1.3천건 · 관련도순
Audit a methods section against a 45-item checklist drawn from the APSA Experimental Section rubric, JARS-Quant, CONSORT, and DA-RT. Use before submission or archiving, or to document a pre-analysis-plan deviation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Advises on setting up and validating topic models for survey and experimental text: discovery vs. measurement, STM/LDA/BERTopic choice, preprocessing, covariate formulas, choosing K across coherence, FREX, held-out likelihood, and residuals, validating topics against human coding, robustness, and reporting. Coding against a fixed codebook goes to text-classification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs conjoint and factorial-vignette experiments, covering attribute architecture and randomization restrictions, effective-N power, treatment realism, the choice among AMCE, marginal-mean, and AMIE estimands, forced-choice versus rating designs, and PAP tiers. Use when the user is planning a conjoint, drafting or critiquing an attribute table, asking how many respondents or tasks are needed, whether to report AMCEs or marginal means, or how to test interactions. Reviewing an existing design goes to conjoint-diagnostics, cleaning the export to conjoint-cleaning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Drafts or audits a scientific paper's introduction: real-world motivation, evidence audit, theory-to-if-then funnel with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and calibrated contributions. Use to write, frame, or critique an introduction.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when facing unknowns, debugging without a clear cause, or making architecture decisions — enforces hypothesis-driven scientific reasoning through observation, hypothesis formulation, prediction, experiment design, and evidence-based conclusion. Use when previous attempts have failed or the problem space involves uncertainty.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Trace bugs, CI failures, and unexpected behavior from reproduced evidence to a causal mechanism and governing contract. Distinguish product, architecture, test-oracle, and harness defects; investigate intermittent failures with controlled experiments and report unresolved evidence explicitly.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Look up prior Claude Code sessions when context is lost or forgotten. Use when asked what was done before, what happened in the last session, or any request to recall past conversation history, prior decisions, experiments, or outcomes. Indexes and searches raw JSONL transcripts from ~/.claude/projects/ via DuckDB. Returns verbatim user messages, summarizes AI actions and sub-agent outcomes, detects tool errors and user frustration signals, and reports tool usage statistics. Summaries cached at ~/.claude/kaizen/session-summaries/.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Opt-in recreation of the Bun + TypeScript framework used to build Vapi's landing-page voice agents from a ROUGH_DRAFT.md spec, including a scenario registry, language stacks, prompt composer, assistant builder, and idempotent bootstrap script. Use only when the user explicitly invokes vapi-bootstrap-framework or specifically asks to reproduce or experiment with the landing-page-agent architecture. Do not use for ordinary Vapi assistant builds; use create-assistant, create-tool, create-squad, and vapi-prompt-builder instead. Targets Bun + TypeScript + @vapi-ai/server-sdk.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Automate and research the GitHub Copilot app desktop experience. Use for driving Copilot App sessions, creating isolated app experiments, mapping app UI/accessibility controls, taking app screenshots, saving PNG captures, optimizing WebP images, testing prompts without submitting, using app/session APIs, canvases, automations, macOS Accessibility, AppleScript, and safe end-to-end Copilot App workflow probes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run the Anabasis v2 improvement loop: score the five points, read each campaign at its milestone, find the link that holds its next promotion, fix that link's owner, prove the path, record a prediction, launch fresh, watch, read and decide. Use when the operator asks to keep campaigns going, run a pass or an hourly audit, read a promotion, investigate a campaign that is not promoting, or choose the next run. Owns the experiment and its evidence; AGENTS.md section 3 owns the operator's decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert chaos engineer specializing in controlled failure injection, resilience testing, and building antifragile systems. Masters chaos experiments, game day planning, and continuous resilience improvement with focus on learning from failure.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run structured prompt-injection attack and defense experiments against an LLM-integrated app before production by measuring attack success and testing detection or recovery pipelines.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use ARIS to run Markdown-based agent skills for literature review, idea discovery, cross-model critique, experiment planning, and paper-writing support.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert growth product management guidance for SaaS applications. Use when designing growth loops, optimizing activation and onboarding, building retention systems, creating referral mechanics, running growth experiments, defining north star metrics, or implementing PLG strategies. Covers the full growth lifecycle from acquisition to monetization.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert product analytics strategist for SaaS and digital products. Use when designing product metrics frameworks, funnel analysis, cohort retention, feature adoption tracking, A/B testing, experimentation design, data instrumentation, or product dashboards. Covers AARRR, HEART, behavioral analytics, and impact measurement.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Respan for LLM observability. Use to set up tracing or the gateway, manage prompts (create/version/deploy), run evals, experiments, and datasets, or work with traces and logs. Trigger for any Respan platform task or when instrumenting an app to send telemetry to Respan.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
First-run guided setup for a fresh gAIOS clone. Interviews the user (identity, role, priorities, voice, connections, team, pain, guardrails) and fills the templates — CLAUDE.md, context/, references/voice.md, connections.md — then introduces the WAT / wiki / workflows / experiments features. Trigger on "/setup", "set me up", "get started", "onboard me", or a fresh clone where CLAUDE.md still has {{placeholders}}.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design the smallest viable test to validate or invalidate a critical assumption. Based on Torres's assumption testing framework, organized by Gilad's AFTER model (Assessment → Fact-Finding → Tests → Experiments → Release Results).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Record a diamond's next decision (set_target; start_experiment and commit_to_build; release; close; an L0's state_purpose or review). Runs the theory gates each decision needs, validates evidence, and at close runs the executable Definition of Done checklist.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply MCAF ML/AI delivery guidance for data exploration, feasibility, experimentation, testing, responsible AI, and operating ML systems. Use when the repo includes model training, inference, data science workflows, or ML-specific delivery planning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Molecular ML with diverse featurizers and pre-built datasets. Use for property prediction (ADMET, toxicity) with traditional ML or GNNs when you want extensive featurization options and MoleculeNet benchmarks. Best for quick experiments with pre-trained models, diverse molecular representations. For ready-made ADMET numbers without training a model use admet-prediction; for benchmark datasets and task-aware splits use pytdc.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design new proteins that bind a chosen surface, using BindCraft's AlphaFold2-guided hallucination or the RFdiffusion backbone plus ProteinMPNN sequence pipeline. Use this skill to specify a target epitope by hotspot residue, trim a receptor to the region worth designing against, set up a design campaign, and filter the output on the in-silico metrics that predict experimental success — interface predicted TM-score, predicted aligned error at the interface, buried surface area, and shape complementarity. Also trigger on BindCraft, RFdiffusion, ProteinMPNN, minibinder, hallucination, inverse folding, hotspot residue, epitope targeting, ipTM, or de novo binder.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Reverse-engineer raw materials (Sparse idea, Dense idea, experimental log) from an existing AI research paper to build a benchmark case for evaluating paper-writing pipelines. Replicates the PaperWritingBench dataset construction procedure from arXiv:2604.05018 §3 / App. C. TRIGGER when the user asks to "build a benchmark case from this paper", "reverse-engineer raw materials", or "evaluate my pipeline against PaperWritingBench".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.