본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

journal-cover-prompter

Builds detailed prompts for AI image generators to create scientific journal covers and graphical abstracts. It organizes the subject, visual style, color palette, lighting, mood, and technical specifications, with style guidance related to journal type and scientific field.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Use when creating journal cover images, generating scientific artwork prompts, or designing graphical abstracts. Creates detailed prompts for AI image generators to produce publication-quality scientific visuals.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Draft a prompt for a scientific journal cover
  • Create a graphical abstract concept
  • Choose a visual style for a journal and research topic
  • Specify colors, lighting, mood, and image details

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md6.9 KB
  • journal-cover-prompter_audit_result_v2.json12.8 KB
  • references/audit-reference.md779 B
  • scripts/main.py4.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Source: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

Journal Cover Image Prompter

Generate detailed prompts for creating scientific journal cover images and graphical abstracts using AI image generators.

When to Use

  • Use this skill when the task needs Use when creating journal cover images, generating scientific artwork prompts, or designing graphical abstracts. Creates detailed prompts for AI image generators to produce publication-quality scientific visuals.
  • Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format.
  • Use this skill when you need a documented fallback path for missing inputs, execution errors, or partial evidence.

Key Features

  • Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use when creating journal cover images, generating scientific artwork prompts, or designing graphical abstracts. Creates detailed prompts for AI image generators to produce publication-quality scientific visuals.
  • Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py.
  • Reference material available in references/ for task-specific guidance.
  • Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

Dependencies

  • Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
  • Third-party packages: not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.

Example Usage

cd "20260318/scientific-skills/Academic Writing/journal-cover-prompter"
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help

Example run plan:

  1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
  2. Edit the in-file CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
  3. Run python scripts/main.py with the validated inputs.
  4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.

Implementation Details

See ## Workflow above for related details.

  • Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
  • Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
  • Primary implementation surface: scripts/main.py.
  • Reference guidance: references/ contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
  • Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
  • Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

Quick Check

Use this command to verify that the packaged script entry point can be parsed before deeper execution.

python -m py_compile scripts/main.py

Audit-Ready Commands

Use these concrete commands for validation. They are intentionally self-contained and avoid placeholder paths.

python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help

Workflow

  1. Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work.
  2. Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported assumptions.
  3. Use the packaged script path or the documented reasoning path with only the inputs that are actually available.
  4. Return a structured result that separates assumptions, deliverables, risks, and unresolved items.
  5. If execution fails or inputs are incomplete, switch to the fallback path and state exactly what blocked full completion.

Quick Start

from scripts.cover_prompter import CoverPrompter

prompter = CoverPrompter()

# Generate prompt
prompt = prompter.create_prompt(
    research_topic="CRISPR gene editing",
    visual_style="photorealistic",
    mood="hopeful",
    key_elements=["DNA strands", "molecular scissors", "cells"]
)

Core Capabilities

1. Prompt Generation

prompt = prompter.generate(
    subject="cancer immunotherapy",
    style="scientific illustration",
    color_scheme="blue_gradient",
    complexity="high"
)

Prompt Structure:

  • Subject description
  • Artistic style
  • Color palette
  • Lighting and mood
  • Technical specifications

2. Style Selection

style_guide = prompter.select_style(
    journal_type="nature",
    subject_matter="molecular_biology"
)

Journal Styles:

  • Nature: Dramatic, artistic
  • Cell: Clean, molecular focus
  • Science: Conceptual, broad appeal
  • Medical journals: Clinical, professional

3. Technical Specs

specs = prompter.get_specs(
    journal="Nature",
    cover_type="front"
)

# Returns dimensions, resolution, color mode

CLI Usage

python scripts/cover_prompter.py \
  --topic "neuroscience synaptic transmission" \
  --style artistic \
  --output prompt.txt

Skill ID: 211 | Version: 1.0 | License: MIT

Output Requirements

Every final response should make these items explicit when they are relevant:

  • Objective or requested deliverable
  • Inputs used and assumptions introduced
  • Workflow or decision path
  • Core result, recommendation, or artifact
  • Constraints, risks, caveats, or validation needs
  • Unresolved items and next-step checks

Error Handling

  • If required inputs are missing, state exactly which fields are missing and request only the minimum additional information.
  • If the task goes outside the documented scope, stop instead of guessing or silently widening the assignment.
  • If scripts/main.py fails, report the failure point, summarize what still can be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.
  • Do not fabricate files, citations, data, search results, or execution outcomes.

Input Validation

This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of journal-cover-prompter and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.

Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:

journal-cover-prompter only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.

References

Response Template

Use the following fixed structure for non-trivial requests:

  1. Objective
  2. Inputs Received
  3. Assumptions
  4. Workflow
  5. Deliverable
  6. Risks and Limits
  7. Next Checks

If the request is simple, you may compress the structure, but still keep assumptions and limits explicit when they affect correctness.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Condense an academic paper into a structured abstract of up to 250 words, organized by background, objective, methods, results, and conclusion. It aims to retain key quantitative findings and supports papers from several research fields; figures and charts are not interpreted.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating a concise abstract from a research paper
  • Summarizing empirical studies while retaining key statistics
  • Preparing structured summaries across multiple papers
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Trim English academic abstracts to a target word count while preserving key findings, statistics, and the background-to-conclusion structure. Choose conservative, balanced, or aggressive compression, check word counts, and review the edited text for readability and accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Cutting an abstract to meet a journal word limit
  • Preparing a conference abstract with a strict word count
  • Checking an abstract's word count before submission
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Refines long medical drafts, reports, or literature notes into formal, single-paragraph Chinese and English abstracts in an SCI journal style. It can place both abstracts in a Markdown report while keeping claims grounded in the source text.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Condensing a medical study report into bilingual abstracts
  • Preparing unstructured abstracts from literature notes
  • Creating a Markdown report with Chinese and English abstracts
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Creates three to five concise English Highlights for journal submission from manuscript text or supported files. It adapts bullets to the article type, keeps each within 85 characters, and grounds every claim in the supplied source without inventing results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft journal Highlights from an abstract or manuscript
  • Summarize a meta-analysis or review for submission
  • Extract key findings from a supported PDF or DOCX
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Design comparative drug safety studies using FAERS, the FDA’s adverse event reporting database, within one defined safety area. The plan compares drugs or classes, lays out workload options and analysis steps, and distinguishes detected signals from conclusions the data cannot support.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing drug classes within one adverse event area
  • Planning a FAERS study with active comparators
  • Adding declared subgroup or onset characterization
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

Predicts absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion properties for small molecules from their structures. Use the results to compare compounds, screen libraries, and review drug-likeness scores in structured outputs. Predictions support prioritization and need experimental validation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Compare predicted ADME profiles for small-molecule candidates
  • Screen a compound library for drug-likeness
  • Rank candidates against target property ranges
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

aipoch의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고