536건 · 관련도순
Review intellectual property terms in contracts to identify gaps in rights transfers, unclear ownership, licensing limits, and warranty or indemnity issues. Receive a risk-ranked memo with suggested edits and inconsistencies across clauses.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Add capabilities to an existing Convex app by consulting an online catalog for matching procedures. If no procedure is available, it falls back to hosting setup or a component search, then installs and connects the selected component.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provides shared reference material for mathematical modeling competitions, covering writing conventions, problem-specific pitfalls, and chart guidelines. Other skills consult relevant sections during their work; this resource does not run independently.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Cross-model second opinion from Google Gemini — a different AI reviewing the same changes, with deep Google ecosystem knowledge. Three modes: review (pass/fail gate for Google Ads campaigns, SEO metadata, or code), challenge (adversarial stress-test that tries to break your changes), and consult (open Q&A with Gemini on Google Ads strategy, SEO best practices, or implementation questions). Use when the user says "gemini review", "ask gemini", "gemini challenge", "second opinion from gemini", "consult gemini", "stress test with gemini", "what would gemini say", "cross-model review", or "get another opinion". Voice aliases: "gem", "gemini check". Especially useful for Google Ads changes, SEO metadata updates, campaign structure decisions, keyword strategies, and bid/budget changes — Gemini has native Google ecosystem knowledge that complements Claude's analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate comprehensive market research reports and industry/competitive analysis in the style of top consulting firms. Use for market sizing, competitive landscape, market entry, investment thesis, strategic recommendations, and consulting-style business reports. Do not use for scientific reports, paper writing, LaTeX submission/PDF builds, EDGAR/FRED/Treasury/Data Commons data retrieval, or biomedical literature evidence work.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Für Consulting AGB: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run a consulting client discovery session — uncover the real problem, scope, and decision process. Use when asked to prepare for a client discovery call, qualify a consulting lead, scope an engagement, or run a kickoff. Produces a discovery plan — the questions that surface the real problem (not the stated one), budget/authority/timeline qualifiers, success criteria, red flags, and a follow-up that leads to a proposal.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
경영 회의와 제안용 슬라이드를 설계 규칙과 62종 HTML 구성 요소로 만듭니다. 배치를 검사해 HTML과 PDF로 제공하며, 요청하면 기존 자료의 서식에 맞춘 PPTX도 만듭니다.
スライド設計規約 slide-rules.md を核に、経営会議品質のスライドを作るスキル。作成前に規約を読み、HTMLパーツ集（基本27＋追加35の62型）から該当パーツをコピーして組み、規約の範囲で型に囚われず調整し、check_deck.py の機械チェック FAIL 0 で仕上げる。型カタログはレイアウトの発想帳であり、合わせる対象ではない。既存の PowerPoint 資料を渡され、そこへ差し込むページを PPTX で求められたときだけ、その資料のマスターの上に直接組む（slide-rules §8.7）。トリガー例:「コンサル品質のスライドを作って」「規約に沿ったデッキで」「型カタログから選んで」「この pptx に足すページを同じ書式で」。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
FDA regulatory consultant for medical device companies, covering 510(k)/PMA/De Novo pathways, QSR (21 CFR 820), HIPAA, and device cybersecurity. Use for FDA submissions, predicate and substantial-equivalence analysis, and premarket strategy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Cross-tool AI consultation — get second opinions from Gemini CLI, Codex CLI, Claude Code, OpenCode, or Copilot CLI
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build a personal brand strategy for founders, executives, creators, and consultants. Use when the user says "personal brand", "personal branding", "build my brand", "founder brand", "executive brand", "thought leadership", "I want to be known for", "grow my personal brand", "LinkedIn presence", "creator brand", "consultant brand", "personal brand strategy", "position myself", "what should I be known for", or wants to establish credibility, grow an audience, or become a recognized voice in their industry.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-LLM collaborative brainstorming and planning. Use when user explicitly requests consultation with multiple AI models (ChatGPT, Gemini, other LLMs) before presenting an implementation plan, or asks to "consult the council", "ask other models", or "get perspectives from other AIs". Queries external LLM APIs, synthesizes their perspectives, and presents an adapted implementation plan.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Choose optimal external AI models for code analysis, bug investigation, and architectural decisions. Use when consulting multiple LLMs via claudish, comparing model perspectives, or investigating complex Go/LSP/transpiler issues. Provides empirically validated model rankings (91/100 for MiniMax M2, 83/100 for Grok Code Fast) and proven consultation strategies based on real-world testing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when stuck in circular debugging, when solutions aren't working despite multiple attempts, or when the user expresses frustration with lack of progress. Bring in GPT-5 as a third-party consultant to provide fresh perspective on complex technical problems, architectural decisions, or multi-system debugging issues. Ideal when you've tried multiple approaches without success, when the problem involves obscure edge cases or novel challenges, or when a second expert opinion would help break through an impasse. Gather all context from the conversation so far and present it comprehensively to GPT-5.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Builds and edits PowerPoint decks bound to a company's own .pptx or .potx template, with a consulting-grade storyline and a rendered visual QA pass. Maps the template's masters, layouts, placeholders, theme colors and fonts; drafts a storyboard of action titles (pyramid principle, SCR) for approval; fills the template's own placeholders instead of drawing text boxes; adds native charts in theme colors, tables sized to placeholders, speaker notes and source lines; then renders every slide to PNG and checks text overflow, off-slide and overlapping shapes, off-theme fonts and colors, empty placeholders and weak titles. Use whenever the user says use our template, company deck, brand or corporate template, make slides, build a deck, pptx, potx, consulting-style deck, board or client presentation, action titles, or fix my deck formatting, and whenever an existing deck must be edited without breaking its masters. Complements the generic pptx skill.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generates full consulting proposals from a brief. Input client name, problem description, and rough scope. Outputs proposal.md with executive summary, problem statement, proposed approach, timeline, team, pricing tiers, and terms. Researches client company for personalization. Multiple pricing models. Professional formatting matching consulting standards.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
UX and visual design consultant for iOS apps using Apple's Liquid Glass design system (iOS 26+). Use when asking about element positioning, layout decisions, visual hierarchy, or whether a design choice is "Apple-approved." Provides design rationale and guidance—not code. Helps create Apple Design Award-worthy apps.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structures risk mitigation planning and residual risk tracking for Data Protection Impact Assessments under GDPR Article 35(7)(d). Covers mitigation measure identification, implementation tracking, residual risk acceptance, and Art. 36 prior consultation triggers. Keywords: DPIA mitigation, risk treatment, residual risk, Art. 35(7)(d), safeguards, mitigation tracking, prior consultation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Arquitecto de Soluciones Principal y Consultor Tecnológico de Andru.ia. Diagnostica y traza la hoja de ruta óptima para proyectos de IA en español.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Consulting-grade research reports: framework + final report.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Consult external AIs (Gemini 2.5 Pro, OpenAI Codex, Claude) for second opinions. Use for debugging failures, architectural decisions, security validation, or need fresh perspective with synthesis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Hamel Husain (@HamelHusain) 视角. 服务咨询派 + practitioner-as-figure 代表, 「evals are the new code」论断的提出者. ex-Airbnb / GitHub principal eng → 2017 起做 independent ML/AI consultant (parlance-labs) → 2023+ 转向 AI evals 专精. hamel.dev 长文 corpus (40+ 篇 1500+ words technical) + Maven「AI Evals for Engineers」课程 (3000+ paid 学员, 与 Shreya Shankar 共同主理). 在 monetize-agents 行业里代表「不规模化 / 不 productize 成 SaaS / 不融资」的第三条路 — independent consultant + course creator. 用途: 当用户面临「AI agent 上线不可靠 / 客户卡在 prompt 调不动 / 该不该雇团队 / 该不该做 SaaS / 怎样把 expertise productize 成课程而非公司」类问题时, 切换到这副镜片.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
B2B 大客户销售 (B2B 大客户销售 / 企业级复杂销售 (Enterprise B2B Sales / Complex Selling) — 面向企业客户的高价值、长周期、多干系人复杂销售的职业认知操作系统，从业者(AE/客户经理/SE 售前/销售负责人 VP Sales/CRO)、想入行者、以及服务这行(销售咨询/enablement/RevOps)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 三大方法论流派之争: **买方主导的诊断式提问 (consultative/discovery-led: SPIN 提问 → 痛点 → 方案, 「像医生先诊断再开方」) ⇄ 卖方主导的教学式挑战 (Challenger: Teach-Tailor-Take control, 用商业洞见 reframe 客户认知, 「像老师挑战客户的既有想法」) ⇄ 资格审查纪律 (MEDDIC/MEDDPICC: 先严格 qualify/disqualify, 「no deal 好过 bad deal」)**; 三派不是非此即彼, 资深人混用, 但底层世界观分歧真实(问 vs 教 vs 筛); 更深层张力 — 「过程/方法论纪律 (process rigor: 预测准确、deal inspection、qualify) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship: champion 培养、高管关系、人情)」, 「卖结果/业务价值 (business outcome/ROI、卖给经济决策人) ⇄ 卖产品/功能 (feature selling)」, 「多线程触达买方委员会 (multithreading buying committee) ⇄ 单一 champion 依赖」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — MEDDIC/MEDDPICC (Metrics 量化指标/Economic buyer 经济决策人/Decision Criteria 决策标准/Decision Process 决策流程/Identify Pain 痛点/Champion 内部拥护者 + Paper process 签约流程/Competition 竞争), SPIN (Situation/Problem/Implication/Need-payoff 提问序列), Challenger (商业洞见 commercial insight + reframe + 建设性张力 constructive tension + Mobilizer 调动者), Solution Selling (痛点链 pain chain/愿景创建/buying vision), Sandler (前置合约 up-front contract/痛苦漏斗 pain funnel/潜艇七步), Command of the Message (Force Management: 业务价值框架/before-after/decision criteria), Gap Selling (Keenan: 现状 current state → 期望 future state → 差距 the gap/问题中心), Miller Heiman Strategic Selling (蓝表 blue sheet/buying influences: 经济/用户/技术买家 + coach), Value Selling, BANT (老式资格框架, 多被 MEDDIC 取代); (c) 行业结构与角色 — SDR/BDR (开发/约见) → AE/客户经理 (成交) → SE/售前/Solutions Engineer (技术验证/POC/demo) → CSM (客户成功/续约扩张) → Sales Manager/VP Sales/CRO; RevOps (收入运营), Sales Enablement (赋能); land and expand (先落地再扩张)、量化指标 quota/OTE(目标总收入)/配额达成率/pipeline coverage(管道覆盖率 ~3x 业内经验法则)/win rate(赢率)/sales velocity(销售速度)/ramp time(爬坡期)/ACV·ARR·NRR(年合同额/年经常性收入/净收入留存); (d) 销售周期 (the deal/opportunity lifecycle) — prospecting 开发 → discovery 需求挖掘 → qualification 资格审查(MEDDIC) → demo/technical validation/POC 技术验证 → business case/value 业务价值与 ROI → proposal 提案 → negotiation 谈判(procurement 采购/法务/security review) → close 成交 → onboarding/expansion 交付与扩张; 干系人: champion 拥护者 vs coach 线人 vs economic buyer 经济决策人 vs blocker 阻碍者; mutual action plan/close plan(双向行动计划/成交计划); (e) 产出物与节奏 — discovery call(需求电话)、demo、business case、proposal/SOW、MAP(mutual action plan)、forecast(预测: commit/best case/pipeline 类别)、pipeline review/deal review/QBR(季度业务回顾)/account plan(客户计划); (f) 职业/招聘/薪酬 — quota/OTE/comp plan(底薪+提成)/accelerator(加速器)/SPIFF/clawback、ramp、President's Club(顶尖销售俱乐部)、SDR→AE→管理 晋升路径、rep turnover(销售流失率高); (g) 争议/批判 — Challenger 是否过誉(CEB 原始数据被质疑、insight selling 批评)、MEDDIC 沦为填表剧场(box-checking theater, 填字段不真 qualify)、活动指标 vs 质量(spray-and-pray 群发/冷电话存废之争)、AI SDR/自动化淹没收件箱(2024-2025 AI BDR 泡沫 + 邮件送达率崩溃 backlash)、SDR 军团模式是否将死(Winning by Design/signal-based GTM 取代)、配额虚高与销售 burnout、季末打折促单、销售方法论的「宗教化」与培训-认证产业链、最大竞争对手其实是「no decision/维持现状」而非对手; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 提问诊断派(Rackham SPIN/Bosworth&Eades Solution Selling/Keenan Gap Selling) vs 挑战教学派(Dixon&Adamson Challenger/Force Management Command of the Message) vs 资格纪律派(MEDDIC: Napoli&Dunkel 起源/John McMahon/MEDDICC Andy Whyte) vs 关系战略派(Miller Heiman Strategic/Large Account) vs SaaS 现代收入架构派(Aaron Ross Predictable Revenue/Mark Roberge Sales Acceleration Formula/Jacco van der Kooij Winning by Design bowtie/David Skok 指标) vs 开发-心态派(Jeb Blount Fanatical Prospecting/Sales EQ、Anthony Iannarino、Josh Braun) vs 谈判(Chris Voss Never Split the Difference 战术同理心)。不含: B2C/零售/电商导购销售、纯电话客服/客户支持、纯渠道/分销管理(channel 虽相关但聚焦直销复杂销售)、纯 marketing/需求生成(demand gen 虽上游但本 skill 聚焦销售执行)、纯 CSM 客户成功(虽相关但聚焦 new logo + expansion 的销售动作)。) Master OS — automated mastery of B2B 大客户销售 / 企业级复杂销售 (Enterprise B2B Sales / Complex Selling) — 面向企业客户的高价值、长周期、多干系人复杂销售的职业认知操作系统，从业者(AE/客户经理/SE 售前/销售负责人 VP Sales/CRO)、想入行者、以及服务这行(销售咨询/enablement/RevOps)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 三大方法论流派之争: **买方主导的诊断式提问 (consultative/discovery-led: SPIN 提问 → 痛点 → 方案, 「像医生先诊断再开方」) ⇄ 卖方主导的教学式挑战 (Challenger: Teach-Tailor-Take control, 用商业洞见 reframe 客户认知, 「像老师挑战客户的既有想法」) ⇄
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.