본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas

Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2").

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(7)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB
  • assets/example_asset.txt889 B
  • diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2_audit_result_v1.json12.6 KB
  • references/api_reference.md1.0 KB
  • references/quadas_2_criteria.md2.0 KB
  • scripts/pdf_extractor.py4.0 KB
  • scripts/quadas_assessment.py454 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Source: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

Clinical Study Bias Assessment (QUADAS-2)

This skill evaluates clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias and applicability concerns using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.

When to Use

  • Use this skill when you need analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the quadas-2 tool. use when claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "assess this paper using quadas-2") in a reproducible workflow.
  • Use this skill when a data analytics task needs a packaged method instead of ad-hoc freeform output.
  • Use this skill when the user expects a concrete deliverable, validation step, or file-based result.
  • Use this skill when scripts/pdf_extractor.py is the most direct path to complete the request.
  • Use this skill when you need the diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2 package behavior rather than a generic answer.

Key Features

  • Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2").
  • Packaged executable path(s): scripts/pdf_extractor.py plus 1 additional script(s).
  • Reference material available in references/ for task-specific guidance.
  • Reusable packaged asset(s), including assets/example_asset.txt.
  • Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

Dependencies

  • Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
  • Third-party packages: not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.

Example Usage

cd "20260316/scientific-skills/Data Analytics/diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2"
python -m py_compile scripts/pdf_extractor.py
python scripts/pdf_extractor.py --help

Example run plan:

  1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
  2. Edit the in-file CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
  3. Run python scripts/pdf_extractor.py with the validated inputs.
  4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.

Implementation Details

See ## Workflow above for related details.

  • Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
  • Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
  • Primary implementation surface: scripts/pdf_extractor.py with additional helper scripts under scripts/.
  • Reference guidance: references/ contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
  • Packaged assets: reusable files are available under assets/.
  • Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
  • Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

Workflow

To assess a study, follow these steps:

  1. Analyze Patient Selection:

    • Assess if the sample was consecutive or random.
    • Check for case-control design (should be avoided).
    • Check for inappropriate exclusions.
    • See references/quadas_2_criteria.md for detailed signaling questions.
  2. Analyze Index Test:

    • Assess if the index test results were interpreted without knowledge of the reference standard.
    • Check if the threshold was pre-specified.
  3. Analyze Reference Standard:

    • Assess if the reference standard correctly classifies the target condition.
    • Check if reference standard results were interpreted without knowledge of the index test.
  4. Analyze Flow and Timing:

    • Assess the interval between index test and reference standard.
    • Check if all patients received the reference standard (and the same one).
    • Check if all patients were included in the analysis.

Output Format

For each domain (Patient Selection, Index Test, Reference Standard, Flow and Timing), you MUST output the findings in the following structure:


### [Domain Name]

**[Signaling Question 1]?**
- Comments: [Explanation in Chinese]
- Quote: [Original text quote]
- Answer: [Yes/No/Unclear]

... (Repeat for all signaling questions)

Quality Rules

  1. Language: Explanations (Comments) must be in Chinese.
  2. Evidence: Every judgment must be supported by a direct quote from the paper.
  3. Strictness: If information is missing, select "Unclear". Do not guess.

PDF Parsing Tool

For processing PDF literature, you can use the provided Python script:


# Install dependencies
pip install PyPDF2

# Extract full text
python scripts/pdf_extractor.py "paper.pdf"

# Extract specific page range
python scripts/pdf_extractor.py "paper.pdf" 5 15

The script will automatically extract the text, which you can then copy and send to me for QUADAS-2 assessment.

References

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Transform lengthy academic papers into concise, structured 250-word abstracts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Precision editing tool that reduces abstract word count through intelligent compression techniques, maintaining scientific rigor while meeting strict journal and conference requirements.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Refines long medical academic texts into SCI-style unstructured Chinese and English abstracts; use when you need to condense drafts/reports/summaries into bilingual abstracts and generate Summary_Report.md.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Generates submission-ready Elsevier/SCI Highlights from manuscript text or extracted PDF/DOCX/TXT content. Use when a user needs 3-5 concise, evidence-grounded highlight bullets for a research paper, review, meta-analysis, case report, or bioinformatics manuscript.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Generates complete FAERS pharmacovigilance study designs for multi-drug or class-level safety comparison inside one predefined SOC or AE family using active comparators, disproportionality analysis, subgroup characterization, and reviewer-facing evidence control.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Analyze data with `adme-property-predictor` using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

aipoch의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고