'outcome' 검색 결과

"Apply Giddens' structuration theory to analyze the duality of structure — how social structures are both the medium and outcome of the practices they organize. Use this skill when the user needs to bridge agency and structure in organizational or social analysis, explain how routines reproduce or transform institutional patterns, analyze the recursive relationship between action and structure, or when they ask 'do people shape institutions or do institutions shape people', 'how are these routines maintained', or 'where does change come from if structures constrain action'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

"Apply Difference-in-Differences (DID) to estimate causal treatment effects by comparing changes in outcomes between treatment and control groups. Use this skill when the user evaluates policy interventions, natural experiments, or regulatory changes, needs to test parallel trends, or when they ask 'did this policy work', 'how do I identify causal effects without randomization', or 'what is the treatment effect'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

"Apply Granovetter's embeddedness theory to analyze how economic behavior is embedded in ongoing social relations, avoiding both over-socialized and under-socialized accounts. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why market transactions deviate from pure economic rationality, analyze how trust and social ties shape business dealings, evaluate structural vs relational embeddedness in inter-firm networks, or when they ask 'why do firms prefer existing partners over cheaper alternatives', 'how do social relationships shape economic outcomes', or 'is this market truly arms-length'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

"Apply public choice theory to analyze political decision-making as rational self-interested behavior. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate government policy failures, rent-seeking costs, voting outcomes, or bureaucratic incentives, especially when the assumption of benevolent government is questionable.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

"Analyze market structures across perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly to predict firm behavior and market outcomes. Use this skill when the user needs to classify a market's competitive structure, predict pricing behavior, evaluate antitrust implications, or understand why an industry behaves the way it does — even if they say 'why can they charge so much', 'is this market competitive', or 'will prices come down'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

"Apply Complex Adaptive Systems theory to analyze phenomena exhibiting emergence, self-organization, co-evolution, and edge-of-chaos dynamics. Use this skill when the user needs to understand why a system behaves unpredictably despite known components, model agent-based interactions that produce emergent outcomes, analyze fitness landscapes, or when they ask 'why does this system behave in ways no one designed', 'how do local interactions create global patterns', or 'why do small changes sometimes cause massive system shifts'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

"Implement Elo rating system to rank items or players from pairwise comparison outcomes. Use this skill when the user needs to rank items from head-to-head matchups, build a competitive rating system, or evaluate relative quality from comparison data — even if they say 'player rating', 'ranking from comparisons', or 'competitive scoring system'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audits whether a machine-readable regelrecht law model is faithful to the LETTER of the wettekst — and strictly separates the wettekst (leading) from the toelichting (Nota/Memorie van Toelichting; explanatory, not a norm). Runs in critical passes per article/lid and detects four deviation classes: toelichting-bleed (a modeled criterion that the letter only states as an open norm, or not at all), missing verbatim elements (a word/condition such as a "tenzij" or a qualifier dropped from the model), wrong legal_basis anchoring (an endpoint hung on a "kapstok"-article while the operative norm lives elsewhere), and verbatim-drift in text: (an ingetrokken/older redaction). Also detects positief-lid vs uitsluitings-lid conflicts and checks the chapeau for an explicit derogation rule ("zo nodig in afwijking van het eerste lid") before judging precedence. Classifies every finding as modelfout (fix), wettekst-gevolg (report, do not fix), or letter-vs-toelichting-question (jurist decides what is leading + revision signal). Use when the user wants to know if a model is "dicht bij de letter", mentions letter vs toelichting/bedoeling, fidelity, "natuurgetrouw", or before trusting feature outcomes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Write and cascade OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) for company, department, team, or project level. Ensure objectives are inspiring and key results are measurable outcomes. Includes weekly check-in template. Use at the start of each quarter or when aligning strategy to execution. Do not use for KPI performance reviews or daily task tracking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Translate strategy into a balanced scorecard, strategy map, OKR bridge, and executive initiative portfolio with clear measures, targets, and owners. Use when leadership needs strategic alignment, portfolio prioritization, or a management dashboard tied to outcomes. Do not use for ad-hoc brainstorming with no strategic horizon.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prepare customer or executive business reviews with outcome tracking, adoption health, ROI narrative, risks, commitments, and next-quarter plan using customer success and CX frameworks. Use when teams need QBRs, success plans, churn-risk conversations, or executive account reviews. Do not use for generic slide beautification or cold outreach prospecting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Procedure for controlled, human-gated outbound README badge provisioning PRs (Issue #1817). Preflights upstream repositories, ensures single-badge placement with deep links, and records campaign outcomes without automated retries or multi-badge noise.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Append a session/state snapshot to MEMORY.md (regardless of where it lives — for this repo it's `founder/MEMORY.md`). Use when the user says "snapshot memory", "save state to memory", "/memory-snapshot", "log what happened in MEMORY", or otherwise asks to record the current session's outcomes for the next orchestrator. Locates the project's MEMORY.md, prepends a dated entry above the previous snapshot (newest first), preserves every existing entry (NEVER overwrites or truncates), and reports back the file path + byte delta. Not for one-off feedback memories (use the user-level memory system at ~/.claude/.../memory/ for those). Not for trimming or deleting old entries.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Firecrawl gives AI agents and apps fast, reliable web context with strong search, scraping, and interaction tools. One install command sets up three skill segments: live CLI tools, app-integration build skills, and outcome-focused workflow skills. Route the reader to the right usage path after install.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Frames a structured, testable threat-hunting hypothesis: grounding it in adversary behavior and available telemetry, defining the data sources and detection logic, and setting success criteria and outcomes. Activates for requests to start a threat hunt, write a hunt hypothesis, or plan a hypothesis-driven hunt.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn a moment of friction — a conflicting PR, a wedged runner, a mysterious red check, a repeated manual chore — into a durable, actionable report. Sizes up the scenario, captures the evidence, separates one-off from SYSTEMIC, proposes a fix, and routes it (fix now, or hand off). Reports are LIVING documents that the fixing agent updates with the outcome. Invoke whenever something feels like it shouldn't have been this hard, or when the same annoyance shows up twice.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of an English Language and Literature Professor — backward-designing a first-year composition or literature syllabus against a shared outcomes rubric, deciding whether an AI-detection or plagiarism flag on a student essay warrants an integrity case, reading where a tenure case's monograph actually sits in a university press's pipeline, or handling a content complaint about an assigned literary text.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Engineering Teacher, Postsecondary — diagnosing a spike in a gatekeeper course's D/F/W rate, running a capstone design course with an industry sponsor, closing the loop on an ABET student-outcome assessment, or building a tenure/promotion teaching-effectiveness case beyond raw student evaluation scores.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Postsecondary Computer Science Professor — diagnosing why a course's DFW (D/F/withdraw) rate spiked, redesigning an intro programming course's assessment structure, staffing TAs and grading load for a large course, deciding what to prioritize pre-tenure, running an academic-integrity (MOSS similarity) investigation, or mapping a curriculum change against ABET student outcomes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run and document QA test execution cycles - smoke tests, regression suites, exploratory testing sessions, and release readiness checklists. Use this skill whenever a QA engineer needs to structure or report on active testing work. Trigger on phrases like "run smoke tests", "start a regression cycle", "exploratory testing session", "test this build", "release checklist", "is this build stable", "log test results", "what passed and what failed", "document my testing", "create a test run report", or any request to execute and record test outcomes. Also trigger when someone says "we need to test before release" or "can you help me track what I've tested".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build QA quality dashboards, calculate defect metrics, analyze escape rates, and produce quality trend reports. Use this skill whenever a QA lead or manager needs to measure and communicate quality outcomes. Trigger on phrases like "quality metrics", "defect density", "escape rate", "bug trends", "quality dashboard", "sprint quality report", "test coverage metrics", "QA KPIs", "how is quality trending", "defect leakage", "production bugs this quarter", "mean time to detect", "quality scorecard", or any request to quantify, visualize, or report on the quality of a product or testing process. Also trigger when a manager asks "how is QA performing?" or an engineering lead asks "what does our defect data tell us?".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Produce a flow-level summary of the current Claude Code session — executive summary, chronological timeline, and outcomes — written into the active feature directory next to spec.md / plan.md.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run work as an explicit event-driven state machine executed by subagents. The orchestrator is the runtime from the canonical loop — `state, effects = init(machine); execute(effects); while state is active: event = nextEvent(); state, effects = transition(machine, state, event); execute(effects); return state.output`. All routing judgment is authored ONCE, at plan time, into a machine file (states, event alphabet, transition table, budgets, final states); at runtime the orchestrator does pure table lookups and dispatches effects — it never decides, never authors, never ingests artifacts. Subagent/sync protocol is the timeboxed-iterating one: role prompts scaffolded once to disk and dispatched BY PATH, an initialiser preamble every subagent reads first, a self-populating cheatsheet, per-unit files, tiny structured returns, independent measurement gate. Use when the user says "workmachine", "run this as a state machine", "state-machine this", or when a goal has a small number of clearly named phases with explicit outcomes (built / passed / failed / blocked) and you want the routing to be auditable rather than judged on the fly. For clock-driven loops use timeboxed-iterating; for wide graphs with judged edge criteria use workgraph.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a rehabilitation recovery tracking system -- evaluate standardized outcome instruments (FIM, Barthel Index, SF-36, DASH, LEFS, PROMIS), functional assessment scoring accuracy, SMART goal and milestone tracking, regression detection with alert workflows, pain scale calibration (NRS.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.