51건 · 관련도순
Evaluates fairness opinion methodologies across DCF, trading comps, and precedent transactions for board-level decisions. Use when reviewing fairness opinions, preparing board materials, or analyzing transaction fairness.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assesses AI bias risks for GDPR Art. 9 special category data and AI Act Art. 10 data governance. Covers fairness metrics, bias detection methods, mitigation strategies, and documentation requirements for protected characteristics. Keywords: AI bias, special category, fairness metrics, discrimination, Art. 9, Art. 10.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit legal case prediction systems for bias, fairness, accuracy, and ethical guardrails. Use when: 'check my prediction model for bias', 'audit case outcome fairness', 'evaluate legal ML model', 'review sentencing prediction ethics', 'analyze bail risk algorithm', 'fairness metrics for justice system AI'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze U.S. electoral district plans in R with redistverse. Guides data preparation, simulations under population and geographic constraints, diagnostic checks, and comparisons of district shape, partisan fairness, and administrative splits through maps and summary tables.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build a Python workflow for empirical research, from data cleaning and statistical checks to estimation, robustness checks, and paper-ready tables and figures. Economics is the default, with additional modes for epidemiology, public health, and machine learning for causal inference.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Screens a dismissal — proposed or already done — against the unfair dismissal framework for England & Wales, and shows where it is exposed. Structures the qualifying-service question, the automatically-unfair categories (no qualifying period), and a Burchell / Polkey / band-of-reasonable-responses analysis for a solicitor to verify — it does not determine fairness. Surfaces specific procedural risks. Use when the user says 'is this unfair', 'screen this dismissal', 'ordinary unfair dismissal', 'automatic unfair dismissal', or wants a structured fairness review before or after dismissal.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the security slice). Use when the user mentions 'AI risk,' 'AI governance,' 'NIST AI RMF,' 'AI compliance,' 'ML governance,' 'model risk management,' 'AI fairness,' 'AI bias,' 'algorithmic accountability,' 'AI Bill of Rights,' 'EU AI Act,' 'AI transparency,' 'model card,' 'AI red team,' 'AI safety,' 'responsible AI,' 'model drift,' 'concept drift,' 'AI monitoring,' 'AI incident,' or needs to assess or govern an AI / ML system.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user wants to analyze dataset bias, create stratified samples, evaluate fairness, or plan dataset collection. Triggers on phrases like "dataset bias", "stratified sample", "class imbalance", "data distribution", "fairness analysis", or "ethical review".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use Fairlearn to assess group fairness, compute disparity metrics, visualize subgroup performance, and mitigate unfairness with preprocessing, reductions, postprocessing, or adversarial learning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use IBM AI Fairness 360 for tabular fairness datasets, metrics, bias mitigation algorithms, sklearn-compatible workflows, subgroup detectors, and explainers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
投行并购 (投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship banking、长期 coverage、reputational capital)」, 「叙事/包装 (the story, equity story, positioning) ⇄ 数字/尽调 (the numbers, diligence, quality of earnings)」, 「估值的科学外衣 (DCF/comps 的伪精确) ⇄ 谈判的真实定价 (价格由 leverage、竞争、时机决定)」; (b) 估值与分析正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — DCF (折现现金流: FCF 预测/WACC 折现率/terminal value 终值/Gordon growth vs exit multiple), Comparable Companies (可比公司/trading comps: EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, P/E), Precedent Transactions (先例交易/deal comps: control premium 控制权溢价), LBO (杠杆收购模型: IRR/MOIC/debt schedule/sources & uses), Accretion/Dilution (增厚/摊薄分析: EPS 影响、pro forma), Sum-of-the-Parts (分部估值/SOTP), Football Field (估值区间图), Merger Model (合并模型: synergies 协同/purchase accounting/goodwill), Sensitivity/scenario; (c) 交易流程与产出物 — 卖方流程 (sell-side: teaser 简介 → NDA → CIM/IM 信息备忘录 → management presentation → IOI 意向函 → data room 数据室 → LOI/term sheet → confirmatory diligence → SPA 买卖协议 → signing → closing), 买方流程 (buy-side: thesis/sourcing → outreach → valuation → bid → exclusivity → diligence → financing → close), auction 类型 (broad/targeted/negotiated/preemptive bid); 产出物: pitchbook 推介材料、CIM、fairness opinion 公平意见、board presentation、fee letter、engagement letter; (d) 交易结构与条款 — consideration (cash/stock/mix/earnout 对赌)、deal protections (breakup fee 分手费/go-shop/no-shop/MAC 重大不利变化条款)、representations & warranties 陈述与保证、escrow 托管、working capital adjustment 营运资金调整、reverse termination fee、collar 价格区间、tender offer vs merger、hostile vs friendly、defensive tactics (poison pill 毒丸/white knight 白衣骑士/staggered board); (e) 行业结构与角色 — bulge bracket (高盛/摩根士丹利/JPM/BofA/花旗) vs elite boutique (Centerview/Evercore/Moelis/Lazard/PJT/Perella) vs middle market (Houlihan Lokey/William Blair/Harris Williams) vs regional/independent; analyst→associate→VP→director→MD 晋升金字塔; coverage (行业组) vs product (M&A/ECM/DCM/leveraged finance/restructuring); sponsors group (服务 PE); 买方包括 PE/strategic acquirer/corp dev; (f) 量化指标与节奏 — deal fee (success fee 业内通常约 1-2% 视规模递减/retainer/Lehman formula)、league table 排行榜、pitch→mandate 转化、deal velocity、hours culture (analyst 80-100h/week 文化批判)、bonus/comp 结构、deal sheet (简历上的成交清单); (g) 争议/批判 — fairness opinion 是否橡皮图章 (利益冲突: 出意见的 banker 也收成交费)、estimate 的伪精确 (DCF garbage in garbage out、假设驱动结论)、banker 永远建议成交 (deal 偏见、empire building 助推 CEO 自利并购)、协同效应系统性高估 (大量并购毁灭价值、winner's curse 赢家诅咒)、analyst 血汗工厂文化 (2021 高盛 13 人 deck 事件、过劳死争议)、advisory 价值 vs 中介寻租之争、bulge vs boutique 的利益独立性叙事 (boutique 标榜「无承销利益冲突」)、SPAC 泡沫与 de-SPAC 教训; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 估值学派 (Aswath Damodaran 估值教父/纽大、Tim Koller McKinsey《Valuation》、McKinsey valuation 体系) vs 公司金融教科书派 (Rosenbaum & Pearl《Investment Banking》行业圣经、Brealey Myers Allen、CFI/WSP/BIWS 培训体系) vs 交易实战派 (Bruce Wasserstein《Big Deal》、Joseph Perella/Felix Rohatyn 老派 dealmaker、现代 boutique 创始人) vs 行为/批判派 (并购毁灭价值的学术证据、Damodaran 对协同/控制权溢价的批判、Matt Levine《Money Stuff》解构华尔街逻辑) vs PE/buy-side 视角 (LBO 数学、value creation 杠杆/运营/multiple expansion)。不含: 二级市场股票交易/卖方研究 (equity research)、零售财富管理/private banking、纯 ECM/IPO 承销执行 (虽相关但聚焦 M&A advisory)、纯 PE 投后运营、量化交易/对冲基金策略、纯公司财务报表会计。) Master OS — automated mastery of 投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (rela
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evaluates management buyouts and take-private proposals with fairness assessment, minority squeeze-out mechanics, and appraisal rights analysis. Use when analyzing going-private deals, evaluating MBO fairness, or assessing minority shareholder protections.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
"Apply AI ethics frameworks (fairness, accountability, transparency, privacy) to evaluate AI systems for algorithmic bias, explainability gaps, and value alignment failures. Use this skill when the user needs to audit an AI system for ethical risks, design fairness constraints, assess explainability requirements, or when they ask 'is this AI system fair', 'how do we detect algorithmic bias', 'what are the ethical implications of this AI deployment', or 'how do we make this model explainable to stakeholders'.".
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert en éthique de l'IA (bias detection, fairness, explainability, responsible AI, guardrails)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Busabase-backed household pooled-pension / elder-care fund App-in-Skill (家庭统筹基金) that keeps one read-only bookkeeping dashboard where transparency equals fairness. Use when the user invokes $kelly-family-fund or /kelly-family-fund, wants to pool two elders' pensions (退休金) managed by one steward (统筹人), pay a fixed care cost (养老院 / nursing home), and share the surplus across sibling families (交通/聚餐/生日礼物/人情/social gifts), track a household fund balance and monthly income/expense/net, see per-family cumulative benefit, share %, and fairness deviation (公平), a per-category spend split, CSV import or manual ledger entry (记账). It reads Busabase only and NEVER moves money.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design and test combat encounters in Three.js action games. Plan arenas, enemy roles, spawn timing, objectives, boss phases, and rewards, then check fairness and difficulty using repeatable starting conditions on desktop and mobile.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build a reproducible Stata analysis from data cleaning through modeling, diagnostic checks, and robustness tests. Generate runnable .do files, regression tables, and figures for empirical papers, with additional workflows for epidemiology and machine learning approaches to causal inference.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build reproducible empirical analyses in R, from data cleaning to statistical modeling and publication tables and figures. Covers economics, epidemiology, and machine learning approaches to causal inference, which estimates effects of interventions.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run empirical and causal analyses in Python with StatsPAI, from stating assumptions to estimating effects and checking how results change under alternative choices. Produce diagnostic figures, regression tables, and replication bundles for economics, public health, or machine learning studies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Model interpretability and explainability using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). Use this skill when explaining machine learning model predictions, computing feature importance, generating SHAP plots (waterfall, beeswarm, bar, scatter, force, heatmap), debugging models, analyzing model bias or fairness, comparing models, or implementing explainable AI. Works with tree-based models (XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest), deep learning (TensorFlow, PyTorch), linear models, and any black-box model.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build a realistic recovery plan for burnout — address the causes, not just the symptoms — with changes you can actually make at work and outside it. Use when asked to help with burnout, I'm burnt out, how to recover from burnout, or I'm exhausted and dread work. Produces a read on what's driving the burnout (load, control, reward, fairness, values, community), immediate relief steps, the boundary and workload changes that address the root, a recovery timeline with realistic expectations, and a flag that severe or persistent burnout/depression warrants a professional. Not medical advice.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with a risk tier score, pre-deployment checklist, and prioritised mitigations.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when appraising the cumulative evidence and ensuring balance in an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — weighing conflicting findings by credibility, steelmanning rival schools, and handling the author's own work even-handedly. Audits evidence quality and fairness; it does not design the framework (amann-organizing-framework) or build exhibits (amann-tables-figures).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
EU AI Act (Regulation EU 2024/1689) compliance specialist. Use for AI system risk classification, provider/deployer obligations, GPAI model compliance, conformity assessments, bias and fairness testing, and AI governance programs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.