1.8천건 · 관련도순
Publish a project's docs as a static HTML manual on GitHub Pages: check that Pages is enabled, bring the wiki up to date, list the doc gaps, build the site, preview it locally and push it after GO. Use for "publish the docs", "docs site", "put the manual on GitHub Pages".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run an offline ASO audit on canonical App Store metadata under `./metadata` and surface keyword gaps using Astro MCP. Use after pulling metadata with `asc metadata pull`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Schedule and execute background work on iOS using BGTaskScheduler. Use when registering BGAppRefreshTask for short background fetches, BGProcessingTask for long-running maintenance, BGContinuedProcessingTask (iOS 26+) for foreground-started work that continues in background, background URLSession downloads, or background push notifications. Covers Info.plist configuration, expiration handling, task completion, and debugging with simulated launches.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test coverage gaps. Use when the user asks for a review swarm, parallel review, diff review, regression review, security review, or wants high-signal issues plus a prioritized fix path without editing files.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Stress-tests ideas by surfacing assumptions, counterarguments, and confidence gaps. Use when evaluating claims, proposals, plans, or decisions that need rigorous intellectual scrutiny.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze a job description, hiring post, or recruitment page for role requirements, evaluation criteria, keywords, risks, and resume or cover letter angles. Use when the user provides a JD URL/text, asks what a company is looking for, wants JD-resume gap analysis, or needs inputs for a tailored cover letter. 한국어 요청도 포함합니다 - 채용공고 분석, 공고 분석, JD 분석, 직무기술서 분석, 자격요건, 우대사항, 이 공고 뭘 원하는지, 공고랑 내 경력 비교.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Sweep recent sessions across every agent CLI recorded in Whalesong and surface the ones worth a look — errors, runaway loops, token blowouts, stalled gaps. Use for "what have my agents been doing", morning reviews, or finding the session that went wrong.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Fan six specialist reviewers (general correctness, silent failures, type design, test gaps, comment accuracy, simplification) out over the current diff, a branch, or a PR in parallel, then merge their findings into one deduplicated, ranked report. Use for a thorough review before merging. Not for editing code or approving on someone's behalf.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detect the project’s test stack, run the narrowest useful tests, create tests when authorized, and report coverage/gaps honestly.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when: investigating a legacy, inherited, third-party-built, or otherwise newly-unfamiliar codebase before scoping a migration or major refactor. Formalizes a repeatable five-step investigation pass — entry-point census, business-rule classification, side-effect/idempotency cataloging, implicit-contract discovery, semantic-duplication detection — plus a canonical per-project Open Questions document. Requires checkable signals: ticket keywords or prior documentation gaps. Not a mandatory gate; reserved for entry-point-heavy work in code areas with no prior investigation record.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when: the agent captures a correction from the team lead, hits an unexpected error, discovers a capability gap, or finds a better practice. Logs to .learnings/ and promotes durable patterns to permanent project memory.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run an offline ASO audit on canonical App Store metadata under `./metadata` and surface keyword gaps using Astro MCP. Use after pulling metadata with `asc metadata pull`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build comprehensive attack trees to visualize threat paths. Use when mapping attack scenarios, identifying defense gaps, or communicating security risks to stakeholders.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
You are an agent architect who has learned the hard lessons of autonomous AI. You've seen the gap between impressive demos and production disasters. You know that a 95% success rate per step means only 60% by step 10.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Automates SOC 2 Type II audit preparation including gap assessment against AICPA Trust Services Criteria (CC1-CC9), evidence collection from cloud providers and identity systems, control testing validation, remediation tracking, and continuous compliance monitoring. Covers all five TSC categories (Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy) with automated evidence gathering from AWS, Azure, GCP, Okta, GitHub, and Jira. Use when preparing for or maintaining SOC 2 Ty...
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Auditing Microsoft Entra ID (Azure Active Directory) configuration to identify risky authentication policies, overly permissive role assignments, stale accounts, conditional access gaps, and guest user risks using AzureAD PowerShell, Microsoft Graph API, and ScoutSuite.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when you have an existing component, flow, or interface and need an evidence-backed accessibility design review after basic checks pass. Best for WCAG 2.2 compliance, focus management, ARIA pattern quality, semantics, and state communication gaps automated tools miss.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run a health check on an existing project: dependency audit, security scan, test runner detection, CI/CD evaluation, and missing configuration analysis. Maps the three execution gates (pre/in/post) from /10x-bootstrapper to an assessment framework for existing codebases. Reads optional context/foundation/stack-assessment.md from /10x-stack-assess to focus checks on identified gaps. Writes context/foundation/health-check.md with findings, prioritized fixes, and an agent-readiness verdict. Use when the user has an existing project and wants to verify its health before working with an agent. Trigger phrases: "health check", "check my project", "audit my project", "is my project healthy", "sprawdź projekt", "audyt projektu", "health-check", "project health". Use AFTER /10x-stack-assess (brownfield chain), BEFORE agent onboarding (m1-l4).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structured competitor teardown skill. Use when scraping competitor sites, extracting pricing/features/positioning, or analyzing strategic gaps. For general research, see market-research.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
当使用者说“这篇建模论文还能怎么提升”“按评分表排修改优先级”“时间不够先改什么”“给我一个论文改进清单”“要不要再加一个高级模型”时使用。基于现有草稿、模型工作包、批判 findings、评分规则和真实剩余资源建立可定位的 gap register，再按结论影响、评分关联、工作量、依赖与失败风险排序；每项写所需数据/代码/作者决定、验证与验收条件，先给一个最小可行修订，不用装饰复杂度替代证据，不编创新、实验或评委偏好。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Disciplined diagnosis workflow for hard, intermittent, or multi-component bugs and performance regressions: inspect logs and existing evidence, build a feedback loop, test falsifiable hypotheses, instrument gaps, and verify the outcome. Use when the root cause is unclear, reproduction is unreliable, several causes or components are plausible, or performance has regressed. Do NOT use for obvious single-cause errors, straightforward configuration or syntax fixes, planned feature work, or broad architecture review. Diagnosis-only requests stop after reporting the root cause and evidence; apply a fix only when the user requested one.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design and execute a social engineering penetration test including phishing, vishing, smishing, and physical pretexting campaigns to measure human security resilience and identify training gaps.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Auditing Microsoft Entra ID (Azure Active Directory) configuration to identify risky authentication policies, overly permissive role assignments, stale accounts, conditional access gaps, and guest user risks using AzureAD PowerShell, Microsoft Graph API, and ScoutSuite.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyzes intrusion activity against the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain framework to identify which phases an adversary has completed, where defenses succeeded or failed, and what controls would have interrupted the attack at earlier phases. Use when conducting post-incident analysis, building prevention-focused security controls, or mapping detection gaps to kill chain phases. Activates for requests involving kill chain analysis, intrusion kill chain, attack phase mapping, or Lockheed Martin kill chain framework.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.