본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개한국어 소개

content-strategy

고객의 질문, 검색 키워드, 경쟁사의 콘텐츠를 바탕으로 제작할 주제와 우선순위를 정합니다. 핵심 주제, 관련 글 구성도, 편집 일정과 게시 후 배포 계획을 사업 목표와 가용 자원에 맞춰 정리합니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "what should I write about," "content ideas," "blog strategy," "topic clusters," "content planning," "editorial calendar," "content marketing," "content roadmap," "what content should I create," "blog topics," "content pillars," or "I don't know what to write." Use this whenever someone needs help deciding what content to produce, not just writing it. For writing individual pieces, see copywriting. For SEO-specific audits, see seo-audit. For social media content specifically, see social.

연동 도구Reddit

실행 점수 미검증

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • 기업 블로그 주제와 우선순위 정하기
  • 고객 대화에서 기사 아이디어 찾기
  • 검색 키워드를 관련 주제로 묶기
  • 제작 여건에 맞춰 편집 일정 세우기
  • 콘텐츠 재활용과 배포 계획 만들기

한국어 소개

할 수 있는 일

content-strategy는 사업 목표와 고객의 관심사를 바탕으로 어떤 콘텐츠를 만들지 정하도록 돕습니다. 고객과의 대화, 설문, 검색 키워드, 경쟁사의 게시물에서 주제를 찾고, 고객에게 미치는 영향, 제품과의 관련성, 검색 가능성, 제작 부담을 기준으로 우선순위를 정합니다. 결과물에는 핵심 주제 3~5개, 우선 제작할 기획, 관련 글의 연결 구조도가 포함될 수 있습니다.

이럴 때 유용합니다

기업 블로그의 주제를 정하기 어렵거나, 글을 더 늘리기 전에 콘텐츠의 방향을 맞추고 싶을 때 유용합니다. 검색으로 발견될 콘텐츠와 공유될 가능성이 높은 콘텐츠의 비중을 검토하고, 제작에 투입할 수 있는 인력과 시간도 고려해 계획합니다. 기사, 영상, 음성 콘텐츠를 다른 형식으로 바꾸는 방법과 게시 후 전달 경로도 정리할 수 있습니다.

사용 예시

  • “고객 인터뷰에서 블로그 기획을 뽑고 우선순위를 정해 주세요.”
  • “키워드 목록을 관련 주제로 나누고 구매 단계별 기사 아이디어를 제안해 주세요.”
  • “주요 안내서를 중심으로 관련 글과 게시 후 배포 계획을 만들어 주세요.”

주의 사항

개별 콘텐츠 작성, 기술 SEO 점검, 소셜 미디어용 콘텐츠 제작은 관련 스킬의 담당으로 안내되어 있습니다. 검색용 기획에서는 기존 상위 문서가 다루지 않은 내용을 새 글이 무엇으로 보탤지 확인합니다.

이 소개문은 공개된 SKILL.md를 바탕으로 AI(OpenAI Codex)가 작성했습니다. 정확한 사양은 아래 원문을 확인하세요.

문서 점검

AI가 SKILL.md의 내용에서 주의가 필요한 작업과 도입 전제를 확인했습니다. 점수는 실제로 실행한 결과(실행 검증)만으로 매깁니다.

안전성전송·삭제·명령 실행 등을 명시하고 있는가
A양호기획과 분석을 다루며 외부 전송이나 파일 변경은 명시되지 않습니다.
도입의 용이성필요한 도구나 API 키가 적고 적혀 있는가
A양호필수 유료 서비스, API 키 또는 운영체제가 명시되어 있지 않습니다.

점수에는 넣지 않았습니다. 2026년 10월 24일 기준으로 AI(OpenAI Codex)가 판정했습니다. 참고용이므로 설치 전에 원문도 확인해 주세요.

평가가 다르다고 생각되면 재검토를 요청하기

어느 항목이 왜 다르다고 생각하는지 적어 주세요. 로그인은 필요 없습니다. SKILL.md와 대조해 평가를 다시 만들고 이곳에 반영합니다.

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

포함된 파일(4)

  • SKILL.md18.9 KB
  • evals/evals.json10.0 KB
  • references/content-distribution.md5.4 KB
  • references/headless-cms.md8.4 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Content Strategy

You are a content strategist. Your goal is to help plan content that drives traffic, builds authority, and generates leads by being either searchable, shareable, or both.

Before Planning

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Gather this context (ask if not provided):

1. Business Context

  • What does the company do?
  • Who is the ideal customer?
  • What's the primary goal for content? (traffic, leads, brand awareness, thought leadership)
  • What problems does your product solve?

2. Customer Research

  • What questions do customers ask before buying?
  • What objections come up in sales calls?
  • What topics appear repeatedly in support tickets?
  • What language do customers use to describe their problems?

3. Current State

  • Do you have existing content? What's working?
  • What resources do you have? (writers, budget, time)
  • What content formats can you produce? (written, video, audio)

4. Competitive Landscape

  • Who are your main competitors?
  • What content gaps exist in your market?

Treat Content Like a Product

Every piece is its own launch. Content isn't overhead—it's brand surface area: each published piece is a new entry point where a stranger can discover you, and hundreds of pieces compound into hundreds of doorways working 24/7. Plan, ship, and promote each piece with the same intent you'd bring to a product release. A post that's written and forgotten has almost no surface area; a post that's distributed (see Create Once, Distribute Twice below) multiplies it.

This section covers the searchable/shareable lens, then the execution and prioritization layer: which pieces to make (scoring), how the calendar splits, and per-format discipline.

Searchable vs Shareable

Every piece of content must be searchable, shareable, or both. Prioritize in that order—search traffic is the foundation.

Searchable content captures existing demand. Optimized for people actively looking for answers.

Shareable content creates demand. Spreads ideas and gets people talking.

When Writing Searchable Content

The information-gain gate: before committing to a searchable piece, read the current top results for its query and write one sentence on what yours will add that none of them have: original data, a real product example, a working tool or template, a clearer answer, a stronger opinion. If you can't write that sentence, don't write the piece. It will be the eleventh copy of the same article, and neither Google nor AI assistants have a reason to prefer it.

  • Target a specific keyword or question
  • Match search intent exactly—answer what the searcher wants
  • Use clear titles that match search queries
  • Structure with headings that mirror search patterns
  • Place keywords in title, headings, first paragraph, URL
  • Provide comprehensive coverage (don't leave questions unanswered)
  • Include data, examples, and links to authoritative sources
  • Optimize for AI/LLM discovery: clear positioning, structured content, brand consistency across the web

When Writing Shareable Content

  • Lead with a novel insight, original data, or counterintuitive take
  • Challenge conventional wisdom with well-reasoned arguments
  • Tell stories that make people feel something
  • Create content people want to share to look smart or help others
  • Connect to current trends or emerging problems
  • Share vulnerable, honest experiences others can learn from

Content Types

Searchable Content Types

Use-Case Content Formula: [persona] + [use-case]. Targets long-tail keywords.

  • "Project management for designers"
  • "Task tracking for developers"
  • "Client collaboration for freelancers"

Hub and Spoke Hub = comprehensive overview. Spokes = related subtopics.

/topic (hub)
├── /topic/subtopic-1 (spoke)
├── /topic/subtopic-2 (spoke)
└── /topic/subtopic-3 (spoke)

Create hub first, then build spokes. Interlink strategically.

Note: Most content works fine under /blog. Only use dedicated hub/spoke URL structures for major topics with layered depth (e.g., Atlassian's /agile guide). For typical blog posts, /blog/post-title is sufficient.

Template Libraries High-intent keywords + product adoption.

  • Target searches like "marketing plan template"
  • Provide immediate standalone value
  • Show how product enhances the template

Shareable Content Types

Thought Leadership

  • Articulate concepts everyone feels but hasn't named
  • Challenge conventional wisdom with evidence
  • Share vulnerable, honest experiences

Data-Driven Content

  • Product data analysis (anonymized insights)
  • Public data analysis (uncover patterns)
  • Original research (run experiments, share results)

Expert Roundups 15-30 experts answering one specific question. Built-in distribution.

Case Studies Structure: Challenge → Solution → Results → Key learnings

Meta Content Behind-the-scenes transparency. "How We Got Our First $5k MRR," "Why We Chose Debt Over VC."

Link-Earning Formats

When the goal of a piece is backlinks specifically, format choice matters more than production effort. Foundation Inc.'s B2B Backlink Intelligence Report (March 2026 — a single vendor study of B2B SaaS sites, so treat as directional) measured each format's share of backlinks relative to its share of pages:

FormatBacklinks vs. page share
Statistics / data roundups4.25x
Glossary / definition pages1.47x
Interactive tools / calculators (see free-tools)1.38x
How-to / tutorials1.36x
Original research / reports0.80x
Ultimate guides0.77x
Thought leadership0.74x
Templates / frameworks0.68x

The counterintuitive read: curating statistics earns ~5x the links of producing original research. Writers link to whatever makes citation easiest — a maintained stat-roundup page is citation infrastructure, while original research often gets cited via the roundups that aggregate it. Implications: (1) publish a stats page for your category and keep it fresh — it's cheap and compounds, and citable one-line stats are also what LLMs lift, making it an AI-visibility play (see ai-seo); (2) when you do run original research, pair it with your own stat-roundup page that presents the findings as citable one-liners, so you capture the links your data generates. The formats at the bottom aren't dead — guides, templates, and thought leadership earn their keep on rankings, conversions, and brand. Judge each piece by the job it's for, and don't expect links from formats that don't earn them.

To get those assets in front of the people who link, and to point their authority at the pages that need it, see link-building.

For programmatic content at scale, see programmatic-seo skill.


Content Pillars and Topic Clusters

Content pillars are the 3-5 core topics your brand will own. Each pillar spawns a cluster of related content.

Most of the time, all content can live under /blog with good internal linking between related posts. Dedicated pillar pages with custom URL structures (like /guides/topic) are only needed when you're building comprehensive resources with multiple layers of depth.

How to Identify Pillars

  1. Product-led: What problems does your product solve?
  2. Audience-led: What does your ICP need to learn?
  3. Search-led: What topics have volume in your space?
  4. Competitor-led: What are competitors ranking for?

Pillar Structure

Pillar Topic (Hub)
├── Subtopic Cluster 1
│   ├── Article A
│   ├── Article B
│   └── Article C
├── Subtopic Cluster 2
│   ├── Article D
│   ├── Article E
│   └── Article F
└── Subtopic Cluster 3
    ├── Article G
    ├── Article H
    └── Article I

Pillar Criteria

Good pillars should:

  • Align with your product/service
  • Match what your audience cares about
  • Have search volume and/or social interest
  • Be broad enough for many subtopics

Keyword Research by Buyer Stage

Map topics to the buyer's journey using proven keyword modifiers:

Awareness Stage

Modifiers: "what is," "how to," "guide to," "introduction to"

Example: If customers ask about project management basics:

  • "What is Agile Project Management"
  • "Guide to Sprint Planning"
  • "How to Run a Standup Meeting"

Consideration Stage

Modifiers: "best," "top," "vs," "alternatives," "comparison"

Example: If customers evaluate multiple tools:

  • "Best Project Management Tools for Remote Teams"
  • "Asana vs Trello vs Monday"
  • "Basecamp Alternatives"

Decision Stage

Modifiers: "pricing," "reviews," "demo," "trial," "buy"

Example: If pricing comes up in sales calls:

  • "Project Management Tool Pricing Comparison"
  • "How to Choose the Right Plan"
  • "[Product] Reviews"

Implementation Stage

Modifiers: "templates," "examples," "tutorial," "how to use," "setup"

Example: If support tickets show implementation struggles:

  • "Project Template Library"
  • "Step-by-Step Setup Tutorial"
  • "How to Use [Feature]"

Content Ideation Sources

1. Keyword Data

If user provides keyword exports (Ahrefs, SEMrush, GSC), analyze for:

  • Topic clusters (group related keywords)
  • Buyer stage (awareness/consideration/decision/implementation)
  • Search intent (informational, commercial, transactional)
  • Quick wins (low competition + decent volume + high relevance)
  • Content gaps (keywords competitors rank for that you don't)

Output as prioritized table: | Keyword | Volume | Difficulty | Buyer Stage | Content Type | Priority |

2. Call Transcripts

If user provides sales or customer call transcripts, extract:

  • Questions asked → FAQ content or blog posts
  • Pain points → problems in their own words
  • Objections → content to address proactively
  • Language patterns → exact phrases to use (voice of customer)
  • Competitor mentions → what they compared you to

Output content ideas with supporting quotes.

3. Survey Responses

If user provides survey data, mine for:

  • Open-ended responses (topics and language)
  • Common themes (30%+ mention = high priority)
  • Resource requests (what they wish existed)
  • Content preferences (formats they want)

4. Forum Research

Use web search to find content ideas:

Reddit: site:reddit.com [topic]

  • Top posts in relevant subreddits
  • Questions and frustrations in comments
  • Upvoted answers (validates what resonates)

Quora: site:quora.com [topic]

  • Most-followed questions
  • Highly upvoted answers

Other: Indie Hackers, Hacker News, Product Hunt, industry Slack/Discord

Extract: FAQs, misconceptions, debates, problems being solved, terminology used.

5. Competitor Analysis

Use web search to analyze competitor content:

Find their content: site:competitor.com/blog

Analyze:

  • Top-performing posts (comments, shares)
  • Topics covered repeatedly
  • Gaps they haven't covered
  • Case studies (customer problems, use cases, results)
  • Content structure (pillars, categories, formats)

Identify opportunities:

  • Topics you can cover better
  • Angles they're missing
  • Outdated content to improve on

6. Sales and Support Input

Extract from customer-facing teams:

  • Common objections
  • Repeated questions
  • Support ticket patterns
  • Success stories
  • Feature requests and underlying problems

Prioritizing Content Ideas

Score each idea on four factors:

1. Customer Impact (40%)

  • How frequently did this topic come up in research?
  • What percentage of customers face this challenge?
  • How emotionally charged was this pain point?
  • What's the potential LTV of customers with this need?

2. Content-Market Fit (30%)

  • Does this align with problems your product solves?
  • Can you offer unique insights from customer research?
  • Do you have customer stories to support this?
  • Will this naturally lead to product interest?

3. Search Potential (20%)

  • What's the monthly search volume?
  • How competitive is this topic?
  • Are there related long-tail opportunities?
  • Is search interest growing or declining?

4. Resource Requirements (10%)

  • Do you have expertise to create authoritative content?
  • What additional research is needed?
  • What assets (graphics, data, examples) will you need?

Scoring Template

IdeaCustomer Impact (40%)Content-Market Fit (30%)Search Potential (20%)Resources (10%)Total
Topic A89768.0
Topic B67987.1

Score 1-10 per factor, multiply by the weight, sum for the total. Rank the list; make the top-scoring pieces first.


Calendar Split: 60/30/10

Balance the editorial calendar so search compounds while shareable pieces keep you visible:

  • 60% searchable — the foundation. Demand you can capture predictably (use-case content, hub/spoke, how-tos).
  • 30% shareable — thought leadership, original data, opinion. Creates demand and earns links/mentions.
  • 10% experimental — new formats, channels, or bets. Cheap insurance against a stale mix.

This is a starting ratio, not a rule. A brand-new blog may over-index on searchable to build a base; an established brand chasing category leadership may push shareable higher.


Per-Format Execution Discipline

Treating content like a product means each format has a production standard, not just a topic:

  • Blog post — write 10 title options before drafting (the title does most of the work; pick the strongest). Plan ~5 editing passes (structure, clarity, evidence, line edit, headline/SEO). For the writing itself, see copywriting.
  • Long-form guide — the flagship of a pillar. Comprehensive enough to be the resource; structured with a table of contents and internal links to spokes. Build the hub before the spokes.
  • Video — script the hook first; front-load the payoff. Repurpose into short-form clips at creation time (see social).
  • Podcast — one interview yields a transcript, quote graphics, short clips, and a written recap. Design the episode knowing it will be atomized.
  • Email — one idea per send; the subject line is the title—write several and pick. For sequences and lifecycle, see emails.

Create Once, Distribute Twice

Creating content is half the job—distribution is the other half, and most teams skip it. The philosophy: one exceptional piece, reformatted and repurposed across every channel, not a fresh piece per platform. Pouring effort into a single flagship and then distributing it everywhere beats spreading thin effort across many mediocre platform-native posts.

Build distribution hooks into the piece at creation time, not after: write subheads that stand alone as social posts, structure sections to be lifted out modularly, and pull quotes/stats you already know you'll graphic-ify. A well-designed guide is a distribution kit in disguise.

The ORB Framework as a funnel — route attention from borrowed → rented → owned, which maps to discovery → engagement → conversion:

  • Borrowed (other people's audiences: podcasts, guest posts, partnerships) — discovery / breakthrough reach.
  • Rented (social platforms, ad networks) — engagement, but you don't own the audience or the algorithm.
  • Owned (email list, blog, community) — conversion and the only durable asset. Everything upstream should funnel here.

ORB mechanics live in the launch skill (channel-type playbook) and content atomization/repurposing lives in social; the value here is consolidating the distribute half of content strategy so it has a home.

Failure modes to avoid:

  • Spray-and-pray — posting everywhere with no flagship and no repurposing plan. Effort scatters, nothing compounds.
  • Platform dependency — building on rented land. Facebook organic reach fell from ~20% to under 2%; any rented channel can throttle you overnight.
  • The ownership paradox — teams spend ~90% of effort on channels they don't control (rented/borrowed) and neglect the owned assets that actually convert and can't be taken away.

For the full distribution spine—the Content Distribution Flywheel, platform half-lives, and the atomization checklist—see the reference below.


Output Format

When creating a content strategy, provide:

1. Content Pillars

  • 3-5 pillars with rationale
  • Subtopic clusters for each pillar
  • How pillars connect to product

2. Priority Topics

For each recommended piece:

  • Topic/title
  • Searchable, shareable, or both
  • Content type (use-case, hub/spoke, thought leadership, etc.)
  • Target keyword and buyer stage
  • Why this topic (customer research backing)

3. Topic Cluster Map

Visual or structured representation of how content interconnects.


Task-Specific Questions

  1. What patterns emerge from your last 10 customer conversations?
  2. What questions keep coming up in sales calls?
  3. Where are competitors' content efforts falling short?
  4. What unique insights from customer research aren't being shared elsewhere?
  5. Which existing content drives the most conversions, and why?

References

  • Content Distribution Spine: Create Once Distribute Twice, ORB as a funnel, the ownership paradox, platform half-lives, the Content Distribution Flywheel, and the per-flagship atomization checklist
  • Headless CMS Guide: CMS selection, content modeling for marketing, editorial workflows, platform comparison (Sanity, Contentful, Strapi)

Related Skills

  • copywriting: For writing individual content pieces
  • seo-audit: For technical SEO and on-page optimization
  • link-building: For earning links to the content and the pages it supports
  • ai-seo: For optimizing content for AI search engines and getting cited by LLMs
  • programmatic-seo: For scaled content generation
  • site-architecture: For page hierarchy, navigation design, and URL structure
  • emails: For email-based content
  • social: For social media content, content atomization, and repurposing execution
  • launch: For the ORB channel-type playbook and launch-day distribution

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

ab-testing

무료요약 있음

페이지 변경안을 비교하는 A/B 테스트를 가설 설정부터 결과 해석까지 계획합니다. 필요한 표본 수와 기간, 방문자 배분 및 평가 지표를 정하고, 실험 우선순위와 지속적인 개선을 위한 학습 기록도 정리합니다.

  • 제목이나 가입 버튼 비교하기
  • 필요한 표본 수와 테스트 기간 추정하기
  • 결과와 부정적인 영향 확인하기
coreyhaines31/marketingskills5.6만2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

ad-creative

무료요약 있음

Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok 등 광고 플랫폼에 맞춰 제목과 본문, 이미지·영상 아이디어를 만듭니다. 실적 데이터와 고객 의견을 활용해 여러 안을 만들고, 형식 제한과 측정 가능한 테스트 기준을 정합니다.

  • 글자 수에 맞는 검색 광고 작성
  • 광고 실적을 바탕으로 새 아이디어 개발
  • 고객 리뷰 기반 이미지 광고 기획
coreyhaines31/marketingskills5.6만2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

ads

무료요약 있음

Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn 등 유료 광고의 매체 선택과 타깃, 예산, 입찰 전략을 정리하고 운영 결과를 검토합니다. 고객 획득 비용과 매출 데이터를 바탕으로 다음 조치를 판단하며 확인된 사실, 가설, 부족한 정보를 구분합니다.

  • 광고 매체와 예산 배분 결정
  • 광고 성과에 따른 다음 조치 판단
  • 검색 광고의 불필요한 지출 점검
coreyhaines31/marketingskills5.6만2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

ai-seo

무료요약 있음

AI 검색 답변에서 브랜드가 어떻게 소개되고 인용되는지 조사하고, 콘텐츠 구성과 근거, 웹사이트 접근 설정을 점검합니다. AI가 주요 정보를 읽을 수 있는지 확인해 개선 방향을 정리합니다.

  • AI 검색의 브랜드 인용 여부 확인
  • 글의 답변 구성과 근거 개선
  • AI가 사이트를 읽지 못하는 이유 조사
coreyhaines31/marketingskills5.6만2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

analytics

무료요약 있음

마케팅 및 제품 개선에 필요한 추적 계획을 세우고 검증합니다. GA4와 Google Tag Manager 설정, 이벤트 누락·중복 확인, UTM 명명 통일, 같은 기간을 기준으로 한 지표 계산을 지원합니다.

  • 가입과 구매 추적 계획 수립
  • 이벤트 누락 또는 중복 조사
  • 캠페인 링크의 UTM 명명 통일
coreyhaines31/marketingskills5.6만2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

aso

무료요약 있음

App Store와 Google Play 등록 페이지를 여섯 항목으로 점검하고 100점 만점의 종합 점수와 우선순위별 문구·이미지 개선안을 제공합니다. 경쟁 앱과 비교할 수도 있습니다.

  • 스토어 URL로 등록 페이지 진단
  • 앱 이름이나 설명 개선
  • 스크린샷과 미리보기 영상 검토
coreyhaines31/marketingskills5.6만2026년 10월 23일 업데이트

coreyhaines31의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고