Use when Radar backlog records or plan-linkage contracts need validation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
331건 · 관련도순
Use when Radar backlog records or plan-linkage contracts need validation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create grounded Radar backlog workstreams.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Validate Radar backlog and plan linkage contracts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prioritize a feature backlog or list of ideas. Use when the user says "help me prioritize", "prioritize this backlog", "RICE score these", "MoSCoW", "opportunity solution tree", "what should we build first", "rank these features", or has a list of items and needs to decide order - even if they don't explicitly say "prioritization".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when building or maintaining a Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) on a Salesforce project: one row per requirement, columns for source, user-story id(s), test-case id(s), defect id(s), sprint, release, and status. Covers forward traceability (req → story → code → test) and backward traceability (test → req). Trigger keywords: RTM, requirements traceability matrix, audit trail for salesforce delivery, traceability for steerco, deferred requirement tracking, regulatory traceability. NOT for eliciting the requirements in the first place — use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf. NOT for user-story authoring — use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for UAT test design — use admin/uat-test-case-design. NOT for Apex test design — use apex/test-class-standards. NOT for backlog prioritization — use admin/moscow-prioritization-for-sf-backlog. More triggers: traceability.md, build-layer traceability, REQ-XXX and FG-XXX id mapping, artefact-to-requirement orphan report, coverage-gap report, check_rtm.py --manifest-dir, owning run-time agent column, design decision ref column, metadata API name in a traceability row.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
JIRA agile via the jira-as wrapper: epics, sprints, backlog, ranking, story points, subtasks, velocity. Triggers: 'create sprint', 'add KEY to sprint', 'set story points on KEY', 'rank KEY before KEY', 'velocity for board', 'epic add'. Board ID ≠ project key. NOT for issue CRUD (mk:jira-issue); NOT for time tracking (mk:jira-time).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Read-only release + backlog recap. Reports the last release, commits-since-tag classified by conventional-commit type with the semver bump they trigger and pushed-vs-origin state, the backlog bucketed (open/picked-up/dropped with epic parent→child nesting), the roadmap epics with their per-task tallies, and condensed open questions — then recommends the next pickup. One `cli.mjs recap` call returns all six recap keys. Invoke any time (on demand) to plan a release or choose the next thing to build; a compact form is also surfaced at session start. Not a workflow phase; never writes CHANGELOG; never starts or commits work.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Agile product ownership for backlog management and sprint execution. Covers user story writing, acceptance criteria, sprint planning, and velocity tracking. Use when writing user stories, creating acceptance criteria, planning sprints, estimating story points, breaking down epics, or prioritizing the backlog.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Decides how far ahead to plan, what to discount future payoffs by, and which backlog items can be dropped without analysis - using receding-horizon planning, an explicit discount factor, and branch-and-bound pruning against the incumbent. Use when building a roadmap, prioritising a backlog, arguing about short-term versus long-term, setting quarterly or annual plans, or when planning has become an end in itself.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Ranks any list of impediments and their countermeasures using a value-stream scoring model (ROI, Cost to Implement, Ease of Deployment, Risk Factor) and a fixed prioritization formula. Use when someone asks to prioritize, rank, sequence, or triage impediments, countermeasures, remediation items, risks, findings, gaps, action items, or backlog entries; or mentions value-stream prioritization, A3 / lean countermeasure ranking, ROI vs. effort scoring, or building a remediation / improvement backlog. Works with GHQR findings, audit results, retrospective action items, risk registers, architecture review gaps, or any free-form `{impediment, countermeasure}` list.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
本番と同じ失敗を本番前に検出するためのテスト階層設計スキル。 DB方言差、実依存関係、永続化確認、timezone差、packaging整合性、 adversarial regressionをunit/integration/e2e/smoke/packagingに 適切に割り振り、PR CIで最低限の本番同等性を保証する。 Use when designing production-parity tests, closing test blind spots, building smoke suites for real dependencies, verifying persistence beyond UI success, or creating adversarial regression backlogs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
大規模システムリプレース・移行プロジェクトについて、マルチベンダー管理に長けたPMOの視点で「見落とされがちな潜在リスク」を洗い出す。正常系設計や特定ベンダーの担当範囲内には現れにくい「ベンダー間の隙間」「業務影響」「異常系」の死角を、4視点の分析フレームワークで特定し、Backlog起票用のリスク表とキラークエスチョンを生成する。要件定義・運用設計・負荷試験フェーズ特化フレームワークへの切替にも対応。総合テスト終盤・移行リハーサル前・負荷試験計画時のリスク総ざらいに使用する。Do NOT use for 個別インシデントの根本原因分析(incident-rca)、要求の追加・変更・矛盾検証(requirement-management)、運用設計書そのものの新規作成(operations-design)。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when working with Azure Boards Deep — deep Azure Boards management covering work items, sprints, backlogs, queries, and team velocity analytics. Use when performing deep audits of Azure DevOps Boards, analyzing sprint health, reviewing backlog grooming, or assessing team capacity and velocity across Azure DevOps projects.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Survey the whole tdmcp project and produce a prioritized list of NEW features it could implement — across artist controls, CLI/DX, AI/LLM integration, and TouchDesigner depth. Use whenever the user wants to brainstorm, discover, survey, list, or audit what features/tools/effects/controls/commands/prompts/capabilities tdmcp *could* add, asks 'what could we build / what's missing / what are the opportunities / ideas for the project', or wants a feature backlog or gap analysis. Also for follow-ups: re-run, refresh, update, re-survey, deepen, or re-prioritize the backlog, or survey just one surface (e.g. 'CLI ideas only'). This is the IDEATION harness — it produces a list to decide from; it does NOT build. When the user has already chosen a feature and wants it implemented/shipped/added, use tdmcp-pipeline instead.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Sort an email backlog into reply, delegate, archive and ignore, and draft the replies. Nothing is sent without your GO. Use for "inbox zero", "sort my mail", "clear my email backlog", "draft replies to my mail".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
backlog(atoms/pipeline/outputs)と skill ヘルス(usage/duration/unused)を統合分析し 1 レポートで提示する。kawai 氏型 analytics ループの起点。「次に何やる?」「atom 整理」「放置案件」「stale」「振り返り」「retro」「skill 使用統計」「unused skill」「atom-suggest」で発動。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Author BACKLOG.md — wayfinding, grilling, create or append items, validate with openspec, and plan OpenSpec change folders for /cc-openspec.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Orchestrator for the experimentation skill suite — turn assumptions and product questions into rigorous, well-instrumented experiments and decision-grade readouts. Routes through backlog → spec → runbook → readout based on user need and existing artefacts. Platform-agnostic with PostHog as the primary binding. Load when the user asks to design an experiment, A/B test something, set up an experiment, run a holdout, test a hypothesis, decide what to test next, read out experiment results, analyse a test, or says "should we A/B test this", "experiment on the landing page", "is this lift real", "ship or kill this test", "what should we test next", "build an experiment backlog", "test the pricing page", "validate this with an experiment".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review and promote backlog items to active milestone
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Add an idea to the backlog parking lot (999.x numbering)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
실시간 화면과 데이터 전달의 지연, 데이터 최신성, 처리 대기를 따로 측정합니다. 이벤트 발생부터 화면 표시까지 경로를 개선하고 운영 환경에서 결과를 확인합니다.
모호한 요구를 다섯 단계로 정리해 구현에 사용할 명세와 GitHub 이슈를 만듭니다. 필요하면 독립 작업 디렉터리에서 Claude Code로 구현을 시작합니다.
지원 요청을 영향과 시간적 긴급성에 따라 분류하고 담당자, 다음 조치, 답변 기한을 정리합니다. 내부 배정과 검토용 고객 답변 초안 작성을 돕습니다.
GitHub 이슈와 PR을 대조해 중복 작업, 수정 PR이 없는 보안 지적, 미해결 중대 버그를 정리하고 우선 조치와 건수를 보고서로 제공합니다.