'c2' 검색 결과

Review English and Chinese empirical papers for formulaic language and claims that overstate the evidence. Supports revisions that preserve numbers and citations, checks bilingual consistency, and includes tools for inspecting invisible characters and file metadata.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Revising formulaic language in English or Chinese empirical papers
• Checking whether claims match tables and citations
• Aligning claims in Chinese text and an English abstract

Style UI for posthog.com using extracted design tokens, named values for colors, corner radius, and fonts. Reuse the supplied settings and identify missing values when the available tokens do not cover a styling need.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Style UI with the extracted posthog.com colors
• Apply the supplied corner radius and body font
• Identify missing settings while reusing existing tokens

Provides malware analysis and network traffic techniques for CTF challenges. Use when analyzing obfuscated scripts, malicious packages, custom crypto protocols, C2 traffic, PE/.NET binaries, RC4/AES encrypted communications, YARA rules, shellcode analysis, memory forensics for malware (Volatility malfind, process injection detection), anti-analysis techniques (VM/sandbox detection, timing evasion, API hashing, process injection, environment checks), or extracting malware configurations and indicators of compromise.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Differential abundance testing for microbiome data using compositionally-aware methods like ALDEx2, ANCOM-BC2, and MaAsLin2. Use when identifying taxa that differ between experimental groups while accounting for the compositional nature of microbiome data.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "codify how our founder sounds", "build a founder voice dossier", or "set our content pillars"; runs an 80%-extraction interview over the user's OWN posts, emails, and decks (never competitor scraping, never an invented persona) and produces the versioned voice record — a per-platform register map (incl. 小红书/微信公众号), banned phrases, per-context disclosure lines (the ECHO C2 upstream), a few-shot bank built exclusively from own posts, and 3-5 content pillars with Estimated %-allocations — submitted via memory/events/channels.ndjson for channel-registry to store as voice-dossier.md, the record every Craft-phase skill reads first. Not for the brand-level voice canon — use brand-language-codifier; not for audience/persona research — use audience-mapper. 声音档案/品牌语气/创始人语气/内容支柱/披露声明

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Provides connectivity, authentication, and troubleshooting guidance for Amazon RDS for SQL Server. Applicable when users ask about SSMS times out connecting from EC2, Cannot generate SSPI context with Windows auth, connect RDS SQL Server from Lambda with pymssql, auth_scheme shows NTLM instead of KERBEROS on ECS Fargate, SSM tunnel to RDS SQL Server from laptop, port 1433 security group, TrustServerCertificate=True for localhost tunnels, SPN MSSQLSvc, AWS Managed Microsoft AD, CNAME not RDS endpoint for Kerberos, tds_version='7.4', encryption='require', port-as-string for pymssql, Secrets Manager credential caching in Lambda, error 18456 login failed. Covers Python (pymssql, pyodbc), .NET (Microsoft.Data.SqlClient), Java (JDBC mssql-jdbc), Node.js (tedious), IAM auth via RDS Proxy, and VPC/ECS/EKS/Lambda deployment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Installs, configures, and troubleshoots Network Flow Monitor agents on EC2 instances to monitor network path health. Covers agent installation, IAM permissions, monitoring network paths, and troubleshooting agents reporting no metrics, HTTP 403 errors, or connectivity failures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Sets up CloudWatch observability for the first time - Omni (CloudWatch Application Observability) and classic CloudWatch. Omni: creating a Space or Domain; access grants (who has access, at what level) and access profiles bounding async alerts, integrations, or agents; instrumenting an app or AI agent with the plain ADOT SDK so traces reach Omni (Python/Node/Java/.NET on EC2/ECS/EKS/Lambda), incl. no-image-rebuild and .NET CoreCLR vars; ingesting Azure telemetry via the CloudWatch agent on an Azure VM or AKS; connecting Slack to a Space; whether GitHub or a custom MCP tool server (HTTP/stdio; API key, bearer, OAuth2) can be connected. CloudWatch: onboarding a service to Application Signals - ADOT auto-instrumentation, the amazon-cloudwatch-observability add-on, monitored service, reporting telemetry, ServiceEvents, CI/CD git/deployment metadata, Terraform/manifest edits. For using what is set up - queries, dashboards, alarms, Omni alerts, X-Ray, synthetics, Dynamic Instrumentation - use aws-observability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plans, builds, runs, and analyzes fault injection experiments with AWS Fault Injection Service (AWS FIS) to validate application resilience through chaos engineering. Covers experiment templates (actions, targets, stop conditions), the FIS actions catalog and action selection, the scenario library (AZ power interruption, cross-Region connectivity, EC2/EKS/EBS stress), experiment lifecycle and monitoring, logging and reports, multi-account experiments, the experiment IAM role, and blast-radius safety. Applies when a user mentions AWS FIS or fault injection, asks what experiment to run for a failure mode (AZ, Region, API errors/throttling, instance/pod/DB/cache failure, latency, packet loss), wants to author an experiment template or CLI/CloudFormation, or needs to safely run chaos experiments in pre-production or production. For the broader resilience program across Resilience Hub and ARC, see aws-resilience-lifecycle; for ARC routing controls and zonal shift, see recovery-controller-setup.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze AWS costs, find savings, manage budgets, evaluate Savings Plans and Reserved Instances, right-size EC2/Lambda/RDS/EBS with Compute Optimizer, look up service pricing, query CUR with Athena, detect cost anomalies, scope costs to billing views, and monitor Free Tier usage. Triggers on: AWS bill, cost analysis, reduce spend, savings plan, reserved instance, right-size, budget alert, cost optimization, pricing, free tier, cost anomaly, CUR, cost audit, billing view, billing view ARN.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Provides authoritative guidance on Amazon Neptune Database and Neptune Analytics for graph, knowledge-graph, and relationship-heavy workloads — fraud detection / fraud rings, agentic memory / chatbot context across sessions, recommendations, identity resolution, Gremlin / openCypher / SPARQL queries, supernode / slow traversal, Neo4j to Neptune migration / APOC compatibility, Neptune Database vs Analytics engine selection, PageRank / community detection, GraphRAG, and connectivity from Lambda / EC2 / applications. Creates and modifies Neptune Database clusters/instances and Neptune Analytics graphs on explicit user confirmation; blocks destructive operations (delete, reset-graph, failover, major upgrade) and redirects to change-control.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Routes serverless requests to a compute form factor and the skill that owns it. Applies first to Lambda, API Gateway, EventBridge, Step Functions and event-driven work while the compute, orchestration or integration choice is open — API backends, webhooks, jobs, cron, queue/stream consumers, durable workflows, event routing, Step Functions vs Durable Functions, and Pipes vs native event source mappings for queues and streams. Decides Event Functions on-demand vs Managed Instances, Web Functions, MicroVMs, EventBridge rules/Scheduler/Pipes/bus, HTTP vs REST API. Owns shared Lambda references (cold starts, SnapStart, concurrency, event sources, function URLs, throttling, troubleshooting). Defers to the specialized skill once a request commits to one form factor or service, or describes its defining feature, even unnamed (durable checkpointing and automatic step retries, Firecracker sandbox, managed instances, Node.js server). Not for EC2, ECS/EKS/Fargate or Amplify hosting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Selects, investigates, and compares AWS object, file, and block storage services, and answers cost, performance, configuration, security, and troubleshooting questions about storage services. Applies when a user asks where to store or archive data based on their usage patterns; which storage service to choose or how two compare; how to migrate data from on-premises or between AWS services; how to protect, replicate, or recover data; how to optimize storage costs; where to deploy shared NFS, SMB, or POSIX file systems; where to store vector embeddings or tabular data; what storage backs enterprise file shares, self-managed databases on EC2, VMware, or stateful containers; or asks what an AWS storage service can do or how it works. Relevant for storage needs for workloads such as AI/ML, analytics, EDA, HPC, media, genomics, or financial trading. Not applicable for SQL query engines (Athena, Spark, Redshift, EMR), ETL (Glue), streaming (Kafka, MSK, Kinesis), or managed database services (RDS, Aurora, DynamoDB).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a Python project's installed dependencies for known CVEs by wrapping pip-audit (PyPA's official vulnerability auditor) and emitting findings in the canonical penetration-tester schema. Detects vulnerable direct AND transitive packages, normalizes pip-audit's severity output via OSV severity bands, falls back to pip list --outdated when pip-audit isn't installed, and supports requirements.txt, pyproject.toml (PEP 621), Pipfile.lock, and poetry.lock as input sources. Use when: pre-merge gate on a Python project, post-incident sweep after a PyPI compromise (e.g. ctx, request-toolbelt typosquats, ultralytics 8.3.42 compromise), SOC2 evidence collection, or inheriting an unfamiliar Python codebase. Threshold: any HIGH or CRITICAL CVE in the resolved dependency tree. MODERATE / LOW reported informationally. Trigger with: "audit python deps", "pip vulnerability scan", "check pypi packages for CVEs", "pip-audit run".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a Node.js project's installed npm dependency tree for known CVEs by wrapping the npm audit JSON output and emitting findings in the canonical penetration-tester schema. Detects direct AND transitive vulnerabilities, normalizes npm's severity scale (info/low/moderate/ high/critical) to the shared Severity enum, and parses both v1 and v2 audit output formats so the skill works against npm 6 and npm 7+ lockfiles. Use when: pre-merge gate on a Node project, post-incident sweep after a transitive package compromise (e.g. event-stream, ua-parser, node-ipc, color.js), SOC2 vendor-management evidence collection, or auditing an inherited or acquired Node codebase. Threshold: any HIGH or CRITICAL CVE in the resolved dependency tree. MODERATE / LOW reported informationally. Trigger with: "audit npm deps", "npm vulnerability scan", "check node packages for CVEs", "npm audit".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Execute automate SOC 2 audit preparation including evidence gathering, control assessment, and compliance gap identification. Use when you need to prepare for SOC 2 audits, assess Trust Service Criteria compliance, document security controls, or generate readiness reports. Trigger with phrases like "SOC 2 audit preparation", "SOC 2 readiness assessment", "collect SOC 2 evidence", or "Trust Service Criteria compliance".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze a target's TLS configuration — negotiated protocol version, cipher suite, certificate chain, expiry, and downgrade vectors. Use when: SOC2 auditor flagged your endpoint for "weak TLS" but you don't know which control failed (TSC CC6.7 transmission integrity vs CC6.6 encryption) or which cipher is the problem. Threshold: any negotiated TLSv1.0 or TLSv1.1, OR a cipher with RC4 / 3DES / null / EXPORT, OR a cert with under 30 days to expiry, OR a chain that fails hostname verification. Trigger with: "audit tls", "check ssl config", "weak tls", "analyze tls".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Heap exploitation playbook. Use when targeting ptmalloc2/glibc heap vulnerabilities including UAF, double free, overflow, off-by-one/null, and leveraging tcache/fastbin/unsortedbin attacks for arbitrary write or code execution.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

You are a compliance expert specializing in regulatory requirements for software systems including GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2, PCI-DSS, and other industry standards. Perform compliance audits and provide implementation guidance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert security auditor specializing in DevSecOps, comprehensive cybersecurity, and compliance frameworks. Masters vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, secure authentication (OAuth2/OIDC), OWASP standards, cloud security, and security automation. Handles DevSecOps integration, compliance (GDPR/HIPAA/SOC2), and incident response. Use PROACTIVELY for security audits, DevSecOps, or compliance implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Draw cloud architecture diagrams for AWS, Azure or GCP with the official provider icon sets, using TerraVision. Use whenever the user asks to draw, diagram, sketch or visualize a system on AWS, Azure or Google Cloud, or one built from their services (Lambda, DynamoDB, S3, EC2, EKS, RDS, API Gateway, Azure Functions, App Service, AKS, Cosmos DB, Cloud Run, GKE, BigQuery and the like), even if they never say 'cloud', 'diagram' or a tool name; also for a diagram of Terraform code. Prefer it over Mermaid, PlantUML, hand-written SVG or ASCII, which cannot use the official icons or VPC/subnet grouping. Not for diagrams that are not cloud infrastructure: sequence diagrams, flowcharts, class or ER diagrams, code or module structure, org charts, on-premises-only networks; use Mermaid or similar for those. Works with or without Terraform: with Terraform code the diagram comes from terraform plan; without it, write a small JSON graph and render it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Predict peptide-MHC class II (HLA-DR/DQ/DP) binding and presentation for CD4 T-cell epitopes with NetMHCIIpan-4.3 and MixMHC2pred-2.0. Covers why class II is far less reliable than class I (open binding groove, 9-mer register ambiguity, sparse noisy training data, DR>DP>DQ accuracy asymmetry), the DQ/DP heterodimer alpha/beta pairing trap, and the looser 1%/5% %Rank thresholds. Use when predicting CD4 epitopes for vaccine help, mapping class II neoantigens, or scoring long peptides against DR/DQ/DP. For CD8/class I see mhc-binding-prediction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Loads, converts, and manipulates Hi-C contact matrices in cooler format (.cool/.mcool/.scool) and Juicer .hic, using cooler (Python + CLI), hic2cool, and hictk. Covers the single-resolution mcool URI (file.mcool::/resolutions/<bp>), the load-bearing divisive-vs-multiplicative weight-naming rule (KR/VC/VC_SQRT auto-divisive vs cooler's multiplicative weight), what survives .hic<->.cool conversion (FRAG matrices and norm vectors do not), raw-vs-balanced coarsening, the .pairs upper-triangle/chromsize-order contract, and chrom-naming/bin-table provenance. Use when loading a cooler, converting .hic to .mcool, selecting a resolution, building a cooler from pairs or a matrix, coarsening/zoomifying, importing Juicer norm vectors, or debugging all-NaN balanced matrices and chr1-vs-1 empty fetches.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Treats a ctDNA assay as a molecule-counting experiment at the Poisson edge and builds its analytical-validation case the measurement-science way. Covers the genome-equivalent currency (~330 haploid copies/ng), the lambda = input_GE x VAF sampling ceiling (lambda>=3 for ~95% detection), the error-suppression ladder (raw NGS ~1e-3 -> single-strand UMI ~1e-4/1e-5 -> duplex <1e-7), the CLSI EP17 LoB/LoD/LoD95/LoQ framework, the per-locus-vs-panel-integrated LoD distinction that lets bespoke MRD reach ppm, contrived/SEQC2 reference standards, and honest LoD reporting conditioned on input mass + consensus depth + replicate detection rate. Use when stating or trusting a sensitivity claim, designing a dilution-series validation, deciding how many genome equivalents are needed at a target VAF, choosing a single-locus vs panel-integrated LoD, or auditing a "detects 0.1% VAF" claim.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.