258건 · 관련도순
SAM-style feature initiation workflow — discovery through codebase analysis, architecture spec, task decomposition, validation, and context manifest. Use when a user asks to add a feature, plan a feature, or convert an idea into an executable SAM plan.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Patterns for multi-agent coordination, task decomposition, handoffs, and workflow orchestration. Best practices for building and managing agent systems.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert agent organizer specializing in multi-agent orchestration, team assembly, and workflow optimization. Masters task decomposition, agent selection, and coordination strategies with focus on achieving optimal team performance and resource utilization.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert agent organizer specializing in multi-agent orchestration, team assembly, and workflow optimization. Masters task decomposition, agent selection, and coordination strategies with focus on achieving optimal team performance and resource utilization.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when verifying information (fact, number, quote, event, statement) against authoritative primary sources, or cross-checking a number via one-level metric decomposition (Z = P × Q). Triggers: "verify X", "is this true", "find the original source", "where is this number from", "two sources disagree", "is it true X never did Y". Covers five scenarios: (1) basic truthfulness check, (2) completeness / out-of-context quoting, (3) one-level reasoning verification, (4) negative-statement handling, (5) multi-source conflict side-by-side output. Dig into whitelisted primary sources only (user-supplied files, official websites & databases, authoritative industry sources); cited reports / charts / datasets must be downloaded and read locally to count as verified — if download is blocked, hand the link to the user. If nothing can be found, plainly state "cannot verify" rather than guessing, patching, or citing secondary paraphrases. Always reply in the user's question language.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
把项目目标分解为可执行工作包时使用。适用于项目启动、Sprint 规划、需求拆任务。优先使用 WBS（Work Breakdown Structure）逐层分解到 5~60 分钟粒度。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Decomposes portfolio risk with factor attribution, idiosyncratic risk, and marginal contribution to risk analysis. Use when decomposing portfolio risk, attributing risk sources, or analyzing factor risk contribution.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Constructs ROIC decomposition with invested capital measurement, operating return analysis, and value creation vs destruction assessment. Use when analyzing ROIC, building capital return frameworks, or assessing value creation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluates market structure dynamics with order book analysis, spread decomposition, and information asymmetry assessment. Use when analyzing market structure, evaluating trading venues, or assessing execution quality.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Process external specifications through transformation, classification, gap analysis, component discovery, and decomposition. Creates workflow items with classified context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze specifications and decompose into independent changes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create a new team composition file following the agent-almanac team template and registry conventions. Covers team purpose definition, member selection, coordination pattern choice, task decomposition design, machine-readable configuration block, registry integration, and README automation. Use when defining a multi-agent workflow, composing agents for a complex review process, or creating a coordinated group for recurring collaborative tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and WBS Dictionary from project charter deliverables. Covers hierarchical decomposition, WBS coding, effort estimation, dependency identification, and critical path candidates. Use after a project charter is approved, when planning a classic or waterfall project with defined deliverables, breaking a large initiative into manageable work packages, or establishing a basis for effort estimation and resource planning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Four-stage alchemical code transmutation — nigredo (decomposition), albedo (purification), citrinitas (illumination), rubedo (synthesis) — with meditate and heal checkpoints between stages. Transforms tangled or legacy code into optimized, well-structured output through systematic material analysis. Use when transforming legacy code into modern equivalents, refactoring deeply tangled modules where incremental fixes keep failing, converting a codebase between paradigms, or when simpler refactoring approaches have stalled and a full-cycle transformation is needed.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run all 5 decomposition validators (req-has-module, code-annotation-maps-to-module, visibility-rule-enforcement, anaemic-context-detection, granularity-match) on the project, reporting violations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prevents premature execution on ambiguous requests. Analyzes request clarity using 5W1H decomposition, surfaces hidden assumptions, and generates structured clarifying questions before work begins. Use at the start of any non-trivial task, or when a request could be interpreted multiple ways. Triggers on "뭘 원하는건지", "요구사항 정리", "clarify", "what exactly", "scope", "requirements", "정확히 뭘", "before we start".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Exposes Claude's reasoning chain as an auditable, decomposable artifact. Quick mode (default) gives assumption inventory + weakest-link in 2 stages. Full mode (--full) adds decision branching, confidence decomposition, and falsification conditions. Triggers on "왜 그렇게 생각해", "reasoning", "근거", "show your work", "어떻게 그 결론이", "trace", "판단 근거", "why do you think that".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluates whether work-in-design is ready to hand off from a chat design conversation to autonomous execution (Claude Code, n8n, agent runtime). Runs a 7-condition gate: spec stability, verification surface, invariants, pump-primer, work decomposition, rollback cost, token budget headroom. Three invocation modes — deliberate (caller provides work_context, returns JSON verdict), proactive sensing (Claude detects handoff signals in design conversation and offers the check), conversational walkthrough (Claude walks the 7 conditions as discussion topics). Returns structured JSON in all modes. Use when designing a Claude Code deployment, scoping an autonomous run, or deciding next move. Trigger on: "ready to hand off," "ready for execution," "is this CC-ready," "handoff check," "walk me through readiness," "are we ready to ship this," "should I just hand this off," or proactive detection. Do NOT use for evaluating completed work, runtime selection, or prompt quality. Profile-agnostic.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Phase 3: Dependency decomposition. Only invoke when explicitly requested by the user or by the yoink orchestrator.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Orchestrate complex development with AUTOMATIC parallel subagent execution, continuous dispatch scheduling, dependency analysis, file conflict detection, and IOSM quality gates. Analyzes task dependencies, builds critical path, launches parallel background workers with lock management, monitors progress, auto-spawns from discoveries. Use for multi-file features, parallel implementation streams, automated task decomposition, brownfield refactoring, or when user mentions "parallel agents", "orchestrate", "swarm", "continuous dispatch", "automatic scheduling", "PRD", "quality gates", "decompose work", "Mixed/brownfield".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Decomposition playbook and anti-temptation rules for an orchestrator agent that routes work through the Surogates subagent task layer. Pair this skill with an AgentDef whose tool filter strips the implementation tools (terminal, file, web, code) — that's how 'don't do the work yourself' is enforced structurally, not just behaviorally.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when complex problems require systematic step-by-step reasoning with ability to revise thoughts, branch into alternative approaches, or dynamically adjust scope. Ideal for multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, or tasks with initially unclear scope.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when building self-correcting retrieval systems for AI agents. Keywords: RAG, retrieval, Corrective RAG, Self-RAG, query decomposition, reranking, hallucination, grounding.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.