Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
When writing validation — Form Requests, rules, custom rule objects, request-boundary design — even when the user just says 'validate this input' or 'check the request' without naming it.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
설치 방법 보기설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
Use when creating FormRequests, validation rules, or custom rule objects.
Do NOT use when:
security skill)api-design skill){Action}{Entity}Request — e.g. CreateProjectRequest.authorize() using Policies.rules() with array syntax — never pipe-separated.prepareForValidation() only when normalization is truly necessary.Illuminate\Validation\Rules classes where possible.→ See guideline php/validations.md for array syntax, route params, property mapping, custom rules.
required ≠ not nullable — required means present, nullable means value can be null.$fail callback, not throw exceptions.$request->all() — use $request->validated().Confirm new rules with a concrete probe: a Pest feature test that POSTs with curl-shaped payloads through the browser/HTTP client, or a phpunit/pest run against the FormRequest. Add at least one negative case per rule (missing, wrong type, boundary). Never claim rules work without running them.
When a rule fires unexpectedly, do not blindly toggle required / nullable / sometimes until tests pass. Print $request->all() once, compare against the rule set, identify the root cause, then make a targeted fix.
If a field's intent is unclear (is tags a CSV string, an array, or JSON? is email required at create or only at update?), ask the user or check the existing schema / API contract before guessing. Hidden assumptions in validation rules surface as production 422s.
아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.
로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.
아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.