본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

experimental-data-analysis

Statistical analysis and reporting for experimental datasets; use when you need to interpret experimental results, test significance (t-tests/ANOVA), or generate reproducible reports.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(6)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB
  • experimental-analysis_audit_result_v1.json12.0 KB
  • references/reporting-template.md217 B
  • references/stats-method-selection.md382 B
  • scripts/analyze_experiment.py6.1 KB
  • scripts/init_run.py1.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Source: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

When to Use

  • You have experimental results in CSV form and need a reproducible end-to-end analysis workflow (clean → test → report).
  • You need to compare two conditions (independent or paired) and determine statistical significance with effect sizes.
  • You need to compare 3+ groups (one-way) or multiple factors (multi-way) using ANOVA and post-hoc multiple comparisons.
  • You must validate assumptions (normality, homogeneity of variance) and document them in a report.
  • You need standardized run outputs (timestamped run directories) for traceability and auditing.

Key Features

  • Reproducible, run-based execution that writes all artifacts into outputs/runs/<timestamp>/.
  • Data preparation guidance: missing values, outliers, and variable type identification (continuous/categorical; grouping factors).
  • Descriptive statistics: means, standard deviations, confidence intervals, and grouped summary tables.
  • Inferential testing:
    • t-tests (independent/paired) and non-parametric alternatives when assumptions fail.
    • ANOVA (one-way and multi-way) with post-hoc testing (e.g., Tukey).
  • Reporting outputs: test statistics, p-values, effect sizes, tables, charts, and explicit assumption notes.
  • Reference materials for method selection and reporting templates:
    • references/stats-method-selection.md
    • references/reporting-template.md

Dependencies

  • Python 3.10+
  • pandas >= 2.0
  • numpy >= 1.24
  • scipy >= 1.10

Example Usage

The workflow is run-directory based. Initialize a new run, then analyze using the latest run by default.

# 1) Initialize a new run directory with sample inputs/config
python scripts/init_run.py

# 2) Run analysis (uses the latest outputs/runs/<timestamp>/ by default)
python scripts/analyze_experiment.py

Expected directory conventions:

  • A new run directory is created at: outputs/runs/<timestamp>/
  • Configuration file location: outputs/runs/<timestamp>/config.json
  • All intermediate and final artifacts (config, inputs, outputs, figures, tables) must be written inside the run directory.
  • Writing outside the run directory is prohibited.

Implementation Details

Reproducible Run Management

  • Before each execution, run:
    • scripts/init_run.py to create outputs/runs/<timestamp>/ and populate initial inputs/config.
  • Analysis scripts default to the latest run directory under outputs/runs/ unless explicitly overridden (if supported by the script).

Analysis Pipeline

  1. Data Preparation

    • Handle missing values (e.g., drop, impute, or flag) according to the experimental design.
    • Detect and treat outliers (e.g., robust rules, domain thresholds), documenting any exclusions.
    • Identify variable roles:
      • Outcome variable(s): typically continuous measurements.
      • Grouping factors: categorical condition labels (treatment/control, timepoint, genotype, etc.).
  2. Descriptive Statistics

    • Compute summary metrics per group:
      • Mean, standard deviation, and confidence intervals (commonly 95% CI).
    • Produce grouped summary tables suitable for reporting.
  3. Inferential Statistics

    • Two-group comparisons
      • Use an independent t-test for separate groups.
      • Use a paired t-test for repeated measures / matched pairs.
      • If assumptions are violated, switch to an appropriate non-parametric alternative.
    • Multi-group / multi-factor comparisons
      • Use one-way ANOVA for a single factor with 3+ levels.
      • Use multi-way ANOVA when multiple factors are present.
    • Multiple comparisons
      • Apply post-hoc procedures (e.g., Tukey) after ANOVA when needed.
      • Define and document the multiple-comparison control strategy.
  4. Assumption Checks and Reporting Standards

    • Validate and report:
      • Normality (per group or model residuals, as appropriate).
      • Homogeneity of variance.
    • Report, at minimum:
      • Test statistic, degrees of freedom (if applicable), p-value.
      • Effect size(s) and confidence intervals where applicable.
    • Retain analysis code and random seeds to ensure reproducibility.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Transform lengthy academic papers into concise, structured 250-word abstracts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Precision editing tool that reduces abstract word count through intelligent compression techniques, maintaining scientific rigor while meeting strict journal and conference requirements.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Refines long medical academic texts into SCI-style unstructured Chinese and English abstracts; use when you need to condense drafts/reports/summaries into bilingual abstracts and generate Summary_Report.md.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Generates submission-ready Elsevier/SCI Highlights from manuscript text or extracted PDF/DOCX/TXT content. Use when a user needs 3-5 concise, evidence-grounded highlight bullets for a research paper, review, meta-analysis, case report, or bioinformatics manuscript.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Generates complete FAERS pharmacovigilance study designs for multi-drug or class-level safety comparison inside one predefined SOC or AE family using active comparators, disproportionality analysis, subgroup characterization, and reviewer-facing evidence control.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Analyze data with `adme-property-predictor` using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

aipoch의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고