1.3천건 · 관련도순
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build production-ready Web3 applications, smart contracts, and decentralized systems. Implements DeFi protocols, NFT platforms, DAOs, and enterprise blockchain integrations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turns Hi-C/Micro-C FASTQ into a deduplicated, filtered .pairs file with pairtools and decides whether the library worked. Covers the bwa mem -SP5M / bwa-mem2 / chromap --preset hic alignment idiom (mates mapped as independent single-end reads), pairtools parse vs parse2 and the walks-policy choice (5unique pairwise vs all for Pore-C/Micro-C concatemers), pair-type classification (keep UU and rescued UC), dedup (PCR vs optical/by-tile), select by pair_type/MAPQ/distance, restriction-fragment handling (restrict, Arima dual-enzyme, Micro-C/DNase fragment-free), and allele-specific phasing (pairtools phase to two coolers). The library-QC decision uses % long-range cis as the one-number quality metric, trans as the noise floor, orientation balance as fragment-map-free dangling-end/self-circle QC, and % duplicates as a complexity proxy. Use when processing Hi-C/Micro-C/Omni-C reads into pairs, judging library quality, handling multi-enzyme or restriction-agnostic protocols, or generating allele-specific contacts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes single-cell pooled CRISPR screens (Perturb-seq, CROP-seq, Perturb-CITE-seq, ECCITE-seq, multiome) where each cell carries an sgRNA and a scRNA-seq / surface-protein / chromatin readout. Covers experimental design (direct-capture Perturb-seq Dixit 2016 vs CROP-seq 3'UTR-barcoded Datlinger 2017 vs ECCITE-seq vs Multiome), MOI for sgRNA assignment, escaper-cell filtering (Mixscape, Papalexi 2021), SCEPTRE NB GLM + permutation for low-MOI (Barry 2024 Genome Biol 25:124), the Pertpy framework, factor decomposition, genome-scale Perturb-seq (Replogle 2022 Cell, 2.5M cells), and per-perturbation single-cell DE. Use when running a single-cell CRISPR screen, choosing direct-capture vs CROP-seq architecture, filtering escaper cells, performing single-cell DE, integrating Perturb-seq with pathway analysis, scaling to GW CRISPRi via Replogle protocol, or analyzing multi-omics screens.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Preprocess CLIP-seq reads (eCLIP, iCLIP, iCLIP2, iCLIP3, irCLIP, PAR-CLIP, FLASH) with protocol-specific UMI extraction, adapter trimming, length filtering, and post-alignment PCR-duplicate collapse. Use when raw CLIP FASTQ must be turned into deduplicated, crosslink-preserving BAM input for peak calling; choosing between two-pass and single-pass adapter trimming; deciding minimum read length; or mapping UMI patterns to specific eCLIP/iCLIP/iCLIP2/iCLIP3 library preps.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Computes sample size and power for clinical trials including continuous, binary, and time-to-event endpoints; superiority, non-inferiority, and equivalence designs; FDA 2016 non-inferiority margin selection with M1/M2 framework; Schoenfeld 1981 and Lakatos 1988 for survival; Schuirmann TOST and 80-125% bioequivalence; minimum clinically important difference (MCID) vs δ distinction. Use when justifying trial size in protocol or SAP per CONSORT 2025 item 7.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs adaptive clinical trials including group-sequential (O'Brien-Fleming, Pocock, Lan-DeMets spending), sample-size re-estimation (blinded Friede-Kieser, unblinded Cui-Hung-Wang, Mehta-Pocock promising zone), seamless Phase 2/3 with treatment-arm selection, population enrichment, and response-adaptive randomisation. Covers FDA 2019 Final Adaptive Designs Guidance, FDA 2022 Master Protocols, and ICH E20 Step 2b/3 draft (June 2025, NOT final). Use when planning interim analyses, sample-size re-estimation, or master/platform-trial designs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when the user asks about driver ergonomics — back/neck/shoulder injury prevention, seat adjustment + lumbar support, entering and exiting cab safely, load handling techniques, vibration reduction, stretching protocols, and how ergonomics affects workers compensation costs in trucking. Reference OSHA + ATA ergonomics research.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Rigorous benchmarking of multi-agent coordination systems: experiment design, statistical analysis, human evaluation protocols, and reproducible reporting. NOT FOR ML model evaluation (use llm-evaluation-harness), A/B testing for web products, survey design, or general data science.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Interpret and design bounded FIPA communicative-act exchanges using XC00037H semantics while keeping delivery, authority, and external effects separate. NOT for proving delivery, task authorization, or external effect completion.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert in cluttering -- the lesser-known fluency disorder characterized by rapid/irregular speech rate, excessive disfluencies, and frequent ADHD comorbidity. Covers differential diagnosis from stuttering, assessment protocols, therapy approaches (rate control, self-monitoring, pragmatic awareness), technology-assisted intervention, and AI tools for people who clutter. Activate on 'cluttering', 'rapid speech disorder', 'speech rate too fast', 'speech disfluency not stuttering', 'disorganized speech', 'ADHD speech problems', 'cluttering vs stuttering', 'speech intelligibility', 'mazed speech', 'telescoping words'. NOT for stuttering-only treatment (overlap is common but they are distinct), hearing disorders, or voice disorders (pitch, resonance).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Building resilient distributed systems with circuit breakers, retries with full-jitter exponential backoff, retry budgets (per-request 3-attempt + per-client 10% ratio per Google SRE), deadline propagation, and the cascading-failure math (4 layers × 3 retries = 64x amplification). Grounded in Resilience4j, Microsoft Cloud Patterns, AWS Architecture Blog (Marc Brooker), and Google SRE Book. NOT for server-side rate limiting, bulkhead isolation, backpressure protocols, or database-specific retry.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Architecture-level decisions for putting a CDN in front of a web app's static assets, API responses, and file/media delivery: provider selection (hyperscaler vs. specialist $/GB), signed-URL / tokenized access for gating private content at the edge, cache invalidation strategy (versioned URLs vs. purge APIs), origin shield / tiered caching for high-miss-rate content, and CDN-layer geo-restriction. Use when deciding which CDN to put in front of a new or growing service, when private/paywalled files need edge delivery without an origin round-trip per request, or when purge/invalidation behavior is being designed rather than debugged. NOT for HTTP cache-control header syntax, Vary, stale-while-revalidate, or surrogate-key purge mechanics (see `cdn-cache-control-headers`); NOT for Cloudflare-specific product configuration once Cloudflare is already chosen (see `cloudflare`); NOT for video-specific transcoding, adaptive bitrate ladders, or streaming-protocol packaging (see `managed-video-streaming-pipeline`).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Declare an agentic application's interaction disclosure, state, context, capabilities, and effect-control boundaries. Use for a reviewable design specification and static consistency audit before implementation. NOT for proving that controls are deployed or enforced, exposing private chain-of-thought, selecting a model/router, or designing a multi-agent protocol.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Technical SEO audit across 9 categories: crawlability, indexability, security, URL structure, mobile, Core Web Vitals, structured data, JavaScript rendering, and IndexNow protocol. Use when user says "technical SEO", "crawl issues", "robots.txt", "Core Web Vitals", "site speed", or "security headers".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Trial protocol for teaching AI Matrx an expert's knowledge until the platform breaks, fixing it. Use when asked to run an expertise trial, distil a person/creator/recent video into a Masterwork, or test the capture product. NOT for a known-missing feature (use build-sub-feature).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
No-loss protocol for changing an existing mandate's output contract. Use when changing what an agent or mandate emits or how it is typed: binding a kind, declaring output_kind, kind-backfill batches, provision reconciliation, or any make-this-contract-honest sweep. NOT for creating a new agent (use create-agent).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
テスト可能なSwiftコードのためのプロトコルベースの依存性注入 — 焦点を絞ったプロトコルとSwift Testingを使用してファイルシステム、ネットワーク、外部APIをモック化。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Law-driven abstraction protocol: evidence first, seam test, minimal algebra, executable law check.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Agent-to-Agent (A2A) executor implementation patterns for task handling, execution management, and agent coordination. Use when building A2A executors, implementing task handlers, creating agent execution flows, or when user mentions A2A protocol, task execution, agent executors, task handlers, or agent coordination.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate A2UI 0.8 protocol compliant UI code. Use when building agent-driven interfaces, generating JSONL messages for surfaceUpdate/dataModelUpdate/beginRendering, creating forms, lists, cards, or any UI components that render across web/mobile/desktop platforms.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.