Fast, modern JavaScript/TypeScript development with the Bun runtime, inspired by [oven-sh/bun](https://github.com/oven-sh/bun).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
1.5천건 · 관련도순
Fast, modern JavaScript/TypeScript development with the Bun runtime, inspired by [oven-sh/bun](https://github.com/oven-sh/bun).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Environment configuration manager for 12-factor config, feature flags, and multi-environment management. Activate on: environment variables, ConfigMap, feature flags, 12-factor config, dotenv management, config per environment, runtime config. NOT for: secret storage (use secret-management-expert), IaC provisioning (use terraform-module-builder), CI/CD variables (use github-actions-pipeline-builder).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design error handling strategies for TypeScript and Python applications — exception hierarchies, Result/Either types, retry patterns, error boundaries, and structured error logging. Use when designing error handling architecture, choosing between exceptions and Result types, implementing retry logic, or building error recovery flows. Activate on "error handling", "exception hierarchy", "Result type", "retry pattern", "circuit breaker", "error boundary", "Pokemon exception". NOT for debugging specific runtime errors, logging infrastructure setup, or monitoring/alerting configuration.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Multi-stage Docker build optimizer for minimal, secure production images. Activate on: Dockerfile optimization, multi-stage build, distroless image, container size reduction, Docker security scanning, BuildKit features. NOT for: container orchestration (use kubernetes-manifest-generator), CI/CD pipelines (use github-actions-pipeline-builder), runtime container config (use environment-config-manager).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design modern, intuitive DAG/workflow visual editors that feel like LEGO, not LabView NOT for runtime DAG admission, graph execution, or claiming usability without user testing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Validates versioned permission requests against a grant scope and records comparison evidence. Activate on 'validate permissions', 'permission check', 'inheritance validation', 'permission matrix', 'security validation'. NOT for runtime enforcement (use dag-scope-enforcer) or isolation management (use dag-isolation-manager).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Debugs recorded DAG lineage through historical inspection, deterministic decision replay when prerequisites hold, and clearly labeled counterfactual or live re-execution. Activate on "debug DAG", "replay execution", "inspect node state", "compare runs", or "execution diff". NOT for live monitoring (use dag-runtime + websocket-streaming), failure analysis (use dag-ops), or general code debugging.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Matches natural language task descriptions to appropriate skills using semantic similarity, ranks candidates by fit and performance history, and maintains the skill catalog. Use when assigning skills to DAG nodes, searching for the right skill for a task, ranking competing skills, or browsing the skill catalog. Activate on "find skill", "match skill", "which skill", "skill for this task", "skill catalog", "rank skills", "best skill". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), creating skills (use skill-architect), or grading skills (use skill-grader).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Operations, debugging, and optimization for DAG workflows. Performs root cause analysis on failures, profiles execution performance, aggregates results from parallel branches, bridges context between nodes, and learns patterns from execution history. Activate on "DAG failed", "why did it fail", "root cause", "performance profile", "aggregate results", "merge branches", "execution patterns", "optimize DAG". NOT for planning DAGs (use dag-planner), executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), or validating outputs (use dag-quality).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Manages agent isolation levels and resource boundaries. Specifies concrete controls and the evidence needed to assess their boundaries. Activate on 'isolation level', 'agent isolation', 'resource boundaries', 'sandboxing', 'agent containment'. NOT for permission validation (use dag-permission-validator) or runtime enforcement (use dag-scope-enforcer).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build and validate a static DAG reachability index from source-qualified path/chain decompositions and partial transitive-edge filtering. NOT for treating a partial edge filter as a complete transitive reduction or runtime scheduler.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze undirected cycle structure within a valid DAG using the source paper's orientation and contraction method. Use for cycle-basis analysis with explicit graph and reduction choices. NOT for directed feedback loops, workflow deadlocks, or runtime resilience claims.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze hierarchical DAG-like systems by separating undirected substrate from ordering metadata, then classifying diamonds, mixers, shortcuts, and hidden cycle structure. Use for workflow architecture, citation or genealogy DAG comparison, and information-flow diagnosis. NOT for ordinary cycle detection in arbitrary graphs, one-node runtime debugging, or systems with no real ordering constraint.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs and audits native-unit capacity reservation, serial admission, ambiguity holds, stop reserves, effect closure, and control-disjoint settlement handoff for consequential agent attempts. Use when scarce capacity must be conserved across retry, rework, resurrection, or compensation. NOT for scheduling work, choosing models, pricing unlike resources into one scalar, authorizing effects, grading work, paying workers, or asserting runtime containment.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when wrangler deploys silently fail or produce wrong artifacts, secrets upload as empty strings, custom domain DNS is not resolving, route assignment broke after rename, observability/tail logs are needed, D1/KV/R2 bindings are missing, OAuth scope errors block a command, cookies on a redirect are not attaching, or the worker exceeds CPU time. Triggers: "Tenant or user not found", "Authentication error" on wrangler d1 push, secret length is 0 after upload, route returns origin not worker, "compatibility_date too old", 1101 errors, custom_domain assignment lost on script rename. NOT for AWS Lambda / Vercel Edge / Deno Deploy (different runtimes), Cloudflare Zero Trust, or R2-specific tuning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has actually shrunk its ~19 legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools — work/act/ask/recall/status — each carrying one denial shape and one transcript event, migrated through a real retirement path (intake-metadata, alias, or doc-history — never a parallel runtime), with zero legacy-verb calls once a body reaches compliance mode C4+. Use when reviewing a broker-collapse migration plan, gating a body's move from advisory (C0-C3) to enforced (C4+) coordination, or verifying IT-018 Broker Collapse compliance. NOT for the inbound trigger→spawn boundary that decides whether an event may spawn an agent at all (use fleet-event-spawn-trust), the capability-token cryptographic mechanism behind a denial (use agentic-zero-trust-security), designing how a swarm of agents invokes and shards work (use swarm-invocation-designer), or auditing an individual PR's mergeability (use agent-pr-authoring).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Choose, compare, and decompose work into the right coordination topology: dag, workflow, manager-driven team, swarm, blackboard, team-builder, or recurring loop. Use when the coordination shape is unclear, when you need topology-native breakdown instructions instead of a generic DAG, or when planning topology and runtime topology may differ. NOT for actual execution, node-level skill matching, or framework/tool installation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Practical incident-response runbook for a suspected or confirmed ComfyUI / GPU-daemon compromise. Triage, scope, contain, forensic collection, weight-integrity verification, rebuild from clean snapshot, postmortem. NOT for hygiene scans on a healthy box (use supply-chain-defense-for-ml-extensions), and NOT for runtime hardening of a fresh deployment (use gpu-hosted-asset-hardening).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Track the full Toulmin epistemic ancestry of every claim produced by a multi-agent swarm. Each agent output is tagged with an argument chain (claim / data / warrant / relationship) derived from SwarmTracer spans and LineageEdge records, so operators can zoom into any sub-claim and see precisely which agents asserted it, what triggered each assertion, and how contradictions propagated or were synthesised away. The SwarmTracer pattern — wrapping the SwarmAgentExecutor to capture spans, record messages, and build a lineage graph — is the concrete runtime substrate. Argumentative lineage lifts that graph into the Toulmin vocabulary so reasoning provenance is both machine-queryable and human-interpretable.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Implement an executable BDI agent cycle with events, context-guarded plans, intention stacks, selection functions, and belief revision. Use when designing or debugging AgentSpeak-style runtimes or concrete BDI program semantics. NOT for high-level BDI adoption, organizational modeling, norms, or hypertree team planning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Frame multi-agent designs through explicit environment, autonomy, information, coordination, commitment, incentive, and verification assumptions. NOT for endorsing multi-agent architecture without need or claiming runtime correctness from conceptual methods.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs and audits closed, ordered, replay-safe message protocols between already admitted agent bodies. Use when a multi-agent exchange needs explicit epochs, audiences, per-sender sequencing, gathers, terminal fences, acknowledgements, and deterministic replay. NOT for selecting or spawning agents, granting identity or authority, choosing a runtime topology, general human facilitation, wire transport implementation, or deciding whether evidence is true.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan, evaluate, and adopt agent infrastructure for a named workload. Use for agent runtime/framework selection, agent evaluation or observability plans, memory and tool boundaries, infrastructure cost controls, and organizational adoption. Covers workload-first comparison, risk and recovery planning, held-out evaluation, cost accounting, and staged rollout. Not a vendor ranking or a production certification. NOT for implementing a specific agent behavior (agentic-patterns), building a specific agent (ai-engineer), prompt optimization (prompt-engineer), or conventional ETL workflow design (jury_rig-architect).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.