'evidence-based' 검색 결과

中医诊疗 — 中医临床医师的认知操作系统 (经典理论 阴阳五行脏腑气血经络六经卫气营血三焦 + 四诊八纲 + 治法 + 方剂学 经方时方 + 中药学 四气五味归经炮制 + 针灸学 经络穴位手法灸法 + 推拿按摩 + 中医各科 内外妇儿骨伤皮肤眼耳鼻喉肛肠老年急症 + 中西医结合 + 循证中医 + NATCM 监管 + 中医诊所备案 + 国家级名老中医 学术继承人 — 不含 道家修炼 / 风水算命 / 中医养生科普 / 中医美容 / 民族医学藏蒙维傣) (Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) clinical practice — the cognitive operating system of practicing TCM physicians covering (a) 经典理论 (阴阳/五行/脏腑/气血津液/经络/六淫/七情/六经/卫气营血/三焦) classical theory, (b) 四诊 (望闻问切) clinical observation/inquiry/pulse + 八纲 (阴阳/表里/寒热/虚实) syndrome differentiation, (c) 治法 (汗吐下和温清消补 + 扶正祛邪) therapeutic principles, (d) 方剂学 (经方 时方 验方) formula science, (e) 中药学 (四气五味/归经/七情/炮制/配伍禁忌) materia medica, (f) 针灸学 (经络穴位/手法/灸法/电针) acupuncture+moxibustion, (g) 推拿按摩 tuina massage, (h) 中医各科 (内/外/妇/儿/骨伤/皮肤/眼/耳鼻喉/肛肠/老年/急症) clinical specialties, (i) 中西医结合 integrative medicine, (j) 循证中医 + 临床流行病学 evidence-based TCM + 现代研究, (k) 中医诊所备案 / 中医师资格 / NATCM 监管 / 药典 / GMP regulatory framework, (l) 国家级名老中医 学术继承人 项目 transmission program; NOT 道家修炼 / 风水 / 算命八字 (那是 玄学不是 中医), NOT 中医养生科普 (是 衍生 不是 临床主体), NOT 中医美容 (是 商业化分支), NOT 民族医学 (藏蒙维傣 是 平行体系 不在本 skill 主线 — 仅作 边界标注).) Master OS — automated mastery of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) clinical practice — the cognitive operating system of practicing TCM physicians covering (a) 经典理论 (阴阳/五行/脏腑/气血津液/经络/六淫/七情/六经/卫气营血/三焦) classical theory, (b) 四诊 (望闻问切) clinical observation/inquiry/pulse + 八纲 (阴阳/表里/寒热/虚实) syndrome differentiation, (c) 治法 (汗吐下和温清消补 + 扶正祛邪) therapeutic principles, (d) 方剂学 (经方 时方 验方) formula science, (e) 中药学 (四气五味/归经/七情/炮制/配伍禁忌) materia medica, (f) 针灸学 (经络穴位/手法/灸法/电针) acupuncture+moxibustion, (g) 推拿按摩 tuina massage, (h) 中医各科 (内/外/妇/儿/骨伤/皮肤/眼/耳鼻喉/肛肠/老年/急症) clinical specialties, (i) 中西医结合 integrative medicine, (j) 循证中医 + 临床流行病学 evidence-based TCM + 现代研究, (k) 中医诊所备案 / 中医师资格 / NATCM 监管 / 药典 / GMP regulatory framework, (l) 国家级名老中医 学术继承人 项目 transmission program; NOT 道家修炼 / 风水 / 算命八字 (那是 玄学不是 中医), NOT 中医养生科普 (是 衍生 不是 临床主体), NOT 中医美容 (是 商业化分支), NOT 民族医学 (藏蒙维傣 是 平行体系 不在本 skill 主线 — 仅作 边界标注).: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) clinical practice — the cognitive operating system of practicing TCM physicians covering (a) 经典理论 (阴阳/五行/脏腑/气血津液/经络/六淫/七情/六经/卫气营血/三焦) classical theory, (b) 四诊 (望闻问切) clinical observation/inquiry/pulse + 八纲 (阴阳/表里/寒热/虚实) syndrome differentiation, (c) 治法 (汗吐下和温清消补 + 扶正祛邪) therapeutic principles, (d) 方剂学 (经方 时方 验方) formula science, (e) 中药学 (四气五味/归经/七情/炮制/配伍禁忌) materia medica, (f) 针灸学 (经络穴位/手法/灸法/电针) acupuncture+moxibustion, (g) 推拿按摩 tuina massage, (h) 中医各科 (内/外/妇/儿/骨伤/皮肤/眼/耳鼻喉/肛肠/老年/急症) clinical specialties, (i) 中西医结合 integrative medicine, (j) 循证中医 + 临床流行病学 evidence-based TCM + 现代研究, (k) 中医诊所备案 / 中医师资格 / NATCM 监管 / 药典 / GMP regulatory framework, (l) 国家级名老中医 学术继承人 项目 transmission program; NOT 道家修炼 / 风水 / 算命八字 (那是 玄学不是 中医), NOT 中医养生科普 (是 衍生 不是 临床主体), NOT 中医美容 (是 商业化分支), NOT 民族医学 (藏蒙维傣 是 平行体系 不在本 skill 主线 — 仅作 边界标注). problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「中医」「中医学」「中医药」「中医诊疗」「中医临床」

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

健身私教 — 为客户设计、指导和推进个性化训练方案的专业工艺, 有别于团课教练、物理治疗师或运动队教练: (a) 训练方案设计与周期化 (线性 / 波动 / 板块周期化 Bompa & Haff; NSCA《力量训练与体能训练精要》行业圣经; Schoenfeld 肌肥大机制; Helms/Valdez/Morgan 肌肉与力量金字塔; 共轭训练法 Simmons/Westside; Starting Strength 线性渐进 Rippetoe; Renaissance Periodization 训练量地标 Israetel); (b) 动作评估与筛查 (FMS 功能性动作筛查 Gray Cook; NASM CEx 纠正性训练连续体 抑制-拉伸-激活-整合; 关节逐级方法 Cook/Boyle; 姿势与代偿模式识别; PAR-Q+ 与 ACSM 运动前筛查指南); (c) 教学与指令 (外部 vs 内部注意焦点 Wulf; 差异化学习 Schöllhorn; 约束导向方法 Davids/Renshaw; RIR/RPE 自动调节 Zourdos/Helms; 动机访谈在健身中的应用 Rollnick/Miller); (d) 营养指导的执业边界 (宏量营养素周期化; Precision Nutrition / ISSN 立场声明的循证建议; 边界: 私教提供一般性指导, 医学营养治疗需 RD/RDN 资质; 能量可用性与 RED-S Mountjoy IOC 共识); (e) 商业与客户管理 (客户留存与方案依从; 咨询与销售伦理; 线上教练平台与规模化 Goodman PTDC; 方案交付工具 TrueCoach/Trainerize/TrainHeroic; 课时定价模型; 独立教练 vs 健身房雇员); (f) 专项方向 (运动表现 CSCS; 纠正性训练 CES; 老年健身 SFN; 产前产后; 青少年 YSCA; 适应性 / 无障碍健身; 健美 / 形体; 力量举; 耐力运动 S&C)。诚实处理: 兄弟科学 vs 循证之争, 补剂行业利益冲突, 合成代谢激素使用现状 (诚实但不推广: 匿名调查约 30% 有经验男性健身者使用过 — 业内估, Kanayama/Pope/Hudson 记录健康风险, WADA 禁用清单用于竞技语境), 体型焦虑与进食障碍风险 (男性私教肌肉变形症, 正食症倾向, NEDA 负责任语言指南), 健身房掠夺性销售 (高压推销、误导性对比照、长约锁定), 执业边界违规 (私教诊断伤病或超范围开饮食处方), 线上教练认证造假 (周末速成、未经认可的认证)。不含: 物理治疗 / 康复治疗 (持照医疗职业), 不含: 团课教练 (Les Mills/Zumba/CrossFit 分馆教练 — 相邻但不同), 不含: 精英竞技运动教练 (团队项目周期化, 不同职业路径), 不含: 营养作为主业 (临床营养学需单独资质)。 (Personal Trainer — the craft of designing, coaching, and progressing individualized exercise programs for clients, distinct from group fitness instruction, physiotherapy, or sports coaching: (a) exercise programming and periodization (linear / undulating / block periodization per Bompa & Haff; NSCA Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning as industry bible; Schoenfeld on hypertrophy mechanisms; Helms/Valdez/Morgan Muscle & Strength Pyramids; conjugate method Simmons/Westside; Starting Strength linear progression Rippetoe; Renaissance Periodization volume landmarks Israetel); (b) movement assessment and screening (FMS Gray Cook; NASM CEx corrective exercise continuum inhibit-lengthen-activate-integrate; joint-by-joint approach Cook/Boyle; posture and compensation pattern identification; PAR-Q+ and pre-exercise screening ACSM guidelines); (c) coaching and cueing (external vs internal cueing Wulf attentional focus research; differential learning Schöllhorn; constraints-led approach Davids/Renshaw; RIR/RPE autoregulation Zourdos/Helms; motivational interviewing for adherence Rollnick/Miller adapted to fitness); (d) nutrition guidance within scope of practice (macronutrient periodization; evidence-based recommendations per Precision Nutrition / ISSN position stands; scope boundary: PT gives general guidance NOT medical nutrition therapy which requires RD/RDN credential; energy availability and RED-S awareness Mountjoy IOC consensus); (e) business and client management (client retention and programming adherence; consultation and sales ethics; online coaching platforms and scaling Goodman PTDC; programming delivery tools like TrueCoach/Trainerize/TrainHeroic; session pricing models; independent contractor vs gym employee dynamics); (f) specialization tracks (sports performance CSCS; corrective exercise CES; senior fitness SFN; pre/postnatal; youth YSCA; adaptive/inclusive fitness; bodybuilding/physique coaching; powerlifting/strength sports; endurance athlete S&C). Evidence-based practice as the core ethos: Schoenfeld/Krieger meta-analyses on volume-response, Helms systematic reviews on protein/resistance training, Brad Schoenfeld's MASS journal bridging research to practice, Menno Henselmans and Eric Helms as practitioner-researchers, Greg Nuckols Stronger By Science as translation layer. Chinese fitness industry context: rapid growth of personal training in commercial gyms (Keep/Lefit/Megafit chains), NSCA-CPT and ACE-CPT as dominant certifications alongside local CSFA (China Sport and Fitness Association) credential, '体适能' (physical fitness) as formal term, online coaching boom post-COVID, PT business models in tier 1-3 cities diverge sharply. Honest treatment of: bro science vs evidence-based d

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Help DeerFlow maintainers investigate GitHub issues and review pull requests, or proposed code changes. It prepares or posts evidence-based comments with fix strategies, risks, and validation guidance, and compares competing proposals for the same issue.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Draft issue replies with fixes and validation steps
• Post evidence-based pull request review findings
• Review batches of issues and pull requests

Design practice lessons around learners’ actual attempts, using the zone of proximal development: learning supported by a teacher or experienced peer. Plan targeted help, fresh independent tasks, and evidence-based next steps, or run a single practice cycle in chat.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Designing a lesson that connects assessment and practice
• Offering hints based on a learner’s actual answer
• Checking independent performance after removing hints

Review AI agent session logs to document repeated work, departures from plans, delays, and token usage. Produce an evidence-based report with file and line references, and prepare a bug report when appropriate.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Investigating delays or token usage in a session
• Reviewing repeated work or departures from a plan
• Checking whether a skill was activated

Meta-cognitive reasoning specialist for evidence-based analysis, hypothesis testing, and cognitive failure prevention. Use when conducting reviews, making assessments, debugging complex issues, or any task requiring rigorous analytical reasoning. Prevents premature conclusions, assumption-based errors, and pattern matching without verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Produces and audits externally published marketing copy where factual claims must survive scrutiny — landing pages, product pages, launch emails, one-pagers, search/social metadata. Every statistic, competitor comparison, capability description, and proof point is traced to a fetched source or the project's own documents, labeled, and adversarially verified before it ships. Use when writing or rewriting high-stakes marketing copy; when copy must pass legal, compliance, brand, or claims review; when the audience is skeptical technical or executive buyers; when the company has little or no customer proof yet (pre-launch, zero customers); or when auditing existing copy for unsupported claims, invented capabilities, unverified statistics, or AI-slop language.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

superpowers 작업 기록을 읽고 중복 작업, 계획 이탈, 시간과 토큰 사용량을 조사합니다. 기록 파일의 경로와 줄 번호를 근거로 경위를 보고서로 정리합니다.

• 중복 작업과 계획 이탈 조사
• 세션 소요 시간과 토큰 사용량 확인
• 스킬 사용 여부 확인

AI 에이전트가 정확성·완전성·명확성·실행 가능성·간결성의 다섯 기준으로 결과물을 자체 평가합니다. 근거가 있는 점수와 평균, 우선순위별 개선안을 제공합니다.

• 여러 파일에 걸친 구현 후 자체 평가
• 여러 작업 단계를 마친 결과물 점검
• 설계 문서와 분석 보고서 평가

Track pull requests opened by a Paperclip instance, explain their purpose, and assess whether their latest changes are ready to merge. Dispatch preparation work for unresolved problems and publish an evidence-based report without merging anything.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing readiness across an instance's open pull requests
• Dispatching preparation work for failing checks or conflicts
• Checking readiness again after fixes

Paperclip의 작업 중단과 반복 복구 원인을 기록으로 조사합니다. 코드를 변경하지 않고 재발 방지 운영 규칙과 단계별 계획을 문서로 정리합니다.

• 작업 묶음이 멈춘 지점을 찾습니다
• 계속 실행과 복구의 반복을 조사합니다
• 사람을 기다리는 일과 재개할 일을 구분합니다

Create an HTML engineering presentation using the tech-sharing template, with OpenDesign internals as the example subject. Organize the slide plan, supporting evidence, visual direction, and speaker notes, with presentation controls and animation support.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Explaining OpenDesign internals to engineers
• Preparing slides for a developer community talk
• Building an evidence-based AI implementation presentation

Turn patient information into a structured HTML case report for rounds, conferences, or documentation. Choose a full presentation or brief update, with organized findings, diagnostic reasoning, and educational management plans in a printable layout.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Preparing a case presentation for a clinical conference
• Summarizing daily changes for rounds or handover
• Organizing findings into a SOAP-format report

Map a codebase into feature flowcharts, find duplicated logic, and propose a simpler shared architecture. Produce source-linked diagrams, an evidence-based duplication report, and prompts for handing each proposed system to /make-plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Map feature flows before a refactor
• Find duplicated logic within and across features
• Compare a unified architecture with existing call sites

Review Archify issues, pull requests, and code by weighing user value, implementation and maintenance costs, and wider impact. Use evidence to decide whether work is worthwhile, compare alternatives, and identify questions that still affect the decision.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Prioritizing reported issues
• Reviewing the cost and impact of a pull request
• Assessing code maintainability

Review Appwrite blog posts for search visibility and clear answers that answer engines can extract. Measure titles and content, assess structure and links, and receive evidence-based findings with prioritized fixes and suggested replacements.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking a blog post before publication
• Reviewing titles, descriptions, and headings
• Assessing search intent and direct answers

Audit a website for problems affecting search visibility, from search engine access and indexing to speed, page titles, content, and links. Receive evidence-based findings and a prioritized action plan, including checks for multilingual and local business sites.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Investigating a drop in search traffic or rankings
• Reviewing page titles and internal links
• Checking multilingual search settings

Turn interviews, surveys, support conversations, and public reviews into evidence-based customer insights. Identify recurring problems, buying triggers, and customer language, then build research reports, quote collections, or personas and plan interviews or surveys to fill gaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Analyze customer interview transcripts
• Find recurring themes in reviews and support tickets
• Build customer personas from research evidence

Design knowledge systems that preserve document structure and connections across sources. Choose retrieval methods, organize conversation memory, and plan evidence-based updates, review workflows, and access controls for information that scattered text searches cannot adequately cover.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Designing searches that combine information across documents
• Organizing and retrieving long conversation histories
• Establishing knowledge update and review workflows

Design a process for AI agents to learn from execution records. Evaluate outcomes, actions, and quality, choose whether to update knowledge, instructions, code, or model parameters, and define independent validation, release checks, and rollback procedures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Turning repeated agent failures into reusable guidance
• Designing evidence-based reviews of execution records
• Converting browser actions into validated workflows

Work with Mary, a business analyst persona, to research markets, examine competitors, and clarify requirements. Use evidence-based discussion to turn vague needs into concrete specifications that can guide the next steps of a project.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Researching a market before planning a project
• Examining competitors to inform a business idea
• Turning vague requests into concrete requirements

Prepare constructive review drafts for scientific manuscripts, protocols, preprints, and proposals. Organize checks of claims, evidence, methods, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, figures, and citations into specific comments that a responsible human reviewer can verify and revise.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Draft evidence-based comments on a scientific manuscript
• Check methods, statistics, and reproducibility reporting
• Choose reporting guidelines and identify missing information

Convert single-plane, single-channel two-photon TIFF images and timestamped behavioral position CSV files into NWB, a neuroscience data format. Preserve metadata, check clock alignment against acquisition evidence, and report format validation findings and source-to-output comparisons.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Converting two-photon TIFF images to NWB
• Combining imaging and behavioral position records
• Checking clock alignment using synchronization pulses

Review supplied writing through twelve DHDNA dimensions, a framework for describing reasoning and expression. Receive observations supported by quotations, optional scores, and comparisons between samples, with clear limits separating textual patterns from psychological traits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reflect on reasoning patterns in your writing
• Compare argumentation across selected texts
• Review how a text expresses assumptions and uncertainty