'alignment' 검색 결과

Design engineering principles for making interfaces feel polished. Use when building UI components, reviewing frontend code, implementing animations, hover states, shadows, borders, typography, icons, micro-interactions, enter/exit animations, or any visual detail work. Supports quick and full review modes. Triggers on UI polish, design details, "make it feel better", "feels off", stagger animations, border radius, optical alignment, font smoothing, tabular numbers, image outlines, box shadows, icons, icon stroke weight, icon states, motion restraint.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build editorial/magazine/report webpages on a GENUINE Müller-Brockmann modular grid (International Typographic Style). Encodes the discipline (columns + modules + baseline, grotesque type, flush-left, restrained black/white/red palette) AND the front-end engineering to make the grid real, visible, and verified: one CSS-variable source of truth, an interactive grid-toggle overlay, subgrid bands, 8px baseline lock, and runtime optical alignment. Triggers: "magazine spread", "grid system", "Swiss design", "editorial layout", "show the grid", "align everything to the grid".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Goal-directed review of git history for change coherence. Trigger when: - Analyzing project history, reviewing diffs, or checking commit messages for alignment. - Prompt contains: /git-review, git history, commit log, change coherence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Writing quality guidelines, formatting conventions, and styling constraints for documentation. Trigger when: - Writing, editing, or auditing documentation files, READMEs, markdown files, or guides. - Modifying files with suffixes like: *.md, *.qmd, *.txt, *.rst. - Prompt contains keywords: doc, documentation, spelling, grammar, headers, links, table alignment, Divio, tone, voice, clarity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnose and fix MARP slide layout issues including whitespace problems, box alignment, bullet formatting, and CSS rendering inconsistencies. Use when MARP slides have visual layout problems or need CSS optimization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Professional project management skill aligned with PMBOK® 6th/7th Edition standards. Use this skill when you need to define requirements (ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148), review project plans, generate progress reports with Earned Value Management (EVM), conduct risk analysis, estimate costs, or provide project health assessments. Ideal for creating comprehensive project documentation, analyzing project performance metrics (SPI, CPI, EAC), managing risks across 14 categories, and ensuring stakeholder alignment. Triggers: "create project plan", "analyze project health", "calculate EVM", "risk assessment", "requirements definition", "progress report", "cost estimation", or requests involving PMBOK knowledge areas.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Strategy map analysis using the Eterdis two-directional causal chain. Use this skill to diagnose whether strategy is coherent by building two chains — bottom-up from resources to results, top-down from expectations to requirements — and finding where they don't connect. Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about strategic alignment, why the strategy isn't working, what to invest in, how the business creates value, whether the plan is realistic, or where the biggest gap is. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Culture assessment and monitoring with three modes — Diagnostic for a deep session surfacing the gap between declared culture and actual culture, Review for periodic check-ins on whether behavior is shifting, and Alert Triggers for setting tripwires around culture-strategy misalignment, regression, and integration risk. Not a culture change programme — a mirror. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about culture, values, team dynamics, how decisions really get made, why change efforts stall, merger integration, or whether the organisation can actually execute its strategy. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluate plan.md design decisions for dominant-axis misalignment using the Decision Quality framework. Detects when a plan optimizes for the wrong evaluation axis given the nature of the change. Use during plan review alongside logic-validator and scope-justification-reviewer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Re-evaluate auto-review findings against the original order's intent. Filters out findings that bend the intent to reduce scope. Use after Document Workflow auto-review completes (step 5→6), or when review feedback feels like it's distorting the original goal.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review product designs before engineering handoff or release for flow and state coverage, business-rule alignment, implementation clarity, accessibility, responsiveness, analytics, and testability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Align stable paths, APIs, CLI commands, schemas, events, IDs, storage keys, and UI/programmatic parity with the surface registries.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use for a focused high-craft polish pass after structure and art direction are stable; improves typography metrics, spacing rhythm, imagery crop, surfaces, optical alignment, micro-interactions, and restrained detail without redesigning the whole page.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run protected AAS maintainer sweeps, PR merge batches, resumable review, immutable distribution, Core checks, and scripted releases. Use for repository maintenance, main alignment, CLI/MCP/Workbench c

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "QA my conversion tracking before launch", "check my UTMs / pixel / event firing", "set up a tracking pre-flight", or "set the dedup rule so Meta and Google stop double-counting"; builds and fixes the measurement plumbing — conversion-event firing, UTM hygiene, cross-platform dedup rules, attribution-window alignment, and offline/iOS-ATT modeled-gap flags — as a pre-flight checklist plus a UTM/event-spec builder. Not for scoring R1/R2 — that is a scored veto in ad-account-auditor; not for account structure — use campaign-architect. 付费广告转化追踪QA/UTM规范/跨平台去重

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Account-based marketing for B2B SaaS. Use this skill to build a target account list, tier it 1:1 / 1:few / 1:many, size it against sales capacity, turn intent and engagement signals into plays, write the multi-channel orchestration contract each tier runs on, and measure the program in account coverage, penetration and pipeline instead of MQLs. Also triggers on: ABM, account-based marketing, target account list, TAL, named accounts, account tiering, 1:1 ABM, one-to-few, programmatic ABM, account selection, ideal customer profile fit, intent data, buying signals, 6sense, Bombora, Demandbase, account penetration, account coverage, sales and marketing alignment on accounts, enterprise account program.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

リファクタリングを「更新されたチームの理解と、コードが表現する過去の理解の差分同期」と捉え、今回得た新知識（要求・ドメイン知識・制約）が naming と responsibility へ反映されているか、boundary が現在の understanding を表現しているか、diff の削除行やコメントに現れる過去の design history と constraint を失っていないかを diff-time で確認する。Knowledge Delta の signal は diff（追加/削除された hunk・コメント・ADR 参照）を一次情報とし、PR 本文が供給されるときは補助に用い、不確実なら question に留める。ドメイン用語の一貫性は ubiquitous-language-naming、集約/コンテキスト境界の設計判断は bounded-context-language、投機的抽象化・caller special-case は altitude-generalization、スコープ逸脱/前提破壊は fix-scope-integrity、振る舞い変更と構造変更の分離は behavior-structure-separation、完了主張の反証は refactor-claim-audit へ委譲する

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reads Copilot conversation history and extracts executive-ready success stories. Use when the user asks to study prior Copilot sessions, summarize what was done before, mine evidence, or quantify time, cost, risk, and priority alignment from GitHub Copilot history in any workspace or repository.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Fit and independently validate rigid scan alignment from named, source traceable correspondences.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.