'experiment' 검색 결과

End-to-end bulk time-course analysis from an expression matrix to temporal gene modules and per-cluster pathway enrichment. Orchestrates temporal DE (limma splines or DESeq2 LRT), Mfuzz/tslearn soft clustering of expression-profile shapes, GAM trajectory fitting, per-cluster GO enrichment against a temporal-gene background, and an OPTIONAL circadian rhythm-detection branch (MetaCycle/CosinorPy) that runs only when the design covers >=2 full cycles with >=6-8 evenly spaced samples per cycle. Use when analyzing a bulk time-series expression experiment from any omics platform and deciding limma-splines vs DESeq2-LRT for temporal DE, soft vs hard clustering, whether the sampling design even licenses rhythm detection, and which background to use for enrichment. Not for single-cell pseudotime (see temporal-genomics/trajectory-modeling for the bulk-vs-pseudotime boundary) or unknown-period discovery (see temporal-genomics/periodicity-detection).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

End-to-end flow, spectral, and mass cytometry (CyTOF) pipeline from raw FCS files to differentially abundant/expressed cell populations. Orchestrates the read -> compensate/unmix -> transform -> QC -> doublet-removal -> cluster-or-gate -> annotate -> diffcyt DA/DS chain with flowCore/CATALYST/diffcyt, branching on instrument type and on clustering-vs-gating. Use when processing a cytometry experiment end-to-end, deciding the pipeline path for an instrument, or wiring the flow-cytometry component skills into one analysis with valid sample-level statistics.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

End-to-end pooled and single-cell CRISPR screen analysis from FASTQ to hit genes. Orchestrates library design QC, guide counting, six-stage screen QC (plasmid Gini, replicate Pearson, CEGv2 PR-AUC, copy-number artifact), method-appropriate hit calling across MAGeCK RRA/MLE, BAGEL2, drugZ, JACKS, and Chronos, cancer-cell-line copy-number correction (CRISPRcleanR / Chronos), batch correction for multi-batch screens, and the specialized branches for combinatorial paralog screens, single-cell Perturb-seq, base-editor variant-function screens, prime-editor screens, and in vivo bottleneck-aware screens. Use when analyzing any pooled CRISPR screen end-to-end, matching the hit-calling method to the experimental design, integrating copy-number correction into the pipeline, or branching the workflow for single-cell, combinatorial, base-editor, prime-editor, or in vivo variants.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Chemical safety and toxicology assessment integrating ADMET-AI predictions, CTD toxicogenomics, PubChemTox experimental data, GHS/IARC hazard classification, and exposure-context analysis. Use for chemical hazard identification, occupational/consumer-product toxicity, dose-response evaluation, and acute (LD50) vs chronic toxicity assessment. Distinguishes drug toxicity from environmental chemical toxicity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, Toxicity) profiling for drug candidates. Integrates ADMET-AI predictions, SwissADME drug-likeness, PubChemTox experimental toxicity, ChEMBL clinical data, Lipinski rule-of-five, and CYP interaction data. Use for drug-likeness assessment, BBB penetration, bioavailability, hepatotoxicity prediction, ADME/PK profiling, or screening compound libraries before lab testing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Molecular ML with diverse featurizers and pre-built datasets. Use for property prediction (ADMET, toxicity) with traditional ML or GNNs when you want extensive featurization options and MoleculeNet benchmarks. Best for quick experiments with pre-trained models, diverse molecular representations. For graph-first PyTorch workflows use torchdrug; for benchmark datasets use pytdc.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Decision-grade statistical analysis for metabolomics intensity tables. Covers transformation and scaling (Pareto vs unit-variance as a hidden hypothesis), unsupervised structure (PCA/HCA for QC), permutation-validated PLS-DA/OPLS-DA (R2 vs Q2, double CV, VIP as heuristic), univariate testing (Welch/Mann-Whitney/ANOVA/LMM with covariate adjustment), and dependence-aware multiple testing. Use when testing which metabolites differ, building or validating a discriminant model, choosing a scaling, or correcting many correlated tests. For sample-wise normalization/drift correction see metabolomics/normalization-qc; for ML classifiers and selection-inside-CV leakage see machine-learning/biomarker-discovery and machine-learning/model-validation; for pathway interpretation see metabolomics/pathway-mapping; for design/power/multiplicity regime see experimental-design/multiple-testing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs QC, corrects signal drift, removes batch effects, filters features, normalizes samples, and imputes missing values for untargeted LC-MS/GC-MS metabolomics, framing each step as a measurement model that can create or erase biological signal. Use when processing a peak/feature table before statistical analysis, choosing a drift-correction or sample-normalization method, deciding QC RSD vs D-ratio filtering, or handling left-censored missing values. The feature table is produced by metabolomics/xcms-preprocessing or metabolomics/msdial-preprocessing; transformation/scaling for modeling defers to metabolomics/statistical-analysis; cross-study design issues link to experimental-design/batch-design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs PROTACs, molecular glues, and bivalent degraders with explicit handling of E3 ligase choice (VHL, CRBN, IAP, MDM2, KEAP1), linker design (length, composition, rigidity), ternary complex prediction (PRosettaC, DeepTernary, AlphaFold3 with constraints), cooperativity (alpha), DC50 / Dmax characterization, hook effect, and prediction-experiment reconciliation. Use when designing targeted protein degraders, planning linker SAR, predicting ternary complex stability, or building generative degrader workflows.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs and analyzes stable-isotope-resolved metabolomics (SIRM / isotope tracing / fluxomics) experiments that measure metabolic ACTIVITY via 13C/15N/2H tracers, distinct from steady-state pool profiling. Covers tracer choice, isotopologue vs isotopomer, mass-isotopomer distributions (MID), fractional enrichment, the mandatory natural-abundance + tracer-purity correction (IsoCor, AccuCor), and the metabolic/isotopic steady-state vs non-stationary (INST-MFA) distinction. Use when feeding a labeled tracer and interpreting labeling patterns, correcting raw isotopologue intensities, computing or plotting an MID, or deciding tracing vs abundance profiling. For absolute pool concentration and MRM mechanics see metabolomics/targeted-analysis; for constraint-based genome-scale flux (FBA, not empirical tracing) see systems-biology/flux-balance-analysis; for feature detection see metabolomics/xcms-preprocessing; for pathway enrichment that ignores the pool-vs-flux caveat see metabolomics/pathway-mapping.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Start a new OpenSpec change using the experimental artifact workflow. Use when the user wants to create a new feature, fix, or modification with a structured step-by-step approach.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design A/B tests with hypotheses, variants, sample sizes, and analysis plans. TRIGGERS - Use when user wants to run A/B tests, split tests, or experiment with variations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Inngest イベント駆動 Durable Execution リファレンス。バックグラウンドジョブ、長時間ワークフロー。 createFunction, step.run, step.sleep, step.waitForEvent, step.waitForSignal, step.invoke, step.sendEvent, step.sleepUntil, step.fetch, step.ai.infer, step.ai.wrap, step.metadata, inngest.send, serve, connect, checkpointing, Inngest CLI。 concurrency, throttle, debounce, rate-limit, batching, priority, idempotency, singleton, multi-tenancy フロー制御。 Realtime（channels, topics, publish, subscribe, subscription tokens, useRealtime）、 Agent Evals（scoring, group.experiment）、MCP（Dev Server / Cloud）。 デプロイ先 Next.js, Express, Hono, Cloudflare Workers, Vercel, Netlify, DigitalOcean, Render。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

GameDay シナリオを AWS FIS 実験テンプレート (CDK) として実装する。「シナリオを FIS にして」「実験テンプレートを作って」「障害注入を実装して」「fault-injection を書いて/直して」など、FIS 実験の実装・修正・レビューの全てで必ず使う。FIS アクションの選定、停止条件 (CloudWatch アラーム)、実験ロールの最小権限 IAM、爆発半径の制御 (selectionMode)、実験レポート設定、ECS タスクアクションの SSM サイドカー前提条件など、検証済みの判断基準とコード例を提供する。lib/constructs/fault-injection.ts を編集するときは内容にかかわらず該当する。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Instabox を使う検証用の開発タスクに対し、ローカル司令・クラウド内の開発継続・外部での仕事と復旧の管理を比較して仮選定し、小さな実装・検証実験で適否を判断する。開発構成の試行や切断・復旧の検証に使う。基本接続だけなら instabox を使う。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Compare cell-type composition and spatial features across conditions in IMC/MIBI cohorts with the patient as the experimental unit, covering pseudoreplication, per-patient aggregation, mixed models, compositional (Dirichlet/scCODA) differential abundance, diffcyt, per-image-to-patient spatial differential testing (SpaceANOVA), batch covariates, and FDR. Use when testing whether a cell type or spatial niche differs between groups, avoiding cell-level pseudoreplication, choosing a differential-abundance method, or correctly powering an IMC cohort comparison.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build weighted gene co-expression networks to identify modules of co-regulated genes, relate them to phenotypes, and find hub genes using WGCNA, hdWGCNA, MEGENA, CEMiTool, and Gaussian graphical models. Covers signed-network choice, soft-threshold selection, module preservation, and the marginal-vs-partial-correlation distinction. Use when finding co-expression modules, identifying hub genes, relating gene networks to clinical or experimental traits, or building single-cell co-expression networks. For directed TF-target inference see scenic-regulons and grn-inference; for condition rewiring see differential-networks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Differential abundance (DA) and differential state (DS) analysis for flow and mass cytometry - tests which cell populations change in frequency or marker expression between conditions using diffcyt (edgeR/voom/GLMM for DA, limma/LMM for DS), with cydar, CITRUS, and compositional methods (sccomp, scCODA, DCATS) as alternatives. Covers the sample-is-the-experimental-unit principle, design/contrast and mixed-model formulas, compositionality of cluster proportions, and FDR across clusters. Use when comparing populations between groups, choosing a DA method, handling paired/batch designs, or deciding whether compositional correction is needed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes single-cell pooled CRISPR screens (Perturb-seq, CROP-seq, Perturb-CITE-seq, ECCITE-seq, multiome) where each cell carries an sgRNA and a scRNA-seq / surface-protein / chromatin readout. Covers experimental design (direct-capture Perturb-seq Dixit 2016 vs CROP-seq 3'UTR-barcoded Datlinger 2017 vs ECCITE-seq vs Multiome), MOI for sgRNA assignment, escaper-cell filtering (Mixscape, Papalexi 2021), SCEPTRE NB GLM + permutation for low-MOI (Barry 2024 Genome Biol 25:124), the Pertpy framework, factor decomposition, genome-scale Perturb-seq (Replogle 2022 Cell, 2.5M cells), and per-perturbation single-cell DE. Use when running a single-cell CRISPR screen, choosing direct-capture vs CROP-seq architecture, filtering escaper cells, performing single-cell DE, integrating Perturb-seq with pathway analysis, scaling to GW CRISPRi via Replogle protocol, or analyzing multi-omics screens.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes pooled CRISPR screens with MAGeCK (Li et al 2014), covering count generation (mageck count), the RRA two-condition workflow (mageck test using alpha-RRA over per-sgRNA negative-binomial p-values), the MLE multi-condition workflow (mageck mle with explicit design matrix and beta-score output), normalization choice (median vs total vs control-sgRNA vs spike-in), sgRNA efficiency injection, paired-sample testing, time-course design, drug-screen versus dropout-screen design matrices, MAGeCKFlute and MAGeCK-VISPR downstream visualization, and decision logic for when to use MAGeCK vs JACKS / BAGEL2 / drugZ / Chronos. Use when running a fresh CRISPR screen analysis, picking RRA vs MLE for the experimental design, choosing a normalization method from QC signatures, debugging MLE convergence failure or NaN beta scores, comparing MAGeCK output across tools, or building a batch-aware multi-cell-line / multi-condition MLE design matrix.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cross-method decision tree for calling hits in pooled CRISPR screens. Catalogs statistical models (MAGeCK RRA, MAGeCK MLE, BAGEL2, drugZ, JACKS, Chronos, CERES), experimental designs each is built for, failure modes outside design domain, reconciliation when methods disagree, multiple-testing and effect-size thresholds, the order of operations (count -> QC -> CN-correct -> hit-call -> validate), the second-best-sgRNA conservative rule, and consensus-hit strategy. Use when choosing among MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / drugZ / JACKS / Chronos for a given design, reconciling disagreement across two or three methods on the same screen, deciding whether to require consensus, gating downstream validation by hit-confidence tier, or interpreting unstable hit lists across reruns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs and analyzes in vivo CRISPR screens in animal tumor models, organoids, and immune-cell adoptive transfers. Covers bottleneck math (250x cells/sgRNA requires ~25M cells implanted; impossible for most syngeneic models, forcing focused libraries), focused library design (Manguso 2017 Nature 547:413 immune screen; Chen 2015 tumor screens), CRISPR-StAR intrinsic-control screening (Uijttewaal 2025 Nat Biotechnol 43:1848), clonal-dynamics-limited detection, tumor-explant DNA recovery, syngeneic vs xenograft vs PDX considerations, and the relationship to downstream MAGeCK / drugZ analysis. Use when designing in vivo CRISPR screens for tumor / immune / metastasis biology, choosing focused vs genome-wide for animal models, addressing bottleneck-induced clonal collapse, picking the syngeneic / xenograft / PDX model, integrating in vivo with in vitro results, or applying CRISPR-StAR for animal experiments.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.