'init' 검색 결과

Knowledge base from the Expanded Guidance for NASA Systems Engineering (NASA/SP-2016-6105-SUPPL, Volume 1, March 2016) — the practitioner-depth supplement to the NASA SE Handbook. Use for the load-bearing mechanics the handbook compresses: the SE Engine's per-phase cadence and the iterative-vs-recursive distinction, the AS9100 crosswalk, life-cycle tailoring vs. customization and the Compliance Matrix, the recursive system-design consistency loop (ConOps vs. Operations Concept, requirement flow/type/ownership, successive refinement), product realization (verify/qualify/accept/certify cardinality, protoflight, 'test the way we fly' coverage, two-form transition), and the crosscutting technical-management procedures (six-step scheduling, cost-estimating method selection, JCL, interface document family, RIDM/CRM, CM baselines, EVM arithmetic, MOE/MOP/KPP/TPM, the three required leading indicators, and the decision-analysis method catalog). This is the DEPTH layer — it deliberately does NOT restate the base definitions; pair it with the nasa-se-handbook pack. Scope: NASA space-flight SE practice (Vol 1 Practices); thin on the Vol 2 process-appendix detail, on non-NASA/commercial life cycles, and on software-engineering methodology.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from FAA-STD-025f (Preparation of Interface Documentation). Use for IRD/ICD family definitions, common format and content, IRD shall-requirements, ICD design characteristics, verification/VRTM, and CM/revision/approval of FAA Enterprise Subsystem interfaces. Covers rev F preparation rules only; does not replace FAA-STD-005 drawing/spec prep, Order 1800.66 full CM procedures, or non-FAA interface standards.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7150.2D — NASA Software Engineering Requirements. Use for NASA's Agency-wide software-engineering requirements: the software classification scheme (Classes A–F), the Requirements Mapping Matrix and class-driven applicability, tailoring and Technical Authority governance, the SWE-### 'shall' requirements across software management (Ch 3) and the engineering life cycle (Ch 4), the supporting disciplines (configuration management, risk, peer reviews/inspections, measurement, non-conformance — Ch 5), safety-critical and cybersecurity requirements, IV&V applicability, traceability, and the Appendix A definitions. Does not cover detailed software-assurance/safety procedures (see NASA-STD-8739.8), implementation how-to and document content (see NASA-HDBK-2203), the systems-engineering process framework (see NPR 7123.1), or program/project management (see NPR 7120.5).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the GAO Agile Assessment Guide (GAO-24-105506, 2023). Use for assessing and managing Agile software development in federal programs: the Agile Manifesto and framework family (Scrum, Kanban, XP, SAFe, DA, DSDM, Lean, DevOps); the three adoption perspectives (team dynamics, program operations, organization environment); requirements decomposition (epics, features, user stories, INVEST, MoSCoW, definition of done); Agile-aware federal contracting (FAR, modular contracting, SOO/PWS/SOW, product owner vs. COR); program monitoring and control (WBS, cost, schedule, EVM at the feature level); Agile metrics (velocity, lead/cycle time, CFD, burn charts); and the auditor's key-question bank. Oversight- and acquisition-oriented: it tells you how to *assess and govern* Agile programs, not how to code. Thin on hands-on engineering practice, deep cost/schedule checklists (see gao-cost, gao-schedule), and any non-US-federal context.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the NASA Digital Engineering Acquisition Framework Handbook (NASA-HDBK-1004). Use for acquiring digital/model-based data under contract: the Data Requirements Description (DRD) instrument and the Appendix A DRD suite (TDP, MBx, CDMP, CSA, CR, FCA/PCA, SDT, EMDAL, REF, MRI); the Data Type 1-5 control scale; SOW/RFP/Cost-Volume contract language and data rights (FAR/DFARS, Table 3 license categories); the Requirements Exchange Format (REF/ReqIF, UUID schema) and Master Records Index; model-based data definition (MBSE, CAD/PMI, M&S credibility, BOM, release-state mapping, PLM); digital data collaboration, the four owned architectures, and interoperability standards (MIL-STD-31000, STEP/ISO 10303, ASME Y14); the four MBE interoperability use cases; and MBE Plan development. Scope is the acquisition and contracting side of digital engineering. Does not reproduce ISO/STEP/ASME/MIL-STD/SAE standard text, and the companion NASA-HDBK-1009A carries the deeper digital-engineering practitioner detail this handbook defers to.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the NASA Cost Estimating Handbook (CEH) v4.0. Use for NASA's 12-step, three-part cost estimating process (Project Definition, Cost Methodology, Cost Estimate); the WBS, CADRe, and ONCE data backbone; estimating methodologies (analogy, parametric/CER, engineering build-up, EVM, Delphi); ground rules and assumptions, data normalization and inflation (BY/CY/RY); the point-estimate-to-S-curve cost-risk chain and Unallocated Future Expense (UFE) reserves; Joint Cost and Schedule Confidence Level (JCL) analysis via probabilistic cost-loaded schedules; decision-support analyses (sensitivity, trade studies, make/lease-vs-buy, affordability, CAIV); and economic analysis (discounting, NPV, OMB Circular A-94). The cost-estimating complement to NASA's SE and risk packs. Does NOT reproduce the handbook's tool-specific procedures, worked examples, or appendix-depth methods (it names the appendices), nor cover full DoD/GAO cost guides, schedule construction, or formal risk management beyond the cost interface.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the DoD Risk, Issue, and Opportunity (RIO) Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs (OUSD R&E, Sep 2023 incl. Change 2.2). Use for the defense-acquisition mechanics of program risk management: the RIO definitions (risk/issue/opportunity), the five-step risk process (plan-identify-analyze-mitigate-monitor), 1-5 likelihood/consequence scoring and the 5x5 risk matrix, the four mitigation options (accept/avoid/transfer/control), burn-down plans, issue management (probability=1), opportunity management toward should-cost, cross-program/interface risk, tailoring RIO to the six AAF acquisition pathways (UCA/MTA/MCA/Software/DBS/Services), specialized methods (RMF, MBCRA/Cyber Table Top, Agile metrics, FMECA, ITRA/DTRAM), and institutionalizing RIO via the PRMP, boards (RMB/JRMB/ROMB/RWG), tools, tiered roles, and WBS/IMP/IMS/EVM/TPM integration. This is the DoD-acquisition complement to nasa-risk (general CRM/RIDM theory) and dau-se-guidebook (the SE process frame). Does NOT teach general risk theory from scratch, and defers specialized risk regimes (system safety/ESOH, HSI, detailed cyber/RMF, spectrum) to their own DoD instructions and the relevant packs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the FAA AMS Lifecycle V&V Guidelines (verification and validation), Version 3.0, dated April 2017. Use for applying verification and validation across the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS) lifecycle: the verify-vs-validate distinction (built right vs. right thing), the work-product/component/product tiers, the nine V&V planning elements, the four method catalogs (Appendix C), decision-point-gated V&V (SASP, CRD, Investment Analysis, Solution Implementation, In-Service Management), the Appendix B document checklists (PRD/APB/ISPD/PMP), and the DT/OT/IOA test triad. Scope limits: this is an FAA acquisition-V&V doctrine, NOT a general SE process model, requirements-engineering manual, or test-design textbook. It borrows its core V&V definitions from CMMI v1.2 (SEI, paraphrased) and presumes the surrounding AMS lifecycle (see the FAA SEM pack); its phase tables are policy snapshots as of April 2017 and it is thin on detailed test methods, tool specifics, and anything outside FAA acquisition governance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Trauma psychoeducation: Trauma definition, normal reactions, window of tolerance, trigger management, and self-care.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structured problem solving in 6 steps: Problem definition, goals, brainstorming, evaluation, implementation, and review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Strukturiertes Problemlösen in 6 Schritten nach D'Zurilla und Goldfried: Problemdefinition, Ziele, Brainstorming, Bewertung, Umsetzung und Rückblick.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Trauma-Psychoedukation: Traumadefinition, normale Reaktionen, Fenster der Belastbarkeit, Triggermanagement und Selbstfürsorge.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Baut und prüft neue Agentenrollen im ellmos-Ökosystem: native Claude-Code- Subagenten (dauerhafte Rollendefinition) und Companion-Worker (SendMessage- wiederverwendete Instanz für eine Ticket-/Aufgabenserie). Formalisiert das bislang unformalisierte eigene Wissen aus dem laufenden Bau von Agentenrollen (ati-agent, bueroassistent, versicherungs-agent u. a.) zu einem wiederverwendbaren Scaffold-plus-Verify-Ablauf. Nutze diesen Skill, wenn eine neue Rolle entstehen soll ("neue Agentenrolle bauen", "Subagent anlegen", "Companion-Worker starten") oder eine bestehende gegen die Haus-Konventionen geprüft werden soll ("ist dieser Agent richtig aufgesetzt?").

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

ドメイン定義書の新規作成・更新・レビューを支援する。AI駆動開発成果物フローのビジネス要求(D1)に位置する成果物で、本プロダクトを構成する業務領域(ドメイン)を網羅・分類する文書。問題空間(プロダクトが扱う業務領域)の整理であり、DDDにおけるBounded Context(解空間としての実装上の境界)とは別レイヤーで扱う。BRDの下流に位置する成果物。後続のプロダクト要求仕様書、ドメイン要求仕様書群(各ドメインごとに1つ)など、様々な成果物から参照される。BRD策定後、ドメイン整理の段階で呼び出す。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when generating, modifying, explaining, or reviewing TBQ3 Bar-based trading strategies with OnBar, OnInit, OnReady, entries, exits, MarketPosition, stop profit/loss, sizing, slippage, commission, multi-symbol, or cross-period logic.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

アーキテクチャ知識グラフ(memory MCP / memory.jsonl)の初期作成。「知識グラフを初期化して」「memory グラフを作って」「アーキテクチャグラフを登録して」といった依頼、またはプロジェクト初期構築完了後の仕上げとして使用する。コードベースを調査し、モジュール構成と依存関係を entities / relations として登録する。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Research any open-source repository end to end and answer the core question — SHOULD YOU contribute to it? — with a GO / NO-GO / GO-IF verdict backed by evidence: snapshot, momentum, contribution landscape (PR acceptance rates, outside-contributor merge rates, first-timer outcomes), issue health, governance, community sentiment, and a final go/no-go recommendation. Use when the user asks 'should I contribute to X', wants a before-I-contribute due-diligence check on a project, asks whether a project accepts outside PRs, wants contribution-health numbers like PR merge rates or stale-PR counts, or asks for a deep dive on an open-source codebase's health and dynamics before investing time in it.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use WooCommerce's customer and session APIs correctly — WC ships its own session handler (WC_Session_Handler, single wp_woocommerce_sessions table for both guests and logged-in users) and its own customer object (WC_Customer via WC()->customer), separate from $_SESSION / native PHP sessions / wp_get_current_user. AI consistently reaches for $_SESSION (breaks with page caching, setcookie (no signing, no namespacing), or user_meta for guests (impossible). The correct path is WC()->session->set/get for ephemeral per-visitor data, WC()->customer->get_billing_* for the active customer context including guests, and new WC_Customer($user_id) for one-off loads. Important — WC()->session is auto-initialized only on frontend requests (incl. admin-ajax); REST, cron, and WP-CLI must call wc_load_cart() explicitly. Use when storing per-visitor state, reading the current visitor's billing data, or debugging session loss across page caches / REST / cron. Triggers on WC_Session, WC_Session_Handler,...

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design and review Action Scheduler jobs in WordPress plugins using Action Scheduler 3.9.x public APIs - async, single, recurring, and cron-expression actions; action_scheduler_init load timing; hook/args/group naming; unique and priority parameters; idempotent callbacks; chunked workloads; activation/deactivation cleanup; WooCommerce-bundled or standalone dependency usage; admin and WP-CLI debugging; queue runner limits; and safe operational troubleshooting. Use when a plugin schedules background jobs with as_enqueue_async_action, as_schedule_single_action, as_schedule_recurring_action, as_schedule_cron_action, as_get_scheduled_actions, or integrates with WooCommerce background queues.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Manage organizational teams and professional roles in the NV oOS Pro Toolkit. Covers team creation, profession definitions, role assignments, and organizational structure. Use when setting up teams, defining professional roles, assigning users to teams, or managing organizational hierarchy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Produces marketing performance reports and data-driven recommendations from WooCommerce sales data, social media metrics, and campaign analytics. Use when the task asks for "campaign performance", "ROI analysis", "monthly report", "sales trends", "product velocity", "audience insights", or "KPI tracking". Covers metric definition, reporting templates, slow-mover detection, and insight-to-action frameworks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Authorized multi-stage attack-path planning and orchestration spanning reconnaissance, initial access, privilege escalation, lateral movement, and reporting. Entry point for full engagements and cross

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build container-based Foundry Agents with Azure AI Projects SDK (HostedAgentDefinition). Use when creating hosted agents with custom container images in Azure AI Foundry.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "build a win-back campaign", "re-engage lapsed subscribers", "run a re-permission / re-consent sweep", or "sunset my dead list"; produces a closed-loop reactivation program — a lapsed-cohort definition, a staged offer ladder, a re-consent (re-permission) capture step, and a sunset-confirm / suppression rule. Owns none of the SEND-N sub-item notes: engagement-decay / sunset is email-sequence-designer's and preference-center / frequency options is preference-frequency-manager's — this skill references those notes, it does not re-emit them. Not for the general lifecycle flows (welcome/cart/post-purchase) — use email-sequence-designer; not for the preference-center / opt-down ladder — use preference-frequency-manager; not for the consent record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing EQS or the N1 veto — use email-quality-auditor. 流失召回/重新授权/沉默用户清理

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.