Pre-action boundary checking — validates agent tool calls against declared capabilities and task contracts
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Analyze project and auto-configure agents, skills, rules, and guides
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Scan a project's tech stack, compare against installed agents/skills, and auto-configure missing items.
--dry-run Show what would be added without making changes
--verbose Show detailed detection reasoning
--interview, -i Run interactive architecture interview before file-based detection
When --interview flag is provided, conduct an interactive AI interview before file-based detection. This captures human context that file scanning cannot determine.
Interview flow (sequential, AI-guided):
프로젝트 유형: "이 프로젝트는 어떤 종류입니까?" → 옵션: web app, REST API, CLI tool, library, monorepo, data pipeline, mobile app
아키텍처 패턴: "어떤 아키텍처를 따르고 있습니까?" → 옵션: microservices, monolith, serverless, event-driven, layered, hexagonal
주요 언어: "주로 사용하는 프로그래밍 언어는?" → 자유 입력, 알려진 에이전트와 매칭
배포 대상: "어디에 배포합니까?" → 옵션: AWS, GCP, Azure, Vercel, on-premises, Docker/K8s, edge
팀 우선순위: "팀의 주요 관심사는?" → 옵션: performance, security, developer experience, cost, scalability
Interview results feed into Step 1 as weighted detection hints:
confidence: highconfidence: medium (unchanged from current)confidence: suggestedIntegration with report:
Interview Insights (--interview):
Project type: REST API (user-specified, confirmed by file scan)
Architecture: microservices (user-specified)
Deployment: AWS + Docker (confirmed by file scan)
Team focus: security → sec-codeql-expert [suggested]
Suggested (from interview, no file evidence):
~ sec-codeql-expert [suggested — no CodeQL config found]
~ de-kafka-expert [suggested — no kafka deps found]
Detect tech stack by checking indicator files and dependency manifests.
| Indicator | Files to Check | Agent | Skill |
|---|---|---|---|
| TypeScript | tsconfig.json, *.ts, *.tsx | lang-typescript-expert | typescript-best-practices |
| React/Next.js | next.config.*, package.json (next dep) | fe-vercel-agent | react-best-practices |
| Vue.js | vue.config.*, *.vue | fe-vuejs-agent | - |
| Svelte | svelte.config.*, *.svelte | fe-svelte-agent | - |
| Flutter/Dart | pubspec.yaml, *.dart, lib/main.dart | fe-flutter-agent | - |
| Python | pyproject.toml, requirements.txt, *.py | lang-python-expert | python-best-practices |
| FastAPI | "fastapi" in imports/deps | be-fastapi-expert | fastapi-best-practices |
| Go | go.mod, *.go | lang-golang-expert | go-best-practices |
| Go Backend | go.mod + cmd/ or internal/ dirs | be-go-backend-expert | go-backend-best-practices |
| Rust | Cargo.toml, *.rs | lang-rust-expert | rust-best-practices |
| Kotlin | *.kt, build.gradle.kts | lang-kotlin-expert | kotlin-best-practices |
| Java | *.java, pom.xml | lang-java-expert | - |
| Spring Boot | spring-boot in deps | be-springboot-expert | springboot-best-practices |
| Express.js | "express" in deps | be-express-expert | - |
| NestJS | "@nestjs" in deps | be-nestjs-expert | - |
| Docker | Dockerfile, compose.yml | infra-docker-expert | docker-best-practices |
| AWS | CDK/SAM/CloudFormation files | infra-aws-expert | aws-best-practices |
| PostgreSQL | *.sql, pg in deps | db-postgres-expert | postgres-best-practices |
| Redis | redis in deps | db-redis-expert | redis-best-practices |
| Supabase | supabase in deps/config | db-supabase-expert | supabase-postgres-best-practices |
| Airflow | dags/*.py, airflow in deps | de-airflow-expert | airflow-best-practices |
| dbt | dbt_project.yml | de-dbt-expert | dbt-best-practices |
| Kafka | kafka in deps/config | de-kafka-expert | kafka-best-practices |
| Spark | spark in deps/config | de-spark-expert | spark-best-practices |
| Snowflake | snowflake in deps/config | de-snowflake-expert | snowflake-best-practices |
Detection logic:
1. Read package.json / go.mod / Cargo.toml / pyproject.toml / pom.xml
2. Glob for indicator files (tsconfig.json, *.vue, Dockerfile, etc.)
3. Grep dependencies for framework/library names
4. For verbose mode: log each indicator found and confidence level
Compare detected stack against what is already installed.
1. List existing agents: ls .claude/agents/*.md
2. List existing skills: find .claude/skills -name "SKILL.md"
3. For each detected indicator:
a. Check if required agent file exists → mark MISSING or PRESENT
b. Check if required skill directory exists → mark MISSING or PRESENT
4. Build two lists:
- missing_agents[] — agents needed but not present
- missing_skills[] — skills needed but not present
5. (Optional) Build unused list for suggestions:
- Agents present but no indicator matched → flag for review
Apply changes for all missing items (skip in --dry-run mode).
For each missing agent:
- If agent exists in templates/.claude/agents/ → copy to .claude/agents/
- Else → delegate to mgr-creator with detected domain context
For each missing skill:
- If skill exists in templates/.claude/skills/ → copy to .claude/skills/
- Else → log as "skill not available in templates, manual setup needed"
Rules:
- Keep all existing rules (they are universal, never remove)
Guides:
- Verify templates/guides/ directory has relevant reference docs
- Log missing guide topics as suggestions only (no auto-copy)
Output a structured summary after the run.
[analysis] Project: <detected project name or path>
Tech Stack Detected:
- TypeScript (tsconfig.json found)
- React/Next.js (next in package.json deps)
- Docker (Dockerfile found)
Agents:
+ lang-typescript-expert [added]
+ fe-vercel-agent [added]
~ infra-docker-expert [already present, skipped]
Skills:
+ typescript-best-practices [added]
+ react-best-practices [added]
~ docker-best-practices [already present, skipped]
Rules: no changes (universal rules kept as-is)
Guides: react/ — present
docker/ — present
typescript/ — present
Suggestions:
- infra-aws-expert not detected (no CDK/SAM files found)
- de-* agents not detected (no pipeline indicators found)
Summary: 2 agents added, 2 skills added, 0 removed
--dry-run output prefixes all additions with [would add] instead of [added] and makes no file changes.
--verbose output adds a Detection section before the report:
Detection Details:
tsconfig.json → TypeScript confirmed
package.json[next] → Next.js confirmed (confidence: high)
package.json[react] → React confirmed (confidence: high)
Dockerfile → Docker confirmed
no go.mod found → Go skipped
no Cargo.toml found → Rust skipped
After analysis completes, offer adaptive-harness optimization:
[Analysis Complete] Tech stack detected. Optimize harness for this project?
├── Yes → Run /omcustom:adaptive-harness --optimize (deactivate unused, suggest missing)
├── Dry-run → Run /omcustom:adaptive-harness --optimize --dry-run (show changes only)
└── Skip → Keep current harness configuration
If user selects Yes or Dry-run, invoke the adaptive-harness skill with the analysis results as context. The project profile generated by analysis feeds directly into adaptive-harness optimization.
| Skill | Integration |
|---|---|
| adaptive-harness | Called after analysis to optimize harness based on detected stack |
/analysis
/analysis --dry-run
/analysis --verbose
/analysis --dry-run --verbose
--dry-run first on unfamiliar projects to preview changesmgr-creator for dynamic agent creation아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Pre-action boundary checking — validates agent tool calls against declared capabilities and task contracts
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Auto-detect project context and optimize harness — deactivate unused agents/skills, suggest missing experts, generate project profile
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Adversarial code review using attacker mindset — trust boundary, attack surface, business logic, and defense evaluation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apache Airflow best practices for DAG authoring, testing, and production deployment
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Alembic migration patterns for naming conventions, safety checks, expand-contract, env.py configuration, and CI integration
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Pre-routing ambiguity analysis — scores request clarity and asks clarifying questions when needed (inspired by ouroboros)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.