본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

devops-automator

Expert DevOps engineer for CI/CD, IaC, Kubernetes, and deployment automation. Activate on: CI/CD, GitHub Actions, Terraform, Docker, Kubernetes, Helm, ArgoCD, GitOps, deployment pipeline, infrastructure as code, container orchestration. NOT for: application code (use language skills), database schema (use data-pipeline-engineer), API design (use api-architect).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(9)

  • SKILL.md7.8 KB
  • CHANGELOG.md1.5 KB
  • references/dockerfile-multistage.dockerfile1.1 KB
  • references/github-actions-patterns.yaml5.2 KB
  • references/INDEX.md535 B
  • references/kubernetes-deployment.yaml4.5 KB
  • references/terraform-eks-module.tf6.5 KB
  • scripts/INDEX.md239 B
  • scripts/validate-devops-skill.sh5.8 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

DevOps Automator

Expert DevOps engineer for CI/CD pipelines, infrastructure as code, and deployment automation.

DECISION POINTS

Deployment Strategy Selection

IF production service with >1000 RPS AND downtime SLA <1min: → Blue/Green deployment (zero downtime, instant rollback, 2x resources)

ELSE IF gradual rollout required OR resource constraints exist: → Canary deployment (5%→25%→100%, traffic-based validation, cost-efficient)

ELSE IF simple application OR development environment: → Rolling update (sequential replacement, K8s default, minimal resources)

Infrastructure Provisioning Choice

IF cloud resources (VPC, RDS, ELB) needed: → Use Terraform with remote state backend ├─ IF team <5 people: Terraform Cloud free tier └─ IF enterprise: S3 + DynamoDB state locking

ELSE IF only Kubernetes applications: → Use Helm charts with ArgoCD GitOps ├─ IF complex config variations: Kustomize overlays └─ IF simple deployments: Plain K8s manifests

CI Pipeline Architecture

IF monorepo with multiple services: → Path-based triggers with parallel jobs

changes:
  - 'frontend/**' → frontend-ci.yml
  - 'backend/**' → backend-ci.yml
  - 'shared/**' → full-rebuild.yml

ELSE IF frequent commits (>10/day per service): → Matrix builds with aggressive caching

strategy:
  matrix:
    service: [api, web, worker]
    include:
      - service: api
        dockerfile: ./api/Dockerfile
        context: ./api

ELSE IF infrequent updates (<5/week): → Simple linear pipeline with full build

FAILURE MODES

Schema Bloat

Detection: Terraform plan shows >50 resources for simple app deployment Symptom: terraform plan takes >2min, state file >500KB for basic infrastructure Fix: Split into focused modules (network, compute, storage), use data sources to reference existing resources

Rubber Stamp Review

Detection: CI passes but deployment fails with "connection refused" or "image not found" Symptom: Green checkmarks everywhere but service is down in production Fix: Add smoke tests after deployment, implement health check validation gates

Secret Sprawl

Detection: grep -r "password\|api_key" . returns hits in committed files Symptom: Secrets hardcoded in YAML, env files committed to git Fix: External secret operators (ESO), sealed-secrets, or cloud secret managers

Pipeline Deadlock

Detection: Multiple commits queued, jobs stuck in "pending" state >10min Symptom: github.event_name == 'push' triggers overlapping workflow runs Fix: Add concurrency groups with auto-cancel-in-progress

Resource Starvation

Detection: kubectl top pods shows pods with no CPU/memory limits consuming >80% node capacity Symptom: Pod evictions, OOMKilled containers, slow application response Fix: Set requests/limits for all containers, implement LimitRanges

WORKED EXAMPLES

Example 1: E-commerce API Canary Deployment

Context: Production API serving 500 RPS, needs feature flag rollout

Decision Tree Navigation:

  • Traffic volume (500 RPS) → Canary deployment chosen
  • Critical service → Blue/Green rejected (too expensive for gradual test)
  • Need traffic analysis → Istio traffic splitting selected

Implementation:

# ArgoCD Rollout with traffic analysis
spec:
  strategy:
    canary:
      steps:
      - setWeight: 5
      - analysis:
          templates:
          - templateName: error-rate
          args:
          - name: service-name
            value: api-service
      - setWeight: 25
      - pause: duration: 10m
      - setWeight: 100

Trade-off Analysis:

  • Cost: 105-125% of baseline (vs 200% for blue/green)
  • Risk: Gradual exposure limits blast radius
  • Rollback: 30s vs 5s for blue/green
  • Complexity: Requires service mesh + monitoring

Example 2: Multi-Environment Terraform Module

Context: Need identical infrastructure for dev/staging/prod with different sizing

Decision Process:

  • Shared configuration patterns → Terraform modules
  • Environment-specific values → workspace variables
  • State isolation required → Separate backends per env

Module Structure:

# modules/eks-cluster/main.tf
resource "aws_eks_cluster" "main" {
  name     = var.cluster_name
  version  = var.k8s_version
  
  vpc_config {
    subnet_ids = var.subnet_ids
  }
}

# environments/prod/main.tf
module "eks" {
  source = "../../modules/eks-cluster"
  
  cluster_name = "prod-cluster"
  instance_type = "m5.large"  # vs t3.micro for dev
  min_size = 3                # vs 1 for dev
}

Validation Gates:

  • terraform validate passes
  • checkov security scan clean
  • Cost estimation under budget threshold

Example 3: GitHub Actions Security Pipeline

Context: Node.js app needs security scanning before production deploy

Pipeline Design Decision:

jobs:
  security:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
    - uses: actions/checkout@v4
    - name: Run Trivy scanner
      uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master
      with:
        scan-type: 'fs'
        exit-code: '1'  # Fail on high/critical vulnerabilities
        
  deploy:
    needs: [security, test]  # Block deployment on security issues
    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'

Trade-offs Considered:

  • Block vs warn: Chose block for prod, warn for feature branches
  • Scan scope: Full filesystem vs dependencies only (chose dependencies for speed)
  • Vulnerability threshold: High/Critical vs Medium+ (chose High/Critical to reduce noise)

QUALITY GATES

  • All container images use specific version tags (no :latest in production)
  • Every Kubernetes workload has resource requests and limits defined
  • CI pipeline fails if security scan finds high/critical vulnerabilities
  • Terraform state is stored in remote backend with state locking enabled
  • All secrets are externalized (no hardcoded values in manifests)
  • Health checks (liveness/readiness probes) configured for all services
  • Deployment strategy supports rollback within 5 minutes
  • Infrastructure changes require successful terraform plan before merge
  • Container images run as non-root user (securityContext.runAsNonRoot: true)
  • Monitoring alerts are configured for deployment success/failure rates

NOT-FOR BOUNDARIES

This skill should NOT be used for:

  • Application code development → Use language-specific skills (typescript-expert, python-developer)
  • Database schema design → Use data-pipeline-engineer for data modeling
  • API endpoint design → Use api-architect for REST/GraphQL specification
  • Frontend build optimization → Use frontend-architect for webpack/bundling
  • Performance testing → Use site-reliability-engineer for load testing strategies
  • Security vulnerability remediation → Use security-auditor for code-level security fixes

Delegation patterns:

  • Infrastructure setup (DevOps) → Application logic (language skills)
  • CI/CD pipeline (DevOps) → Code review/testing (language skills)
  • Deployment automation (DevOps) → Performance monitoring (SRE)

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Expert in 2000s-era music visualization (Milkdrop, AVS, Geiss) and modern WebGL implementations. Specializes in Butterchurn integration, Web Audio API AnalyserNode FFT data, GLSL shaders for audio-reactive visuals, and psychedelic generative art. Activate on "Milkdrop", "music visualization", "WebGL visualizer", "Butterchurn", "audio reactive", "FFT visualization", "spectrum analyzer". NOT for simple bar charts/waveforms (use basic canvas), video editing, or non-audio visuals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Expert legal research agent for finding and scraping expungement data state by state. Knows authoritative sources, URL patterns, Firecrawl configuration, and 2026 legal landscape.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 18일 업데이트

Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

curiositech/port-daddy32026년 10월 18일 업데이트

curiositech의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고