'boundary' 검색 결과

Builds reusable Convex components with isolated tables and app-facing APIs. Use for new components, reusable backend modules, integrations, or component boundary work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design traceable functional test conditions across positive, negative, boundary, and error behavior with observable expectations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Clear the freeze boundary set by /freeze, allowing edits to all directories again. Use when you want to widen edit scope without ending the session. Use when asked to "unfreeze", "unlock edits", "remove freeze", or "allow all edits". (gstack)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when asked to "review this PR", "code review", "pre-landing review", or "check my diff". Proactively suggest when the user is about to merge or land code changes. (gstack)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Explain Ponytail's intended tradeoffs and measurement boundary. It does not estimate code, cost, or speed savings for the current repository. One-shot display, not a persistent mode. Trigger: ponytail-gain, "ponytail gain", "what does ponytail save", "show ponytail impact", or "ponytail scoreboard".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan which model tier handles which work BEFORE execution begins — a high-cognition model deeply understands the problem, lays the foundations, then emits a modular plan assigning each module the cheapest tier that can safely execute it, with escalation tripwires and one-way-door protection. Advisory only: it announces "next module → tier X / model Y" at each boundary and the HUMAN switches models — harnesses like Cursor cannot switch mid-run. Load when the user asks which model to use, wants a model plan, model tiers, model-tier routing, assign models to tasks or modules, says "cheap model got stuck", "which model for this task", "cost-efficient model choice", or when implementation-plan / problem-to-plan need a model: tier column. NOT dynamic-routing (plan-path selection after failure) — this skill assigns cognition tiers to work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Capture the "why" behind technical choices to prevent architectural drift. Load when the user makes a major technical decision, chooses a library/framework, defines a system boundary, or changes a core architectural pattern. Also triggers on "record a decision", "write an ADR", "why did we do this", "document this architectural choice", or "architectural decision record". Supports `SYNTHESIS=true` mode for retrospective ADR backfill from observed repo state — used by `retroactive-project-setup` and any future backfill skill. Essential for long-term project maintainability and agent alignment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Handles BED-format genomic intervals (BED3 through BED12, narrowPeak/broadPeak) and the coordinate-system substrate the whole interval category rests on, with bedtools (CLI) and pybedtools/pyranges/pandas (Python). Covers the 0-based half-open vs 1-based-closed convention boundary and the start-1/end-unchanged conversion, the silent failures (chrom-name mismatch, CRLF, lexicographic-vs-version sort under -sorted), genome/chrom.sizes generation, sorting contracts, BED12 block invariants, validation, makewindows, cross-assembly liftover (liftOver/CrossMap), and BED<->VCF/BAM/FASTA conversion. Use when reading, creating, validating, sorting, lifting between genome builds, or converting interval files, preparing inputs for bedtools/tabix/bigBed, or debugging an off-by-one or empty-overlap result.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quality control for flow, spectral, and mass cytometry - time-based anomaly cleaning (flowAI, flowCut, PeacoQC, flowClean), margin/boundary event removal, signal-drift detection, dead-cell exclusion, CyTOF Gaussian/DNA/event-length checks, instrument calibration/standardization (MESF, CS&T, peak-2), and batch-level outlier flagging. Use when assessing acquisition quality, choosing a cleaning tool, ordering QC relative to compensation, deciding margin removal before density-based steps, or flagging problematic samples before clustering or differential analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Defines cell populations in flow and spectral cytometry through manual gates (rectangle, polygon, quadrant, boolean) and reproducible automated gating (openCyto gating templates, flowDensity data-driven thresholds, flowClust model-based gates), organized as a hierarchical GatingSet (flowWorkspace) and round-tripped with FlowJo via CytoML. Covers the canonical gate order (time -> debris -> singlets -> live -> lineage), FMO-vs-isotype boundary setting, gate-order dependence and recompute semantics, rare-event/MRD gating, and per-population statistics. Use when building a gating strategy, automating a manual FlowJo scheme across samples, choosing manual vs data-driven gates, or extracting population frequencies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Handles batch effects in bulk RNA-seq via design-matrix inclusion (the correct path for DE), ComBat/ComBat-seq for visualization, SVA for unknown latent factors, RUVSeq for negative-control-gene-anchored unwanted variation, and limma::removeBatchEffect for plotting only. Encodes the Nygaard 2016 cardinal sin against testing on a batch-corrected matrix, the choice between SVA/RUVg/RUVs/RUVr, the confounding non-identifiability problem, the single-cell boundary (Harmony/MNN are NOT for bulk), and the Goh 2017 harmonization critique. Use when designing a DE analysis with batch structure, troubleshooting batch-dominated PCA, choosing ComBat vs ComBat-seq, handling unknown batch via SVA, integrating across studies, or deciding when (rarely) to subtract batch.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design error handling strategies for TypeScript and Python applications — exception hierarchies, Result/Either types, retry patterns, error boundaries, and structured error logging. Use when designing error handling architecture, choosing between exceptions and Result types, implementing retry logic, or building error recovery flows. Activate on "error handling", "exception hierarchy", "Result type", "retry pattern", "circuit breaker", "error boundary", "Pokemon exception". NOT for debugging specific runtime errors, logging infrastructure setup, or monitoring/alerting configuration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Classify every destructive/gated action an agent body can attempt (git, filesystem, network, shell, github) into block/approve/allow tiers, and audit whether the pre-tool and post-tool governance backing that classification is real: blocked actions proven zero-side-effect by a negative fixture, every denial backed by a receipt and a transcript event, every block-tier denial paired with a safe alternative, and no unmanaged or same-UID body ever marked "contained." Use when building or reviewing Agent Harbor's C5 governance gate (destructive git blocker, approval request/result, denial receipts), gating a new tool surface before it can run destructive commands, or auditing whether an existing "destructive-action blocked" claim actually has evidence behind it. NOT for proving an existing sandbox boundary actually contains an adversary once an action is isolated (use sandboxed-adversarial-test-harness), deciding where in a DAG to place a human review node or designing the approval UX itself (use human-gate-designer), or designing the general work-receipt schema across an entire agent task (use agent-work-receipt-designer).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Runtime enforcement of file system boundaries and tool access restrictions. Blocks unauthorized operations and logs violations. Activate on 'enforce scope', 'access control', 'boundary enforcement', 'tool restrictions', 'runtime security'. NOT for validation (use dag-permission-validator) or isolation management (use dag-isolation-manager).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has actually shrunk its ~19 legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools — work/act/ask/recall/status — each carrying one denial shape and one transcript event, migrated through a real retirement path (intake-metadata, alias, or doc-history — never a parallel runtime), with zero legacy-verb calls once a body reaches compliance mode C4+. Use when reviewing a broker-collapse migration plan, gating a body's move from advisory (C0-C3) to enforced (C4+) coordination, or verifying IT-018 Broker Collapse compliance. NOT for the inbound trigger→spawn boundary that decides whether an event may spawn an agent at all (use fleet-event-spawn-trust), the capability-token cryptographic mechanism behind a denial (use agentic-zero-trust-security), designing how a swarm of agents invokes and shards work (use swarm-invocation-designer), or auditing an individual PR's mergeability (use agent-pr-authoring).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create an Agent SKILL.md fallback for an existing find-XXXX finder that relies on a fragile discovery foundation — above all LLM_DECOMPILE (patterns C/D/E), which matches the decompiled shape of a predecessor function against a stored reference and breaks when a symbol is inlined or de-inlined in a way the reference does not cover. The generated fallback coexists with the preprocessor and runs only when it returns failure, recovering every target robustly by decompiling the predecessor and following the inline/de-inline boundary with semantic anchors. Use when a finder broke on a game update, or you want to durably backstop one before it does. The recipe generalizes to any finder foundation. Triggers: create agent skill fallback, add SKILL.md fallback, robust fallback for finder, backstop LLM_DECOMPILE finder, final guarantee skill

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds reusable Convex components with isolated tables and app-facing APIs. Use for new components, reusable backend modules, integrations, or component boundary work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes bounded context boundaries in DDD projects. Detects cross-context coupling, shared kernel violations, context mapping issues, and ubiquitous language inconsistencies. Generates context map diagrams and boundary recommendations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Define boundary conditions - fixed supports, displacements, symmetry. Use when user mentions fixed, pinned, clamped, supported, or constrained. Does NOT handle loads or forces.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Error handling patterns and best practices for OneKey. Use when implementing try/catch blocks, handling async errors, showing error messages, or managing error states in UI. Triggers on error, try, catch, exception, throw, fail, failure, error handling, error boundary, useAsyncCall, toast, fallback, error state.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[21] UNDERSTAND. Deep research workflow for this project using 150% scope (100% core + 50% boundary), evidence-based reasoning, and structured investigation notes. Use when the task requires investigation, root-cause analysis, or mapping unknown areas. Always maintain a research log file that captures findings, hypotheses, and next branches; use web.run when external verification is needed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Presents a risk framework for every configurable security control in NemoClaw. Use when evaluating security posture, reviewing sandbox security defaults, or assessing control trade-offs. Trigger keywords - nemoclaw security best practices, sandbox security controls risk framework, nemoclaw credential storage, credentials.json, api key security, openclaw security controls, nemoclaw security boundary, prompt injection, tool access control.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.