717건 · 관련도순
Use when capturing research artifacts to a vault or knowledge base, formatting source citations, saving synthesized connections from a writing project, or enriching a knowledge base with produced content.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze competitors using Blue Ocean Strategy's ERRC Grid and Strategy Canvas (W. Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne) to identify uncontested market space, not just who is better on the same axes. Produces an ERRC Grid, Strategy Canvas, positioning matrix, messaging comparison, and differentiation map. Use when the user asks for competitive analysis, competitor research, "how do we compare to X", positioning vs competitors, market landscape, "analyze our competition", "where is the blue ocean", or wants to update competitor docs. Writes to knowledge/markets/competitors.md. For a lightweight competitor summary in the knowledge base, see brand-context. For positioning against them, see positioning-doc. For a product or feature-level comparison outside the marketing knowledge base, see competitive-analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Obsidian Claw is an ontology-building skill that transforms chaotic notes, raw ideas, voice dumps, and meeting transcripts into a structured, interlinked knowledge base inside Obsidian. Use this skill whenever the user wants to: add new notes to their Obsidian vault and auto-link them to existing ones, build a concept graph or knowledge map, surface forgotten related discussions ("you talked about this with investor X 3 months ago"), extract entities and relationships from unstructured text, or turn scattered thoughts into wiki-style atomic notes. Also trigger when the user mentions "second brain", "Zettelkasten", "PKM", "personal knowledge management", "note graph", "knowledge graph", "link my notes", "organize my vault", "connect ideas", or asks Claude to "remember" something across sessions using Obsidian. If the user is doing anything with Obsidian notes and wants intelligence layered on top, use this skill.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base synthesized from the Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK) v2.14 by the BKCASE Project. Use for the established systems-engineering canon: SE fundamentals and foundations (systems science, systems thinking, the systems approach, modelling/MBSE), the life cycle (ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288/24748/24774 process, development & agile approaches, model selection/tailoring), technical management, concept definition, architecture/realization (the Vee), V&V, maintenance/sustainment, SE standards, and the application contexts (product, service, enterprise, systems-of-systems, healthcare), plus enabling SE (business/team/individual), related disciplines, quality attributes/specialty engineering, implementation examples, and emerging knowledge. Good for grounding background, vocabulary, and prior-art positions across all eight SEBoK Parts. SCOPE LIMITS: this pack is SEBoK v2.14 only (released 2026-05-18); it synthesizes and signposts rather than reproducing the source — it does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE standard text, is a curated guide (not a complete textbook), and is thin on AI-integration depth (Part 8 is a staging area, not settled practice). LICENCE: content is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 — non-commercial use only, attribution to the BKCASE Project required, share-alike obligations carry forward.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from MIL-STD-40051-2C (15 Dec 2015), Preparation of Digital Technical Information for Page-Based Technical Manuals. Use for TM/TDP structure, work packages, front/back matter, style/format, warnings/HAZMAT, change packages, content selection matrices, and plate exemplars. Primary Training & Documentation pack (cluster 25) with Ops & Maintenance procedure use—page-based (-2C) only, not IETM 40051-1.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the DoD M&Q BoK (the Manufacturing and Quality Engineering Body of Knowledge), v3.0 of July 2025, published by OUSD(R&E). Use for the manufacturing-and-quality view of the defense acquisition life cycle: what M&Q engineers do across the Adaptive Acquisition Framework phases (Pre-MDD, Materiel Solution Analysis, Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and Deployment, Operations and Support); the twelve M&Q threads (A–L) built on the '5 Ms'; manufacturing feasibility and producibility; Manufacturing Readiness Levels and assessments; Key/Critical Characteristics and process capability (Cp/Cpk, SPC); the standards stack (AS6500, AS9100/ISO 9001, AS9103, AS9145); technical reviews (ASR/PDR/CDR/PRR) and milestone gates; DCMA surveillance; industrial base and supply chain; and sustainment (LCSP, IPS, ILA, ISR). Scope is DoD acquisition M&Q practice on the Major Capability Acquisition path — it is a best-practice compilation, not policy, and is thin on detailed shop-floor process engineering, contract law, and the full text of the cited industry standards (which it names but does not reproduce).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide (GAO-16-89G, 2015). Use for building, assessing, or auditing a program's integrated master schedule (IMS): the ten best practices of a reliable schedule (capture, sequence, resource, duration, traceability, valid critical path, reasonable total float, schedule risk analysis, updating, baseline), the four characteristics (comprehensive, well-constructed, credible, controlled), critical path method arithmetic (forward/backward pass, total float), schedule risk analysis (Monte Carlo, contingency), statusing and baseline control, and the Appendix II audit triad. Scheduling/time-management oriented: it is the authority on schedule reliability, but it is NOT a cost-estimating guide, a full SE process model, an agile guide, or a risk-management framework — see sibling packs (gao-cost, dau-se-guidebook, nasa-schedule, nasa-risk) for those.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the NASA Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide (NASA/SP-2011-3421, 2nd ed.). Use for quantitative PRA of aerospace and safety-critical systems: the risk triplet and scenario logic stack (MLD, ESD, event trees, fault trees, minimal cut sets), Bayesian data collection and parameter estimation, aleatory/epistemic uncertainty modeling and common-cause failure (Alpha Factor, beta-factor, CCBE), human reliability analysis (THERP, CREAM, NARA, SPAR-H), context-based software risk (CSRM), physics-based and structural/phenomenological models (stress-strength, limit states, FORM/SORM, NASGRO, range safety), uncertainty propagation and importance measures (F-V, RAW, Birnbaum, DIM), and launch-abort modeling with worked PRA examples. This is the QUANTITATIVE engine beneath NASA's risk doctrine — for the qualitative RIDM/CRM decision framework use the nasa-risk pack. Thin on programme management, organisational risk governance, and non-aerospace regulatory contexts; aerospace-focused and anchored to the 2011 second edition.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the Expanded Guidance for NASA Systems Engineering (NASA/SP-2016-6105-SUPPL, Volume 1, March 2016) — the practitioner-depth supplement to the NASA SE Handbook. Use for the load-bearing mechanics the handbook compresses: the SE Engine's per-phase cadence and the iterative-vs-recursive distinction, the AS9100 crosswalk, life-cycle tailoring vs. customization and the Compliance Matrix, the recursive system-design consistency loop (ConOps vs. Operations Concept, requirement flow/type/ownership, successive refinement), product realization (verify/qualify/accept/certify cardinality, protoflight, 'test the way we fly' coverage, two-form transition), and the crosscutting technical-management procedures (six-step scheduling, cost-estimating method selection, JCL, interface document family, RIDM/CRM, CM baselines, EVM arithmetic, MOE/MOP/KPP/TPM, the three required leading indicators, and the decision-analysis method catalog). This is the DEPTH layer — it deliberately does NOT restate the base definitions; pair it with the nasa-se-handbook pack. Scope: NASA space-flight SE practice (Vol 1 Practices); thin on the Vol 2 process-appendix detail, on non-NASA/commercial life cycles, and on software-engineering methodology.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the GAO Technology Readiness Assessment Guide (GAO-20-48G, 2020). Use for evaluating technology maturity in acquisition programs and projects: Technology Readiness Levels (TRL 1–9) and related scales (MRL, IRL), identifying Critical Technology Elements (CTEs), the five-step process for a high-quality TRA, the four characteristics of a reliable TRA (comprehensive, well-documented, credible, defensible), Technology Maturation Plans (TMPs), and using TRA results in knowledge-based, milestone decisions. Assessment/maturity oriented: it measures readiness and frames risk — it is not a full SE process model, cost-estimating, or schedule guide (see sibling packs for those).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the NASA Digital Engineering Acquisition Framework Handbook (NASA-HDBK-1004). Use for acquiring digital/model-based data under contract: the Data Requirements Description (DRD) instrument and the Appendix A DRD suite (TDP, MBx, CDMP, CSA, CR, FCA/PCA, SDT, EMDAL, REF, MRI); the Data Type 1-5 control scale; SOW/RFP/Cost-Volume contract language and data rights (FAR/DFARS, Table 3 license categories); the Requirements Exchange Format (REF/ReqIF, UUID schema) and Master Records Index; model-based data definition (MBSE, CAD/PMI, M&S credibility, BOM, release-state mapping, PLM); digital data collaboration, the four owned architectures, and interoperability standards (MIL-STD-31000, STEP/ISO 10303, ASME Y14); the four MBE interoperability use cases; and MBE Plan development. Scope is the acquisition and contracting side of digital engineering. Does not reproduce ISO/STEP/ASME/MIL-STD/SAE standard text, and the companion NASA-HDBK-1009A carries the deeper digital-engineering practitioner detail this handbook defers to.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the NASA Schedule Management Handbook (2024 edition, Revision 2). Use for program/project schedule management of aerospace and large engineering efforts: the five sub-functions (Planning, Development, Assessment & Analysis, Maintenance & Control, Documentation & Communication); the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the WBS/OBS/CBS breakdown structures; the Schedule Management Plan (SMP) and Basis of Estimate (BoE); Critical Path Method, logic, durations, float and margin; tiered schedule assessment (Requirements/Health/Basis checks, the Shock Test) and the Dimensions of Schedule Reliability; Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA), Integrated Cost-Schedule Risk Analysis (ICSRA), Monte Carlo, correlation, merge bias, and the Joint Confidence Level (JCL); baselining, replan vs. rebaseline, EVM schedule metrics (SPI, BEI, CEI, HMI, Earned Schedule, CPLI), and status/progress/forecast reporting. This is NASA's scheduling doctrine grounded in NPR 7120.5 and the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide. Thin on the underlying mechanics of CPM, statistics, and EVM (it points to companion handbooks); aerospace/space-flight-centric; anchored to the 2024 second edition.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Personal App-in-Skill customer-support desk (help desk) that triages incoming support tickets from email, WhatsApp, web chat, contact forms, and WeChat, drafts KB-grounded replies, and proposes actions, then holds every send behind a human approval queue with a pre-send quality gate (support-qa) that outputs SHIP/FIX/BLOCK, plus SLA and CSAT tracking. Use when the user invokes $kelly-support or /kelly-support, mentions 客服 / 工单 / 支持台, a support desk, help desk, customer service, support tickets, ticket triage, a knowledge base or canned macros, SLA / first-response time, CSAT, escalations, or refund requests, wants incoming tickets triaged into a needs_review → approved → done pipeline, agent-drafted replies grounded in a knowledge base and reviewed before sending, refunds and commitments gated behind human approval, or breaching-SLA tickets surfaced. This is the OPERATOR desk (agent + human), distinct from a visitor-facing chat bubble.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Curate Busabase training examples, create immutable dataset snapshots, run reproducible LoRA or QLoRA fine-tunes on a local Apple Silicon Mac with MLX-LM, compare the untouched baseline and adapter on locked evaluations, and register approved adapters. Use when the user wants to train, fine-tune, evaluate, compare, promote, or manage a local language model with Busabase as the workflow source of truth. Do not use for RAG-only knowledge retrieval, cloud training, or training a foundation model from scratch.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Biological knowledge: query curated assertions and reference databases for genes, variants, pathways, regulation, cell types, reference atlases, perturbation-derived relationships, phenotypes, therapeutic targets, drugs, interactions, annotations, signatures, compounds, and predicted structures. Use for identifiers, marker sets, gene sets, associations, ontologies, database facts, and cross-database coverage.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Auto-generate knowledge YAML from the codebase. Use when the user runs /sync-knowledge or wants knowledge files refreshed.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
API로 SiYuan 노트를 검색하고 읽으며 편집합니다. 문서 생성, 문단 추가·수정, 이름 변경과 삭제를 처리하고 Markdown으로 내보낼 수 있습니다.
코드의 함수와 호출 관계, 실행 흐름을 연결된 도표로 만들어 브라우저에서 탐색할 수 있게 합니다. Cloudflare를 통한 원격 공유도 지원합니다.
기사·논문·메모를 출처와 상호 링크가 있는 Markdown 지식 모음으로 정리합니다. 답변과 비교를 저장하고, 끊어진 링크와 정보 모순도 점검합니다.
대화에서 얻은 사실, 일상 사건, 사용자 선호를 파일로 저장합니다. 프로젝트와 지속적인 책임 등으로 분류하고, 세션이 바뀌어도 검색하고 참조할 수 있습니다.
코드, 설정, 문서를 분석해 구성 요소와 의존 관계를 대화형으로 탐색하는 그래프를 만듭니다. 일본어 설명 생성과 변경 내용에 따른 갱신도 지원합니다.