본문으로 건너뛰기
cccskills
무료GitHub에 공개

project-analysis-zend-laminas

Use for deep Zend Framework or Laminas project analysis: bootstrap, config merge order, service manager, MVC flow, data layer, and migration-specific risks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

설치 방법 보기

포함된 파일(1)

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB

SKILL.md(원문)

설치하기 전에 에이전트에게 전달되는 지시 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.

project-analysis-zend-laminas

When to use

Use this skill when:

  • The project uses Zend Framework or Laminas
  • A deep framework-specific analysis is needed
  • universal-project-analysis routes here after framework detection
  • The issue spans bootstrap, config merge, ServiceManager, MVC flow, or migration concerns

Do NOT use when:

  • The task is a small isolated change
  • The project is not Zend/Laminas
  • The issue is already isolated to another specialist domain

Core principles

  • Config merge order is runtime behavior
  • ServiceManager resolution rules matter
  • Shared services can hide state issues
  • Legacy Zend/Laminas migrations often preserve subtle compatibility traps
  • MVC flow and module boundaries must be traced explicitly

Procedure

1. Confirm framework generation and version

Check: composer.lock, composer.json, Zend vs Laminas packages, PHP version, migration-related packages. Validate: framework family is explicit, migration state is known, major modules/components are identified.

2. Analyze bootstrap and config merge order

Inspect: application bootstrap, module loading order, global/local/autoload config, environment-specific overrides, Module.php lifecycle hooks.

Check:

  • merge order surprises
  • missing overrides
  • environment config mismatches
  • heavy bootstrap logic

3. Analyze ServiceManager behavior

Inspect: factories, abstract factories, delegators, initializers, shared vs non-shared services, service aliases.

Check:

  • incorrect sharing/state leakage
  • slow abstract factory fallback
  • delegator order problems
  • initialization side effects

4. Trace request-to-response flow

Trace: route match → dispatch/listener flow → controller → service layer → data access → view model/response rendering. Validate: authorization/input filtering path is visible, service resolution path is visible, rendering flow is explicit.

5. Analyze data layer and migration risks

Inspect: TableGateway/hydrators, Doctrine if present, SQL abstraction vs raw queries, buffered/unbuffered result usage, Zend → Laminas migration artifacts.

Check:

  • namespace drift
  • hidden legacy references
  • data mapping inconsistencies
  • memory/performance risks on large result sets

6. Validate Zend/Laminas analysis quality

Check:

  • bootstrap and merge order are explicit
  • ServiceManager behavior is mapped
  • MVC and data flow are traceable
  • migration/legacy risks are evidence-based
  • next specialist skill is clear if needed

Output format

  1. Framework/version summary
  2. Bootstrap/config findings
  3. ServiceManager findings
  4. MVC/data flow findings
  5. Migration/legacy risks
  6. Key risks and next steps

Gotcha

  • Many Zend/Laminas issues are caused by config order and service resolution, not controller code.
  • Shared services and legacy migration remnants can create cross-request or environment-specific bugs.
  • Old project behavior may depend on historical bootstrap side effects that are easy to miss.

Do NOT

  • Do NOT assume Laminas behavior if the project still carries Zend-era patterns
  • Do NOT ignore config merge order
  • Do NOT ignore shared-service behavior
  • Do NOT treat migration leftovers as harmless
  • Do NOT stop at controller code when bootstrap or ServiceManager behavior is involved

리뷰

아직 리뷰가 없습니다. 사용해 본 소감을 남겨 주세요.

댓글

로그인 없이 쓸 수 있습니다. 사용 후기, 질문, 작동하지 않은 환경 등을 편하게 남겨 주세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 댓글을 남겨 보세요.

보내면 바로 공개됩니다. 이메일 주소나 전화번호 같은 개인 정보는 쓰지 마세요. URL은 2개까지입니다.

0 / 1,000자

이 양식은 reCAPTCHA로 보호되며 Google 개인정보처리방침 및 서비스 약관이 적용됩니다.

같은 저장소의 스킬

Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

event4u-app/agent-config132026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

event4u-app/agent-config132026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

event4u-app/agent-config132026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

event4u-app/agent-config132026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

event4u-app/agent-config132026년 10월 22일 업데이트

Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

event4u-app/agent-config132026년 10월 22일 업데이트

event4u-app의 스킬 모두 보기

이 스킬의 문제 신고