본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

team-audio

Coordinate game audio work from creative direction through sound specifications, accessibility requirements, technical planning, and code integration. Combine the participating agents’ outputs into an audio design document for a chosen feature or area.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

원문원문 설명 보기

Orchestrate the audio team — audio-director, sound-designer, technical-artist, gameplay-programmer — direction through implementation.

설치 방법 보기

이럴 때 유용합니다

  • Planning combat sound effects and gameplay triggers
  • Designing ambience for a forest area
  • Planning adaptive music for a boss encounter
  • Checking visual alternatives and captions for critical sounds

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md17.1 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

Team Audio

If no argument is provided, output usage guidance and exit without spawning any agents:

Usage: /team-audio [feature or area to design audio for] [--review full|lean|solo] — specify the feature or area to design audio for (e.g., combat, main menu, forest biome, boss encounter). Do not use AskUserQuestion here; output the guidance directly.

When this skill is invoked with an argument, orchestrate the audio team through a structured pipeline.

Decision Points: At each step transition, use AskUserQuestion to present the user with the subagent's proposals as selectable options. Write the agent's full analysis in conversation, then capture the decision with concise labels. In collaborative mode, the user must approve before moving to the next step. In guided mode the pipeline advances automatically unless a step is BLOCKED; in autonomous mode it runs end to end, recording each step outcome via log_decision. Decisions in automation_always_ask categories (is_always_ask_category helper) always prompt regardless of mode. See .claude/docs/automation-modes.md.

Phase 0: Resolve Config

!bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../hooks/yaml-helper.sh" resolve_config --keys review_mode,automation,team.size

Resolved above — use as-is; --review overrides review_mode. No block → defaults in .claude/docs/config-resolution.md.

review_mode sets director-gate depth, and this pipeline has no director gate: no phase below spawns CD-, TD-, PR- or AD-PHASE-GATE, at any review_mode. Its phase gates are the pipeline's own decision points (defined under team.size below), and the agents that work at them are team members, not director gates.

automation drives the Decision Points note above. See the Decision Points note above and .claude/docs/automation-modes.md for how each mode changes pipeline behavior.

team.size: which agents are active (orthogonal to review_mode gate-depth and workflow docs).

  • individual (default): sound-designer only. Other agents consulted via the sound-designer, not spawned separately.
  • small: + audio-director + technical-artist + gameplay-programmer.
  • studio: + accessibility-specialist + the primary engine specialist (the full pipeline as documented). A non-core agent needed at individual routes through the nearest active core agent with an informational note. "Phase gate" means any phase that ends in an AskUserQuestion decision point this pipeline itself lists — a transition under Decision Points above, or a Gate step written into the pipeline below — whatever the automation mode. guided and autonomous change how a gate is passed (it auto-advances, or is recorded with log_decision), not whether it is one, so bounded-exception condition (3) below holds at it in every mode. An agent restricted to "phase gates only" is spawned at those points and no others. This active-set scoping applies throughout the pipeline below: any phase that names an agent outside the active set routes through the nearest core agent rather than spawning it.

Announce the active set before Step 1 — never let the collapse be silent. Before spawning anything, state in one line which agents this run will actually spawn, and which the pipeline below names but will not spawn at the resolved team.size. For example:

Active set (team.size: <resolved>): <the agents listed for that size above>. Not spawned this run: <every other agent this pipeline names> — consulted through <nearest active core agent>. Raise team.size (or modes.rigor) to widen.

Fill it from the team.size list directly above and the agents this file's own pipeline names — not from an example. Both sets differ per orchestrator.

The pipeline below reads as a multi-agent fan-out and at the shipped default it is one or two agents — team-release names ten and runs one, team-narrative names six across five phases and runs writer alone. The collapse is correct: team.size is rigor-fronted and the narrow default is the token lever. Without saying so, a reader cannot distinguish a correctly-collapsed run from a broken pipeline, and the per-agent "routes through the nearest core agent with an informational note" rule above fires at routing time and never states the shape of the run as a whole.

This is the same rule as the skipped-check reporting elsewhere in this file: a constraint that is enforced but never surfaced is indistinguishable, to the person reading the output, from one that was never enforced.

  1. Read the argument for the target feature or area (e.g., combat, main menu, forest biome, boss encounter).

  2. Gather context:

    • Read relevant design docs in design/gdd/ for the feature
    • Read the sound bible at design/audio/sound-bible.md if it exists. If only design/gdd/sound-bible.md exists (where earlier versions put it), read that and recommend moving it to design/audio/ — in design/gdd/ the GDD checks count every file as a system GDD. If neither exists, say so in one line — "No sound bible at design/audio/sound-bible.md; audio direction starts from the GDDs alone" — so the gap is visible in the output. Carry the gap forward: say so in the audio-director's Step 1 brief, and recommend creating a sound bible in Next Steps.
    • Read existing audio asset lists in assets/audio/
    • Read any existing sound design docs for this area

How to Delegate

Use the Agent tool to spawn each team member as a subagent:

  • subagent_type: audio-director — Sonic identity, emotional tone, audio palette
  • subagent_type: sound-designer — SFX specifications, audio events, mixing groups
  • subagent_type: accessibility-specialist — Visual fallbacks and subtitles for critical audio, auditory sensitivity
  • subagent_type: technical-artist — Audio middleware, bus structure, memory budgets
  • subagent_type: [primary engine specialist] — Validate audio integration patterns for the engine
  • subagent_type: gameplay-programmer — Audio manager, gameplay triggers, adaptive music

Brief each agent — do not dump context. Read the shared inputs once and pass a distilled brief inline: the lines each agent actually needs, never a file path for a document you have already read (an agent handed a path re-reads the whole file). Pass a path only for a document you have not read and only that agent needs.

End every agent prompt with a return contract: "Write your full output to [path] — that named path is your write authorisation under the bounded exception below, so write it without a separate approval prompt. Return only (1) the path written, (2) a ≤5-bullet summary of decisions, (3) any BLOCKED/CONCERNS items, one line each. Do not restate the documents you read." Without it, an agent returns everything it read back into this session. Implementation files are the exception: an agent writing code or assets first returns the files it will create or change, and its return contract names them only after you have asked once for the set and the user said yes (File Write Protocol) — that answer, not the bounded exception, authorises those writes.

Substitute a real path for [path]. Working artifacts go under production/audio/[feature]/, where [feature] is the argument as a slug — lowercase, spaces → hyphens (boss encounter → boss-encounter), the same slug the "Save to" step uses. One file per agent, so parallel steps never share one:

Step / agentWrites to
1 audio-directorproduction/audio/[feature]/direction.md
2 sound-designerproduction/audio/[feature]/sfx-spec.md
2 accessibility-specialistproduction/audio/[feature]/accessibility.md
3 technical-artistproduction/audio/[feature]/integration-plan.md
3 engine specialistproduction/audio/[feature]/engine-notes.md
4 gameplay-programmerthe code root and the engine's test root — the files the one implementation ask lists (File Write Protocol), outside the bounded exception

These are working drafts; the durable record is the audio design document you compile from them.

Why this does not violate the Collaboration Protocol. CLAUDE.md requires an agent to ask "May I write this to [filepath]?" before Write/Edit. A subagent spawned here writes without asking, and that is a deliberate, bounded exception rather than an oversight — the same call already made for consistency-check appending to active.md. The exception holds only when all three are true: (1) the path is one you named in the prompt, so the user approved the destination when they approved the phase; (2) it is a new artifact under production/, docs/ or tests/, never an edit to existing source or config; (3) the phase that produced it is itself gated by an AskUserQuestion before the pipeline advances. Outside those three, the agent must ask. Do not "fix" this by asking per subagent — a prompt per agent per phase makes an orchestrator unusable, which is why the exception exists.

  1. Orchestrate the audio team in sequence:

Step 1: Audio Direction (audio-director)

Spawn the audio-director agent to:

  • Define the sonic identity for this feature/area
  • Specify the emotional tone and audio palette
  • Set music direction (adaptive layers, stems, transitions)
  • Define audio priorities and mix targets
  • Establish any adaptive audio rules (combat intensity, exploration, tension)

Step 2: Sound Design and Audio Accessibility (parallel)

Spawn the sound-designer agent to:

  • Create detailed SFX specifications for every audio event
  • Define sound categories (ambient, UI, gameplay, music, dialogue)
  • Specify per-sound parameters (volume range, pitch variation, attenuation)
  • Plan audio event list with trigger conditions
  • Define mixing groups and ducking rules

Spawn the accessibility-specialist agent in parallel to:

  • Identify which audio events carry critical gameplay information (damage received, enemy nearby, objective complete) and require visual alternatives for hearing-impaired players
  • Specify subtitle requirements: which audio events need captions, what text format, on-screen duration
  • Check that no gameplay state is communicated by audio alone (all must have a visual fallback)
  • Review the audio event list for any that could cause issues for players with auditory sensitivities (high-frequency alerts, sudden loud events)
  • Output: audio accessibility requirements list integrated into the audio event spec

A gameplay-critical audio event with no visual cue or subtitle is labelled BLOCKING in the report, not advisory. Step 3 does not start until the user resolves it or explicitly accepts it at the Step 2 decision point, which offers the fix (a visual cue, subtitle or haptic fallback) and a stop; an accepted gap is listed among the open questions in the summary.

Step 3: Technical Implementation (parallel)

Spawn the technical-artist agent to:

  • Design the audio middleware integration (Wwise/FMOD/native)
  • Define audio bus structure and routing
  • Specify memory budgets for audio assets per platform
  • Plan streaming vs preloaded asset strategy
  • Design any audio-reactive visual effects

Spawn the primary engine specialist in parallel (<engine>-specialist derived from engine.name — Godot→godot-specialist, Unity→unity-specialist, Unreal→unreal-specialist; fall back to the Primary line of ## Engine Specialists in .claude/docs/technical-preferences.md) to validate the integration approach:

  • Is the proposed audio middleware integration idiomatic for the engine? (e.g., Godot's built-in AudioStreamPlayer vs FMOD, Unity's Audio Mixer vs Wwise, Unreal's MetaSounds vs FMOD)
  • Any engine-specific audio node/component patterns that should be used?
  • Known audio system changes in the pinned engine version that affect the integration plan?
  • Output: engine audio integration notes to merge with the technical-artist's plan

If no engine is configured, skip the specialist spawn. Record Engine validation: NOT ASSESSED — no engine configured (`engine.name` unset in `project.yaml`) in this run's output. A skipped check that says nothing is indistinguishable from a check that passed; the reader cannot tell engine guidance was never sought.

Step 4: Code Integration (gameplay-programmer)

Spawn the gameplay-programmer agent to:

  • Implement audio manager system or review existing
  • Wire up audio events to gameplay triggers
  • Implement adaptive music system (if specified)
  • Set up audio occlusion/reverb zones
  • Write unit tests for audio event triggers
  1. Compile the audio design document combining all team outputs.

  2. Save to design/audio/audio-[feature].md — but ask first. design/ is NOT one of the three directories the bounded write exception covers (production/, docs/, tests/), so a sub-agent handed this path must prompt, and one has done exactly that. Do not resolve that by widening the exception. Instead, follow the same pattern team-level uses: you already hold every sub-agent's output, so compile the document yourself and ask directly via AskUserQuestion — "May I write the audio design to design/audio/audio-[feature].md?" — then write it on approval. Sub-agent working artifacts stay under production/ where the exception does reach them.

    Note: If design/audio/ does not exist, writing the file creates it.

  3. Output a summary with: audio event count, estimated asset count, implementation tasks, and any open questions between team members.

Verdict: COMPLETE — audio design document produced and team pipeline finished.

If the engine validation was skipped (no engine configured), the verdict says so — never a plain COMPLETE:

Verdict: COMPLETE — engine validation NOT ASSESSED ([reason]) — audio design document produced; the engine specialist never reviewed the integration plan.

If the pipeline stops because a dependency is unresolved (e.g., critical accessibility gap or missing GDD not resolved by the user):

Verdict: BLOCKED — [reason]

File Write Protocol

Per-agent artifacts (SFX specs, integration plans) are written by the sub-agent that produced them, under the bounded exception documented above under "Why this does not violate the Collaboration Protocol" — the path is one you named, the artifact is new under production/, docs/ or tests/, and the phase is gated by an AskUserQuestion. A sub-agent does not prompt per write inside those bounds; outside them it must ask. Implementation files — gameplay-programmer's audio integration code, anything under the code root or assets/ — are outside those bounds: the agent returns the files it will create or change, you ask once for the set, and it writes after a yes. The one exception is the final compiled audio design document: the orchestrator already holds every input, so it compiles and writes design/audio/audio-[feature].md itself after its own "May I write …?" prompt (the "Save to" step above).

Next Steps

  • Review the audio design doc with the audio-director before implementation begins.
  • Use /dev-story to implement the audio manager and event system once the design is approved.
  • Run /asset-audit after audio assets are created to verify naming and format compliance.
  • If there was no sound bible, create one before the next audio pass: ask the audio-director agent to draft design/audio/sound-bible.md from .claude/docs/templates/sound-bible.md, starting from this run's Step 1 direction (it asks before writing under design/).

Error Recovery Protocol

First, verify the artifact. If the return contract named a path, check the path exists before treating the phase as done — a named artifact that is not on disk is a failed phase, however fluent the response reads. An agent can burn a full phase and return a plausible preamble having written nothing, which is neither BLOCKED nor an error nor "cannot complete", so the trigger below never fires. Resume it naming the unmet contract; the context is usually still there.

If any spawned agent returns BLOCKED, errors, or cannot complete: surface it immediately, don't proceed past a dependency it blocks, and always produce a partial report. A skipped agent's section stays a named gap — never fill it with content of your own. Full procedure: .claude/docs/error-recovery-protocol.md.

Common blockers:

  • Input file missing (story not found, GDD absent) → redirect to the skill that creates it
  • ADR status is Proposed → do not implement; once it is decided, accept it with /architecture-decision accept ADR-NNNN
  • Scope too large → split into two stories via /create-stories
  • Conflicting instructions between ADR and story → surface the conflict, do not guess

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

adopt

무료

Audit an existing project's design documents and supporting files to check whether their formats work with the template's skills. Get a numbered migration plan that prioritizes gaps and required changes, rather than simply listing what exists.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking existing documents before adopting a project template
  • Auditing game design documents or architecture decision records
  • Prioritizing gaps in project tracking and configuration files
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios2.7만2026년 10월 8일 업데이트

Document a technical decision in an architecture decision record, or ADR. Capture its context, alternatives, and consequences, assign a record number, and distinguish a proposed decision from an accepted one so dependent work reflects its actual status.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Recording the reasons behind a technical choice
  • Documenting alternatives and consequences of a design decision
  • Creating numbered records alongside existing architecture decisions
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios2.7만2026년 10월 8일 업데이트

Review whether game design requirements are covered by documented architecture decisions. Identify missing coverage, conflicting decisions, and engine compatibility concerns, with an optional matrix linking requirements to development stories and tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Find game requirements without architecture decisions
  • Check for conflicts between architecture decisions
  • Review compatibility with the pinned engine version
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios2.7만2026년 10월 8일 업데이트

art-bible

무료

Create a game's art direction document, defining its visual rules, mood, shapes, colors, and production standards. Review and approve sections individually, with guidance that connects character, environment, and interface design to the game's concept and technical constraints.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Defining a game's core visual identity before asset production
  • Documenting character, environment, and interface design rules
  • Aligning asset standards with engine and performance limits
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios2.7만2026년 10월 8일 업데이트

Audit game asset files for naming rules, size limits, formats, and broken references. Receive a report of measured violations and suggested fixes, with clear explanations of checks that lack data or cannot be assessed for the engine.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • Checking image and audio naming conventions
  • Finding files that exceed asset size limits
  • Investigating missing references and potentially unused assets
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios2.7만2026년 10월 8일 업데이트

Turn game design documents and character profiles into asset specifications and image generation prompts. Define appearance, dimensions, file formats, and naming rules, then maintain an asset list that tracks progress and identifies shared assets.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

  • List the visual assets needed for a game
  • Define consistent character and environment asset specifications
  • Prepare image generation prompts from an art direction guide
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios2.7만2026년 10월 8일 업데이트

Donchitos의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고