'usability' 검색 결과

Plan and run usability tests on existing or prototype designs including test design, task scripts, moderation, observation, and findings synthesis. Use this skill whenever the user wants to test usability, run a moderated test, run an unmoderated test, validate a design, find usability issues, or improve task completion. Triggers on usability test, usability testing, moderated test, unmoderated test, task script, think aloud, prototype testing, user testing, design validation, task completion. Also triggers when the user has built something and wants to know if real users can use it before shipping.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

产品设计 / UX 设计 (产品设计 / UX 设计 (Product Design / UX Design) — 数字产品的用户体验设计：从用户研究 → 信息架构 → 交互设计 → 视觉/UI → 可用性测试 → 设计系统的认知操作系统，面向 UX designer / product designer / interaction designer / UX researcher / design systems engineer / design lead，以及想入行、转岗、服务这行(设计外包、设计工具厂商、研究平台)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **用户中心/研究驱动 (user-centered, 'you are not the user', research before pixels, observe behavior not opinions) ⇄ 商业目标/约束/交付 (business goals, north-star metrics, ship it, designer 服务于产品成功不是个人作品集)**; **设计直觉/品味/craft (taste, aesthetics, 'attractive things work better' — Norman 情感化设计) ⇄ 数据/实验/A-B 测试 (data-driven, metrics, experimentation, 'opinions are not data')**; **用户说的 (stated preference, 访谈里说喜欢) ⇄ 用户做的 (revealed behavior, 行为观察 > 自陈, usability test 看人真实卡在哪)**; **一致性/设计系统/规范 (consistency, design system, Jakob's law 用户带着别处的习惯来, 复用组件) ⇄ 创新/打破模式 (innovation, 该不该破规范)**; **减法/简化 (simplicity, Krug 'Don't Make Me Think', less but better — Dieter Rams) ⇄ 功能丰富/利益相关者塞需求 (feature creep, stakeholder pressure)**; **UX(体验/流程/研究) ⇄ UI(视觉/像素/组件)** 的职责之争, **designer 该不该写代码 (design engineer / 'should designers code')**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — Double Diamond (发现 discover → 定义 define → 开发 develop → 交付 deliver) / Design Thinking (共情 empathize → 定义 → 构思 ideate → 原型 prototype → 测试 test) / Design Sprint (Jake Knapp 5 天冲刺); 完整链: 用户研究 (访谈/问卷/可用性测试/卡片分类) → persona / journey map / JTBD → 信息架构 IA + 用户流 user flow → 线框 wireframe (低保真) → 交互/原型 prototype (高保真) → 视觉 UI / 设计系统落地 → 可用性测试 usability testing → handoff 给开发 → 度量迭代 (北极星 / HEART 框架); (c) 工具栈 — 设计/原型 (Figma 绝对主导 / Sketch 衰退 / Adobe XD 已停更 / Framer 高保真+建站 / Penpot 开源 / Principle / ProtoPie 微交互); 协作白板 (FigJam / Miro / Mural); 用户研究 (Maze / UserTesting / Lookback / Dovetail 研究库 / Optimal Workshop 卡片分类树测试 / Hotjar / Microsoft Clarity 热图); 设计系统/交付 (Storybook / 蓝湖(中) / Zeplin / design tokens / Tokens Studio); 度量 (Amplitude / Mixpanel / 北极星指标); AI 新兴 (Figma AI / v0 by Vercel / Galileo AI / Uizard / Cursor 给 design engineer); (d) 知识正典 — Don Norman《The Design of Everyday Things》(affordance/signifier/mapping 圣经)、Steve Krug《Don't Make Me Think》(可用性入门)、Alan Cooper《About Face》《The Inmates Are Running the Asylum》(交互设计/persona 起源)、Jakob Nielsen 10 Usability Heuristics + NN/g 文章库、Jake Knapp《Sprint》、Jeff Gothelf《Lean UX》、Teresa Torres《Continuous Discovery Habits》、Erika Hall《Just Enough Research》、Julie Zhuo《The Making of a Manager》、《Refactoring UI》(Adam Wathan/Steve Schoger)、《Universal Principles of Design》、Laws of UX (Jon Yablonski)、《100 Things Every Designer Needs to Know About People》(Susan Weinschenk)、IDEO/Stanford d.school 设计思维材料; (e) figures/流派 — 认知心理/人因派 (Don Norman 认知科学奠基、Susan Weinschenk 行为心理、Kathryn Whitenton); 可用性工程派 (Jakob Nielsen 启发式/折扣可用性、Steve Krug、Jared Spool UIE); 交互设计/目标导向派 (Alan Cooper goal-directed/persona、Kim Goodwin); 设计思维派 (IDEO Tim Brown、David Kelley d.school); 精益/持续探索派 (Jeff Gothelf Lean UX、Teresa Torres continuous discovery、Marty Cagan《Inspired》产品发现); 设计系统/系统化派 (Brad Frost Atomic Design、Nathan Curtis design tokens、Alla Kholmatova); 视觉/UI craft 派 (Adam Wathan & Steve Schoger Refactoring UI、Dieter Rams 'less but better' 工业设计遗产); 设计领导/职业派 (Julie Zhuo、Aarron Walter 情感化设计、John Maeda); 移动优先 (Luke Wroblewski 'Mobile First'); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — affordance 可供性 / signifier 意符 / mental model 心智模型 / IA 信息架构 / heuristic evaluation 启发式评估 / usability 可用性 / a11y accessibility 无障碍 / WCAG / persona 用户画像 / journey map 用户旅程 / JTBD jobs-to-be-done / north-star metric 北极星 / HEART 框架 / wireframe 线框 / mockup / prototype 原型 / fidelity 保真度 (lo-fi/hi-fi) / design system 设计系统 / design token 设计令牌 / atomic design 原子设计 / component library 组件库 / handoff 交付 / red routes 关键路径 / dark pattern 暗黑模式 / Fitts's law / Hick's law / Jakob's law / Miller 7±2 / progressive disclosure 渐进披露 / above the fold / hamburger menu / skeuomorphism vs flat / micro-interaction / empty state / edge case / happy path / design debt 设计债 / dogfooding / dot voting / affinity mapping 亲和图 / card sorting 卡片分类 / tree testing / A/B test / NPS / SUS (System Usability Scale); (

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Agent SkillやCLAUDE.md等のルール文書のように、AIが読んで従う文書のusability testを行うスキル。 下位tierのmodelのsubagentにゴールを与え、検証したい文書の記述を頼りに進められるかを手を貸さずに観察し、終了後にインタビューとtranscriptの監査で判断の根拠を確かめる。 ユーザーが「skillのusability testをして」「skillをE2Eテストして」「手順書だけで完遂できるか試して」と言った時に使用する。 手順の追加や組み替え、新しいコマンドの組み込み、ガイドラインの判断基準の変更のように、文書のワークフロー構成や判断基準に影響する変更をした後に、実行をユーザーに提案する。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn interviews, surveys, and usage data into evidence-based user profiles, experience maps, and design recommendations. Plan usability tests, define success measures, and organize research findings to identify user problems and prioritize improvements.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Create user personas from research data
• Map user actions, emotions, and pain points
• Plan usability tests for a proposed design

Evaluate and improve interface usability using heuristic analysis. Use when the user mentions "usability audit", "users are confused", "form usability", "navigation problems", "Nielsen heuristics", "cognitive walkthrough", or "is this easy to use". Also trigger when reviewing a design for usability issues, improving form-completion rates, or evaluating information architecture and navigation. Covers Krug's laws, Nielsen's 10 heuristics, severity ratings, dark-pattern recognition, and accessibility. For visual design fixes, see refactoring-ui. For conversion-focused audits, see cro-methodology.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn user data and interviews into research-backed personas, or representative user profiles. The toolkit also supports mapping user journeys, planning usability tests, and combining research findings to guide and validate design decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Creating personas from user data and interviews
• Mapping the steps of a customer journey
• Planning usability tests to validate a design

Review a Figma design, screenshot, or written description for usability, visual hierarchy, consistency, and accessibility. Receive specific findings, explanations, and prioritized improvements, with feedback tailored to the design stage and intended users.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing an early screen design
• Checking navigation and onboarding usability
• Finding inconsistent colors, spacing, and typography

Plan user research, prepare interview guides, and organize findings into themes and recommendations. Choose methods suited to the question, such as interviews, surveys, or usability tests that examine how people use a design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Planning research into user needs and motivations
• Preparing an interview guide
• Designing usability tests or surveys

Review a Figma design, screenshot, or written description for usability, visual hierarchy, consistency, and accessibility. Receive specific findings, explanations, and prioritized improvements, with feedback tailored to the design stage and intended users.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing an early screen design
• Checking navigation and onboarding usability
• Finding inconsistent colors, spacing, and typography

Plan user research, prepare interview guides, and organize findings into themes and recommendations. Choose methods suited to the question, such as interviews, surveys, or usability tests that examine how people use a design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Planning research into user needs and motivations
• Preparing an interview guide
• Designing usability tests or surveys

Design a usability test plan with tasks, success metrics, participant criteria, and facilitation guide. Use when planning moderated or unmoderated usability testing sessions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics. Use when auditing an interface, designing interaction flows, writing error messages or reviewing usability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Usability review — evaluate an existing flow or UI against usability heuristics, flag friction points, and recommend fixes. Use when asked to "review the UX", "usability audit", "what's wrong with this flow", "UX feedback", "critique this design", or "why are users dropping off here".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review user experience and interface design using Nielsen's heuristics, WCAG 2.1 accessibility guidelines, keyboard and screen reader audit, user flow analysis, cognitive load assessment, and form usability evaluation. Use when conducting a usability review before release, assessing WCAG 2.1 accessibility compliance, evaluating user flows for efficiency, reviewing form design, or performing a heuristic evaluation of an existing interface.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evaluate UI/flows from cognitive load, error prevention, and accessibility perspectives. Apply when reviewing UX, discussing user confusion, high drop-off, or form usability issues.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

기술에 익숙하지 않고 쉽게 불만을 느끼는 사용자로 앱을 시험합니다. 혼란스러운 조작과 이탈 원인을 찾고, 개선 과제와 개인적 불만을 나눠 수정안을 정리합니다.

• 출시나 시연 전에 사용성을 확인합니다
• 신규 사용자의 경험을 점검합니다
• 가입과 결제 과정의 어려움을 찾습니다

웹 화면 코드를 최신 Web Interface Guidelines와 대조해 개선할 부분을 확인합니다. 지적 사항은 파일명과 줄 번호를 함께 표시합니다.

• 웹 화면 코드를 검토합니다
• 기준에 따라 접근성을 확인합니다
• 디자인과 사용성을 검토합니다

Review web interface code against the latest Web Interface Guidelines to identify issues in design, usability, and accessibility. Specify files or a file pattern, and receive concise findings with file names and line numbers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Review the code behind a web interface
• Check accessibility against the guidelines
• Request a design or usability review

Review web interface code against the latest Web Interface Guidelines to identify issues in design, usability, and accessibility. Specify files or a file pattern, and receive concise findings with file names and line numbers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Review the code behind a web interface
• Check accessibility against the guidelines
• Request a design or usability review

Turn a Cherry Studio support conversation into an editable draft for a bug report, usability issue, or feature request. The user reviews the wording, chooses any diagnostic data, and submits the report themselves.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Draft a bug report from a support conversation
• Organize feedback about interface usability
• Prepare a feature request for review

Create and improve web, mobile, and desktop interfaces in Penpot through connected tools. Reuse existing design patterns, build layouts and components, and inspect designs for readability, accessibility, spacing, and usability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Designing dashboards and app screens
• Improving forms and navigation
• Building a consistent component library

Review interface code against the latest Web Interface Guidelines to check accessibility, design, and usability. Provide files or a file pattern, and receive concise findings with file names and line numbers for locating issues.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing interface code for accessibility
• Auditing the design and usability of a site
• Checking selected files against the latest guidelines

Plan a portfolio website that helps potential employers or clients understand your work and contact you. Covers site structure, project presentations, case studies explaining decisions and results, personal branding, and mobile usability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Planning a developer or designer portfolio
• Turning projects into detailed case studies
• Improving paths from project pages to contact

Review web interface code against the latest Web Interface Guidelines to identify issues in design, usability, and accessibility. Specify files or a file pattern, and receive concise findings with file names and line numbers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Review the code behind a web interface
• Check accessibility against the guidelines
• Request a design or usability review