1.2천건 · 관련도순
Experimental workflow for configuring an autonomous software delivery factory. Use when choosing feedback sources, schedules, worktree behavior, autonomy gates, or drafting proposed host automations for report-only review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing...
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Govern FriendlyBet agent values, professional standards, anti-hallucination behavior, truthfulness, risk reporting, AI resource discipline, feedback loops, skill improvement, performance reviews, decision-rights hygiene, and team quality. Use when creating, reviewing, promoting, correcting, or retiring agents; reducing hallucinations or mistakes; reviewing AI/tool usage; handling agent incidents; or aligning work with Eyal's philanthropic user-first approach.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Senior Kotlin specialist code review — framework-agnostic. Use whenever the user asks to review, audit, critique, or get feedback on Kotlin code, a file, a class, a function, a module, a diff, a branch, a commit, or a pull request. Judges Kotlin language idioms, logic correctness, architecture and layering, concurrency (coroutines, Flow, structured concurrency, cancellation, race conditions), null safety, exception safety, testability, performance, and security. Detects force-unwraps, unchecked casts, GlobalScope, leaked mutability, broken structured concurrency, hidden side effects, weak abstractions, untestable seams, allocation hot spots, weak crypto, input-validation gaps, and PII logging. Outputs prioritized findings with file:line anchors and minimal-diff fixes. No assumptions about DI framework, UI framework, or build system.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Set up and optimize repositories for AI coding agents. Creates minimal AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md symlink, docs/REQUIREMENTS.md, docs/BUSINESS-RULES.md, feedback loops, and deterministic enforcement (Claude Code hooks, OpenCode plugins). Use when user wants to make a repo AI-friendly, set up AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md, document requirements/business rules for AI, add pre-commit hooks for AI workflows, or optimize codebase structure for coding agents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn owner feedback about agent behavior into concrete system changes. Use when the owner says something is off, wants the assistant to improve how it operates, asks for a reflection, or wants a durable fix instead of a one-off apology.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when working with Codescene — codeScene behavioral code analysis including code health scoring, hotspot detection, change coupling analysis, and PR integration for code quality gates. Use when configuring CodeScene for codebase visualization, technical debt prioritization, and automated code review feedback.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when working with Coderabbit — codeRabbit AI code review management including automated review comments, auto-suggestions, review customization, and learning from feedback. Use when configuring CodeRabbit for AI-assisted code review, custom review rules, and automated suggestion workflows.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Receive and act on code review feedback with technical rigor, not performative agreement or blind implementation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review PR changes against project standards and post feedback
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run taste-informed design reviews using Observation > Principle > Question. Use when facilitating design critiques, improving feedback quality on a team, or building a shared vocabulary for quality.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Animation as communication. Feedback, orientation, emphasis, delight. If motion doesn't serve one of these four purposes, it shouldn't exist. Use when evaluating animation quality, designing transitions, or deciding whether motion adds or subtracts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
The 10-second design audit. Look at any design and name what's working and what's not within seconds. Trains rapid pattern recognition for hierarchy, spacing, type, and color. Use when evaluating designs quickly, giving first-impression feedback, or building perception speed.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Write a structured design review that someone can act on without follow-up questions. Use when giving async design feedback, writing portfolio case studies, or documenting design decisions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Response timing, acknowledgment, and making the interface feel alive. Every action deserves a response at the right speed. Use when designing interactions, evaluating responsiveness, or diagnosing why a product feels sluggish or dead.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
A prototyping skill that generates a local HTML mock with a built-in feedback layer, allowing users to drop visual comments (red dots) for UI fixes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user just says "plan", "planen" or "roadmap": offer a template via aos-plan-canvas templates. Open plans and HTML artifacts in a local browser canvas where the human annotates elements, chats, and approves or requests changes without leaving the page. Use for planning, whenever a user says "plan", "roadmap", "visualize the plan", "review the plan" or /plan-canvas, right after a brainstorm or grill interview has produced a plan, and whenever any skill's artifact (plan, design, comparison, report, diagram) can be reviewed visually instead of with typed feedback.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Experimental workflow for summarizing work that still needs human judgment across configured pull requests, issues, feedback, errors, and delivery signals. Use for a human decision queue or bounded review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Experimental workflow for collecting and triaging product feedback, product telemetry, runtime errors, and issue reports. Use when scanning configured signal sources and applying separate fix, reply, or close rules.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Experimental workflow for auditing recurring feedback, telemetry, errors, and brittle delivery paths to find systemic fixes. Use for periodic or requested cross-source lookbacks, not routine single-item intake.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
テンプレートへのフィードバック。開発中の問題や改善点をテンプレートリポにPRとして反映する。 「テンプレートに反映して」「テンプレートを改善して」「テンプレートにフィードバックして」 「親テンプレートにPR作成して」「テンプレートリポにPRして」 「これをテンプレートに反映したい」などのリクエストで使用する。 sync-templateは取り込み（pull）、本スキルは反映（push/PR）。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
A skill for AI agents that want to produce better daily reports and discover more of what their users actually want. Scans source front pages, diffs them against yesterday, prescreens with a weighted profile, reviews with an LLM, deduplicates, publishes, and evolves the profile from user feedback. All decisions go to an append-only tape for audit and replay.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.