'poc' 검색 결과

Structure-based docking with AutoDock Vina, Vinardo, and AutoDock4 through the Meeko toolchain. Use this skill to define a docking box, prepare receptors and ligands as PDBQT, run single or batch docking, rescore, and interpret affinities, poses, and ligand efficiency. Covers box definition from a reference ligand or pocket residues, protonation and tautomer decisions, flexible side chains, exhaustiveness and seeds, redocking validation, and virtual screening over compound libraries. Also trigger on vina, smina, gnina, mk_prepare_ligand, mk_prepare_receptor, mk_export, scrub.py, PDBQT, autogrid4, docking box, or binding-pose prediction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user is working a B2B SaaS deal from qualified opportunity to closed-won — preparing discovery calls, structuring demos or POCs, handling a specific objection, qualifying with MEDDIC/MEDDPICC/SPICED, building mutual action plans, navigating negotiation or procurement, or reviewing pipeline health, forecast accuracy, and deal velocity. Not for finding or prospecting new leads (use prospecting) or upstream positioning (use product-position).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Sets up an `## Agent skills` block in AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md and `docs/agents/` so the engineering skills know this repo's issue tracker (GitHub or local markdown), triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run before first use of `to-issues`, `to-prd`, `triage`, `diagnose`, `tdd`, `improve-codebase-architecture`, or `zoom-out` — or if those skills appear to be missing context about the issue tracker, triage labels, or domain docs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build and validate Azure infrastructure in a lab or sandbox using Azure CLI and official Microsoft docs. Use when creating verification environments, provisioning hub-and-spoke VNets, VPN Gateway or ExpressRoute-adjacent validation labs, checking subscription/tenant access, debugging Azure deployment constraints, comparing before/after route behavior, or cleaning up lab resources. Triggers on 'Azure 検証', '検証環境', 'PoC', 'sandbox', 'lab', 'Azure CLI で構築', 'VPN Gateway', 'VNet peering', 'BGP', 'route validation', 'summarizedGatewayPrefixes', 'デプロイして検証', 'インフラ検証'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

"Apply phenomenological methods including bracketing (epoche), lived experience inquiry, and Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to uncover the essence of human experience. Use this skill when the user needs to study how people experience a phenomenon from the first-person perspective, apply Husserlian descriptive or Heideggerian interpretive phenomenology, conduct IPA with idiographic focus, or when they ask 'what is the lived experience of X', 'how do I bracket my assumptions', or 'how do I do IPA'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Genereert uit een (semi-)gevalideerd regelrecht-corpus een geloofwaardige service-PoC (burger- + behandelaar-portaal, of een headless beslis-service) en zet die in als validatie-instrument met uitvoeringsexperts — om tastbaar te maken wat nodig is om een wet rechtvaardig in de praktijk te brengen, gezien vanuit de betrokkene. Gebruik dit als workshop-fase ná de logica-/scenariovalidatie (audit-products) om de dienstverlening-kant te valideren: welke service impliceert de wet, waar zit menselijk oordeel, welke last ligt bij de burger, welke termijnen, waar is de wet hard of onduidelijk. Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode (hooks, legal_character, untranslatables, source/implements, type_spec, receipts) is de vaste taal. Voor de logica-/scenariovalidatie zelf: zie de zusterskill regelrecht-audit-products.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Sales enablement, technical presales and deal acceleration for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Use this skill when planning outbound campaigns, running discovery calls, building deal strategy, creating battle cards, writing proposals, responding to RFPs, preparing a product demo, scoping a proof of concept or pilot, answering a security questionnaire or the AI annex buyers now attach to it, executing sales sequences, coaching qualification, or deciding what the website's AI chat agent is allowed to say. Also triggers on: outbound, cold outreach, reply handling, reply classification, out-of-office replies, auto-replies counted as replies, our reply rate is inflated, prospect replied remove me, opt-out by reply, is this list ready to send, launch readiness, CRM segment outbound, we emailed a current customer, outbound hit an open opportunity, ownerless leads, prospects engaging our competitors, competitor connections, displacement list, is this personalization creepy, can we mention they visited our site, signal freshness, deal strategy, pipeline, battle card, objection handling, common objections, why do we keep hearing this objection, mine call transcripts for objections, objection register, proposal, RFP, discovery call, MEDDPICC, sales sequence, qualification, sales engineer, solutions engineer, presales, demo plan, demo script, POC, proof of concept, pilot success criteria, technical evaluation, technical win, security questionnaire, vendor security review, SOC 2 questionnaire, AI security questionnaire, AI annex, AI vendor due diligence, the buyer is asking if we train on their data, do you train on customer data, which model do you use, model provider sub-processor, AI subprocessor disclosure, where does inference run, can the customer turn the AI feature off, AI-CAIQ, CSA AI Controls Matrix, ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act Article 50, are we a provider or a deployer, AI feature disclosure, our model vendor changed and nobody told the buyer, technical objection, mutual action plan, MAP, close plan, mutual close plan, buyer enablement, the deal is stalled, deal stalled after the demo, how do I get this deal to close, close date keeps slipping, JOLT, buyer indecision, no-decision loss, website chatbot, chat widget, AI chat agent, AI SDR, inbound AI SDR, conversational marketing, live chat, what should our chatbot be allowed to say, our chatbot quoted the wrong price, the bot promised a discount, do we have to disclose it is AI, EU AI Act chatbot disclosure, chatbot handoff to sales, chat transcript review, prompt injection on our chatbot, Drift, Qualified, Intercom.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Define a Lean Six Sigma improvement project using DMAIC, problem framing, baseline measures, root-cause hypotheses, CTQs, and control planning. Use when an existing process is underperforming and the team needs a charter, SIPOC, baseline, and improvement path. Do not use for brand-new process design or vague complaints with no process boundary.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) tricks authenticated users into submitting forged requests to a target application by exploiting browser automatic cookie attachment. Detect via missing or predictable CSRF tokens in state-changing requests (POST/PUT/DELETE), absent `SameSite` cookie attributes, and JSON endpoints accepting `text/plain` Content-Type. Test using HTML auto-submitting forms, XHR requests, and CORS-enabled fetch. Tools: Burp Suite (Generate CSRF PoC), OWASP ZAP.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Writes professional bug bounty reports for HackerOne, Bugcrowd, and Intigriti with CVSS 4.0 scoring, business impact, working exploits, and remediation. Runs 5-check Pre-Report Verification first: hallucination detection, AI writing patterns, PoC reproducibility, duplicate detection, and impact plausibility. Use when user describes a vulnerability, shares HTTP logs, HAR files, recon output, or screenshots; says 'write a bug report', 'format my finding', 'draft a vuln report', 'is this valid', 'rate my vulnerability', 'verify my report', or any variant. Trigger for partial or messy input — raw notes, one-liners, or full writeups all work. Do not wait for perfect input.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cloud security posture assessment for AWS, Azure, and GCP. Tests IAM privilege escalation paths, public storage exposure, serverless attack surface, database exposure, logging gaps, container registry security, and cloud-specific attacks. Both authenticated (with cloud credentials) and unauthenticated (external) modes. Uses nuclei cloud templates, Prowler, ScoutSuite, manual IMDS/metadata probing, and deep AWS/Azure/GCP CLI enumeration. Produces: cloud architecture diagram, attack path map, findings per category, compliance mapping (SOC 2, PCI DSS 4.0, HIPAA, CIS), PoCs for confirmed exploits. Chains into /gh-export for issue filing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI/LLM red-team assessment using the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) + OWASP AI Testing Guide (AITG v1, Nov 2025) frameworks, plus OWASP MCP Top 10 runtime testing for agentic/MCP targets. Tests prompt injection, jailbreaks, system prompt leakage, sensitive data extraction, excessive agency, improper output handling, model extraction, content bias, evasion, membership inference, MCP token exposure, MCP command injection, and more. Uses four tools in combination: FuzzyAI (single-turn jailbreak fuzzing), PyRIT (multi-turn orchestrated attacks), Garak (probe-based vulnerability scanning), and promptfoo (plugin-based red-team evaluation). Each tool covers different OWASP categories; running them together gives systematic coverage. Includes a conditional MCP reconnaissance phase and a post-access AI infrastructure phase (chained from /post-exploit). Produces: OWASP LLM Top 10 + AITG + MCP coverage matrix, findings per category, architecture diagram of the AI system, PoCs for confirmed exploits. Chains into /gh-export for issue filing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Active Directory security audit using the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Full domain enumeration, trust mapping, GPO analysis, ACL abuse paths, ADCS attacks (ESC1-ESC8), delegation abuse (constrained/unconstrained/RBCD), fine-grained password policies, LAPS deployment, service account security, and Kerberos configuration. Uses enum4linux-ng, netexec, impacket, ldapsearch, certipy-ad, bloodhound-python, and rpcclient. Produces attack path diagrams, prioritized risk register, and PoCs. Chains into /gh-export for issue filing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes CVE vulnerabilities in project dependencies with code path tracing and PoC generation for Burp Suite. Traces vulnerable code from user input to sink, assesses exploitability, and generates HTTP requests for testing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate a fully customized Amazon Connect AI agent PoC bundle (Lambda handlers, OpenAPI spec, AI agent prompt, Contact Flows, CloudFormation/CDK infrastructure, FAQ knowledge base) from a ~15-minute structured interview — or from a requirements doc, a flow sketch, or an existing flow/prompt you want to improve. Use when the user wants to build, scaffold, prototype, or refine an Amazon Connect contact center, an AI voice/chat agent on Amazon Connect, or any contact-center use case that mentions Connect, Lex, Wisdom, Q in Connect, "AI agent domain", or Agentic CX Designer (ACXD, Connect Customer, the Agentic CX block — the ACXD runtime target). Also triggers on "I have a requirements document", "turn this flow sketch into a Contact Flow", or "improve my existing Contact Flow / AI prompt". Produces 6 asset packages on local disk.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate a fully customized Amazon Connect AI agent PoC bundle (Lambda handlers, OpenAPI spec, AI agent prompt, Contact Flows, CloudFormation/CDK infrastructure, FAQ knowledge base) from a ~15-minute structured interview — or from a requirements doc, a flow sketch, or an existing flow/prompt you want to improve. Triggers on "amazon connect", "aicc", "contact center AI", "connect ai agent", "connect ai agents domain", "agentic cx designer", "acxd", "connect customer", "agentic cx block", "requirements document", "improve my contact flow", "flow sketch", "\uc544\ub9c8\uc874 \ucee4\ub125\ud2b8", "\ucee8\ud0dd\uc13c\ud130 AI \uc0c1\ub2f4\uc6d0".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

High Availability control plane for Yuzu — the canonical entry point for any work on ADR-2002 (active-active server tier, gateway-fronted routing, Postgres-backed coordination seam, HA Postgres storage). Use when the user says "/ha", "/high-availability", "/ha-matrix", asks to plan or implement an HA workstream (WS-0…WS-14), asks "what's our HA gap" or "is it safe to run a second replica yet", asks to audit HA readiness, or starts work touching the coordination seam (leader election / fenced epochs / transactional outbox), gateway intra-cluster routing, shared `AgentRegistry` presence, PKI/CA HA, or the `deploy/docker/*ha*` / `scripts/ha/` surface. The skill bundles the two-axis model, the safe-to-scale gate, the delivery matrix (current-state + reviewers + status), the per-workstream workflow, and the load order for the routed reference docs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when user wants to create a refactor plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when writing a PRD for a feature.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Trust-boundary security audit of cqs — fans out unbiddable-auditor agents across 6 categories (RT-INJ/RT-FS/RT-RES/RT-DATA/RT-RELAY/RT-EXFIL), attacker mindset, run-the-attack PoC + regression guard.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Safely develop, verify, and document proof-of-concept exploits and payloads for authorized targets inside isolated Workspace Containers. Use when a Hypothesis is well-founded, target authorization covers scope, and each active step will carry a durable approval — for minimal PoCs, impact verification, or reproducible exploit Evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Recommends real-time CGM with confirmatory POC-BG for insulin dosing adjustments in insulin-treated hospitalized adults at high risk of hypoglycemia when resources and training are available. Triggers include: "Should we use CGM for insulin adjustments?" or "Is CGM appropriate for this patient?

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

An infographic skill for AI agents — works inside Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, OpenClaw, Cursor, and any agent host that loads skills. Create professional infographics as self-contained HTML files with PNG exports. Use when the user asks to create, design, generate, build, or make an infographic, data visualization, visual explainer, chart poster, cheatsheet, or pocket guide. Trigger phrases include "make this visual", "turn this into a graphic", "visualize this data", "infographic for X", "cheatsheet for X", or when the user provides structured data (tokenomics allocations, ecosystem/partner lists, timelines, comparisons, step-by-step processes) AND asks for a visual output. Covers tokenomics, ecosystem overviews, game overviews, cheatsheets, airdrop guides, comparisons, and process flows. Do NOT trigger for plain text answers, markdown tables, bulleted summaries, questions asking for advice or explanations about a topic (even when the topic is tokenomics, ecosystem, vesting, etc.), inline chat diagrams, or data processing with no visual output requested. The signal is "asks for a visual", not "mentions a keyword".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Sets up an `## Agent skills` block in AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md and `docs/agents/` so the engineering skills know this repo's issue tracker (GitHub or local markdown), triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run before first use of `to-issues`, `to-prd`, `triage`, `diagnose`, `tdd`, `improve-codebase-architecture`, or `zoom-out` — or if those skills appear to be missing context about the issue tracker, triage labels, or domain docs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.