251건 · 관련도순
Measure the active Agent model with pinned offline ModelTrace sampling and return an unsigned closed-set attribution record. Use before Agent-originated commits, Issue/PR creation or material updates, comments, reviews, and current collaboration writes in either execution mode. Do not treat a fingerprint, declared model label, or record reference as authenticated identity, permission, independent review, or acceptance.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit one bounded Proto UI collaboration-governance slice and route policy-determined drift toward reversible correction. Use across Issues, pull requests, Discussions, labels, milestones, Project, rules, permissions, or Actions. This evidence leaf is read-only; authorized corrections continue in their registered leaves.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply one exact-target Proto UI collaboration update through the ordinary governed primitive or an explicitly current-user connected-operation path for archive/ref recovery, Issue reopening/linking, additive carrier publication and service control. Do not manufacture review dispositions, merge, close, release or change privileged settings.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert in designing, orchestrating, and managing multi-agent systems (MAS). Specializes in agent collaboration patterns, hierarchical structures, and swarm intelligence. Use when building agent teams, designing agent communication, or orchestrating autonomous workflows.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Delegate coding tasks to Codex AI for implementation, analysis, and alternative solutions. Use when you need a second AI perspective, want to explore different approaches, or need specialized Codex capabilities for complex coding tasks.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
"Apply Social Identity Theory to analyze how group categorization, identification, and intergroup comparison drive behavior, bias, and conflict. Use this skill when the user needs to explain in-group favoritism or out-group hostility, diagnose organizational silo dynamics, design inclusive team structures, or when they ask 'why do groups polarize', 'how does team identity affect collaboration', or 'what drives us-vs-them thinking'.".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
"Apply governance theory to analyze multi-level, network, and collaborative governance arrangements beyond traditional government. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate public-private partnerships, analyze multi-stakeholder governance structures, compare governance models across sectors, or assess institutional arrangements for collective decision-making — even if they say 'who governs this', 'public-private collaboration', or 'how are decisions made across organizations'.".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Developer-Figma collaboration: dev mode, design tokens, component inspection, handoff, and design-system alignment. Use when implementing designs from Figma or aligning code with a design system.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Master Figma workflows with auto layout, components, variables, prototyping, and team collaboration.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design role-based agent teams with CrewAI — agents, tasks, crews, and collaboration patterns for complex workflows.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Git expert covering branching strategies, collaboration, conflict resolution, and best practices
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Manage persistent coding sessions across Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity (agy), Grok Build, and OpenCode engines. Use when orchestrating multi-engine coding agents, starting/sending/stopping sessions, running multi-agent council collaborations, cross-session messaging, ultraplan deep planning, ultrareview parallel code review, autoloop autonomous workspace iteration, ultraapp building deployable web apps from a structured Q&A interview, switching models/tools at runtime, exposing the orchestrator's 78 tools as an MCP server to Hermes Agent / Claude Desktop / Cursor / Cline / Continue / Zed / Windsurf / Goose, or running as an Agent Client Protocol (ACP) agent that Zed / JetBrains / Neovim / Emacs / VS Code / dsh can drive directly. Triggers on "start a session", "send to session", "run council", "ultraplan", "ultrareview", "autoloop", "ultraapp", "Forge tab", "build a web app", "one-click app", "AppSpec", "autonomous iteration", "iterate until goal", "auto research", "switch model", "hand off a session", "session handoff", "switch engine", "continue on codex", "continue on claude", "move this session to another engine", "multi-agent coding", "coding session", "session inbox", "grok session", "grok build", "opencode", "mcp server", "clawo-mcp", "hermes mcp", "model context protocol", "ultracode", "dynamic workflow", "fanout", "fan-out", "best-of-N", "steer turn", "interrupt turn", "fork thread", "rollback turns", "acp", "agent client protocol", "clawo acp", "zed agent", "jetbrains agent", "external agent", "dsh subagent", "deepseek harness", "clawo runs", "run ledger", "session cost", "coding-agent token usage", "spend cap", "budget limit", "maxBudgetUsd", "durable workflow", "resume a run", "verify a coding run", "acceptance contract", "evidence bundle", "did the agent's tests actually pass", "protected tests", "agent edited the tests", "human gate", "repair loop", "clawo workflow", "clawo verify", "clawo solve", "clawo fanout", "fix and verify", "solve from the terminal".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
A skill that creates new Claude skills and automatically shares them on Slack using Rube for seamless team collaboration and skill discovery.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when admins are governing the Chatter group lifecycle — creation policy, public/private/unlisted visibility decisions, group ownership transfer when owners leave, archived vs inactive vs deleted state changes, auto-archive behavior, naming conventions, group templates (Information Templates), and orphan-group cleanup after user terminations. Triggers: 'we have 800 dead chatter groups', 'group owner left the company who owns it now', 'should this group be public private or unlisted', 'when does a chatter group auto-archive', 'how do I delete vs archive a chatter group', 'we need a chatter group naming convention'. NOT for Chatter notification / digest / feed-noise tuning (use admin/chatter-notification-tuning), NOT for Chatter REST API integration patterns (use apex/apex-connect-api-chatter), NOT for Custom Notifications API (use apex/apex-custom-notifications-from-apex), NOT for Experience Cloud / Customer Community group access (different sharing model).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
A skill that creates new Claude skills and automatically shares them on Slack using Rube for seamless team collaboration and skill discovery.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Applies insights from MetaGPT paper on how structured communication, role specialization, and SOPs prevent coordination failures in multi-agent LLM systems
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Initialize or safely upgrade a processor project's root AGENTS.md from a maintained baseline. Use when starting a processor project, adding project-level Agent collaboration rules, or comparing an existing AGENTS.md with the package baseline. This skill only handles AGENTS.md; it does not scaffold documentation, inspect or configure environments, install tools, or modify processor source.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
决策调研 / Decision-Driven Research：当用户面对一个具体决策需要找信息时使用——「有没有现成方案」 「怎么接入 X 平台」「这个技术可行吗」「业界怎么做 Y」「选 A 还是 B」「桌面端应该怎么定位」 「高级版和基础版怎么拉开差异」「这个产品方向对不对」。 核心行为：先框定研究层级和问题类型，再锚定决策问题，枚举竞争假设，主动找反对证据， 用排除逻辑给出有立场的结论。支持技术选型、产品策略、商业判断、竞品定位等所有需要做决定的调研。 可用中文唤起：「帮我调研」「有没有现成方案」「这个怎么接」「技术上可行吗」「帮我选一个」 「这个产品方向对不对」「我们应该怎么定位」「行业怎么做」。 与 research-topic-compiler 的边界：需要最终选择、推荐、排除理由、置信度和颠覆条件时用这个； 如果目标是长期学习、候选池沉淀或 Research Project，用 research-topic-compiler，再把 Candidate Backlog 交回本 Skill 做最终决策。 只有发现一个会实质改变结论、可研究且可关闭的证据 gap 时，才向 research-topic-compiler 发出精确 Return Request。 不用于：问题还没定义清楚时（先用 ai-collaboration-calibration L4-fuzzy 脑暴）。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
方案拷问 / 压力测试：当用户有一个产品方案、架构设计、计划或决策，想被连续追问、反方挑战、 压测取舍和失败模式时使用。可用中文唤起：“拷问我的方案”“压力测试这个设计”“帮我问 hard questions” “这个方案哪里会翻车”“grill me”。目标是一问一答把决策树走清楚，不是直接替用户写最终方案。 跨 Skill 运行时只输出 Challenge/Critic Handoff，并把一个 gap 返回最小责任节点；不重写完整方案。 如果用户还不知道真正问题是什么，先用 ai-collaboration-calibration；如果用户要标准 PRD 交付准备度评审， 用 prd-review。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
复杂探索资产化 / Complex Exploration：当用户面对复杂、不确定、多轮迭代的产品策略、Roadmap、商业化定价、竞品定位、复杂 PRD 前置探索、项目复盘或方法论沉淀任务时使用。它先判断任务类型，暴露隐含假设，重构真正问题，规划探索路径和中间产物，并在结束后沉淀认知、结构、方法论、工具和影响力资产。不用于简单润色、翻译、摘要、明确执行任务；问题只需早期认知校准时优先用 ai-collaboration-calibration，已有方案要压力测试时用 grill-me，系统专题研究用 research-topic-compiler。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
协作校准 / 认知校准 / 问题脑暴：当用户有模糊感受说不清问题、方案越补越复杂、想挑战假设、 想重新定义问题、想知道成熟领域里怎么叫这个问题时使用。 可用中文唤起："帮我想想""先聊一下""一起脑暴""我感觉有问题但不清楚是什么" "先别执行，帮我看清问题""挑战我的假设""这个方案是不是想错了""帮我做认知校准" "双向钢人""钢人论证一下""正反最强论证，给我明确判断"。 也适用于：用户直接说"帮我做 X 功能""接入 Y 平台"但背景复杂、或对话早期感觉方向可能跑偏时， AI 主动识别并建议进入脑暴模式。 这里的“挑战假设”主要指问题定义、目标、约束和领域定位层面的假设；如果问题已确认且用户已有具体方案、 计划、架构或决策要压力测试，应转用 grill-me。不用于翻译、摘要、格式整理、单文件小改等简单执行任务。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
设计脑暴 / 实现前方案校准：当用户想把已基本成立的想法、功能方向或产品问题，在写 PRD、画 mockup 或进入开发计划前，先比较方案、确认取舍、对齐 UI/视觉约束，并收敛成可执行设计 spec 时使用。 可用中文唤起：“先脑暴一下方案”“先不要写 PRD，帮我设计几种路径”“参考 brainstorming 把这个需求变成设计 spec” “实现前先讨论设计”。问题还没定义清楚时先用 ai-collaboration-calibration；已有方案要压力测试时用 grill-me； 直接写 PRD 时用 prd-architect；grill-me 返回精确设计 gap 时，本 Skill 只输出 Design Delta。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
NDA、共同研究、受託研究、データ提供、MTA、再委託契約の初期論点を整理し専門部署へ引き渡す
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
国際共同研究、招聘、MOU、調印式、海外機関連絡、時差調整、英文連絡の運営支援を行う
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.