본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

"algo-seo-tfidf"

"Implement TF-IDF scoring to measure term importance relative to a document corpus. Use this skill when the user needs to rank documents by keyword relevance, extract important terms from text, or build a basic search relevance engine — even if they say 'find relevant documents', 'keyword extraction', or 'term importance'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(5)

  • SKILL.md3.7 KB
  • examples/sample_input.json3.1 KB
  • references/bm25-comparison.md11.5 KB
  • references/inverted-index.md11.1 KB
  • scripts/tfidf.py7.0 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

TF-IDF

Overview

TF-IDF (Term Frequency–Inverse Document Frequency) scores term importance as TF(t,d) × IDF(t). High scores mean a term is frequent in a document but rare across the corpus. Computes in O(N × V) where N is documents and V is vocabulary size.

When to Use

Trigger conditions:

  • Ranking documents by keyword relevance
  • Extracting distinguishing terms from documents
  • Building lightweight search without ML models

When NOT to use:

  • When semantic similarity matters (use embeddings instead)
  • When you need ranking with link authority (combine with PageRank)

Algorithm

IRON LAW: TF-IDF Measures RELATIVE Importance
- A term with high TF but low IDF is common, NOT important
- TF-IDF = TF(t,d) × log(N / DF(t))
- A term appearing in ALL documents has IDF = 0 → score = 0

Phase 1: Input Validation

Tokenize documents, apply lowercasing, remove stop words. Build vocabulary. Gate: All documents tokenized, vocabulary size reasonable.

Phase 2: Core Algorithm

  1. Compute TF(t,d) for each term in each document (raw count, log-normalized, or boolean)
  2. Compute IDF(t) = log(N / DF(t)) where DF(t) = number of documents containing term t
  3. Compute TF-IDF(t,d) = TF(t,d) × IDF(t)
  4. Optionally L2-normalize document vectors for cosine similarity

Phase 3: Verification

Check: terms appearing in all documents have IDF ≈ 0. Rare terms have high IDF. Gate: Score distribution is reasonable; common words score low.

Phase 4: Output

Return scored terms per document or ranked documents per query.

Output Format

{
  "query_results": [{"document": "doc_id", "score": 0.73, "matching_terms": ["term1", "term2"]}],
  "metadata": {"corpus_size": 1000, "vocabulary_size": 5000, "tf_variant": "log_normalized"}
}

Examples

Sample I/O

Input: Corpus: ["the cat sat", "the dog sat", "the cat played"], Query: "cat" Expected: TF("cat", doc1)=1/3, DF("cat")=2, IDF=log(3/2)=0.405. TF-IDF(doc1)=0.135, TF-IDF(doc3)=0.135, TF-IDF(doc2)=0

Edge Cases

InputExpectedWhy
Term in all docsScore = 0IDF = log(N/N) = 0
Term in one docHighest IDFlog(N/1) = log(N)
Empty documentAll scores = 0No terms to score

Gotchas

  • Stop words matter: Without stop word removal, "the", "is", "a" dominate TF but have zero IDF. Preprocess properly.
  • TF variant choice: Raw count, log(1+count), or boolean TF produce very different rankings. Log normalization prevents long documents from dominating.
  • IDF smoothing: Add 1 to denominator to avoid division by zero for unknown query terms: IDF = log(N / (DF+1)) + 1.
  • Not semantic: "car" and "automobile" are treated as completely different terms. TF-IDF has no concept of synonymy.
  • Corpus dependency: IDF values change when the corpus changes. Adding documents alters all scores.

Scripts

ScriptDescriptionUsage
scripts/tfidf.pyCompute TF-IDF vectors, top terms per document, and query scoringpython scripts/tfidf.py --help

Run python scripts/tfidf.py --verify to execute built-in sanity tests.

References

  • For BM25 (improved TF-IDF), see references/bm25-comparison.md
  • For efficient inverted index implementation, see references/inverted-index.md

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

"Implement and select ad bidding strategies from manual CPC to automated target-CPA and target-ROAS. Use this skill when the user needs to choose a bidding strategy, set up automated bidding, or optimize bid parameters — even if they say 'what bidding strategy should I use', 'target CPA setup', or 'smart bidding configuration'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill262026년 7월 20일 업데이트

"Optimize advertising budget allocation across campaigns using marginal returns analysis. Use this skill when the user needs to distribute budget across multiple campaigns, optimize spend pacing, or maximize overall ROAS under budget constraints — even if they say 'how to split my ad budget', 'campaign budget optimization', or 'diminishing returns on ad spend'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill262026년 7월 20일 업데이트

"Build CTR prediction models for estimating ad click-through rates from features. Use this skill when the user needs to predict click probability, build an ad ranking model, or evaluate ad creative performance — even if they say 'predict click rate', 'ad relevance scoring', or 'which ad will get more clicks'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill262026년 7월 20일 업데이트

"Implement Generalized Second Price auction for ad slot allocation and pricing. Use this skill when the user needs to understand search ad auctions, compute ad positions and costs-per-click, or analyze bidding dynamics — even if they say 'how does Google Ads auction work', 'ad rank calculation', or 'second price auction for ads'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill262026년 7월 20일 업데이트

"Implement VCG mechanism for incentive-compatible ad slot allocation with truthful bidding. Use this skill when the user needs to design a truthful auction mechanism, compute externality-based payments, or understand why platforms may prefer GSP over VCG — even if they say 'truthful auction design', 'VCG payments', or 'incentive-compatible mechanism'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill262026년 7월 20일 업데이트

"Explain blockchain fundamentals including distributed ledger architecture, consensus mechanisms, and block structure. Use this skill when the user needs to understand blockchain concepts, evaluate whether blockchain fits a use case, or design a blockchain-based solution — even if they say 'how does blockchain work', 'do I need blockchain', or 'distributed ledger'.".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill262026년 7월 20일 업데이트

charlieviettq의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고