'capability' 검색 결과

Reduce an oversized SKILL.md by checking whether an existing skill already covers the excess sub-workflow before creating a new child skill only when none fits. Load when a skill exceeds 200 lines and compress-skill determines excess content is genuinely CORE, when the same sub-workflow appears in multiple skills, or when universal-skill-creator or improve-skills identifies a coherent sub-capability. Also triggers on "split this skill", "extract a sub-skill", "this skill is doing too much", or "make this skill reusable". Always checks for an existing home before creating a new skill.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Match a user request to the right skill using trigger matching, project context, and conversation history. Score ambiguity 1–10 and resolve it using context signals or a single clarifying question. Load when project-orchestrator needs to route a request, or when multiple skills could match and the right one is unclear. Also triggers on "which skill should handle this", "route this request", "I'm not sure which skill to use", "disambiguate this", "skill routing". Called by project-orchestrator for request routing. For finding whether a skill exists for a capability, use skill-finder instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Find the right skill for a capability. Load when a user or skill needs to check if a skill exists for a given task, when process-decomposer assigns skills to steps, or when agent-builder checks skill availability. Triggers on "what skill does this need", "find a skill for", "is there a skill that", "which skill handles", "does a skill exist for", "skill lookup", "check skill library". Prevents skill sprawl by always checking existing skills before creating new ones. The gatekeeper for all skill creation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate 5–10 business idea candidates from a blank page or a founder's domain context — using pain mining, jobs-to-be-done, trend × capability mapping, constraint relaxation, adjacency search, and founder-market-fit prompts. Each candidate is a structured idea card (segment, JTBD, current alternative, why-now, distribution wedge, monetisation, "feels like"). Load when the user asks to generate business ideas, brainstorm startup ideas, find ideas to work on, says "what business should I start", "give me startup ideas", "I don't know what to build", "ideate ventures", "blank-page idea generation", "find me a startup idea", "explore business opportunities". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Hard-bans "Uber for X" / "AI for X" with no specific JTBD, "everyone" segments, and idea cards missing any of the 7 required fields. Does NOT design or evaluate ideas generated — for that use `idea-evaluation`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn a rough idea into a fully approved design before any code is written. Load when the user wants to brainstorm, explore ideas, design a feature, think through approaches, plan a new capability, or figure out what to build. Also triggers on "let's think through", "help me design", "explore options", "what's the best approach for", "I have an idea for", "before we build", or any request to design something before implementation. Enforces a hard gate: no code, no implementation until user approves a design. For executable feature specs (FRs, NFRs, ACs as Given/When/Then), route to `feature-spec` instead — brainstorming owns approach and architecture, not machine-readable requirements.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill to develop the capability to investigate crashes internally. Covers what to look for, when to escalate to outside experts, and documentation standards.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan and diagnose FIPA-style ontology-service interactions while keeping declared ontology relations, provider capability, and application authorization separate. NOT for treating an ontology mapping as provider authority or guaranteed interoperability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit or design server-side indexes, directories, reputations, or aggregates that are DERIVED from traffic a platform witnesses (chain heads, run verdicts, heartbeats, publish activity) so that consent gates the derivation, not merely the read: no shadow index over non-consenting principals, post-consent-only evidence windows, retention bounds and delete-propagation into derived rows, activity-oracle threat modeling, and audit-logged ranking discretion. Use when building a capability directory / whois from witnessed activity, a reputation ledger from settled outcomes, vitals aggregation across tenants, or any "the yellow pages can't lie because they index signatures" feature. Keywords: shadow index, derived index, consent gates derivation, activity oracle, phone book not a log, delist propagation, ranking weight audit, k-anonymous aggregate, subpoena surface. NOT for the consent-screen UX and scope-ladder mechanics themselves (use local-first-tenancy-boundary), reputation scoring math and Sybil economics (use agent-identity-continuity-reputation), or discovery-layer architecture L1/L2/L3 (use agent-discovery-directories-guilds).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Central catalog of available skills with metadata, capabilities, and performance history. Provides skill discovery and lookup services. Activate on 'skill registry', 'list skills', 'skill catalog', 'available skills', 'skill metadata'. NOT for matching skills to tasks (use dag-semantic-matcher) or ranking (use dag-capability-ranker).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has actually shrunk its ~19 legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools — work/act/ask/recall/status — each carrying one denial shape and one transcript event, migrated through a real retirement path (intake-metadata, alias, or doc-history — never a parallel runtime), with zero legacy-verb calls once a body reaches compliance mode C4+. Use when reviewing a broker-collapse migration plan, gating a body's move from advisory (C0-C3) to enforced (C4+) coordination, or verifying IT-018 Broker Collapse compliance. NOT for the inbound trigger→spawn boundary that decides whether an event may spawn an agent at all (use fleet-event-spawn-trust), the capability-token cryptographic mechanism behind a denial (use agentic-zero-trust-security), designing how a swarm of agents invokes and shards work (use swarm-invocation-designer), or auditing an individual PR's mergeability (use agent-pr-authoring).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply Conway's homomorphism principle to multi-agent system design, recognizing that agent coordination structure predetermines system architecture and capability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audits an Articles of Agreement contract — the daemon-witnessed agreement every official Port Daddy agent signs covering registration, transcript reporting, tool-use gating, file claims, parley conduct, budget limits, and operator control — against the enforcement-beats-hope bar: a clause counts as safe only when it resolves to a concrete, daemon-observable mechanism with a defined denial shape, never a promise the agent might honor. Use when drafting a new agent's Articles, reviewing a compliance-level (C0-C6) claim, deciding whether a clause is genuinely enforced or merely documented, or auditing whether an agent's claimed identity can be trusted. NOT for securing the inbound event-to-spawn path (fleet-event-spawn-trust), designing the relay's transport PKI and signing keys (pd-relay-zero-trust), or tracking an agent's identity and reputation across its whole lifetime after it signs (agent-identity-continuity-reputation).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automated discovery and matching of agent skills for dynamic task routing and capability assessment

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs and verifies fail-closed continuation of a living durable agent after its VM, process, provider session, backend, or context window disappears. Use for body leases, generation fencing, cold-birth failure, process GC, native resume, cross-harness rebodiment, resurrection capsules, capability translation, ambiguous-effect reconciliation, and capacity-aware handoff. NOT for reviving an intentionally retired identity, generic disaster recovery, copying credentials or raw transcripts, ordinary process restart, or claiming metaphysical continuity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design or review a declared control-command profile and its verb/backend lifecycle matrix. Distinguish policy denial, unsupported capability, delivery acknowledgement, independently observed effect, and unknown outcome; bind authorization to principal, target, scope, current policy, expiry, and fencing epoch. NOT for claiming runtime correctness, proving an adapter from declarations, or approving a control-panel button without independent runtime evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Discovery batch that grows the Provider Access Launch queue. Use when asked to find more user-connected OAuth, API, API-key, remote MCP, marketplace, or partner-access campaigns for a capability, provider family, MCP/plugin catalog, or competitive gap. NOT for client Local Listings distribution.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Runbook for creating or majorly growing an @ai-matrx TypeScript npm package. Use when invoked as /new-package <name or capability>, or for a new @ai-matrx/* package, extracting code into one, or a major growth wave. NOT for a routine fix inside an existing package (THE SAME-SESSION LAW).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Doctrine for adding a capability INTO a live, existing feature to a world-class bar. Use on 'add X to Y', 'extend Y to support X', a new option, button, setting, endpoint, or tool for Y, or a sub-feature spec to implement. NOT for whole-feature audits or overhauls (use feature-deep-dive).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A live demo or admin page shipped with every feature whose results the user would otherwise not see. Use when building or extending a server-side capability, service, registry, or pipeline, or adding a backend endpoint or feature with no UI, whose output only shows in logs, the DB, or an agent run, or when the user says there's no way to see it or asks 'how do I test this'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Adding a file type or upgrading any of its capability slots in the files feature (preview, edit, thumbnail, grid card, info, share, versions, conversion, diff, rail panel). Use when supporting a new extension or MIME type, building a previewer, touching FILE_TYPES, PreviewKind, FilePreview.tsx, EDITABLE_KINDS, or surfaces/single-file/, or working the FILE_SURFACES.md wishlist.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Redux state for agent execution and firing agent shortcuts. Use when editing features/agents/redux/, building agent UI, creating a conversation, touching assembleRequest or NDJSON stream state, wiring agent-state selectors, adding a per-conversation capability, or triggering a shortcut from a button, menu, or code (useShortcutTrigger, launchAgentExecution).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Agent Workforce Orchestration: Hybrid Human+AI Teams. Build agent-led workforce orchestration: capability matching, escrow-based payments for AI agents and human gig workers, unified reputation scoring, SLA enforcement, dispute resolution, and compliance reporting. Includes detailed Python code examples for every pattern.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.