2.3천건 · 관련도순
Use for tradeoff analysis, or when the user must pick between concrete options: "A or B?", "which library should we use?", "build vs buy", "compare these approaches". Scores options on weighted criteria, tests sensitivity and reversibility. Skip for open ideation or single-option reviews.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Research current job markets and hiring requirements, analyze recent job descriptions (JDs), compare them with a user's resume, projects, skills, and constraints, and turn evidence gaps into prioritized career actions. Use when students, job seekers, or career changers ask about current role or industry outlook (including “现在行情怎么样”), whether a role or JD fits them (including “这个JD适合我吗”), cross-platform JD sampling, resume evidence gaps or truthful tailoring, what career skill to learn next, target-role course or certificate decisions, application readiness, or a capacity-bounded 30/60/90-day job-search plan. Do not use for unrelated personal or education advice, simple factual lookups, automatic job applications, or unsupported resume rewriting.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
对 profiling 数据（kernel_details.csv / trace_view.json / step_trace_time.csv）做统一分析： 5 层递进管道（analyze_trace.py）+ baseline/优化后 kernel diff（compare_traces.py），输出 瓶颈诊断、算子执行序、可融合候选与 P0-P2 方向建议。输入统一来自 profiling-collect。 只要用户有 profiling 产出并问"为什么慢/瓶颈在哪/优化前后差多少/往哪个方向"，都用本技能；采集走 profiling-collect，方案选档走 dit-perf-opt，实现/并行/基准走 pattern-dev/dit-parallel-opt/benchmark-dev——本技能只做诊断与方向。 由 model-auto-optimization 的 S1（融合分析）/S3（并行）阶段调用，亦由 dev-workflow 的分析阶段指引加载。 融合机会候选只做**识别**；候选的**边界与收益判定**（能不能融成一个单元、融多大、值不值）交 `fusion-scope-analyze`（本技能的辅助技能）——本技能不判融合边界。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate multiple radically different interface designs for a module using parallel sub-agents. Use when user wants to design an API, explore interface options, compare module shapes, or mentions "design it twice".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Choose, compare, and decompose work into the right coordination topology: dag, workflow, manager-driven team, swarm, blackboard, team-builder, or recurring loop. Use when the coordination shape is unclear, when you need topology-native breakdown instructions instead of a generic DAG, or when planning topology and runtime topology may differ. NOT for actual execution, node-level skill matching, or framework/tool installation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Ranks skill matches by fit, performance history, and contextual relevance. Applies multi-factor scoring including success rate, resource usage, and task alignment. Activate on 'rank skills', 'best skill for', 'skill ranking', 'compare skills', 'optimal skill'. NOT for semantic matching (use dag-semantic-matcher) or skill catalog (use dag-skill-registry).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Task-sized forensic analysis of Vivado synthesis and routed timing evidence for processor RTL. Use when Codex must trace a named setup or hold path, audit whole-design timing populations, compare implementation runs, map primitive, LUT, CARRY, BRAM, DSP, MUXF, register, and routed-net stages back to Chisel or generated RTL, distinguish logic from routing pressure, identify missing DCP queries, or write an evidence-backed timing report. This skill is read-only by default and stops at ranked modification directions. Use optimize-chisel-fpga-timing for RTL edits and routed A/B implementation closure.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Score an Instagram creator's (or a list of creators') audience authenticity and engagement quality using Xpoz. Measures real engagement rate against views rather than follower count, the bot/spam share of their comments, and an overall 0-100 authenticity score for influencer vetting and partner selection. Use when asked to "vet this influencer", "are their followers real", "check engagement quality for @username", "rate these Instagram accounts", "compare creators before a sponsorship", or when the user pastes a list of Instagram handles to evaluate.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Trigger when: (1) the user mentions "manim", "scene", "video", "EN/KO render", "GEODE_HERO_LANG", "1080p60", or (2) editing files under `scripts/visualizations/` ending in `.py`, or (3) the user asks to render, re-render, or extend any of the four validated scenes (`geode_hero.py`, `autoresearch_filewalk.py`, `autoresearch_compare.py`, `critical_floor.py`). GEODE Manim Scene authoring standard. Locks the patterns the four validated scenes already share — Anthropic-style palette, Helvetica Neue + Pretendard font pairing with weight=NORMAL, EN/KO multilingual lang via `GEODE_HERO_LANG` env, `_dashed_arrow_with_head` stage-coupled tinting, `verify_hero_layout.py` ratchet — so the next scene does not re-discover the kerning / padding / transition regressions catalogued in [[viz-frame-audit]].
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Researches and compares free and open source software projects in a supplied domain, using either user-named candidates or a discovered shortlist. Use when evaluating FOSS alternatives, comparing GitHub popularity, maintenance, licences, domain fit, trade-offs, or producing a linked HTML comparison report.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Visualises RNA-modification data with transcript-feature metagene plots (Guitar GuitarPlot; MetaPlotR; deepTools computeMatrix scale-regions), peak-centred heatmaps (ComplexHeatmap; deepTools plotHeatmap), IP-vs-input paired browser tracks (log2 IP/input bigWig via deepTools bamCompare; pyGenomeTracks; Gviz; IGV/UCSC track hubs), DRACH sequence-logo plots (ggseqlogo; MEME), feature-distribution stacked bars, and volcano/MA plots for differential modification. Establishes stop-codon enrichment in the metagene plot as the biological QC anchor for any MeRIP dataset (Dominissini 2012; Meyer 2012). Use when producing the canonical metagene plot with stop-codon enrichment as a QC anchor, building paired IP/input genome-browser tracks at single-locus resolution, plotting peak-centred heatmaps clustered by condition, summarising peak distribution across transcript features, generating DRACH motif logos as sanity checks, rendering volcano plots of differential m6A, or reproducing the stop-codon enrichment plot.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda scheduling, soft-core potentials, MBAR/BAR analysis, cycle-closure validation, and protocol-appropriate enhanced sampling. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Compare gene co-expression and regulatory networks between biological conditions to find rewired relationships using DiffCorr, DiffCoEx, DINGO/iDINGO, and CoDiNA. Covers the differential-connectivity-is-not-differential-expression distinction, the pairwise multiple-testing explosion, marginal vs partial (direct) rewiring, and the underpowered-rewiring failure mode. Use when comparing co-expression networks between disease vs control, treatment, or developmental stages, or finding hub genes that rewire without changing mean expression. For single-condition modules see coexpression-networks; for differential expression of means see differential-expression/de-results.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate or compare multiple technical approaches for one validated decision. NOT for product discovery or refining an existing plan.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn a live website into a working local frontend you can edit. Fetches the page, extracts its design system and structure, and rebuilds it locally in your stack, then screenshot-compares to the original. Use when the user says "url to code", "clone this site locally", "make it look like linear.app", "rebuild this page", or provides a live URL to recreate. Part of the Product Design set. Uses web-fetch + browser automation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn a reference image or mockup into a working local frontend that matches it closely. Inspects the image, extracts the design system (layout, type, spacing, color, components), implements it, then screenshot-compares and iterates to close the gap. Use when the user says "image to code", "build this mockup", "code this screenshot", "make this design real", or provides a UI image to implement. Part of the Product Design set. Uses a browser tool for screenshot verification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Check a prototype against its original design direction and requirements before shipping. Compares implementation to the mockup/spec/context, flags drift in layout, spacing, type, color, states, and behavior, and reports a pass/fix list. Use when the user says "design QA", "does it match the design", "check against the spec", "conformance check", or before sharing/handing off a prototype. Part of the Product Design set. Uses a browser tool for visual comparison.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Passive, pattern-calibrated risk discovery for authorized security research over an open-source project, repository URL, dependency, release, or local checkout. Use when the security research agent needs to find highest-risk areas, map attack surface, identify likely bug-hunting targets, prioritize security review, inspect structural/logical/security-critical code, compare vulnerable versus patched versions, reason from broad high-severity vulnerability families, or remember areas of interest for later attack-chain research.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Recommends initiating intravenous bisphosphonate or denosumab for adults with hypercalcemia of malignancy compared with no treatment. Use when a clinician asks about first‑line pharmacologic therapy for HCM or when deciding to start antiresorptive agents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Inspect scoped Autodesk data, compare versioned BOMs, and prepare ownership-aware drafts or approved custom-property changes. Not for implicit PLM release, membership changes or CAD geometry editing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate multiple radically different interface designs for a module using parallel sub-agents. Use when user wants to design an API, explore interface options, compare module shapes, or mentions "design it twice".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Throwaway HTML mockups: 2-3 design variants to compare.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.