179건 · 관련도순
Evaluates unfunded commitment obligations with call probability, pacing models, and portfolio-level exposure management. Use when analyzing unfunded exposure, managing commitment pacing, or stress testing capital calls.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluates GP capital commitment levels with co-invest obligations, management company funding, and alignment assessment. Use when analyzing GP commitment, assessing alignment, or structuring GP capital contributions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluates asset retirement and decommissioning liabilities with cost estimation, timing analysis, and funding adequacy assessment. Use when analyzing decommissioning costs, evaluating ARO exposure, or assessing abandonment liability.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when a supplier has returned a security questionnaire, assurance report, certificate or trust pack and someone asks "review this vendor's answers", "is this supplier safe to use", "read their SOC report for us", "what should we ask the vendor next", "triage the vendor security assessment" or "does their certificate cover the service we buy". Checks report and certificate scope against the service in use, sorts answers into evidenced, asserted, contradicted and evasive, lists the obligations the report puts back on the customer, and writes a triage note with follow-up questions and a proposed decision for the owner.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when a company needs recovery objectives it can defend, before a continuity plan, a disaster recovery design, an audit or a resilience review, and asks "do a BIA", "business impact analysis", "set our RTO and RPO", "what is our maximum tolerable downtime", "which services are critical", "impact tolerance" or "can our backups meet our recovery targets". Lists services from the customer's view, prices an outage over time in the company's own money and obligations, sets recovery time and data loss objectives, maps dependencies, and compares each objective with what backups, restore tests, suppliers and people actually allow, listing the gaps for a decision.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run Phase 5 (formal hardening) for the active VCSDD feature. Invokes vcsdd-verifier to execute proof obligations, security hardening, and a purity-boundary audit before convergence.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Meet EU Cyber Resilience Act vulnerability duties — coordinated disclosure, SBOMs, and lifecycle security for digital products.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Summarize document-heavy inputs such as memos, policies, PDFs, research notes, proposals, and multi-document packets. Use when users need key points, obligations, questions, and action implications from documents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate tests from Allium specifications. Use when the user wants to propagate tests, generate test files from a spec, write tests for a specification, create property-based tests, produce state machine tests, check test coverage against spec obligations, or understand what tests a specification requires.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when a task needs the judgment of an emergency medicine physician — risk-stratifying an undifferentiated chief complaint against a can't-miss diagnosis, deciding an ED disposition (discharge/observation/admit/transfer) under time and bed pressure, reasoning through EMTALA screening-and-stabilization obligations, or triaging a department under crowding/boarding load.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit an existing mathematical, logical, algorithmic, or technical proof from its stated conclusion backward as a bounded AND/OR graph of exact obligations. Use to reconstruct conclusion dependencies, determine whether a proof-supplied route establishes the conclusion, or expose hidden assumptions, unmet side conditions, cycles, overly strong steps, or silent route switches. For a source-mapped Lamport rendering use convert-lamport, and for forward hierarchy, construct, and scope conformance use forward-lamport before this skill. This does not decide full theorem-level entailment by searching for a different proof; do not turn the audit into a linear reversed proof, exhaustive proof search, or replacement proof.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Comprehensive healthcare system compliance and security audit: review HIPAA Privacy and Security Rule adherence, check HITECH and 21st Century Cures Act obligations, validate clinical data integrity for HL7 FHIR and patient safety.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Extracts structured data from large sets of legal documents into tabular format for review, analysis, and reporting. Processes contracts, agreements, correspondence, filings, and other legal documents in bulk — extracting key terms, dates, parties, obligations, risks, and custom fields into organized tables. Use when conducting due diligence document review, bulk contract extraction, compliance audits across document sets, lease portfolio analysis, employment agreement review, regulatory filing review, or any task requiring structured extraction from multiple documents. Trigger keywords: tabular review, bulk extraction, document review table, data room review, batch document analysis, contract extraction, portfolio review, structured extraction, document comparison table.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Drafts Brownfields Agreements for contaminated-property transactions under CERCLA, EPA brownfields programs, and state voluntary cleanup programs. Structures BFPP liability protections, All Appropriate Inquiries documentation, remediation obligations, institutional controls, cost allocation, and long-term stewardship covenants. Use when drafting brownfields purchase agreements, prospective purchaser agreements, voluntary cleanup MOAs, or environmental covenant frameworks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Drafts franchise advertising fund contribution agreements or addenda governing franchisee obligations to a centralized marketing fund. Trigger when drafting ad fund agreements, marketing fund addenda, or franchise contribution agreements involving fund administration, contribution calculations, or financial reporting.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generates structured summaries of mediation and arbitration proceedings, extracting outcomes, settlement terms, monetary amounts, obligations, releases, and enforcement steps. Trigger when the user needs to document mediation settlements, arbitration awards, or partial ADR resolutions from transcripts, agreements, mediator reports, or awards.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
欧盟 AI 法案知识引擎——以 70 份官方欧盟来源文件为基础的权威监管问答（包括 2026 年委员会关于 Art. 6 高风险分类的指南草稿——一般原则、附件 I、附件 III）。基于完整条例文本、委员会指南、EDPB/EDPS 意见、《实践守则》、协调标准、FRIA 指南、事件模板和行业特定指引，以条款级引用回答关于 AI 法案的任何问题。当用户询问"EU AI Act"、"AI Act regulation"、"Regulation 2024/1689"、"KI-Verordnung"、要求"explain an AI Act article"、"what does Article X say"、"AI Act requirements"、"AI Act penalties"、"AI Act timeline"、"GPAI obligations"、"high-risk AI"、"prohibited AI practices"、"AI Act and GDPR"、"fundamental rights impact assessment"、"AI Act standards"、"AI Act national implementation"、"AI literacy"、"serious incident reporting"、"Digital Omnibus"、"AI regulatory sandbox"，或任何关于欧盟人工智能监管的问题时，应使用本技能。德语术语同样触发："KI-Gesetz"、"KI-Verordnung"、"Hochrisiko-KI"、"KI-Kompetenz"、"Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung"、"GPAI-Verhaltenskodex"。对于产出分类决定而非知识答案的评估工作流，提议在会话内运行结构化风险等级分类。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
/cs:ai-act-readiness <system> — EU AI Act 6-question forcing interrogation. Use during AI-system intake, before EU deployment, or during annual compliance refresh as Article 113 obligations phase in (2025-02-02 / 2025-08-02 / 2026-08-02 / 2027-08-02).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit over-engineered codebases by factoring layers into live obligations, quotienting redundant distinctions, ablating unearned surface, and normalizing survivors while preserving required behavior. Use when change latency or agent difficulty comes from frameworks, plugins, DI, codegen, task runners, config indirection, ORMs, GraphQL, monorepo/infra tooling, or web stacks, or when asked to remove layers. Produces an evidence-backed Reduction Certificate, cuts, migration phases, proof signals, and rollback. Not for one local readability cleanup (use tw-complexity-mitigator).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
The LAW a council SEAT is bound by — deliberation protocol, pact obligations, governance, and decision-ledger recording — the discipline half of a seat. Trigger when: - Holding a seat on a bound council (architect, lead-maintainer, process-auditor, or a summoned guest). - Depositing an independent assessment, routing a decision, or recording assent or a finding. - Auditing whether the council honored the pact, the delegation table, or the barring lifecycle. - Prompt contains: /council, council seat, deliberation protocol, pact, delegation table, decision ledger, barring, merge-consent.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
/cs:ai-act-readiness <system> — EU AI Act 6-question forcing interrogation. Use during AI-system intake, before EU deployment, or during annual compliance refresh as Article 113 obligations phase in (2025-02-02 / 2025-08-02 / 2026-08-02 / 2027-08-02).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turns a set of questions (form exports, helpdesk logs, meeting Q and A, chat threads, a plain list) plus the source documents the user supplies into a DRAFT FAQ grouped by theme: every answer quoted or paraphrased from a named source with a reference, verbatim quotes for dates, figures, eligibility and obligations, UNKNOWN where the sources are silent, a source register with precedence, a conflicts table and a routing list of unanswered questions to owners. Use when the user asks to "build an FAQ from these documents", "answer these questions from the policy", "turn the Q and A into an FAQ page", "group these questions and answer them from the guide" or "what do our documents say about these questions". Do not use for the manager FAQ of a changed HR policy, use policy-change-briefing instead; for checking whether a document's own claims are evidenced, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Reconstructed reference notes on US FDA medical-device software regulation, built from seven public-domain FDA sources (the QMSR final rule 89 FR 7496, FDA device software guidance documents, and the eSTAR program page; pinned 2026-10-12). Use for regulatory pathways and premarket submissions (510(k), De Novo, PMA, eSTAR), premarket software documentation levels (Basic or Enhanced), software validation and Computer Software Assurance, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR, 21 CFR 820), medical-device cybersecurity (secure product development, SBOMs, FD&C Act section 524B, labelling), clinical decision support boundaries, off-the-shelf software, MDDS and other software-function scope questions, and the 510(k) software-change trigger. SCOPE LIMITS: US FDA device regulation only; no EU MDR or UKCA content (see `med-device-eu`); no ISO 13485, ISO 14971, or IEC 62304 text, which are named and summarized only as FDA obligations; no drug, biologic, or combination-product rules; reflects the pinned source dates, not later FDA actions; synthesized reference notes, not legal advice and not a substitute for the guidance documents. LICENCE: Public Domain (US Government work, 17 U.S.C. 105).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base synthesized from the Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK) v2.14 by the BKCASE Project. Use for the established systems-engineering canon: SE fundamentals and foundations (systems science, systems thinking, the systems approach, modelling/MBSE), the life cycle (ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288/24748/24774 process, development & agile approaches, model selection/tailoring), technical management, concept definition, architecture/realization (the Vee), V&V, maintenance/sustainment, SE standards, and the application contexts (product, service, enterprise, systems-of-systems, healthcare), plus enabling SE (business/team/individual), related disciplines, quality attributes/specialty engineering, implementation examples, and emerging knowledge. Good for grounding background, vocabulary, and prior-art positions across all eight SEBoK Parts. SCOPE LIMITS: this pack is SEBoK v2.14 only (released 2026-05-18); it synthesizes and signposts rather than reproducing the source — it does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE standard text, is a curated guide (not a complete textbook), and is thin on AI-integration depth (Part 8 is a staging area, not settled practice). LICENCE: content is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 — non-commercial use only, attribution to the BKCASE Project required, share-alike obligations carry forward.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.