Use when a project-local paper dossier should produce graph delta JSON proposals and run through the human-gated delta loop.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
62건 · 관련도순
Use when a project-local paper dossier should produce graph delta JSON proposals and run through the human-gated delta loop.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a set of sources, dossiers, graph records, or experiment notes must be synthesized into project understanding, evidence pressure, uncertainty, and optional strict-review graph proposals.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Maakt regelrecht-scenario's vindbaar en hun norm-ketens leesbaar/geassert. Aan de invoerkant — vertaal een platte lijst leaf-parameters naar benoemde casus-assen + een herbruikbare persona-bibliotheek, met een reverse-lookup casus-matrix. Aan de uitvoerkant — maak de norm-keten zichtbaar via keten-checkpoints (assert elke knoop op het kritieke pad, niet alleen de endpoint) en golden-trace-snapshots + branch-coverage. Gebruik dit bij het schrijven of opschonen van scenario-/feature-files, het terugvinden of ontwerpen van een specifieke casus in een grote variabelenlijst, het reviewen van engine-traces, of het regressie-bestendig maken van cross-law-ketens zodat een ketenfout niet stil achter een correcte endpoint verdwijnt. Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode is de vaste taal. Haakt aan op regelrecht-stelselanalyse (engine-tests / meta-check) en regelrecht-audit-products (testcase-scenario's).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Genereert uit een (semi-)gevalideerd regelrecht-corpus een geloofwaardige service-PoC (burger- + behandelaar-portaal, of een headless beslis-service) en zet die in als validatie-instrument met uitvoeringsexperts — om tastbaar te maken wat nodig is om een wet rechtvaardig in de praktijk te brengen, gezien vanuit de betrokkene. Gebruik dit als workshop-fase ná de logica-/scenariovalidatie (audit-products) om de dienstverlening-kant te valideren: welke service impliceert de wet, waar zit menselijk oordeel, welke last ligt bij de burger, welke termijnen, waar is de wet hard of onduidelijk. Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode (hooks, legal_character, untranslatables, source/implements, type_spec, receipts) is de vaste taal. Voor de logica-/scenariovalidatie zelf: zie de zusterskill regelrecht-audit-products.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Postsecondary Art, Drama, or Music Professor — diagnosing a jury/crit score that contradicts a semester of formative work, building a studio-art or performance tenure dossier around exhibitions and productions instead of publications, staffing applied one-on-one lessons or crit sections between adjuncts and full-time faculty, running a structured critique, or deciding whether a failed barrier jury means a change of major.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a task needs the judgment of a tenure-track or tenured Agricultural Sciences faculty member at a land-grant university — deciding whether to submit a grant this cycle versus wait, allocating time across the teaching/research/extension appointment split, diagnosing a stalled graduate student or field trial, or drafting a tenure-and-promotion dossier narrative.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a task needs the judgment of a postsecondary Anthropology or Archaeology professor — designing a gen-ed or major-track course, building a tenure or promotion dossier, defending a department against an enrollment-driven program review, mentoring a graduate student's fieldwork grant application, or writing an IRB/NAGPRA-compliant fieldwork plan.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run a bounded, source-grounded research loop, draft a cited dossier, and optionally propose a separately reviewed canonical vault merge. Use when the user wants autonomous or deep research that may access the public web. Triggers: /autoresearch, autoresearch, research this topic, deep dive into, investigate, find everything about, research and file, go research, build a wiki on.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Cycle 30 min du secrétaire vérificateur myia-po-2026:CoursIA-3. Atteste en tiers, du plus ancien au plus récent, les PRs ouvertes sans dossier valide (chaque READY, une fois lu et approuvé par ai-01, est mergé sans attendre son cycle), et fait circuler l'information sur workspace-CoursIA-3.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Contract governing the --advice flag: supervision checkpoints, caps, packets, dossier, receipts, and the boundary that keeps counsel from approving anything. Load only when --advice is present.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Usar tras definir el sector de un proyecto: prepara un dossier en español con contexto, normas aplicables, patrones UX y riesgos, distinguiendo fuentes verificadas de hipótesis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "log this launch", query a launch date/embargo, record a stage transition, or update submissions/outcomes; curates launch facts through the append-only launches event stream with optimistic revisions and derived dossier/calendar views. Not for RAMP scoring — use launch-readiness-auditor; not for planning tier/window — use launch-tier-planner. 发布台账/发布日历/阶段与禁运期记录
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user asks to "codify our brand voice", "define naming rules for our products and tiers", or "write the tone-of-voice guide with banned phrases"; produces the brand-level voice canon (register, tone spectrum, banned-phrase list, few-shot examples drawn only from the brand's own published material) and the naming tax (product / feature / tier naming rules plus approved and banned terms) that seeds the narrative-registry canon and that every channel's voice adaptation points up to. Not for per-platform voice adaptation — use channel-registry's voice-dossier; not for finished copy or blog posts — use content-writer; not for the message hierarchy itself — use message-system-architect; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 品牌语气/词汇表/命名税/禁用词/品牌语言规范
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
When the user wants to research, profile, or analyze competitors from their URLs. Also use when the user mentions 'competitor profile,' 'competitor research,' 'competitor analysis,' 'profile this competitor,' 'analyze competitor,' 'competitive intelligence,' 'competitor deep dive,' 'who are my competitors,' 'competitor landscape,' 'competitor dossier,' 'competitive audit,' or 'research these competitors.' Input is a list of competitor URLs. Output is structured competitor profile markdown files. For creating comparison/alternative pages from profiles, see competitors. For sales-specific battle cards, see sales-enablement.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.