when scope pressure threatens to expand the task beyond what was asked, or when user frustration or correction needs to be absorbed rather than deflected.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Tailor a resume to a job description with ATS keyword optimization, gap analysis, and rewritten bullets — zero fabrication. Use when the user wants /tailor for a single role, /batch for multiple JDs, career pivot reframing, or interview prep questions from a tailored application.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Camera Operator (television, video, or film) — deciding how to physically execute a director/DP's shot on a moving or stabilized platform, reframing live for unpredictable subject movement, protecting a frame for multi-format delivery, or diagnosing why a take got flagged for reshoot.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

User experience and interface design expert for wireframing, user research, and design systems

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Self-help mental wellness coach — daily journaling prompts + gratitude practice + emotional regulation tools + thought reframing สำหรับคนทั่วไป (ไม่ใช่ clinical therapy)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn a raw idea into ONE honest recommendation: interview one question at a time until the problem, requirements, goals, non-goals, and constraints are CONFIRMED, then deliver a single verdict — do, don't, cheaper alternatives, trade-offs, ordered checklist, success metrics. Required: the user wants exactly ONE recommendation — not options, not a debate — and their framing is open to challenge (advise may answer a different question than the one asked). Triggers on "what should I do about X", "advise me on X", "am I approaching this right", "is this the right move". Do NOT use to be interrogated with no recommendation (→ mk:grill) — advise also interviews one question at a time, but only to reach a verdict. Do NOT use when the framing is settled and only the options are open (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to decide whether something is worth building (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when you want several perspectives to argue it out (→ mk:party).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Ideenschürf-Workflow für festgefahrene, schwere Probleme (Beweise, Forschungsfragen, hartnäckige Design-/Architekturprobleme): einen Ideenspeicher über acht Schürftechniken füllen (Wiedererkennung, Fern-Disziplin-Analogie, Alltags-Allegorie, Störgefühl/Ästhetik, Märchen-Reframing, Web-/Literatur-Recherche, Geschwisterprojekte, Bestandsquerlauf), dann gegen bereits Versuchtes filtern, eine Idee wählen und bis zur Substanz verfolgen. Nutze diesen Skill, wenn ein Problem trotz mehrerer Anläufe feststeckt, wenn „neue Ideen für X" gebraucht werden, bei „wir drehen uns im Kreis", oder für periodische Innovations-Läufe über ein Projekt. Für breites, freies Ideensammeln ohne festgefahrenes Problem stattdessen brainstorm (SCAMPER, Six Hats etc.).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply repeatable dialogue MA, Studio-based or automatic portrait reframing, overlay-safe rendering, and loudness/sync QA to an existing interview or talking-head rough cut. Use when the user asks to make speech easier to hear, perform MA, enlarge or rebalance a person in frame, crop or punch in an interview, automatically propose framing, or prepare a finishing preview before final approval.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Change what something MEANS before you change what it IS — Rory Sutherland's cheapest lever. Use when a product, price, feature, or message is objectively fine but feels cheap, generic, boring, overpriced, or unjustified; when the user says 'how do we make this feel more premium/valuable/exciting', 'people don't get why it's worth it', 'how do we reposition/rename/repackage this', or wants to raise perceived value without changing the product or cutting the price. Covers renaming, recategorising, mental accounting (price framing), creating artificial value, and context-shifting. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic. 日本語の相談（「高いと言われる」「安っぽく見える」「値下げせずに高級感を出したい」）にも使う。中文咨询（“被说太贵”“显得廉价”“不降价也想显得高级”）也适用。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The perception-by-culture lens for psycho-logic — establish HOW a specific region, country, or subculture reads a signal before you send it, because perception is culturally coded and the same move can mean the opposite elsewhere. Use when adapting a product, price, message, or campaign to a new market; when the user asks 'will this work in [country/region]', 'why does this land in X but flop in Y', 'how do people here perceive Z', 'how do we localise/differentiate by region', or is about to copy a US/global playbook into another market. Covers the cultural dimensions that move Sutherland's levers — uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism, status/power distance, high- vs low-context communication, mental-accounting norms, trust locus, and taboo/sacredness — and how each rewires reframing, costly-signaling, and experience-design. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic; pair with market-recon for live local data. 日本語・中文の相談（「この地域で通用する？」「适合本地市场吗？」）にも使う。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Rory Sutherland's 'psycho-logic' approach to marketing, product, and business problems — solve the human perception, not just the engineering or economic metric. Use when the obvious 'logical' fix is expensive, slow, or already done by every competitor; when the user asks 'how do we make people want X', 'the product/price/funnel is fine but nobody converts', 'how do we stand out', 'is there a cheaper way to fix this', or mentions behavioral economics, nudges, irrational behavior, perception, or 'it doesn't make sense but it works'. This is the ROUTER skill: it diagnoses the problem in human terms, then dispatches to reframing, costly-signaling, counterintuitive-tests, or experience-design. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's book *Alchemy*. 日本語の相談（「商品はいいのに売れない」「値下げしかない？」「競合と差別化できない」）にも使う。中文咨询（“产品很好却卖不动”“只能降价吗？”“无法差异化”）也适用。For a catalogue of individual biases, use marketing-psychology (separate plugin) instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Facilitate idea generation sessions that actually produce diverse, useful options instead of degenerating into the first plausible answer. Use for product ideation, feature exploration, problem-reframing, naming, design alternatives, strategic option-generation, or any task where the failure mode is "we picked the obvious thing too fast." Covers solo and group sessions, divergence/convergence discipline, technique selection (SCAMPER, Crazy Eights, How Might We, 6-3-5 Brainwriting, Reverse Brainstorming, Worst Possible Idea, Random Stimulus), facilitation moves for handling dominant voices and groupthink, and structured convergence to a shortlist with rationale. Outputs a session artifact with options generated, evaluation, shortlist, and the rejected-but-interesting list.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.