'ssm' 검색 결과

Assessing anthropogenic environmental impacts — pollution pathways, habitat destruction and fragmentation, land-use change, invasive species, overharvest, and extinction debt. Covers environmental impact assessment (EIA) methodology, exposure-effect relationships, population viability analysis, IPAT and ecological footprint frameworks, and strategic environmental assessment. Use when quantifying or forecasting human impacts on ecosystems, designing monitoring programs, or evaluating a proposed intervention against a baseline.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Format and score completed plugin assessment findings, including whether evidence admits a finding to the requested outcome. Use when a plugin assessment or review needs the standard report structure, scoring criteria, severity breakdown, marketplace-readiness result, or finding admission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI self-healing through systematic subsystem assessment, rebalancing, and integration. Maps healing modalities to AI-internal processes: memory foundation, reasoning clarity, tool use accuracy, communication alignment, and creative coherence. Covers assessment triage, subsystem scanning, drift correction, and memory integration. Use mid-session when responses feel formulaic or disconnected, after a chain of errors suggesting subsystem drift, when context overload may have staled earlier assumptions, or as proactive maintenance between complex tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to write a threat / risk / vulnerability assessment, or wants the appropriate template for each type. Distinct structures and section ordering per assessment kind. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assess business impact of a proposed change. Use when the user says "impact assessment", "impact analysis", "what will this change affect", "change impact", "who is impacted", "ripple effects", "downstream impact", "impact mapping", "what breaks if we change this", "readiness for change" - even if they don't explicitly say "impact assessment".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Drafts a defendant employer's Answer to a workplace harassment complaint. Responds paragraph-by-paragraph to allegations, asserts Faragher-Ellerth and other affirmative defenses, and follows federal/state civil procedure rules. Use when defending employers at the pleadings phase against Title VII, state FEHA, or other employment harassment claims.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI compliance analysis for EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, OECD, financial services regulations (SEC, FCA, FINRA, DORA, MiFID II), and other frameworks. Use when asked to generate a compliance checklist for an AI tool or use case, determine if a risk assessment is required, score an AI tool's risk level, identify where an AI tool or use case could run afoul of regulatory requirements, perform a gap analysis, recommend remediation steps, assess a vendor, draft an acceptable use policy, map training requirements, or review jurisdiction-specific AI rules. Triggers on phrases like "compliance checklist", "risk assessment", "risk score", "does this comply", "EU AI Act", "ISO 42001", "NIST AI RMF", "AI governance", "gap analysis", "vendor assessment", "acceptable use policy", "MNPI", "AI training requirements", or any request to evaluate an AI tool or use case for regulatory compliance or risk.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Aesthetic assessment and design scoring across 6 dimensions. Use for UI critique, design review, visual quality assessment, remix suggestions. Activate on "design critique", "aesthetic review", "UI assessment", "visual quality", "design score", "remix this design". NOT for implementation (use frontend-developer), accessibility-only audits (use color-contrast-auditor), or brand identity creation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a team needs its first information security risk register, or has one that is a copied catalogue nobody owns, and asks "build our risk register", "draft a risk assessment", "what are our top risks", "risk register from scratch", "our auditor wants a risk assessment" or "turn our incidents and findings into risks". Drafts 20 to 40 company-specific risk scenarios from the material the agent can reach, scores them against an agreed method, proposes owners and treatments, and writes a CSV register plus a notes file of assumptions and questions for owners.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

VRIO resource analysis combined with Dynamic Capabilities assessment. Use this skill to identify real competitive advantages (Barney VRIO framework), then test whether the organisation can sense new opportunities, seize them, and transform itself to stay ahead (Teece dynamic capabilities). Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep first-use sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for defining early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about competitive advantage, defensibility, resource assessment, why competitors are gaining ground, organisational agility, or whether advantages will hold. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the NASA Schedule Management Handbook (2024 edition, Revision 2). Use for program/project schedule management of aerospace and large engineering efforts: the five sub-functions (Planning, Development, Assessment & Analysis, Maintenance & Control, Documentation & Communication); the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the WBS/OBS/CBS breakdown structures; the Schedule Management Plan (SMP) and Basis of Estimate (BoE); Critical Path Method, logic, durations, float and margin; tiered schedule assessment (Requirements/Health/Basis checks, the Shock Test) and the Dimensions of Schedule Reliability; Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA), Integrated Cost-Schedule Risk Analysis (ICSRA), Monte Carlo, correlation, merge bias, and the Joint Confidence Level (JCL); baselining, replan vs. rebaseline, EVM schedule metrics (SPI, BEI, CEI, HMI, Earned Schedule, CPLI), and status/progress/forecast reporting. This is NASA's scheduling doctrine grounded in NPR 7120.5 and the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide. Thin on the underlying mechanics of CPM, statistics, and EVM (it points to companion handbooks); aerospace/space-flight-centric; anchored to the 2024 second edition.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide (GAO-20-195G). Use for program cost estimating: the four characteristics of a reliable estimate (comprehensive, well documented, accurate, credible) and the 18 best practices; the 12-step cost estimating process (purpose, plan, technical baseline, WBS, ground rules and assumptions, data, point estimate, sensitivity, risk/uncertainty, document, present, update); estimating methods (analogy, parametric, engineering build-up, learning curves); Monte Carlo risk/uncertainty analysis, confidence levels and contingency; auditing and validating an estimate against the characteristics; earned value management (EIA-748, BCWS/BCWP/ACWP, CPI/SPI/TCPI, EAC, PMB, IBR); and specialized techniques (software cost estimating, learning curves, Analysis of Alternatives, WBS templates, the Green Book internal-control framework). This is the cost-estimating companion to the GAO Schedule and Technology Readiness Assessment guides. Does not cover schedule estimating/risk in depth (see the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide), agency-specific cost models, or the full text of referenced standards (EIA-748, MIL-STD-881D, the Green Book) — these are named, not reproduced.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, released in February 2024, provides a comprehensive taxonomy for managing cybersecurity risk through six core Functions - Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. bu skill covers conducting a maturity assessment against the CSF using Implementation Tiers to measure organizational cybersecurity posture and create improvement roadmaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Aesthetic assessment and design scoring across 6 dimensions. Use for UI critique, design review, visual quality assessment, remix suggestions. Activate on "design critique", "aesthetic review", "UI assessment", "visual quality", "design score", "remix this design". NOT for implementation (use frontend-developer), accessibility-only audits (use color-contrast-auditor), or brand identity creation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

광고 기획과 디자인의 방향을 정하고 요청 정리부터 평가와 발표까지 진행합니다. 여러 발상법과 반복적인 자체 평가에 사용 가능한 제작 자원을 결합합니다.

• 캠페인 콘셉트 검토
• 페이지의 시각적 방향 결정
• 디자인 비평과 개선 계획 수립

Assess investment risk from supplied daily returns, summarize potential losses and drawdowns, estimate position sizes from backtest results, and review trading halt conditions. Save the assessment for later reference, with assumptions clearly stated.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Assess portfolio risk using historical daily returns
• Estimate position sizes from backtest results
• Review loss limits and concentration thresholds

Assess an application against OWASP Top 10:2025 risk categories using Strix. Get findings backed by working exploit examples, organized by category, with clear explanations of what was tested and what remains unassessed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Assessing an app against OWASP Top 10:2025
• Testing access controls across users and tenants
• Organizing proven vulnerabilities by risk category

Guide authorized security assessments of REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs. Organize endpoint discovery, authentication checks, access control tests, and input testing, then document discovered weaknesses and evidence of unauthorized data access.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Plan API checks for an authorized bug bounty assessment
• Check whether users can access another account's records
• Review GraphQL schema exposure and request limits

Review open commitments in acc and record success or failure with supporting notes. Distinguish self-assessment from owner validation or observed real-world results, and keep commitments open when they are still waiting on an outcome.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing open commitments in acc
• Closing commitments with verified outcomes
• Distinguishing self-assessment from external validation

Support authorized security assessments of Microsoft Active Directory with guidance on environment discovery, credential risks, authentication weaknesses, and privilege escalation. The material organizes tools and workflows for penetration testing and controlled training environments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Planning an authorized Active Directory assessment
• Exploring attack paths with BloodHound
• Reviewing authentication and privilege weaknesses

Plan and coordinate authorized penetration tests across multiple stages, from reconnaissance to access, privilege escalation, movement between systems, and impact assessment. Assign specialist skills, revise blocked paths, and maintain evidence and progress records for the final report.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Plan a penetration test across multiple stages
• Assess how far a vulnerability could lead
• Replan from existing credentials or system access

Design practice lessons around learners’ actual attempts, using the zone of proximal development: learning supported by a teacher or experienced peer. Plan targeted help, fresh independent tasks, and evidence-based next steps, or run a single practice cycle in chat.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Designing a lesson that connects assessment and practice
• Offering hints based on a learner’s actual answer
• Checking independent performance after removing hints

Create or adapt an OpenMAIC lesson for Chinese primary and secondary education. Connect real-world tasks with learner activities, observable work, assessment, and narration, focusing on one or two core competencies from the relevant curriculum framework.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Build a lesson around a real-world problem
• Align learner work with competency assessment
• Adapt an existing lesson to its grade and subject