'restructure' 검색 결과

Review what an LLM feature or agent actually puts in its context window — and find what's bloating, missing, or fighting itself. Use when asked to review a system prompt and context assembly, cut token usage without losing quality, debug an agent that ignores instructions, or audit how retrieval results, history, and tool definitions are packed into the window. Produces a context inventory with a keep/cut/restructure verdict per component, ordering and caching fixes, and a token budget. For wording-level prompt tuning use prompt-optimizer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Restructure or clean up code with no behavior change, proved by before-and-after checks. Use when: asked to clean up, extract, dedupe or simplify, even one function.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnosis before prescription: reproduce, hypothesize, isolate, fix root cause, add a regression test; refactor mode maps deps, coupling and blast radius. Triggers: bug, error, fix, broken, not working, crashed, stack trace, exception, refactor, restructure, coupling, dependency map.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Restructure existing code while preserving observable behavior. Use for targeted technical debt or hotspot work with characterization tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when an Advanced Materials manuscript must be fit to its article-type format — Communication versus Research Article — where word count and display items are budgeted together against a typeset page limit. Manages the length budget; does not restructure the science or polish prose line by line.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when polishing the prose of an Advanced Materials manuscript for Wiley house style, concision, precise materials nomenclature and units, and readability across materials subfields. Polishes language; does not restructure the advance or manage the length budget.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design the structure of a website or product including sitemap, navigation, URL structure, content types, taxonomy, and labeling. Use this skill whenever the user asks to plan a sitemap, design navigation, structure URLs, define content types, build taxonomies, design site search, or organize content at the system level. Triggers on sitemap, site structure, navigation, IA, information architecture, URL structure, content types, taxonomy, categorization, breadcrumbs, hub pages, faceted navigation, site search, labeling. Also triggers when content is being created without a structural plan, or when an existing site's structure is being audited or restructured.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Move content between platforms, domains, or URL structures while preserving SEO equity, user bookmarks, and integrations. Use this skill when planning a CMS migration, replatforming, consolidating sites, changing URL structures, or merging content from multiple sources. Triggers on content migration, replatform, CMS migration, domain migration, URL restructure, redirect map, site merge, content consolidation, migration plan, post-migration drop. Also triggers when planning a launch that involves moving existing content.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Drafts a customized Customer Agreement starting from the Y Combinator standard form SaaS template. Tailors the agreement through structured intake questions covering fee structure, data handling, ML rights, implementation services, and more. Applies 18 always-on defaults that transform the raw YC form into a professional starting point (renamed to "Customer Agreement", data privacy section added, warranty restructured, consolidated SLA/support exhibit, etc.). Produces a clean .docx and a lawyer-facing memo explaining every change from the YC standard. Use when user says "draft a SaaS agreement", "YC SaaS", "startup SaaS contract", "customer agreement", "SaaS subscription agreement", or "I need a SaaS agreement starting from the YC form". Also trigger when the user is a startup founder discussing SaaS contracting, even if they don't mention YC specifically.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Restructure any rough build, research, or legal-drafting request into an IRAC-shaped prompt — Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion — optimized for a frontier model. It's the bar-exam framework, repurposed as prompt engineering. The skill leads with the issue and ends with the conclusion (where models weight attention most), forces you to name your constraints and non-goals, and specifies what "good" looks like before a single token is generated. Use it before any non-trivial build, or whenever a vague ask deserves a precise brief.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Transforms reading-oriented prose into listening-optimized text for flat, neutral vocal delivery — TTS, podcasts, audiobooks, CLE audio. Carries a legal layer: case citations, section symbols, subsection lettering, Latin terms and footnotes are unspeakable as written, so a brief, opinion, statute, contract or memo needs them expanded, restructured or stripped before it can be listened to — and quoted authority is never rewritten. Use when converting written content for audio, preparing oral argument by ear, producing CLE or client-facing audio, or making a document listenable on a commute. Triggers on "make this listenable," "convert for audio," "optimize for reading aloud," "prepare for TTS," "make an audio version," "podcast script," "read this aloud." Supports English, French, Spanish, Italian, German and Portuguese; outputs plain text, ElevenLabs audio tags, or SSML for Amazon Polly, Google or Azure.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," or "site navigation." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have and how they connect. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," or "website planning." NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema-markup.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Migrate Infrahub docs feature pages from the legacy topic+guide pair into a cleaner structure (single merged page, hub+spokes, or tutorial extraction). Supports both single-feature migrations (one feature like Profiles or Webhooks) and section-wide migrations (a whole section like Branches & Change Control with multiple features migrated together) when the team has agreed on a section-wide restructure plan. Trigger when the user names a specific feature or section to migrate (e.g. "let's migrate profiles", "start the Resource Manager migration", "do the entire Branches & Change Control section"). Each migration is its own branch off `demo/groups-diataxis-example`, its own PR back to that branch.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Restructure or clean up code with no behavior change, proved by before-and-after checks. Use when: asked to clean up, extract, dedupe or simplify, even one function.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Polish, translate, diagnose, and restructure technical manuscript text into IEEE-style academic English using routed failure-mode guidance. Use for IEEE abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, experiments, conclusions, figure captions, rebuttals, Chinese-to-English technical writing, AI-like or template-like academic prose, and engineering prose that needs clearer problem logic, contribution framing, method rationale, evidence discipline, natural author voice, or reviewer-ready wording.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Draft, restructure, and diagnose IEEE-style technical manuscript sections using a routed static/dynamic workflow. Use for IEEE conference, journal, Transactions, Letters, or magazine papers when writing titles, abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, experiments, conclusions, contribution statements, section outlines, or Chinese-to-English engineering paper drafts in AI, computer science, communications, control, signal processing, electrical/electronic engineering, power, robotics, circuits, and applied systems.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to create, review, or restructure a fundraising pitch deck for seed or Series A. Also activates when the user mentions "deck", "pitch", "investor presentation", or "slide structure".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Writes and restructures technical documentation - READMEs, tutorials, how-to guides, user guides, architecture docs, onboarding guides, runbooks and SOPs, troubleshooting guides, release notes, and knowledge base articles - grounded in the actual code or product, with commands and examples verified where possible. Use when the user asks to document a project, feature, system, or process, write or fix a README, explain a codebase to new developers, turn notes into a guide, or make existing docs clearer. For endpoint-by-endpoint API reference or OpenAPI specs, use api-documentation-writer; for CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md files, use claude-md-writer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds a feature specification from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the design tree decision-by-decision, resolving dependencies as it goes. Use when the user wants to plan, design, scope, specify, or flesh out a new feature, capability, or system behavior before implementation. Produces a feature specification focused on system behaviors, not implementation detail. Does not plan a restructure of code that already exists — use plan-a-change. Does not refine or stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review. Does not document already-built features — use project-documentation. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not research open-ended options before there is a feature to specify — use research. Does not map the bounded contexts of existing code — use ddd-analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs the contract for an API change inside one codebase — a component's props, a function surface, URL or query parameters, an event payload, or a module boundary — through a discovery pass, an options document with one recommendation, a question round, and an adversarial validation round, with every element of the contract justified from one stated goal. Use when you want to design, shape, decide, or nail down an interface, contract, signature, or API change for a capability you can already describe, sized for roughly one pull request. Produces a design document and changes no code. Does not specify what a feature should do — use plan-a-feature. Does not plan delivery or sequencing — use plan-implementation. Does not assess the architecture of existing code — use architectural-analysis. Does not write the code — use tdd. Does not restructure existing code — use refactor. Runs its rounds without pausing for review; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when organizing or verifying a modular Spring Boot monolith with Spring Modulith, including module APIs, dependency rules and reliable module events. Do not restructure an application into modules for an unrelated endpoint change.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when designing organizational structure (team topologies, Conway's Law alignment), mapping stakeholders by power-interest for change initiatives, defining team interface contracts (APIs, SLAs, decision rights, handoffs), assessing capability maturity (DORA, CMMC, agile maturity models), planning org restructures (functional to product teams, platform teams, shared services), or when user mentions "org design", "team structure", "stakeholder map", "team interfaces", "capability maturity", "Conway's Law", or "RACI".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Restructure and improve Isabelle or Coq proofs to enhance readability, modularity, and maintainability without changing semantics. Use when proofs are long and monolithic, have repeated patterns, use unclear naming, lack documentation, or when the user asks to refactor, clean up, improve, or reorganize their formal proofs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.