624건 · 관련도순
Extract and consolidate reusable components, design tokens, and patterns into your design system. Identifies opportunities for systematic reuse and enriches your component library. Use when the user asks to create components, refactor repeated UI patterns, build a design system, or extract tokens.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Configure and distribute creator fees to multiple shareholders using the PumpFees program with BPS-based share allocation, admin management, and cross-program fee consolidation for graduated tokens.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Runs twice in a PFD to P&ID job. Part 1, before gate G3, validates the discipline proposals for provenance, UNKNOWN handling, conflicts, prohibited content and cross-section consistency and returns results and blocking items. Part 2, before gate G5, assembles the review package, with job header, gate record, every register and proposal, consolidated UNKNOWN list, feedback log and closing statement. Use when the user asks to "validate the enrichment", "run validation before G3", "assemble the review package" or "build the G5 package". Do not use for the readiness map, use pid-tool-readiness-mapping instead; do not use to produce a missing discipline section, use the discipline skill that owns it. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
복잡한 if/then/else의 조건식과 각 분기를 의미 있는 메서드로 추출하여 가독성 향상. "조건문 분해", "if 가독성", "복잡한 조건식에 이름 붙여", "/decompose-conditional" 요청 시 사용. 단, 같은 결과를 내는 조건문들을 하나로 합치는 것은 /consolidate-conditional, 타입별 분기를 클래스로 바꾸는 것은 /replace-conditional-with-poly가 적합. /decompose-conditional [commit-ref]로 호출.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
여러 메서드·분기에 중복된 동일 조건문을 상위(호출자 또는 메서드 시작)로 끌어올려 중복 제거. "조건 위로 올려", "같은 if가 여러 메서드에", "lift up", "/lift-up-conditional" 요청 시 사용. 단, 한 메서드 안에서 동일 결과를 내는 조건문 통합은 /consolidate-conditional이 적합. /lift-up-conditional [commit-ref]로 호출.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Navigating Sparse Evidence: Agentic Visual RAG via Explicit Context Selection and Consolidation Soochow University ; Baidu Inc.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the FAA Human Factors Design Standard (HF-STD-001B, 2016) — the FAA's consolidated human-factors / human-systems-integration design criteria for systems it manages, operates, or maintains. Use for requirement-level design rules on: general human-factors design principles; automation and function allocation; designing equipment for maintenance; displays, controls, and visual indicators; alarms, audio, and voice communications; the computer-human interface (information presentation, coding, interaction styles, windows, dialogue); keyboards, input devices, and workstation/workplace ergonomics; system security, personnel safety, environment, anthropometry, and user documentation; plus intended-use and tailoring guidance. It is a quantified, source-attributed synthesis (heavily citing MIL-STD-1472G, MIL-HDBK-759C, DOD-HFDG-ATCCS, NUREG-0700, NASA-STD-3000, ANSI, OSHA, ISO 9241). Complements nasa-hsi as a parallel HSI tradition from the civil-aviation domain. Scope limits: it is design criteria, NOT an HSI lifecycle/process model (use nasa-hsi, nasa-npr-7123, or dau-se-guidebook for process); it does NOT reproduce the third-party standards it cites; it is FAA-acquisition-oriented (ATC, towers, TRACONs, airway facilities), not a general consumer-UX guide; and it is thin on modern touchscreen/mobile, web, and AI-driven interface patterns and on quantitative human-reliability analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Análisis de requisitos de documentos: Analiza los documentos de concepto y requisitos en la carpeta docs/, verifica los requisitos con el código actual y crea un informe de diferencias consolidado.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Procedimiento estructurado de 6 pasos para mejorar, renovar o reconstruir pipelines existentes, carpetas de proyectos individuales, estructuras de documentación o stacks de software. Direccionable como "pipeline optimizer" (para pipelines temáticos completos, p. ej. de software, investigación o desarrollo de videojuegos) o "project-folder optimizer" (para carpetas de proyectos individuales dentro de un pipeline, p. ej. una herramienta de software o proyecto de artículo académico). Se activa ante tareas como "mejorar pipeline X", "optimizar el stack", "reconstruir Y", "renovación", "refactorización de pipeline", "limpiar carpeta de proyecto", "mejorar estructura de carpetas", "unificar convenciones", "consolidación de documentación", "integrar en sistema existente" o cualquier intervención sustancial en estructuras establecidas. Proporciona análisis del estado actual, aclaración del propósito, boceto del estado ideal, plan de brechas, identificación empírica de puntos de dolor y reevaluación con subagentes limpios. Previene estándares paralelos, duplicación y rupturas en el pipeline.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Manages your own skill landscape: surveys and compares existing skills (Audit mode), researches the web for new skills/plugins (Explore mode), and is at the same time the installer that generates lean subskills (Skill-Finder, family umbrella, maintenance skills) instead of loading a monolith. Use this skill for "compare/audit skills", "which skills are duplicated", "form skill families", "clean up/consolidate skills", "maintain the skill register", "find skills/plugins for topic X", "install new skills", "browse the skill marketplace", or for `/skill-explorer`. Delivers a sub-report per family and a globally numbered decision list; installs/uninstalls only after a security check and explicit approval.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Document requirements analysis: Analyzes concept and requirements documents in the docs/ folder, checks requirements against current code, and creates a consolidated difference report.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structured 6-step procedure for improving, renovating, or rebuilding existing pipelines, individual project folders, documentation structures, or software stacks. Addressable as "pipeline optimizer" (for whole topic pipelines, e.g. a software, research, or game-dev pipeline) or "project-folder optimizer" (for individual project folders within a pipeline, e.g. a single software tool or paper project). Triggers on tasks like "improve pipeline X", "optimize the stack", "rebuild Y", "renovation", "pipeline refactoring", "clean up project folder", "improve folder structure", "unify conventions", "documentation consolidation", "integrate into existing system", or any substantial intervention in established structures. Delivers building-stock analysis, purpose clarification, ideal sketch, gap plan, empirical pain-point identification, and retests with fresh subagents. Prevents parallel standards, duplication, and pipeline breaks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Daily read-only triage of all open cvoya-com/spring-voyage issues: grouping/dedup/consolidation, milestone moves, attention/design/executable split, and prioritized parallel execution waves.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "run my launch day", "build a launch day runbook / war room", or "decide CONTINUE or ROLLBACK after the push"; produces a pre-conditions gate check (launch-readiness-auditor SHIP verdict + the authoritative date in launch-registry — missing either stops the skill), a dated hour-blocked runbook with owners (morning irreversible pushes, daytime monitoring loop, evening consolidation), a forced observation-window verdict after every irreversible action against pre-declared kill criteria, a P0-P3 incident ladder with rollback playbooks, and T-0 status lines for the registry proposal protocol. Not for channel submission content and platform rules — use community-launch-runner; not for media replies — use press-media-relations. 发布日runbook/作战室/观察窗/回滚裁决/发布日指挥
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its quality, maintainability, and performance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guide for organizing MSBuild infrastructure with Directory.Build.props, Directory.Build.targets, Directory.Packages.props, and Directory.Build.rsp. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: structuring multi-project repos, centralizing build settings, implementing NuGet Central Package Management (CPM) with ManagePackageVersionsCentrally, consolidating duplicated properties across .csproj files, setting up multi-level Directory.Build hierarchy with GetPathOfFileAbove, understanding evaluation order (Directory.Build.props → SDK .props → .csproj → SDK .targets → Directory.Build.targets). Critical pitfall: $(TargetFramework) conditions in .props silently fail for single-targeting projects — must use .targets. DO NOT USE FOR: non-MSBuild build systems, migrating legacy projects to SDK-style (use msbuild-modernization), single-project solutions with no shared settings. INVOKES: no tools — pure knowledge skill.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guide for modernizing and migrating MSBuild project files to SDK-style format. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: converting legacy .csproj/.vbproj with verbose XML to SDK-style, migrating packages.config to PackageReference, removing Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs in favor of auto-generation, eliminating explicit <Compile Include> lists via implicit globbing, consolidating shared settings into Directory.Build.props. Indicators of legacy projects: ToolsVersion attribute, <Import Project="$(MSBuildToolsPath)">, .csproj files > 50 lines for simple projects. DO NOT USE FOR: projects already in SDK-style format, non-.NET build systems (npm, Maven, CMake), .NET Framework projects that cannot move to SDK-style. INVOKES: dotnet try-convert, upgrade-assistant tools.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Test smart contracts comprehensively using Hardhat and Foundry with unit tests, integration tests, and mainnet forking. Use when testing Solidity contracts, setting up blockchain test suites, or validating DeFi protocols.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its...
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its...
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Execute production-readiness gates with applicability control, consolidate validation report, and issue final readiness verdict
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply Gang of Four design patterns to solve architectural problems in TypeScript. Use when refactoring code architecture, implementing extensible systems, decoupling components, or following SOLID principles. Covers all 22 GoF patterns: Creational (Factory Method, Abstract Factory, Builder, Prototype, Singleton), Structural (Adapter, Bridge, Composite, Decorator, Facade, Flyweight, Proxy), and Behavioral (Chain of Responsibility, Command, Iterator, Mediator, Memento, Observer, State, Strategy, Template Method, Visitor).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Manage SVG icons as framework components using Denji CLI. Use when the user needs to add, remove, list, export, import, or manage SVG icons in React, Preact, Solid, Qwik, Vue, or Svelte projects. Triggers include requests to "add an icon", "set up icons", "manage SVG icons", "remove an icon", "list icons", "export icons", "import icons", "dry-run icon add", or any task involving Iconify icons as framework components.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.