본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

baseline-extraction-for-clinical-trials

Extract ten baseline characteristics from a clinical trial article. Given a PMID, the workflow checks PubMed for basic metadata; when that is incomplete or unavailable, it uses the supplied full text to produce structured JSON and marks unreported fields as null or empty.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Extracts clinical trial baseline data (study, region, participants, etc.) from article text or PMID. Checks PubMed for metadata; always falls back to LLM extraction for full details.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Extracting baseline details from a clinical trial article
  • Organizing study and participant information from full text
  • Checking a PMID and completing missing details from article text
  • Creating structured JSON from trial baseline data

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB
  • baseline-extraction-for-clinical-trials_audit_result_v1.json12.1 KB
  • references/extraction_schema.md1.2 KB
  • scripts/extract_pdf.py2.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Source: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

Baseline Extraction (RCT)

This skill extracts 10 key baseline characteristics from clinical trial articles. It implements a hybrid workflow:

  1. PubMed Lookup: Checks PubMed API using the PMID to verify existence and get basic metadata.
  2. LLM Extraction: Analyzes the article text to extract detailed baseline data (since PubMed metadata is limited).

When to Use

  • Use this skill when you need extracts clinical trial baseline data (study, region, participants, etc.) from article text or pmid. checks pubmed for metadata; always falls back to llm extraction for full details in a reproducible workflow.
  • Use this skill when a data analytics task needs a packaged method instead of ad-hoc freeform output.
  • Use this skill when the user expects a concrete deliverable, validation step, or file-based result.
  • Use this skill when scripts/extract_pdf.py is the most direct path to complete the request.
  • Use this skill when you need the baseline-extraction for clinical trials package behavior rather than a generic answer.

Key Features

  • Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Extracts clinical trial baseline data (study, region, participants, etc.) from article text or PMID. Checks PubMed for metadata; always falls back to LLM extraction for full details.
  • Packaged executable path(s): scripts/extract_pdf.py.
  • Reference material available in references/ for task-specific guidance.
  • Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

Dependencies

  • Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
  • Third-party packages: not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.

Example Usage

cd "20260316/scientific-skills/Data Analytics/baseline-extraction-for-clinical-trials"
python -m py_compile scripts/extract_pdf.py
python scripts/extract_pdf.py --help

Example run plan:

  1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
  2. Edit the in-file CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
  3. Run python scripts/extract_pdf.py with the validated inputs.
  4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.

Implementation Details

See ## Workflow above for related details.

  • Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
  • Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
  • Primary implementation surface: scripts/extract_pdf.py.
  • Reference guidance: references/ contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
  • Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
  • Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

Workflow

Step 1: Check PubMed (Deterministic)

If the user provides a PMID, use the baseline_extractor.py script to check PubMed.

import subprocess
import json

# Replace <PMID> with actual PMID
result = subprocess.run(["python", "scripts/baseline_extractor.py", "<PMID>"], capture_output=True, text=True)
print(result.stdout)

Analyze the Script Output:

  • If status is "success": Stop here. Return the data JSON to the user.
  • If status is "not_found", "incomplete", or "error" (or if no PMID was provided): Proceed to Step 2.

Step 2: LLM Extraction (Fallback)

If Step 1 did not yield a complete result, use the LLM to extract the information from the full article text.

Input:

  • Full article text provided by the user.

Instructions:

  1. Read the Extraction Schema carefully.
  2. Analyze the text to identify all 10 required fields.
  3. Ensure the output is strictly in the JSON format defined in the schema.
  4. Constraint: Do not hallucinate. If a field is not mentioned in the text, set it to null or an empty string.

Output

Return the final result as a Markdown code block containing the JSON object.

{
  "study": "...",
  "region": "...",
  ...
}

Helper Scripts

PDF Text Extraction

When the user provides a PDF file path, use extract_pdf.py to extract the text content before assessment:

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Condense an academic paper into a structured abstract of up to 250 words, organized by background, objective, methods, results, and conclusion. It aims to retain key quantitative findings and supports papers from several research fields; figures and charts are not interpreted.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating a concise abstract from a research paper
  • Summarizing empirical studies while retaining key statistics
  • Preparing structured summaries across multiple papers
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Trim English academic abstracts to a target word count while preserving key findings, statistics, and the background-to-conclusion structure. Choose conservative, balanced, or aggressive compression, check word counts, and review the edited text for readability and accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Cutting an abstract to meet a journal word limit
  • Preparing a conference abstract with a strict word count
  • Checking an abstract's word count before submission
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Refines long medical drafts, reports, or literature notes into formal, single-paragraph Chinese and English abstracts in an SCI journal style. It can place both abstracts in a Markdown report while keeping claims grounded in the source text.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Condensing a medical study report into bilingual abstracts
  • Preparing unstructured abstracts from literature notes
  • Creating a Markdown report with Chinese and English abstracts
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Creates three to five concise English Highlights for journal submission from manuscript text or supported files. It adapts bullets to the article type, keeps each within 85 characters, and grounds every claim in the supplied source without inventing results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft journal Highlights from an abstract or manuscript
  • Summarize a meta-analysis or review for submission
  • Extract key findings from a supported PDF or DOCX
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Design comparative drug safety studies using FAERS, the FDA’s adverse event reporting database, within one defined safety area. The plan compares drugs or classes, lays out workload options and analysis steps, and distinguishes detected signals from conclusions the data cannot support.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing drug classes within one adverse event area
  • Planning a FAERS study with active comparators
  • Adding declared subgroup or onset characterization
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Predicts absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion properties for small molecules from their structures. Use the results to compare compounds, screen libraries, and review drug-likeness scores in structured outputs. Predictions support prioritization and need experimental validation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Compare predicted ADME profiles for small-molecule candidates
  • Screen a compound library for drug-likeness
  • Rank candidates against target property ranges
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

aipoch의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고