'sequence' 검색 결과

Route ordinary public-web information tasks to the correct Tavily CLI operation. Use when the task concerns publicly accessible webpages and needs web discovery, clean extraction, URL mapping, same-site crawling, or public-web-only research, but the exact Tavily operation is not yet clear or several operations must be sequenced. Prefer the specific leaf skill when intent is clear: tavily-search for discovery without a URL, tavily-extract for known URLs, tavily-map for URL/site-structure discovery, tavily-crawl for content from many pages on one site, tavily-research for cited multi-source synthesis, and tavily-dynamic-search for programmatic filtering with context isolation. Do not use for named social/community/media/career/code platforms, login or cookie-dependent content, platform-native discussions, or cross-platform collection; use Agent Reach there. Do not use for local files, Git operations, deployments, or ordinary code editing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when landing a stack of dependent GitHub PRs (A ← B ← C, where each bases on the one below) onto master, merging a PR whose base is another open PR's branch, or whenever a request mentions "stacked PRs", "PR stack", "dependent PRs", or merging several related PRs in sequence. Requires every same-repository dependency chain to use GitHub's official stacked-PR feature before landing so GitHub owns stack-wide rules, CI, ordering, retargeting, and merge state.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants help with revenue operations or the marketing-to-sales handoff — 'RevOps,' 'lead scoring,' 'lead routing,' 'MQL,' 'SQL,' 'pipeline stages,' 'deal desk,' 'CRM automation,' 'data hygiene,' 'leads aren't getting to sales.' For prospecting, see cold-email; drip campaigns, email-sequence; pricing, pricing-strategy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user needs marketing ideas, inspiration, or growth strategies for their SaaS or software product — 'how to market,' 'ways to promote,' 'what else can I try,' 'no idea how to market this,' 'brainstorm marketing.' The starting point when someone is stuck on growth. For channel execution, see the relevant skill (paid-ads, social-content, email-sequence, etc.).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — homepage, landing, pricing, feature, about, or product pages; "headline help," "CTA copy," "value proposition," "tagline," "hero section," "make this more compelling," "conversion copy," or complete Figma-ready full-page copy (see Full-Page Mode below). For email copy, see email-sequence. For popups, see popup-cro. For editing existing copy, see copy-editing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Act as a Senior Motion Designer to specify and ship purposeful UI animation — micro-interactions, transitions, scroll-driven sequences, page transitions, loading states. Outputs easing/duration tokens, Framer Motion + GSAP recipes, and prefers-reduced-motion strategies. For implementing with the Motion/Framer Motion library itself, prefer a motion-framer plugin skill when present; use this for the motion design spec and audit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create and edit draw.io diagrams in XML format. Use when the user wants to create flowcharts, architecture diagrams, sequence diagrams, or any visual diagrams. Handles XML structure, styling, fonts (Noto Sans JP), arrows, connectors, and PNG export.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Ranks any list of impediments and their countermeasures using a value-stream scoring model (ROI, Cost to Implement, Ease of Deployment, Risk Factor) and a fixed prioritization formula. Use when someone asks to prioritize, rank, sequence, or triage impediments, countermeasures, remediation items, risks, findings, gaps, action items, or backlog entries; or mentions value-stream prioritization, A3 / lean countermeasure ranking, ROI vs. effort scoring, or building a remediation / improvement backlog. Works with GHQR findings, audit results, retrospective action items, risk registers, architecture review gaps, or any free-form `{impediment, countermeasure}` list.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Discipline for repairing a false claim once it has propagated: select what depends on it, produce a replacement, and accept with an expiring verdict. Trigger when: - A claim, citation, premise, or documented fact is found wrong and its downstream consequences must be traced and fixed. - A refutation, a failed re-run, a retracted external source, or a human correction lands against something already closed or already promoted. - Prompt contains: /remediation, remediation, retraction, false claim, propagated error, scrub, correction propagation, born-false, became-false, currency verdict, impeachment queue.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The case-law chronicle of this repo's major failures — symptom, root cause, evidence, status, and the rule each battle minted — so nobody re-fights a settled battle or re-proposes a rejected fix. Use when a bug/incident looks familiar ("didn't this happen before?"), when you're about to propose an approach that may have been tried and rejected (e.g. shipping a migration from a package), when someone asks "why does rule X exist" / "why is done-by-lgtm a thing" / "what was incident 988", or when a bug-archaeology run hits the shallow-clone wall and needs the pre-June-2026 history. Trigger phrases: "has this broken before", "why can't packages ship migrations", "why did graduation fail", "why is the green-build lesson a rule", "what did we learn from incident NN". (For a live "build is green but the app is broken" symptom, start at crouton-diagnostics-index. NB keep this description free of any space-then-hash sequence — an unquoted YAML scalar treats space-hash as a comment start and silently truncates.)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Recreate the nuxt-crouton dev environment from scratch and survive its install/build traps — the pnpm toolchain, the cold-start sequence (why packages must build before apps prepare), the version catalog and workaround pins, the per-app typecheck rule, required env vars, and the known environment traps. Use when setting up a fresh clone/worktree, when "pnpm install" or "nuxt prepare" fails, when an app won't boot after install, when typecheck output looks insane, or when a tool "isn't available". Trigger phrases: "set up the repo from scratch", "why does typecheck show thousands of errors", "playwright install fails", "what pnpm/node version". (Exact error strings — "Could not load '@fyit/crouton-*'", "Cannot find module '@vue/compiler-sfc'" — route via crouton-diagnostics-index first; it points back here for depth.)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

This skill covers detecting anomalies in Modbus/TCP and Modbus RTU communications in industrial control systems. It addresses function code monitoring, register range validation, timing analysis, unauthorized client detection, and deep packet inspection for malformed Modbus frames. The skill leverages Zeek with Modbus protocol analyzers, Suricata IDS with OT rules, and custom Python-based detection using Markov chain models for normal Modbus transaction sequences.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Drafts an architecture or design decision record (ADR) from the discussion notes, design review minutes, chat threads and diagram descriptions the user provides: context, decision drivers, options considered with arguments as stated, the decision as the group worded it, consequences and a review date, with every factual claim tagged evidenced, asserted or UNKNOWN so unsupported claims are marked for the author to substantiate. Use when the user asks to "write an ADR", "document the architecture decision", "record why we chose this design", "turn these design review notes into a decision record" or "draft the design decision log entry". Do not use for a business or governance decision with no technical design, use decision-memo-builder instead; for the change ticket that implements the decision, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Checks a master document register extract for gaps and returns a DRAFT question list for document control: missing or out-of-sequence revisions, overdue or slipping deliverables, numbering that breaks the project convention, duplicates and incomplete rows, each with row, test and quoted evidence. Never edits the register, re-baselines a date or marks a deliverable complete. Use when the user asks to "check the MDR", "find the gaps in the deliverables list" or "prepare questions on the drawing register". Do not use for drafting a transmittal from a document list, use transmittal-drafter instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Proposes tag and number structures for the new lines and instruments in a P&ID draft according to the project's numbering procedures, checks every tag extracted from the PFD against the quoted procedure format, and lists cross-section identifier mismatches and the registry checks a human must run. Never invents a numbering convention, never alters a PFD tag and never assigns a sequence number the procedure reserves for the registry. Use when the user asks to "run the tagging and numbering section", "check the tags against the numbering procedure", "propose the tag structure for the new lines and instruments" or "list the registry checks before validation" after the process safety flags. Do not use for validating the four sections, use validation-and-review-package instead; do not use for instrument content, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan a refactor as a sequence of tiny safe commits via interview and codebase exploration. Use when restructuring working code, or when the user says 'plan a refactor'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a music-led video sequence by planning beats, creating or accepting an audio track, animating ordered visuals, and assembling a reviewable draft.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the DoD Risk, Issue, and Opportunity (RIO) Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs (OUSD R&E, Sep 2023 incl. Change 2.2). Use for the defense-acquisition mechanics of program risk management: the RIO definitions (risk/issue/opportunity), the five-step risk process (plan-identify-analyze-mitigate-monitor), 1-5 likelihood/consequence scoring and the 5x5 risk matrix, the four mitigation options (accept/avoid/transfer/control), burn-down plans, issue management (probability=1), opportunity management toward should-cost, cross-program/interface risk, tailoring RIO to the six AAF acquisition pathways (UCA/MTA/MCA/Software/DBS/Services), specialized methods (RMF, MBCRA/Cyber Table Top, Agile metrics, FMECA, ITRA/DTRAM), and institutionalizing RIO via the PRMP, boards (RMB/JRMB/ROMB/RWG), tools, tiered roles, and WBS/IMP/IMS/EVM/TPM integration. This is the DoD-acquisition complement to nasa-risk (general CRM/RIDM theory) and dau-se-guidebook (the SE process frame). Does NOT teach general risk theory from scratch, and defers specialized risk regimes (system safety/ESOH, HSI, detailed cyber/RMF, spectrum) to their own DoD instructions and the relevant packs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide (GAO-16-89G, 2015). Use for building, assessing, or auditing a program's integrated master schedule (IMS): the ten best practices of a reliable schedule (capture, sequence, resource, duration, traceability, valid critical path, reasonable total float, schedule risk analysis, updating, baseline), the four characteristics (comprehensive, well-constructed, credible, controlled), critical path method arithmetic (forward/backward pass, total float), schedule risk analysis (Monte Carlo, contingency), statusing and baseline control, and the Appendix II audit triad. Scheduling/time-management oriented: it is the authority on schedule reliability, but it is NOT a cost-estimating guide, a full SE process model, an agile guide, or a risk-management framework — see sibling packs (gao-cost, dau-se-guidebook, nasa-schedule, nasa-risk) for those.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

C4モデル レベル1 シーケンス図の新規作成・更新・レビューを支援する。C4モデル レベル1 の登場要素(アクター・対象システム・外部システム)だけを用い、ユースケースごとに 1 本の Mermaid シーケンス図を描く D2 成果物。ユースケース一覧・C4モデル レベル1(システムコンテキスト)・機能一覧の整備後に呼び出す。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when explaining or writing TBQ3 language syntax, including Params, Vars, Events, data types, variables, sequence variables, arrays, Map variables, control flow, operators, assignment, functions, and formula execution rules.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate production-quality Excalidraw architecture diagrams from natural language. Visual structure maps to conceptual structure — fan-out for one-to-many, timelines for sequences, convergence for aggregation. Includes self-validation via Playwright render review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "build a media list for my launch", "write a launch press release", or "pitch press under embargo"; produces a three-tier media and analyst list (Tier 1 exclusive candidates, Tier 2 vertical press, Tier 3 communities and newsletters), an embargo pitch timing skeleton keyed to the launch-registry date, a press-release draft in standard structure with no fabricated quotes or numbers, and an analyst briefing outline. Not for press-kit assets — use launch-asset-packager; not for follow-up sequence mechanics — use outreach-manager; not for post-launch news-echo monitoring — use launch-monitor. 媒体名单/禁运期pitch/新闻稿/分析师简报

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "build a preference center", "set up a frequency opt-down ladder", "give people a step-down instead of unsubscribe", or "design a topic/cadence preference page"; produces a preference-center field spec, a frequency/topic opt-down ladder (down-tier paths that substitute for a hard unsubscribe), a preference-to-suppression mapping, and a SEND N-dimension sub-item note on preference-center / frequency options offered. Not for the lifecycle flow map or cadence governance — use email-sequence-designer; not for the consent/suppression record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing EQS or ruling the N1 unsubscribe veto — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件偏好中心/降频阶梯设计/退订替代降档

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.