87건 · 관련도순
Extract and score leads from GitHub repositories by analyzing stars, forks, issues, PRs, comments, and contributions. Produces unified multi-repo CSV with deduplicated user profiles. No paid API credits required.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-agent board meeting protocol running a structured 6-phase deliberation with isolated C-suite contributions to prevent groupthink. Use when making major strategic decisions or resolving cross-functional disagreements.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Help the user turn their Retentioneering ideas, friction reports, bug findings, or feature needs into high-quality upstream contributions: from capturing and validating the idea, through minimal reproductions and issue drafts, to preparing, testing, and submitting a pull request that follows this repository's conventions. Use when the user says they found a bug, wants a feature, wrote a workaround worth upstreaming, or asks how to contribute, open an issue, or make a PR to retentioneering-tools.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Read, decompose, and analyze IEEE-style papers using routed technical-reading workflows. Use when extracting problem setting, object-method-condition logic, contributions, method pipeline, equations, datasets, baselines, metrics, ablations, limitations, replication details, citation role, related-work positioning, implementation notes, or reviewer-style assessment from a paper, PDF, abstract, or manuscript excerpt.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
smina molecular docking CLI. AutoDock Vina fork with customizable scoring functions, native SDF/MOL2/PDB ligand input, autoboxing, local energy minimization, and per-atom score breakdowns. Pipeline: receptor PDBQT prep -> ligand prep (RDKit/OpenBabel) -> dock via autobox or explicit grid -> rescore/minimize with custom scoring -> rank poses by affinity. Choose smina over Vina when you need custom scoring terms (--custom_scoring), local optimization of an existing pose (--local_only), per-atom contributions (--atom_term_data), or SDF/MOL2 ligands without manual PDBQT conversion. For unknown binding sites use diffdock; for the Python-bindings/Vinardo workflow use autodock-vina-docking.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn vague or partially formed AI, computer-science, data-driven, and engineering-method research directions into evidence-grounded, falsifiable, paper-ready Research Idea Briefs through heuristic questioning, staged confirmation, literature positioning, novelty attack, and method-figure planning. Use when the user needs to clarify a research idea, formalize inputs/outputs/objectives/constraints, frame background and motivation, select 3-5 anchor papers, identify a defensible gap, derive 2-3 contributions, stress-test novelty, or design an input-to-output method framework and core-paper figure. Also trigger on requests such as 明确科研 idea、启发式梳理 idea、互动追问科研问题、梳理论文创新点、定义研究任务、找对标论文、把研究方向变成论文方案、画方法框架图. Do not use as the primary workflow for running experiments, exhaustive systematic reviews, drafting full manuscript sections, or polishing finished prose.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Source technical and professional talent by combining LinkedIn profiles, GitHub contributions, and company intelligence. Identifies candidates with specific skills, assesses expertise depth, and provides outreach context for recruiting teams.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Research GitHub user profiles including repositories, contributions, languages, stars, and activity patterns. Useful for developer talent sourcing, open-source community research, and technical due diligence on engineering teams.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prepare a meeting-ready alternative-investments brief for a client, household, IRA, trust, or named account before a review — pulls the alts book from iCapital or Addepar (positions, NAV vs. commitment, called and unfunded amounts, contributions/distributions/subscriptions/redemptions, lockups, and the platform's own IRR/TVPI/DPI/RVPI) and sits it beside the liquid book and IPS target from the connected portfolio system (Orion Connect, Addepar, or Envestnet), then flags cash needed for capital calls, alts % vs. target, concentration, unfunded concentration, and stale as-of data. Cites the source platform on every figure and keeps disclosures on the page. Does not recommend funds, forecast NAVs/IRRs, or simulate allocation changes. Triggers on "alts brief", "/alts-brief", "prep the [client]'s alts review", "what's going on with [client]'s PE/private investments", "how's [client] doing on their alts", or any request to review a household's alternative investment positions before a meeting.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Implement and route HitKeep contributions through the repository-owned hk developer platform. Use for any HitKeep code, UI, API, database, analytics-feature, seed, screenshot, documentation, integration, or release-preparation change, as well as setup, local development, builds, smoke tests, and contributor workflow discovery.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Reads and analyzes academic papers (arXiv preprints, conference / journal PDFs, Zotero items) at three configurable depths: quick skim (2 min), standard read (10 min), or deep analysis (30 min). Produces structured digests covering problem, method, key innovation, results, limitations, reproducibility, hidden assumptions, and connections to the user's other work. Use when the user shares an arXiv link, PDF, or paper title and asks to read / summarize / digest / TL;DR / analyze / review / critique / explain / break down a paper, asks about a paper's contributions / methods / results / equations / figures, wants to compare two papers side by side, or needs a reading note for their records.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Schools of historical thought, methodology debates, and the philosophy of history. Covers the major historiographical traditions (Annales, Marxist, feminist, postcolonial, subaltern, world-systems), their methodological commitments, their contributions and limitations, and the enduring debates about objectivity, narrative, and the nature of historical knowledge. Use when evaluating how different historians approach the same subject, understanding why historical interpretations change over time, or assessing the theoretical framework underlying a historical argument.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Drafts or audits a scientific paper's introduction: real-world motivation, evidence audit, theory-to-if-then funnel with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and calibrated contributions. Use to write, frame, or critique an introduction.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Find unclaimed open source issues that match the user's skills and experience level. Searches for issues created by maintainers/org admins, checks contribution eligibility, and ranks by learning value. Use when looking for an issue to contribute to, starting OSS contributions, or finding GSoC-friendly issues. Not for finding problems that nobody has filed an issue for yet. Use oss-find-real-issues for that.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluate whether an OSS repo is worth long-term investment before committing time. Assesses project health, governance, community, bus factor, and trajectory. Use when deciding whether to contribute to a specific repo, choosing between multiple repos, or evaluating a project's sustainability. Not for checking if a repo accepts contributions — use oss-find-issue for that.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan and execute your second and third contributions to become a regular contributor. Covers relationship building, progressive complexity escalation, and community presence. Use when your first PR was merged and you want to keep contributing, when transitioning from one-off contributor to regular, or when planning a sustained OSS involvement. Not for your first contribution — use the oss-find-issue → oss-contribute chain for that.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Find actual code issues in a repo that aren't listed in GitHub issues. missing tests, inconsistent patterns, outdated dependencies, documentation gaps. Presents findings to the user for evaluation. Use when you want to make proactive contributions beyond existing issues, or when no good issues are available. Not for browsing the existing issue tracker. Use oss-find-issue for that.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware: breaks down per-person contributions with praise and growth areas.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate changelog for ArchitectKB template contributions
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structures capital call execution with notice preparation, pro-rata allocation, default remedy provisions, and wire coordination. Use when processing capital calls, calculating LP contributions, or managing call logistics.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluates GP capital commitment levels with co-invest obligations, management company funding, and alignment assessment. Use when analyzing GP commitment, assessing alignment, or structuring GP capital contributions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware: breaks down per-person contributions with praise and growth areas. Use when asked to "weekly retro", "what did we ship", or "engineering retrospective".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
30/60/90 Day Onboarding Plan — Day 1 setup, week 1 ramp, month 1 milestones, month 2 contributions, month 3 evaluation criteria
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assesses a research paper outline (.qmd file) against structured criteria from Kosuke Imai's empirical research guide. Evaluates the abstract and section outline for: research question clarity, stated contributions, hypotheses and testable implications, data description, planned results and inferential approach, and robustness checks. Detects causal papers from the abstract and conditionally assesses identification strategy only when causal framing is present. Produces a structured markdown report with PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL assessments and actionable suggestions. Use when asked to assess, evaluate, review, or check a paper outline, abstract-and-outline, or research plan in a .qmd file.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.