194건 · 관련도순
Oracle-bound spec-review check that every structured Rollout prerequisite binds to an enforcement-type acceptance criterion. A prerequisite whose `enforced-by` is missing, dangling, or points at a non-enforcement AC is a BLOCKER (hard-blocks implementation entry via the checker fan-out verdict); a prerequisite left in free prose is ADVISORY. Read-only. Runs in the spec-review fan-out before implementation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Dev-only check that a drafted spec for THIS baseline repo won't ship dev-tree references to consumer installs. Catches three failure modes — shipped SKILL.md prose that references paths under `src/`, `tests/`, `scripts/`, `obj/` as runtime invocations (in ```bash fences``` OR `inline backticks`, plus shipped `.mjs`/`.js`/`.sh`/`.py` helper-file imports); new Python helpers added under `.claude/skills/<slug>/` (shipped helpers must be `.sh` or `.mjs`/`.js` going forward); and imports of modules that aren't in `obj/template/.claude/manifest.json` (consumer won't have the file). The aggregate scanner (`scan-shipped-skills.mjs`) walks only baseline-owned skill dirs (via `owner: baseline` frontmatter) at top level — `references/` and other subdirs are documentation, not runtime. BLOCKER findings hard-block implementation entry; ADVISORY surfaces but doesn't block. Read-only — surfaces a punch list; maintainer edits the spec and re-runs until CLEAN.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Code simplification suggestions — clarity, unnecessary complexity, redundant abstractions. Advisory only.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Code simplification suggestions — clarity, unnecessary complexity, redundant abstractions. Advisory only.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use before completion, PR, deploy, handoff, or when verifying code changes. Runs advisory or blocking checks and reports evidence.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use between gz content compose and corpus attestation to judge a candidate rendition and record its advisory QC receipt.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provide private local advice to Codex about whether to call a tool, which candidate is best, risk, recovery, and task completion. Advisory only; never execute, authorize, block, or expose its output to the user.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Concrete remediation proposal with Safe Harbour confidence — version bump, inline as first-party code, patch, workaround, or advisory. Use when applying a fix for a triaged CVE, evaluating fix-type trade-offs across registry / source / distro patches, producing rollback-safe manifest edits with dry-run verification, or generating a CycloneDX SBOM after the fix lands.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Advisory checkpoint for deciding whether planning-document edits should be split into a separate planning branch/PR. Use only when the user explicitly asks where to commit `memory/SPEC.md` or `memory/PLAN.md` changes, mentions planning-doc merge conflicts, asks for a planning PR, or instructs you to prepare/submit one. Do not trigger for ordinary ln-* planning edits, one-line status updates, or routine canonical reconciliation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from MIL-HDBK-61B, the DoD Configuration Management (CM) guidance handbook (7 April 2020, cataloged with Change 1, 2025). Use for defense CM across the acquisition and sustainment life cycle: the five CM functions (planning, identification, control/change management, status accounting, verification & audit), the three configuration baselines (FBL/ABL/PBL) and FCD→ACD→PCD documentation, configuration items (CIs/HWCI/CSCI), change instruments (ECP/NOR/RFV), the CCB and Class I/II classification, CDCA/AA authority, FCA/PCA audits, data management and data rights (CDRL/DID, DFARS rights ladder, master/authoritative source), and tailoring CM by phase (EIA-649-1 R/T/NR matrix, Appendix C templates), plus digital-era CM (digital twin, viewpoints, MOSA). NOTE: 61B is advisory guidance that adopts and points to the SAE EIA-649 / EIA-649-1 / GEIA-HB-649 suite for the authoritative CM requirements — this pack names and describes that suite but does not reproduce its copyrighted requirement text. Thin on: the EIA-649 requirement clauses themselves, form-level detail (DD-form field instructions, full DID content), and non-DoD/commercial CM frameworks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when working with Activemq — activeMQ broker health, destination management, advisory topic monitoring, network connector status, and message flow analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when working with Dependabot — dependabot and Renovate dependency update management. Covers vulnerability alerts, dependency update PRs, auto-merge configuration, version pinning, update scheduling, and security advisory tracking. Use when managing dependency updates, reviewing vulnerability alerts, configuring auto-merge policies, or auditing dependency health.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Dependency management, updates, and security advisory handling. Use when adding, updating, or auditing project dependencies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detect project tech stack and configure Claude Code hooks for mechanical enforcement of linting and security rules. Use this skill when a user wants to set up hooks, configure auto-linting, add security guards, or move from advisory CLAUDE.md rules to mechanical enforcement.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
10 C-level advisory agent skills and plugins for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenClaw. CEO, CTO, COO, CPO, CMO, CFO, CRO, CISO, CHRO, Executive Mentor. Multi-role board meetings, strategy routing, structured recommendations. For founders needing executive-level decision support.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Authors portable, strongly-typed bioinformatics pipelines in the Common Workflow Language (CWL v1.2) as CommandLineTool/Workflow/ExpressionTool documents, validated with cwltool and run at scale on Toil/Arvados/Calrissian. Use when deciding CWL (portability/provenance/regulated) vs Nextflow/WDL/Snakemake; declaring secondaryFiles for indexed companions (.bai/.fai/.dict/.tbi and the caret rule); putting resources/containers under requirements (must-hold) vs hints (advisory) to avoid silent OOM; choosing scatterMethod (dotproduct vs flat_/nested_crossproduct); preferring $(...) parameter refs over ${...} JavaScript for portability; pinning DockerRequirement images; or emitting a CWLProv provenance object for audited/clinical settings.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design AI financial advisory assistants. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-financial-advisor related tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Single entry point for all AEM as a Cloud Service Dispatcher skills. Covers config authoring, technical advisory, incident response, performance tuning, security hardening, and full lifecycle orchestration for the Adobe Dispatcher Apache HTTP Server module and its HTTPD/dispatcher configuration.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Plan which model tier handles which work BEFORE execution begins — a high-cognition model deeply understands the problem, lays the foundations, then emits a modular plan assigning each module the cheapest tier that can safely execute it, with escalation tripwires and one-way-door protection. Advisory only: it announces "next module → tier X / model Y" at each boundary and the HUMAN switches models — harnesses like Cursor cannot switch mid-run. Load when the user asks which model to use, wants a model plan, model tiers, model-tier routing, assign models to tasks or modules, says "cheap model got stuck", "which model for this task", "cost-efficient model choice", or when implementation-plan / problem-to-plan need a model: tier column. NOT dynamic-routing (plan-path selection after failure) — this skill assigns cognition tiers to work.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Managing third-party dependencies — version pinning, security auditing, license compliance, update workflows, lockfile management, supply chain security. Activate on "npm audit", "dependabot", "renovate", "pin versions", "dependency update", "supply chain", "license compliance", "lockfile", "security advisory", "typosquatting", "SBOM". NOT for internal monorepo package management (use monorepo-management) or publishing your own packages to npm/PyPI.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has actually shrunk its ~19 legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools — work/act/ask/recall/status — each carrying one denial shape and one transcript event, migrated through a real retirement path (intake-metadata, alias, or doc-history — never a parallel runtime), with zero legacy-verb calls once a body reaches compliance mode C4+. Use when reviewing a broker-collapse migration plan, gating a body's move from advisory (C0-C3) to enforced (C4+) coordination, or verifying IT-018 Broker Collapse compliance. NOT for the inbound trigger→spawn boundary that decides whether an event may spawn an agent at all (use fleet-event-spawn-trust), the capability-token cryptographic mechanism behind a denial (use agentic-zero-trust-security), designing how a swarm of agents invokes and shards work (use swarm-invocation-designer), or auditing an individual PR's mergeability (use agent-pr-authoring).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Author a pull request an AI coding agent can actually get merged: a scoped, coherent diff; a Summary and Test Plan backed by real evidence; correct triage of required-and-blocking CI gates versus external/advisory checks (e.g. a Cloudflare Pages preview build); draft-while-WIP discipline; named fixup commits for real review findings; and a clean landing through a merge queue without force-pushing or bypassing branch protection. Use when opening, updating, triaging red CI on, or landing an agent-authored GitHub PR. NOT for this repo's internal release ceremony, actor embodiments, or contributor mirror-sync mechanics (use port-daddy-internal-dev), tracking backlog/issue lifecycle across a board (use agent-issue-tracker-workflow), or deciding what to build next / sequencing a roadmap (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze raw prompts, identify intent and gaps, match ECC components (skills/commands/agents/hooks), and output a ready-to-paste optimized prompt. Advisory role only — never executes the task itself. TRIGGER when: user says "optimize prompt", "improve my prompt", "how to write a prompt for", "help me prompt", "rewrite this prompt", or explicitly asks to enhance prompt quality. Also triggers on Chinese equivalents: "优化prompt", "改进prompt", "怎么写prompt", "帮我优化这个指令". DO NOT TRIGGER when: user wants the task executed directly, or says "just do it" / "直接做". DO NOT TRIGGER when user says "优化代码", "优化性能", "optimize performance", "optimize this code" — those are refactoring/performance tasks, not prompt optimization.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.