본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

regulatory-submission

Organize FDA or EMA regulatory submission materials into CTD Modules 1–5. Draft Module 2 summaries, check data integrity and ICH guideline alignment, identify gaps, and prepare dossier components such as cover letters and checklists.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Prepare FDA/EMA regulatory submissions (IND/NDA/BLA/510(k)/PMA/MAA) in CTD format. Generate module outlines (Modules 1-5), run ICH compliance checks (ALCOA+, E6 GCP, Q1-Q12), verify data integrity, and produce submission-ready dossiers with cover letters and checklists.

aipoch/medical-research-skills
연동 도구Google Cloud

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • FDA・EMA申請のCTD構成を整理したいとき
  • 申請資料の不足項目を洗い出したいとき
  • ICH指針とデータ完全性を点検したいとき
  • 申請書類の表紙文書やチェックリストを準備したいとき

포함된 파일(3)

  • SKILL.md3.8 KB
  • eval_report_regulatory-submission_result.json6.3 KB
  • POLISH_CHANGELOG.md666 B

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Source: https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills

Regulatory Submission — FDA/EMA Dossier Structure

When to Use

  • Preparing FDA/EMA regulatory submissions (IND/NDA/BLA/510(k)/PMA/MAA)
  • The user mentions regulatory submission, FDA, EMA, IND, NDA, BLA, CTD, dossier, or regulatory affairs
  • Generating CTD module outlines and compliance checks for dossier assembly

Workflow

  1. Identify submission type — Input: product type, development stage, market (US/EU) → Output: submission type (IND/NDA/BLA/510(k)/PMA/MAA)
  2. Generate CTD outline — Map to Modules 1-5 with required sections → Output: CTD table of contents
  3. Populate Module 2 — Draft Quality Overall Summary, Nonclinical/Clinical Overviews → Output: Module 2 drafts
  4. Verify data integrity — Check ALCOA+ compliance across all modules → Output: integrity audit report
  5. Run compliance check — Verify against ICH guidelines (E6 GCP, Q1-Q12) → ⛔ Checkpoint: Review gaps with user, prioritize remediation → Output: compliance gap list
  6. Finalize dossier — Compile modules, generate cover letters, verify cross-references → Output: submission-ready package

If Data Incomplete

  • Missing CTD sections → generate "[DATA REQUIRED]" placeholders with expected data sources
  • ICH compliance gaps → classify critical/major/minor with remediation timeline
  • Product type ambiguous → ask user to clarify drug vs. biologic vs. device

Submission Types

FDA

TypePurposeKey Sections
INDInvestigational New DrugChemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, clinical protocol
NDANew Drug ApplicationFull CMC, nonclinical, clinical data
BLABiologics LicenseManufacturing, characterization, clinical
510(k)Device clearanceSubstantial equivalence, performance testing
PMADevice approvalClinical data, manufacturing

EMA: CTA | MAA | Scientific Advice

CTD Format

  • Module 1: Administrative (cover letters, forms, labeling)
  • Module 2: Summaries (quality, nonclinical, clinical overviews)
  • Module 3: Quality/CMC (drug substance, product, manufacturing)
  • Module 4: Nonclinical (pharmacology, PK, toxicology)
  • Module 5: Clinical (study reports, literature)

Key Principles

  • Follow ICH guidelines (E6 GCP, Q1-Q12)
  • Data integrity: ALCOA+ (Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, Accurate)
  • Risk-based approach: prioritize critical quality attributes

Error Handling

  • If required inputs are missing, state exactly which fields are missing and request only the minimum additional information.
  • If the task goes outside the documented scope, stop instead of guessing or silently widening the assignment.
  • If execution fails, report the failure point, summarize what can still be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.
  • Do not fabricate files, citations, data, search results, or execution outcomes.

Input Validation

This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of regulatory-submission and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.

Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:

regulatory-submission only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

abstract-summarizer

무료

Condense an academic paper into a structured abstract of up to 250 words, organized by background, objective, methods, results, and conclusion. It aims to retain key quantitative findings and supports papers from several research fields; figures and charts are not interpreted.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Creating a concise abstract from a research paper
  • Summarizing empirical studies while retaining key statistics
  • Preparing structured summaries across multiple papers
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

abstract-trimmer

무료

Trim English academic abstracts to a target word count while preserving key findings, statistics, and the background-to-conclusion structure. Choose conservative, balanced, or aggressive compression, check word counts, and review the edited text for readability and accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Cutting an abstract to meet a journal word limit
  • Preparing a conference abstract with a strict word count
  • Checking an abstract's word count before submission
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

academic-abstract-refiner

무료

Refines long medical drafts, reports, or literature notes into formal, single-paragraph Chinese and English abstracts in an SCI journal style. It can place both abstracts in a Markdown report while keeping claims grounded in the source text.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Condensing a medical study report into bilingual abstracts
  • Preparing unstructured abstracts from literature notes
  • Creating a Markdown report with Chinese and English abstracts
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

academic-highlight-generator

무료

Creates three to five concise English Highlights for journal submission from manuscript text or supported files. It adapts bullets to the article type, keeps each within 85 characters, and grounds every claim in the supplied source without inventing results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Draft journal Highlights from an abstract or manuscript
  • Summarize a meta-analysis or review for submission
  • Extract key findings from a supported PDF or DOCX
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

active-comparator-single-soc-faers-safety-comparison

무료

Design comparative drug safety studies using FAERS, the FDA’s adverse event reporting database, within one defined safety area. The plan compares drugs or classes, lays out workload options and analysis steps, and distinguishes detected signals from conclusions the data cannot support.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Comparing drug classes within one adverse event area
  • Planning a FAERS study with active comparators
  • Adding declared subgroup or onset characterization
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

adme-property-predictor

무료

Predicts absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion properties for small molecules from their structures. Use the results to compare compounds, screen libraries, and review drug-likeness scores in structured outputs. Predictions support prioritization and need experimental validation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Compare predicted ADME profiles for small-molecule candidates
  • Screen a compound library for drug-likeness
  • Rank candidates against target property ranges
aipoch/medical-research-skills2천2026년 9월 17일 업데이트

aipoch의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고