'microsoft research' 검색 결과

Create agent skills for Microsoft technologies by researching official documentation and code samples. Package essential knowledge and examples locally, with instructions for looking up detailed or version-specific information through Microsoft Learn tools or the mslearn CLI.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Create an agent skill for Azure tasks
• Package .NET library usage into a skill
• Organize framework conventions and code examples

Find explanations, tutorials, configuration guidance, and code examples in official documentation for Microsoft technologies. Choose documentation sources for Azure, .NET, VS Code, GitHub, Aspire, and Agent Framework based on where the relevant material is published.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Find official explanations and setup instructions
• Look up code examples for a specific language
• Research VS Code settings or extension APIs

Summarize Microsoft Teams meetings and extract action items. Use the Hermes command line to inspect meeting processing, rerun saved jobs, troubleshoot missing summaries, and manage Microsoft Graph subscriptions that deliver meeting notifications.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Summarizing meetings and extracting action items
• Investigating missing meeting summaries
• Rerunning failed meeting jobs

Combine tools for research, reference management, notes, document creation, and publishing. Agents check available software and credentials, then choose suitable tools based on output requirements, costs, and offline needs to build a complete workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Review literature and organize references
• Research, write, and publish a blog post
• Turn competitor research into a presentation

Build Python workflows that constrain language model output using text patterns and grammar rules. Generate structured JSON, restrict classifications to allowed labels, extract information, and combine reusable generation steps with loops and tool selection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Generate JSON with a defined structure
• Constrain date, email, and identifier formats
• Classify text using a fixed set of labels

Research-only RPI playbook that gathers task evidence, writes dated research artifacts under .copilot-tracking/research/ or a caller's trusted evidence root, and hands off planning-ready findings. Use when the user needs evidence, alternatives, or task framing first.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Configure email security gateways to detect targeted phishing messages. Set up sender impersonation protection, link checks, isolated attachment analysis, and custom rules, then validate quarantine actions and alerts for suspected attacks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Strengthening protection against targeted phishing
• Detecting executive or vendor impersonation
• Reviewing link and attachment protection

Build Python workflows that constrain language model output using text patterns and grammar rules. Generate structured JSON, restrict classifications to allowed labels, extract information, and combine reusable generation steps with loops and tool selection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Generate JSON with a defined structure
• Constrain date, email, and identifier formats
• Classify text using a fixed set of labels

Research and evaluate microsoft code reference with current authoritative sources, provenance, and explicit evidence gaps. Use when the user asks for microsoft code reference findings or verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Research and evaluate microsoft docs with current authoritative sources, provenance, and explicit evidence gaps. Use when the user asks for microsoft docs findings or verification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

产品设计 / UX 设计 (产品设计 / UX 设计 (Product Design / UX Design) — 数字产品的用户体验设计：从用户研究 → 信息架构 → 交互设计 → 视觉/UI → 可用性测试 → 设计系统的认知操作系统，面向 UX designer / product designer / interaction designer / UX researcher / design systems engineer / design lead，以及想入行、转岗、服务这行(设计外包、设计工具厂商、研究平台)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **用户中心/研究驱动 (user-centered, 'you are not the user', research before pixels, observe behavior not opinions) ⇄ 商业目标/约束/交付 (business goals, north-star metrics, ship it, designer 服务于产品成功不是个人作品集)**; **设计直觉/品味/craft (taste, aesthetics, 'attractive things work better' — Norman 情感化设计) ⇄ 数据/实验/A-B 测试 (data-driven, metrics, experimentation, 'opinions are not data')**; **用户说的 (stated preference, 访谈里说喜欢) ⇄ 用户做的 (revealed behavior, 行为观察 > 自陈, usability test 看人真实卡在哪)**; **一致性/设计系统/规范 (consistency, design system, Jakob's law 用户带着别处的习惯来, 复用组件) ⇄ 创新/打破模式 (innovation, 该不该破规范)**; **减法/简化 (simplicity, Krug 'Don't Make Me Think', less but better — Dieter Rams) ⇄ 功能丰富/利益相关者塞需求 (feature creep, stakeholder pressure)**; **UX(体验/流程/研究) ⇄ UI(视觉/像素/组件)** 的职责之争, **designer 该不该写代码 (design engineer / 'should designers code')**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — Double Diamond (发现 discover → 定义 define → 开发 develop → 交付 deliver) / Design Thinking (共情 empathize → 定义 → 构思 ideate → 原型 prototype → 测试 test) / Design Sprint (Jake Knapp 5 天冲刺); 完整链: 用户研究 (访谈/问卷/可用性测试/卡片分类) → persona / journey map / JTBD → 信息架构 IA + 用户流 user flow → 线框 wireframe (低保真) → 交互/原型 prototype (高保真) → 视觉 UI / 设计系统落地 → 可用性测试 usability testing → handoff 给开发 → 度量迭代 (北极星 / HEART 框架); (c) 工具栈 — 设计/原型 (Figma 绝对主导 / Sketch 衰退 / Adobe XD 已停更 / Framer 高保真+建站 / Penpot 开源 / Principle / ProtoPie 微交互); 协作白板 (FigJam / Miro / Mural); 用户研究 (Maze / UserTesting / Lookback / Dovetail 研究库 / Optimal Workshop 卡片分类树测试 / Hotjar / Microsoft Clarity 热图); 设计系统/交付 (Storybook / 蓝湖(中) / Zeplin / design tokens / Tokens Studio); 度量 (Amplitude / Mixpanel / 北极星指标); AI 新兴 (Figma AI / v0 by Vercel / Galileo AI / Uizard / Cursor 给 design engineer); (d) 知识正典 — Don Norman《The Design of Everyday Things》(affordance/signifier/mapping 圣经)、Steve Krug《Don't Make Me Think》(可用性入门)、Alan Cooper《About Face》《The Inmates Are Running the Asylum》(交互设计/persona 起源)、Jakob Nielsen 10 Usability Heuristics + NN/g 文章库、Jake Knapp《Sprint》、Jeff Gothelf《Lean UX》、Teresa Torres《Continuous Discovery Habits》、Erika Hall《Just Enough Research》、Julie Zhuo《The Making of a Manager》、《Refactoring UI》(Adam Wathan/Steve Schoger)、《Universal Principles of Design》、Laws of UX (Jon Yablonski)、《100 Things Every Designer Needs to Know About People》(Susan Weinschenk)、IDEO/Stanford d.school 设计思维材料; (e) figures/流派 — 认知心理/人因派 (Don Norman 认知科学奠基、Susan Weinschenk 行为心理、Kathryn Whitenton); 可用性工程派 (Jakob Nielsen 启发式/折扣可用性、Steve Krug、Jared Spool UIE); 交互设计/目标导向派 (Alan Cooper goal-directed/persona、Kim Goodwin); 设计思维派 (IDEO Tim Brown、David Kelley d.school); 精益/持续探索派 (Jeff Gothelf Lean UX、Teresa Torres continuous discovery、Marty Cagan《Inspired》产品发现); 设计系统/系统化派 (Brad Frost Atomic Design、Nathan Curtis design tokens、Alla Kholmatova); 视觉/UI craft 派 (Adam Wathan & Steve Schoger Refactoring UI、Dieter Rams 'less but better' 工业设计遗产); 设计领导/职业派 (Julie Zhuo、Aarron Walter 情感化设计、John Maeda); 移动优先 (Luke Wroblewski 'Mobile First'); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — affordance 可供性 / signifier 意符 / mental model 心智模型 / IA 信息架构 / heuristic evaluation 启发式评估 / usability 可用性 / a11y accessibility 无障碍 / WCAG / persona 用户画像 / journey map 用户旅程 / JTBD jobs-to-be-done / north-star metric 北极星 / HEART 框架 / wireframe 线框 / mockup / prototype 原型 / fidelity 保真度 (lo-fi/hi-fi) / design system 设计系统 / design token 设计令牌 / atomic design 原子设计 / component library 组件库 / handoff 交付 / red routes 关键路径 / dark pattern 暗黑模式 / Fitts's law / Hick's law / Jakob's law / Miller 7±2 / progressive disclosure 渐进披露 / above the fold / hamburger menu / skeuomorphism vs flat / micro-interaction / empty state / edge case / happy path / design debt 设计债 / dogfooding / dot voting / affinity mapping 亲和图 / card sorting 卡片分类 / tree testing / A/B test / NPS / SUS (System Usability Scale); (

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Controle saída de LLM com regex e gramáticas, garanta geração válida de JSON/XML/código, aplique formatos estruturados e construa fluxos de trabalho multi-etapas com Guidance - framework de geração restrita da Microsoft Research

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Control LLM output with regex and grammars, guarantee valid JSON/XML/code generation, enforce structured formats, and build multi-step workflows with Guidance - Microsoft Research's constrained generation framework

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Control LLM output with regex and grammars, guarantee valid JSON/XML/code generation, enforce structured formats, and build multi-step workflows with Guidance - Microsoft Research's constrained generation framework

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Convert PDF, Office, and other documents into Markdown that preserves useful text structure. Use batch conversion and literature organization to prepare files for search, text analysis, or AI systems that retrieve information from documents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Convert PDF and Office files to Markdown
• Batch-convert a document folder
• Organize research papers with source metadata

Implement and troubleshoot large-model training with DeepSpeed across multiple GPUs. The skill covers memory optimization, parallel training, and numerical precision choices, alongside examples for storage transfers and models that divide work among specialized components.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Review settings for distributed model training
• Tune transfers between NVMe storage and tensors
• Configure training with specialized model components

Investigate why TypeScript uses a particular built-in type by tracing issues, proposed changes, and team comments. Produces a linked timeline and explanation of past trade-offs to help assess type overrides in ts-reset or proposed typing changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Investigate the reasoning behind a built-in type
• Assess a proposed type override in ts-reset
• Find rejected or reverted typing changes

Causal inference framework for answering "does X cause Y?" beyond correlation. DoWhy (Microsoft Research) provides the identify-estimate-refute loop: define a causal graph (DAG), identify the causal effect using backdoor/frontdoor/instrumental variable criteria, estimate treatment effects with multiple estimators, and validate results with automated refutation tests. Use when: distinguishing causation from correlation, estimating treatment effects (ATE, ATT, CATE), designing and analyzing A/B tests with confounders, using instrumental variables, performing counterfactual reasoning ("what would have happened if..."), validating causal claims with sensitivity analysis, working with observational data where randomization is impossible, or any analysis where the question is "what is the CAUSAL effect of X on Y" rather than just "how do X and Y relate?"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conducts multi-turn iterative deep research on specific topics within a codebase with zero tolerance for shallow analysis. Use when the user wants an in-depth investigation, needs to understand how something works across multiple files, or asks for comprehensive analysis of a specific system or pattern.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design Thinking handoff knowledge for research-ready rpi-research inputs and DT-aware rpi-plan, rpi-implement, and rpi-review context

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Microsoft Learn の公式ドキュメントを調査し、正確で最新の情報を構造的にまとめるスキル。Azure サービスの仕様確認、機能比較、ベストプラクティスの調査に使用する。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build a sales prospecting package by researching the market, ranking potential customers, drafting messages in the sender's voice, and logging outreach. Separate approvals govern key stages, with customer files and spreadsheets supporting work when connectors are unavailable.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Find prospects similar to existing paying customers
• Use market and competitor changes to refine sales targeting
• Draft personalized outreach for an approved prospect list

Darwin Skill 2.0 (达尔文.skill 2.0): autonomous skill optimizer, v2.0 integrates Microsoft Research SkillLens (arXiv 2605.23899) 9-dim rubric + SkillOpt (arXiv 2605.23904) validation-gated design + human-in-the-loop checkpoints. Evaluates SKILL.md files using a 9-dimension rubric (structure + effectiveness + meta-skill blacklists), runs hill-climbing with git version control, spawns independent judge agents for blind evaluation, validates improvements through test prompts with auto-break on diminishing returns, and generates visual result cards. Use when user mentions "优化skill", "skill评分", "自动优化", "auto optimize", "skill质量检查", "达尔文", "darwin", "帮我改改skill", "skill怎么样", "提升skill质量", "skill review", "skill打分".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run one independent Council critique against engagement-report research evidence. Use as the manual separate-session fallback when independent critic agents are unavailable.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.