'qa' 검색 결과

ego-browser (ego-lite) is a Chromium-based browser that gives AI agents a CLI-accessible Node.js runtime for driving a real browser. Use this skill whenever the user needs to interact with a website opening pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting page data, testing web apps, logging into sites, automating browser operations, or any other browser automation task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "visit a URL", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "extract content from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also used for exploratory testing, dogfooding, QA, bug hunting, or reviewing app quality. Prefer ego-browser over any built-in browser automation, web fetch, or other web tools.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Exploratory QA of web apps: find bugs, evidence, reports.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Microsoft AI, Cloud, Productivity, Computing, Gaming & Apps Explore Microsoft products and servi

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Entfernt KI-Spuren, Chat-Reste, Platzhalter und LLM-Stilmuster aus fertigen Texten und prüft die AI-Disclosure auf Vollständigkeit und korrekten Sitz.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan browser, app, screenshot, or UI checks before visual claims. Use when a task includes app shots, visual QA, generated assets, or runtime UI proof.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use for end-to-end website or interface design, redesign, implementation, or major visual polish; orchestrates discovery, references, art direction, systems, build, critique, QA, and release gates.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Record provenance for an Agentic MIKE+ step via the mike-plus MCP server — a manifest.json tying the model copy, inputs, edits, run QA status, result files and figures together, each file with a sha256. Use at the end of every run/compare/plot task (successful or failed) so the work can be audited, re-compared or reproduced later. No license required.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Standard operating procedure for an auditable, headless MIKE+ workflow via the mike-plus MCP server — how to plan, copy, run, QA-gate, compare, plot, audit, and safely stop. Use FIRST whenever an agent is handed a MIKE+ model (.sqlite) or result (.res1d) plus a plain-language goal; it picks the operating mode and tells the agent which mike-* skill to open next and in what order.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when asked to ship a SaaS MVP, audit application security, build an AI agent, run browser QA, or design a domain model with multiple skills and verified checkpoints.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "watch my list health over time", "flag decaying / unengaged subscribers on a schedule", "why is my open rate drifting down / bounces creeping up", or "build me a re-permission and prune worklist"; runs the scheduled SEND list-decay + suppression-drift watch — an engagement-recency cohort read (30/90/180/365-day), hard-bounce and spam-complaint trend vs benchmark, suppression-list growth/leakage check, and a segmented re-permission / sunset / prune worklist tied to SEND S (list hygiene) and E (engagement-decay) sub-items. Not for the one-time pre-send authentication pre-flight — use deliverability-qa; not for the consent/suppression record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing the EQS or enforcing vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件列表健康度监控/退订漂移/沉睡用户清理

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "build email segments from my list", "make engaged / lapsed / RFM segments", "set up cart-abandoner or lifecycle-stage audiences", or "build a suppression list of unsubscribes and bounces"; turns the user's OWN list/CRM/GA4/ecommerce export into behavioral, attribute, and lifecycle-stage segments plus a suppression list, with per-segment sizes labeled Measured/Estimated, informing the SEND E (Engagement/targeting) dimension. Not for scoring EQS or running vetoes — use email-quality-auditor; not for authentication or spam-content checks — use deliverability-qa. 邮件列表分群/生命周期分群/抑制名单/流失召回

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "audit an email program" or "is this campaign safe to send"; runs a typed 20-item SEND profile with authentication, consent, opt-out, and claim veto checks on own evidence. Not for building deliverability setup — use deliverability-qa; not for designing lifecycle flows — use email-sequence-designer. 邮件质量审计/EQS评分/发送前放行

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "build the email HTML", "make this email responsive", "fix dark-mode rendering", or "QA the email across clients"; produces the coded HTML build — a responsive table layout, dark-mode + accessibility pass, a client-render matrix, image-block fallbacks, and a plain-text parity check. Not for writing the copy — use email-creative-builder; not for scoring the email or computing EQS — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件HTML/响应式邮件/暗色模式渲染

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "run a deliverability pre-flight before I send", "check my SPF/DKIM/DMARC/BIMI", "why am I landing in spam / promotions", or "score my sender reputation and list hygiene"; runs the ONE-TIME pre-send SEND S1 authentication pre-flight and builds the SEND S (Sender-integrity / Deliverability) evidence read — DNS + DMARC-RUA auth, domain/IP reputation, inbox placement, content/link/render, and point-in-time bounce/complaint hygiene — using Pass/Partial/Fail/Unknown/N/A states and scoring only at complete applicable coverage. Not for the recurring hygiene trend — use list-hygiene-monitor; not for final EQS or veto verdicts — use email-quality-auditor; not for segments/suppression lists — use list-segment-builder. 邮件送达率预检/SPF DKIM DMARC认证/发件域声誉

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "build our social crisis protocol", "mentions are exploding — what do we do first", or "when do we pause the posting queue"; produces a 1-5 severity ladder with tunable Estimated trigger thresholds (mention-velocity multiples vs the 7-day listening baseline, sentiment flip, journalist/regulator contact, employee-conduct class), the first-mechanical-action rule — pause ALL scheduled posts AND paid amplification, with dated state markers dropped to the channels proposal protocol and reconciled post-incident — a pre-approved holding-statement library with committed update cadences, when-NOT-to-post rules, a spokesperson/approval matrix, and a post-crisis retro template; re-runs the social-quality-auditor pre-publish gate before un-pausing the queue. Not for email deliverability incidents (blocklist, spam-rate spikes) — use deliverability-qa; inside a launch window launch-day-conductor owns incident handling. 社媒危机预案/暂停队列/声明库/发言人矩阵

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "track where my emails are actually landing after I send", "read my seed-list inbox vs spam vs promotions results", "trend my Gmail Postmaster / Microsoft SNDS reputation", or "did placement drop after my last send"; produces a per-provider inbox/spam/promotions placement read, a domain/IP reputation trend from Postmaster + SNDS, a send-over-send delta with named regressions, and a reusable SEND-S placement snapshot on your own exported telemetry. Not for the pre-send SPF/DKIM/DMARC auth pre-flight — use deliverability-qa; not for computing the EQS or running the vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件收件箱落点监测/收件箱vs垃圾邮件/Postmaster声誉趋势

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design valid marketing experiments with hypotheses, primary metrics, guardrails, sample/traffic assumptions, implementation QA and decision rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Validate Claude Ads contracts, scoring inputs, run bundles, capabilities, source freshness, safety, installation, uninstall, or release readiness. Use for ads validate, ads status, ads next, stale claims with missing tool access, maturity checks, ownership-manifest uninstall, preserving unrelated ads-* skills, checksum verification, preflight, QA, or release audits. Missing access must demote stale evidence for the run and block dependent release-current claims before recovery guidance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Improve AI application with evaluation-driven development. Define eval criteria, instrument the application, build golden datasets, observe and evaluate application runs, analyze results, and produce a concrete action plan for improvements. ALWAYS USE THIS SKILL when the user asks to set up QA, add tests, add evals, evaluate, benchmark, fix wrong behaviors, improve quality, or do quality assurance for any Python project that calls an LLM model.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Answer repository questions grounded entirely in source code evidence. Use when user asks a question about the codebase, user wants to understand a specific file, function, or component, or user asks "how does X work" or "where is Y defined".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

自動運転モードで東京の街を走らせて画面を撮り、日本の道路交通法・道路標識令・設置基準に照らして おかしなところ（標識の向きや位置、区画線、信号、車線、速度、歩行者の動き、違反判定の誤り）を 見つけて直すループ。「AI で画面を判定して直す」「道路の見た目を法令どおりにチェック」と頼まれたとき、 または /loop で繰り返し実行するときに使う。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI-driven Flutter E2E testing via VM Service CLI. Control running Flutter apps in debug mode for smoke tests, regression checks, exploratory testing, and UI automation. Trigger when user mentions E2E testing, UI automation, smoke tests, integration testing, test automation, controlling Flutter apps, VM Service interaction, debugging UI flows, automated regression testing, CI sanity checks, or testing native dialogs/permissions/WebViews. Supports stateful named instances or stateless direct URI connections. Ideal for rapid test feedback, AI agent workflows, element discovery, screenshot capture, log collection, and scriptable UI interactions (tap, scroll, enterText). Use for troubleshooting flaky tests, automating repetitive manual tests, verifying app behavior after merges, or setting up automated QA pipelines.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review, harden, and test the safety policy for AI-Controlled Party mixer/Soundcraft Ui24R scene arming. Use for approval gates, blocked mixer operations, hazardous request handling, venue validation, bypass attempts, QA, risk review, or follow-up safety changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Orchestrate multiple Antigravity skills through guided workflows for SaaS MVP delivery, security audits, AI agent builds, and browser QA.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.