1.3천건 · 관련도순
Diagnose and draft or explicitly apply paid-ad optimizations using evidence, financial constraints, experiments, and capability-gated adapters. Use for campaign optimization, budget reallocation, bid changes, pausing or archiving ads, requests to delete campaigns, search-term or negative-keyword actions, creative rotation, or improving CPA and ROAS.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Calculate and model paid-media CPA, CPL, CPC, CPM, ROAS, MER, break-even targets, contribution margin, LTV:CAC, impression-share opportunity, budgets, forecasts, and experiment economics. Use for PPC math, ad calculator, break-even analysis, ROAS calculator, CPA calculator, budget forecast, LTV CAC, or MER.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Help authors learn from exemplary ICLR, ICML, and NeurIPS papers through source-linked manuscript comparisons, concrete writing and experiment suggestions, and guided reflection. Use for research storytelling, contribution framing, paper comparison, figure planning, or research retrospectives. Not an acceptance predictor or a routine grammar/citation formatter.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Operate professional paid advertising across Google, Meta, YouTube, LinkedIn, TikTok, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Reddit, Pinterest, Snapchat, and X. Use for account intake, source-grounded audits, strategy, budget and measurement planning, creative production, experiments, reporting, monitoring, and explicitly approved campaign changes. Also trigger on PPC, paid social, retail media, attribution, tracking, landing pages, cross-platform conversion totals, negative keywords or search terms, beta-feature scoring, stale platform claims, API-token or credential setup, campaign deletion, and safe Claude Ads installation or uninstall.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when 用户想根据论文、科研文档、研究文本、图注、开题/答辩材料或具备读图条件的参考图生成可复制的 AI 科研绘图提示词；触发场景包括论文配图、科研绘图、图形摘要、Graphical Abstract、机制图、技术路线图、实验装置图、模型架构图、多面板对比图、汇报总览图、参考图风格迁移、未知领域母版生成，或上传/引用 PDF、Word、LaTeX、Markdown、摘要、方法段、图注、课题说明、研究方案、参考图片。Also use when the user asks for scientific figure prompts, research illustration prompts, graphical abstract prompts, mechanism diagrams, technical roadmaps, experimental setup diagrams, model architecture diagrams, multi-panel scientific figures, paper/conference figures, or AI image prompts based on papers, research documents, abstracts, methods sections, figure captions, proposals, reference images, PDFs, Word docs, LaTeX files, Markdown files, or research plans.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when creating publication-grade scientific figure images or prompts, including graphical abstracts, mechanism diagrams, anatomy diagrams, surgical step figures, experimental workflows, pathology mechanisms, device principles, and structured paper illustrations. If the user asks to generate the image, use ChatGPT image generation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-file hypothesis testing with keep/discard loop, compound baselines, and experiment logging
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Refine academic writing for computer science research papers targeting top-tier venues (NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML, AAAI, IJCAI, ACL, EMNLP, NAACL, CVPR, WWW, KDD, SIGIR, CIKM, and similar). Use this skill whenever a user asks to improve, polish, refine, edit, or proofread academic or research writing — including paper drafts, abstracts, introductions, related work sections, methodology descriptions, experiment write-ups, or conclusion sections. Also trigger when users paste LaTeX content and ask for writing help, mention "camera-ready", "rebuttal", "paper revision", or reference any academic venue or conference. This skill handles both full paper refinement and section-by-section editing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run one safe self-improvement cycle: hypothesize → experiment → record → (maybe) federate.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run Karpathy-style autoresearch optimization on any content. Generates 50+ variants, scores with a 5-expert simulated panel, evolves winners through multiple rounds, outputs optimized version + full experiment log. Use when optimizing landing pages, email sequences, ad copy, headlines, form pages, CTA text, or any conversion-focused content. Triggers on "optimize this page", "run autoresearch", "score these variants", "A/B test this copy".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when implementing analytics with PostHog in a TypeScript app — capturing events, identifying users, adding feature flags, tracking errors, or wiring API lifecycle telemetry. Triggers on edits to analytics integration files, or mentions of "PostHog", "analytics", "feature flag", "event tracking", "capture", "identify", "A/B test", or "experiment".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI-powered SEO operations: keyword intelligence, competitor gap analysis, Google Search Console optimization, and trend detection. Use when asked to research keywords, analyze competitor content gaps, audit GSC performance, or detect trending topics. For growth experiments see growth-engine; for content optimization see autoresearch.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Scientific research engine with adversarial review, tree search, and serendipity detection. Use when: exploring hypotheses, validating findings against literature, running computational experiments with quality gates, or hunting for unexpected discoveries. Do NOT use for simple Q&A, code editing, or non-research tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Code auditor that grades software projects and the agents/developers who built them. Produces structured JSON + Markdown reports with a standardized rubric. Evaluates architecture, correctness, testing, authorship cohesiveness, ghost code, and more. Optionally ingests tmux session logs for process evidence and interrogates agents about specific problems found. Use when asked to "audit", "grade", "evaluate", "review code quality", "rate this project", "score the agents", or "assess the codebase". Especially useful after Marcus multi-agent experiments to grade agent output and track quality over time.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build signal-based forms in Angular v21+ using the new Signal Forms API. Use for form creation with automatic two-way binding, schema-based validation, field state management, and dynamic forms. Triggers on form implementation, adding validation, creating multi-step forms, or building forms with conditional fields. Signal Forms are experimental but recommended for new Angular projects. Don't use for template-driven forms without signals or third-party form libraries like Formly or ngx-formly.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when introducing a feature flag system, choosing between release flags / experiment flags / operational flags / kill switches / permission flags, designing percentage rollouts, building kill-switch + circuit-breaker patterns, structuring evaluation contexts (user IDs, plan tier, region), or building flag-cleanup discipline. Triggers: LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Unleash / Flagsmith / OpenFeature, percentage ramp, sticky bucketing, kill switch wired to alerting, "we still have flags from 2 years ago", flag debt, OpenFeature provider, evaluation context, default value on provider failure. NOT for A/B test statistical analysis (separate skill), traffic-split routing at the edge, build-time bundler defines, or environment-based config.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze data from randomized controlled trials. Use when user mentions: treatment effects, ITT analysis, LATE, TOT, compliance analysis, attrition, balance checks, heterogeneous effects, RCT results, experimental analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill whenever a task involves running parallel work on a git repository without conflicts — e.g. "fix this bug while I keep working on my feature", "run Claude on two branches at once", "work on this task in isolation", "create a throwaway branch for this experiment", or anything where two agents or sessions might edit the same files. Also trigger when the user asks to use worktrees directly, or when an agent needs its own isolated checkout so it can work without disturbing the main branch. Even if the user just says "do this in parallel" or "don't mess up my current work", consider worktrees.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Align, run, audit, and publish GEODE benchmark comparisons against Agent-World arXiv 2604.18292v1 across MCP-Mark, BFCL V4, and tau2-bench. Use for Agent-World or AgentWorld comparison requests, cross-suite agent benchmark design, Tau2 comparator/profile diagnosis, paired thin-runtime-versus-GEODE experiments, mean-accuracy@8 replication, or benchmark comparability and artifact reviews.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Differential abundance (DA) and differential state (DS) analysis for flow and mass cytometry - tests which cell populations change in frequency or marker expression between conditions using diffcyt (edgeR/voom/GLMM for DA, limma/LMM for DS), with cydar, CITRUS, and compositional methods (sccomp, scCODA, DCATS) as alternatives. Covers the sample-is-the-experimental-unit principle, design/contrast and mixed-model formulas, compositionality of cluster proportions, and FDR across clusters. Use when comparing populations between groups, choosing a DA method, handling paired/batch designs, or deciding whether compositional correction is needed.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build weighted gene co-expression networks to identify modules of co-regulated genes, relate them to phenotypes, and find hub genes using WGCNA, hdWGCNA, MEGENA, CEMiTool, and Gaussian graphical models. Covers signed-network choice, soft-threshold selection, module preservation, and the marginal-vs-partial-correlation distinction. Use when finding co-expression modules, identifying hub genes, relating gene networks to clinical or experimental traits, or building single-cell co-expression networks. For directed TF-target inference see scenic-regulons and grn-inference; for condition rewiring see differential-networks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes single-cell pooled CRISPR screens (Perturb-seq, CROP-seq, Perturb-CITE-seq, ECCITE-seq, multiome) where each cell carries an sgRNA and a scRNA-seq / surface-protein / chromatin readout. Covers experimental design (direct-capture Perturb-seq Dixit 2016 vs CROP-seq 3'UTR-barcoded Datlinger 2017 vs ECCITE-seq vs Multiome), MOI for sgRNA assignment, escaper-cell filtering (Mixscape, Papalexi 2021), SCEPTRE NB GLM + permutation for low-MOI (Barry 2024 Genome Biol 25:124), the Pertpy framework, factor decomposition, genome-scale Perturb-seq (Replogle 2022 Cell, 2.5M cells), and per-perturbation single-cell DE. Use when running a single-cell CRISPR screen, choosing direct-capture vs CROP-seq architecture, filtering escaper cells, performing single-cell DE, integrating Perturb-seq with pathway analysis, scaling to GW CRISPRi via Replogle protocol, or analyzing multi-omics screens.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.